BTW one benefit of SVG is that it has a shadow dom. That means it is
shielded from tampering unwanted CSS styling. This is one of the problems
web devs face using web components. So if you have a web component,
"MyButton" and it has it's using the regular DOM using div, img and spans
to make the bu
On 11/8/15, 2:56 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I was kind of expecting a way to link the source code to the SWCs. I sort
>of expect users to want to be able to jump into the source, so they can
>see how some part of the SDK is working. As a longer term goal, I think
>it’s a good one.
Agreed. I think th
Hi Yishay,
If you have a few moments to write down some things that were hard or
confusing, it would be great.
For sure, I haven’t spent any time on using FB to develop components.
Once we finish the back port so all of our code can be written in AS and
parts cross-compiled to JS, then I’ll put m
Hi Alex,
I've been following these threads (usually in silence) because I still hope
to use FlexJS and contribute to it. Recently I've had very little time for
this, as I started a new Flex (not JS) project which is taking up most of my
computer time.
The comments made by Harbs and others regardi
I was kind of expecting a way to link the source code to the SWCs. I sort of
expect users to want to be able to jump into the source, so they can see how
some part of the SDK is working. As a longer term goal, I think it’s a good one.
I’m fine adding each piece as a separate project for now, but
The script is looking for gnu privacy app to verify the signature. Please
install it.
Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-- Original message--
From: Harbs
Date: Sat, Nov 7, 2015 12:48 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org;
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0
I
I just tried running the approval script and it failed:
/Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/ApproveFlexJS/ApproveFlexJS.xml:236: The
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/ApproveFlexJS/ApproveFlexJS.xml:240: Execute
failed: java.io.IOException: Cannot
BTW, another data point is that FOP implemented the KP algorithm. I don’t know
how practical it would be to adapt that code, but it’s an Apache project, so
licensing should be a non-issue.
On Nov 7, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Harbs wrote:
>
> On Nov 6, 2015, at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> That
On Nov 6, 2015, at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> That was an awesome list! Thanks. Just curious, can text layout end up
> affecting more than two lines back?
Yes. Assuming we’re dealing with paragraph composition, text anywhere in the
paragraph can effect the entire line breaking sequence. Th
On 11/6/15, 12:47 PM, "jude" wrote:
>I said this in another thread but since you asked I would say this would
>be
>the perfect workflow for me (for both Flex and FlexJS):
>
>1. Provide URL to source on Github (the project would have to be on github
>obviously)
Our repos are already mirrored to
On 11/6/15, 12:36 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>>
>> I’m sure in the early days of FlexJS and Falcon, going away for a while
>> and coming back probably didn’t work. But is that still true? And if
>>so,
>> can you just blow away your repos and re-grab flex-as
I said this in another thread but since you asked I would say this would be
the perfect workflow for me (for both Flex and FlexJS):
1. Provide URL to source on Github (the project would have to be on github
obviously)
2. I create a local repository from that
3. I open FB and import a default *exis
>
> I hope Chris will
> stick around to do it and that others can help them. I will try to help
> with refactoring needed to make Maven work better. Those changes usually
> help make sure we have the loose-coupling we need between modules.
I think that is a good start.
> I’m
> not that i
That was an awesome list! Thanks. Just curious, can text layout end up
affecting more than two lines back? I still think it boils down to
rectangles on a path but the path may not be a straight horizontal line or
always going left-to-right, and you sometimes have to go back a bit.
-Alex
On 11/
Let me see if I can summarize these various “simplify the build threads
here”.
For me, I have to go by what I read on our mailing lists. Maybe there is
some silent faction waiting for simpler builds, but I am going to reward
those who speak up by trying to work on their issues. It doesn’t seem
r
I’ll give this a go again on Sunday. Even if I do get this setup, the fact that
I’m having so much trouble is probably an indicator that others who want to
contribute will also.
Bottom line: The simpler we make it to contribute, the more likely we will get
more contributors. The more contributo
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Harbs wrote:
> I agree with Justin here. I’ve been playing with FlexJS for a good few
> weeks already and I still do not have a good setup for working on the SDK.
> I would have been productive a long time ago already if we would have the
> following:
>
> 1. Simple
I agree with Justin here. I’ve been playing with FlexJS for a good few weeks
already and I still do not have a good setup for working on the SDK. I would
have been productive a long time ago already if we would have the following:
1. Simple building of the SDK. Environment variables are tough to
>
> What isn’t clear to me is that there is something about text layout to be
> “figured out”. I’m not convinced there is a “best practice” for text
> layout that covers international, effects, character positioning that
> isn’t on a horizontal line, etc. Many of the folks who worked on Adobe
>
HI,
> Nobody is saying simpler builds wouldn’t help. But how much?
A lot I think. Developer are unable to contribute if they can’t compile and
test their changes.
> More than a more functional DataGrid? Or a more Spark and/or MX-like
> component set
> that reduces migration time for your ap
On 11/5/15, 11:30 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>I think trying to have a simpler build would help a lot. This ties into
>what Chris has just posted as well.
Nobody is saying simpler builds wouldn’t help. But how much? More than a
more functional DataGrid? Or a more Spark and/or MX-like compon
On 11/5/15, 10:44 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>On Nov 6, 2015, at 1:01 AM, jude wrote:
>
>> How did the TLF engineers figure this out?
>
>I think you just need to know and know people who know. Microsoft’s site
>has some great info, but it’s scattered all over the place. I learned a
>lot some years a
Hi,
> Apache is not “people”. Apache is the organization that we have certain
> obligations to, such as the source package you mention. “People” is our
> customers and plenty of them are using the Installer and the binary
> packages. Let’s focus on the customers.
In this context I would of sai
I was just about to respond similarly. My version is:
Apache is not “people”. Apache is the organization that we have certain
obligations to, such as the source package you mention. “People” is our
customers and plenty of them are using the Installer and the binary
packages. Let’s focus on the
On 11/5/15, 10:04 PM, "jude" wrote:
>Yep, that's the plan. I'm still trying to catch up on what web developers
>are doing these days and I haven't heard IDE's come up much (anyone
>wishing
>to share I would appreciate it). It seems like people are using code
>editors like Brackets and vim. Ther
On Nov 6, 2015, at 1:01 AM, jude wrote:
> How did the TLF engineers figure this out?
I think you just need to know and know people who know. Microsoft’s site has
some great info, but it’s scattered all over the place. I learned a lot some
years ago when I was working on creating some fonts. I
Justin,
While that’s technically true, the vast majority of users would want a
convenience package.
On Nov 6, 2015, at 8:23 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> People who are having trouble with building are trying to build from the
>> source distribution and/or the Git repository. Things are
Hi,
> People who are having trouble with building are trying to build from the
> source distribution and/or the Git repository. Things are a little more
> complicated that way, but the vast majority of people won't need to deal
> with that type of build.
The building from source is important as f
Hi,
> I haven't heard IDE's come up much (anyone wishing
> to share I would appreciate it). It seems like people are using code
> editors like Brackets and vim.
Most common editors I’ve seen used in that space recently are TextMate,
Sublime, Atom, and Brackets. Perhaps WebStorm (IntelliJ) is als
Yep, that's the plan. I'm still trying to catch up on what web developers
are doing these days and I haven't heard IDE's come up much (anyone wishing
to share I would appreciate it). It seems like people are using code
editors like Brackets and vim. There are some tools that run preprocessing
or po
Jude,
Are you envisioning some sort of a mini-IDE? One button creates a new
project, another button compiles it, another button cross-compiles it?
That would be cool. Especially for folks who don’t have FB or IntelliJ.
Not sure what to do about code editing and debugging though.
Another related
As Alex said, most people who want to try out FlexJS 0.5.0 will simply use
the Apache Flex SDK Installer. It'll be super easy for them. In fact, you
can already install the nightlies and RC1 using the installer if you
right-click and choose Show Dev Builds. Once 0.5.0 is released, the build
will sh
There are many scripts.
ApproveFlexJS.xml takes you through the steps required to approve a
release.
Installer.xml converts a binary release into an IDE-compatible folder
structure.
In build.xml, there is an ‘all’ target that attempts to clone all the
upstream repositories and build them in the c
Ok, the reason why I was so confused is because it's "ApproveFlexJS" build.
:P I thought it was the install and run script. Is there a another ant
build file?
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:21 PM, jude wrote:
> Alex,
> I'm going to go ahead and put together an app so that you can install
> FlexJS with
Alex,
I'm going to go ahead and put together an app so that you can install
FlexJS with one click and compile. I want it to be as simple as possible
for anyone (new web developers). I've downloaded the build script and
looked over it but there is some code in it for voting and release. I'm
sure you
Alex, I'm proud to say I have worked on TLF with Harbs and so I know a lot
on this subject. Well, that's not true, Harbs did all the work while I
poked and prodded and wrote code he had to rewrite. :P However, in my
opinion it was one of the more difficult frameworks I've seen because of a
lot of n
I’m planning on trying to make txtjs work for me. I like the fact that it has
complete control of font loading, and text effects is an important feature for
me.
It would be an interesting exercise to compare performance of the various
rendering methods. txtjs has some performance testing, and i
Thanks Harbs.
That’s a really great set of information. It is one reason we are trying
not to lock FlexJS to any particular text rendering mechanism. Can you
tell us more about which choice you are going to make for your apps?
-Alex
On 11/5/15, 5:06 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>There’s two parts to p
On 11/5/15, 3:56 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I’m a bit confused about the release process.
>
>I thought we were creating release branches in git for each release to
>“freeze” the code, so we do not have a wildly moving target. It does not
>seem like that’s happening, so I’m not sure if I just misunders
There’s two parts to performance. With Flash TLF, the bottleneck is really in
the TLF code. The FTE composition is pretty low level. With JS, everything is
going to be high level. It remains to be seen how the performance of the FTE
part will be in javascript. Of course, there’s the chance that
I’m a bit confused about the release process.
I thought we were creating release branches in git for each release to “freeze”
the code, so we do not have a wildly moving target. It does not seem like
that’s happening, so I’m not sure if I just misunderstood.
Harbs
On Nov 3, 2015, at 12:04 AM,
Instead of running just ‘ant’ or ‘ant all’, you should be able to add:
-Dbrowser=C:/path/to/browser.exe
and it will override what is defaulted in the build.xml
On 11/4/15, 6:59 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote:
>Got it to finally build took it two more tries.
>
>Side bar: I have a gripe abou
Got it to finally build took it two more tries.
Side bar: I have a gripe about having to dig through build files several
folders down to get to to run a browser other than IE. Especially since I
don't have IE installed on this particular machine. Should we add a
property that allows people to c
Even more interesting. I deleted my compc.jar from the FalconJX build and
the FlexJS build still works. I can’t figure out how you are getting into
this hole.
Has anyone else experienced the same issue?
Anyway, try running “ant all” again in your FalconJX build and see if that
makes the problem
>From: Justin Mclean [mailto:justinmcl...@me.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 9:39 PM
>To: dev@flex.apache.org
>Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS
>0.5.0 RC1
>
>Hi,
>
>> D:\PortableDev\FlexJS\framew
Interesting. Looks like compc.jar is placed there by the
flex-oem-compiler build. Try running “ant all” in your FalconJX build and
see if that gets you past that point.
I’ll see if that can be smoothed out somehow.
-Alex
On 11/4/15, 12:32 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> That part of the
For the FlexUnit? I already had it in for the Falcon test folders.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:justinmcl...@me.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 9:39 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0 RC1
: Justin Mclean [mailto:justinmcl...@me.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 3:32 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0 RC1
Hi,
> That part of the build is building the AS SWC using Falcon not FalconJX.
> So check FALCON_HOME/l
Hi,
> That part of the build is building the AS SWC using Falcon not FalconJX.
> So check FALCON_HOME/lib for compc and falcon-flexTasks.jar
FALCON_HOME only has falcon-compc.jar and falcon-flexTasks.jar. There’s no
compc.jar in there.
ls $FALCON_HOME/lib
compiler.jarfalcon-compc.ja
On 11/3/15, 8:46 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I’m still unable to compile from source and get this error. I’m trying to
>compile FlexJS with the Falcon 0.5 RC.
>
>compile:
> [echo] Compiling libs/Core.swc
> [echo] FLEX_HOME:
>/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-
Hi,
I’m still unable to compile from source and get this error. I’m trying to
compile FlexJS with the Falcon 0.5 RC.
compile:
[echo] Compiling libs/Core.swc
[echo] FLEX_HOME:
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.5.0-src
[echo] FALCON_HOME:
/Users/justi
Hi,
> D:\PortableDev\FlexJS\frameworks\projects\Core\as\tests\build.xml:150:
> java.util
> .concurrent.ExecutionException: Socket timeout waiting for flexunit report
>at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
>at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.j
Having building FlexJS source. Keep getting this timeout.
BUILD FAILED
D:\PortableDev\FlexJS\build.xml:431: The following error occurred while
executin
g this line:
D:\PortableDev\FlexJS\frameworks\build.xml:79: The following error occurred
whil
e executing this line:
D:\PortableDev\FlexJS\framew
This is the discussion thread.
Thanks,
Alex Harui
On 10/30/15, 3:19 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Hmm, I was hoping more PMC folks would respond. Remember that,
>>according
>> to the release process, the PMC folks planning to vote are supposed to
>>be
>> running tests now. In theory, the only new test to be run after we
>>start
>> the
Renaming the thread to see if we can get more opinions..
There is some evidence that “hot” JS code runs better than “hot” AS code.
So one consideration is the coding patterns themselves. That’s why FlexJS
prefers composition over subclassing, so shared code lives in one place so
it can get “hotte
I don’t remember the list off-hand, but a lot is related to language specific
features. There’s also 3 or 4 levels of ligatures. There were some features I
wished it supported (maybe it was contextual alternates?), but the OpenType
support in general is not bad. There’s definitely missing pieces
On 11/1/15, 10:26 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Not just RTL. There’s an awful lot of OpenType features that it supports.
>(Of course It would be great to support even more…) ;-)
I wasn’t aware of that. What kinds of things and how do the browsers do
it?
-Alex
Not just RTL. There’s an awful lot of OpenType features that it supports. (Of
course It would be great to support even more…) ;-)
On Nov 1, 2015, at 5:06 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> IMO, TextLine was primarily there to do right-to-left text.
On 11/1/15, 3:21 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I forgot to respond to this.
>
>Yes. I could be a candidate to work on this. If I get some help, I’d be
>more inclined to work on a public port of TLF. If not, it’ll be MUCH
>easier to just hack together some code that I could use internally.
>
>FWIW, I’m no
I forgot to respond to this.
Yes. I could be a candidate to work on this. If I get some help, I’d be more
inclined to work on a public port of TLF. If not, it’ll be MUCH easier to just
hack together some code that I could use internally.
FWIW, I’m not totally thrilled with Flash’s TextLine. The
Hi,
> Hmm, I was hoping more PMC folks would respond. Remember that, according
> to the release process, the PMC folks planning to vote are supposed to be
> running tests now. In theory, the only new test to be run after we start
> the vote is whether the PGP signature is valid.
We’re continual
Been busy with work. I should have some time over the weekend.
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 10/26/15, 11:14 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
> >I’m not super-familiar with this, so I’m not super-confident that I
> >checked all the right things, but I did check wh
On 10/26/15, 11:14 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I’m not super-familiar with this, so I’m not super-confident that I
>checked all the right things, but I did check what I could.
>
>I do think we should get this out, and start on the next version…
Hmm, I was hoping more PMC folks would respond. Remember
I’m not super-familiar with this, so I’m not super-confident that I checked all
the right things, but I did check what I could.
I do think we should get this out, and start on the next version…
On Oct 26, 2015, at 7:47 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Has everyone who is planning to vote completed thei
Has everyone who is planning to vote completed their examination of the
nightly builds for both Falcon and FlexJS? I really think we need to get
this stuff released.
-Alex
On 10/22/15, 10:30 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>Thanks, Alex. I'll give that a try instead.
>
>- Josh
>On Oct 22, 2015 9:01
Thanks, Alex. I'll give that a try instead.
- Josh
On Oct 22, 2015 9:01 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> I looked into this. It might be a bug in GCC. The export symbol code
> overwrites the Example.run when it create Example. IMO, it should check
> for existence, or export in a different order.
>
>
I looked into this. It might be a bug in GCC. The export symbol code
overwrites the Example.run when it create Example. IMO, it should check
for existence, or export in a different order.
FlexJS works because it doesn’t rely on a static entry point. The
following works for me:
package
{
pub
Sorry, that should be:
asjsc source/Example.as
On Oct 22, 2015 5:41 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
> I'm able to get -js-compiler-option to work. It's not ideal, but I can add
> it to my examples.
>
> I can't get ADVANCED_OPTIMIZATIONS to work with asjsc at all, though. Not
> even the simplest exampl
I'm able to get -js-compiler-option to work. It's not ideal, but I can add
it to my examples.
I can't get ADVANCED_OPTIMIZATIONS to work with asjsc at all, though. Not
even the simplest example that I can think of. No externs required.
source/Example.as:
package
{
public class Example
{
On 10/21/15, 11:27 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>
>By the way, the SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS argument for the closure compiler
>might be an acceptable middle ground for minification. When I tried it, I
>was able to load up my CreateJS demo and it actually rendered everything.
>However, I noticed that it
That makes it easier than generating the externs files myself.
By the way, the SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS argument for the closure compiler
might be an acceptable middle ground for minification. When I tried it, I
was able to load up my CreateJS demo and it actually rendered everything.
However, I notic
On 10/21/15, 10:16 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>The cross-compiler that generates ActionScript from TypeScript
>definitions?
>Yeah, I could probably do that. Generating both ActionScript and externs
>files adds some complexity that I'd prefer to hide from ActionScript
>developers, though. Ideally
The cross-compiler that generates ActionScript from TypeScript definitions?
Yeah, I could probably do that. Generating both ActionScript and externs
files adds some complexity that I'd prefer to hide from ActionScript
developers, though. Ideally, most developers wouldn't need to know about
the exte
On 10/21/15, 8:29 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>The problem with expecting externs files to be packaged into the SWC is
>that they might not exist. For instance, if I've converted a TypeScript
>definition to ActionScript, I won't have an externs file to add to the
>SWC.
Hmm. Maybe the cross-comp
The problem with expecting externs files to be packaged into the SWC is
that they might not exist. For instance, if I've converted a TypeScript
definition to ActionScript, I won't have an externs file to add to the SWC.
- Josh
On Oct 20, 2015 11:46 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
> On 10/20/15, 5:08
For sure, FlexJS is not so far along that you won’t have to use browser
debugging. More thoughts inline.
On 10/21/15, 12:19 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Changing the subject…
>
>Here’s a real-life scenario which I’m not sure how it’s going to work:
>
>I expect to spend the next many months building a JS
should turn it on
>>>for
>>> flexjs apps.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Original message--
>>>
>>> From: Harbs
>>>
>>> Date: Tue, Oct
Changing the subject…
Here’s a real-life scenario which I’m not sure how it’s going to work:
I expect to spend the next many months building a JS version of my PrintUI
WYSIWYG web app. Many parts of the the code maps pretty well to JS, especially
when using EaselJS. However, I think it’s unreas
gt; Josh turned off the variable renaming. I suppose we should turn it on for
>> flexjs apps.
>>
>>
>> Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
>>
>>
>> -- Original message------
>>
>> From: Harbs
>>
>> Date: Tue, Oct 2
On 10/20/15, 4:06 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>You should know that I’ve spent the last few weeks (or longer) struggling
>with an AngularJS application. My opinion of AngularJS is that it’s
>broken by design.
>
>Comparing the organization and clarity of a FlexJS application to an
>AngularJS application
On 10/20/15, 5:08 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>As long as FlexJS apps don't use external libraries, it should be safe to
>do more drastic optimization like automatically renaming variables and
>things. This must be disabled for code transpiled with asjsc because
>external JS libraries can be refe
t; flexjs apps.
>
>
> Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
>
>
> -- Original message--
>
> From: Harbs
>
> Date: Tue, Oct 20, 2015 3:51 PM
>
> To: dev@flex.apache.org;
>
> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0
>
>
Josh turned off the variable renaming. I suppose we should turn it on for
flexjs apps.
Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-- Original message--
From: Harbs
Date: Tue, Oct 20, 2015 3:51 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org;
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0
With the flexunit ant task, you can set its command attribute to the path
of the standalone Flash Player debugger or ADL.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/FlexUnit+Ant+Task#FlexUnitAntTask-Configuration
- Josh
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 10/20/15
You should know that I’ve spent the last few weeks (or longer) struggling with
an AngularJS application. My opinion of AngularJS is that it’s broken by design.
Comparing the organization and clarity of a FlexJS application to an AngularJS
application is literally night and day.
I was able to cr
Yes. They do. Pretty exciting!
Question:
The release js for the data binding example is 432 KB. Why is it so big?
On Oct 21, 2015, at 1:25 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Yay! So in the examples folder, should be some examples in bin/js-debug
> and bin-debug folders. They should run and work mostly.
On 10/20/15, 3:04 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>I don't think we should rely on someone having the debugger version of
>Flash Player installed in a browser. I'm pretty sure that I only have the
>release player installed these days. I haven't debugged a SWF in a browser
>in a very long time.
I’m o
Yay! So in the examples folder, should be some examples in bin/js-debug
and bin-debug folders. They should run and work mostly.
Thanks for sticking with it.
-Alex
On 10/20/15, 3:17 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>OK. I feel like I just took a big step in the right direction! :-)
>
>approve:
>
>+1
>Packag
OK. I feel like I just took a big step in the right direction! :-)
approve:
+1
Package
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/apache-flex-flexjs-0.5.0-src.tar.gz
Java 1.7
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds:
I don't think we should rely on someone having the debugger version of
Flash Player installed in a browser. I'm pretty sure that I only have the
release player installed these days. I haven't debugged a SWF in a browser
in a very long time.
- Josh
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Alex Harui wrot
Never mind. I just noticed that it launched Safari and Safari blocked Flash.
bah!
Why is it launching Safari? I have Firefox as my default browser.
On Oct 21, 2015, at 1:03 AM, Harbs wrote:
> What’s the script trying to launch? I should have both a stand-alone debug
> player as well as a debu
What’s the script trying to launch? I should have both a stand-alone debug
player as well as a debug browser plugin.
I have MAMP running. Maybe that’s messing things up?
On Oct 21, 2015, at 12:56 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hmm. For me, my console looks more like:
>
> [flexunit]
> [flexunit] Op
Bingo. That’s the piece of info I was missing.
Thanks!
On Oct 21, 2015, at 12:48 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> in a .bash_login file in the “~”
> folder
On 10/20/15, 12:26 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>I’m now getting an error here:
>
>Core:
>
>clean:
>
>compile:
>Compiling libs/Core.swc
>FLEX_HOME:
>/Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/FlexJS0.5.0/apache-flex-flexjs-0.5.0-src
>FALCON_HOME:
>/Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/FlexJS0.5.0/falconjx/compiler
On 10/20/15, 12:30 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Is there a way to set these variables permanently across sessions?
Not sure what you mean by “sessions”, but on Mac, you can put a bunch of
export commands in a shell script and/or in a .bash_login file in the “~”
folder. If you use .bash_login, every Te
Is there a way to set these variables permanently across sessions?
On Oct 20, 2015, at 6:29 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I’m also curious
> about why your computer wasn’t already set up with ANT_HOME and
> FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER
On Oct 20, 2015, at 6:29 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>> I’m now getting to the point of expanding the FalconJX nightly where it
>> fails:
>
> Is it possible you simply got a bad download? I guess I will take the
> time to add an MD5 check on the download. When you get an error, please
> try to prov
On 10/20/15, 4:33 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I ran out of time for now.
Well, thanks for trying. I am going to try to consolidate your comments
and reply to them in this one post.
>I’m now getting to the point of expanding the FalconJX nightly where it
>fails:
Is it possible you simply got a bad
I ran out of time for now. I’m now getting to the point of expanding the
FalconJX nightly where it fails:
Expanding:
/Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/FlexJS0.5.0/apache-flex-falconjx-0.5.0-bin.zip
into /Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/FlexJS0.5.0/falconjx
BUILD FAILED
/Users/harbs/Documents/
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
