Hi Yishay,

If you have a few moments to write down some things that were hard or
confusing, it would be great.

For sure, I haven’t spent any time on using FB to develop components.
Once we finish the back port so all of our code can be written in AS and
parts cross-compiled to JS, then I’ll put more time into making FB work
better.

-Alex

On 11/8/15, 7:58 AM, "yishayw" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Hi Alex,
>
>I've been following these threads (usually in silence) because I still
>hope
>to use FlexJS and contribute to it. Recently I've had very little time for
>this, as I started a new Flex (not JS) project which is taking up most of
>my
>computer time.
>
>The comments made by Harbs and others regarding the complexity of setting
>up
>a working environment pertain to me as well. The WIKI had some mistakes
>and
>incomplete instructions, which I usually had to spend some time to figure
>out. This forum has proven very helpful, and I will probably surface
>problems earlier on, next time I have time to put into this. That would
>also
>help give you and others a better understanding of the kind of things that
>set me back.
>
>I still have a mind to finish the Video components and contribute them. If
>someone else wants to do it, that would be cool too. I could post what
>I've
>got somewhere accessible.
>
>As a side note, the project I'm working on now is in the process of being
>migrated to JS (I think they're using AS3JS). If they'd started the
>migration after this release (now that Grids and layouts are working
>better)
>I think I would recommend using FlexJS instead. So even from my limited
>vantage point, I can see an immediate market for what you guys are doing.
>I
>hope you keep it up.
>
>Thanks,
>Yishay
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Release-Apach
>e-FlexJS-0-5-0-tp49347p49912.html
>Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to