On 10/21/15, 11:27 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>By the way, the SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS argument for the closure compiler
>might be an acceptable middle ground for minification. When I tried it, I
>was able to load up my CreateJS demo and it actually rendered everything.
>However, I noticed that it wasn't responding correctly to touch events, so
>that's why I fell back to WHITESPACE_ONLY. At the time, I couldn't
>investigate further, but maybe now I can figure out what's going on.
>SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS should minify a lot more than WHITESPACE_ONLY, and it
>seems to work without externs.
FWIW, SIMPLE didn’t seem to make a difference vs WHITESPACE_ONLY on the
one example I tried. ADVANCED makes a big difference, dropping the
example from 568K to 141K.
I’m just pushed the -js-compiler-option changes and set the default back
to ADVANCED. Or will it be a problem to have to add this option to your
examples?
It should just be:
-js-compiler-option=“—compilation_level WHITESPACE_ONLY”
-Alex
>
>Since Harbs mentioned Angular being minfied so well, it looks like they
>use
>closure compiler with SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS for most of their codebase (one
>particular file uses ADVANCED_OPTIMIZATIONS, for some reason):
>
>https://github.com/angular/angular.js/blob/d077966ff1ac18262f4615ff1a533db
>24d4432a7/lib/grunt/utils.js#L188
>
>- Josh
>
>On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/21/15, 10:16 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >The cross-compiler that generates ActionScript from TypeScript
>> >definitions?
>> >Yeah, I could probably do that. Generating both ActionScript and
>>externs
>> >files adds some complexity that I'd prefer to hide from ActionScript
>> >developers, though. Ideally, most developers wouldn't need to know
>>about
>> >the externs files.
>>
>> Actually, I was thinking that you could take the generated .as files and
>> run them through FalconJX and package the JS as externs files.
>>
>> Today, any of the FlexJS SWCs like Core.swc have a build script that
>>runs
>> a couple of passes to cross-compile the AS to JS, then a final pass that
>> compiles the AS into a SWC and packages the generated JS. It looks from
>> the code, that if you put the JS in an externs folder inside the SWC and
>> folks reference these SWCs on the external-library-path, that the right
>> thing should happen.
>>
>> >
>> >I guess I could redesign dts2as to look for FlexJS and ask it to
>> >automatically build the final SWC file with both the generated
>> >ActionScript
>> >and the generated externs files. That would simplify my tutorials
>>either
>> >way, since developers won't need to run compc manually.
>> >
>> >What's the usual environment variable a developer might add for
>>FlexJS? Is
>> >it FLEXJS_HOME?
>>
>> FlexJS tries to look just like a regular Flex SDK, so folks should be
>>able
>> to use FLEX_HOME.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
