#x27;t
see your response. Have fun guys. 700 likes on facebook in 3 years, I can
see your project is going places.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 12/9/14, 2:56 PM, "Jesse Nicholson" wrote:
>
> >Okay so,
> >
> >"you may have
arently easy to
screw up.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:28 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Jesse Nicholson <
> ascensionsyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > How do I unsubscribe from the apache morticians of private corporate
> > interest lis
How do I unsubscribe from the apache morticians of private corporate
interest list?
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Jesse Nicholson
wrote:
> It works in Chrome as well. But that doesn't matter. It's not full blown
> because it's not a complete product. Besides, its a stupi
is over.
Apparently you are too? Or maybe IBM has a bunch of flex based projects
that you're here to make sure keep running?
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:53 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Jesse Nicholson <
> ascensionsyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
code.
> >
> > I don't understand why Flex have to do everything with everything, I
> would
> > just do the right thing with the right thing.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Jesse Nicholson <
> > ascensionsyst...@gmail.com>
pay me and some others to work on Flex and I can
> draw on all kinds of internal resources to do that. Adobe has spent
> serious money on getting Flex established and growing at Apache to ensure
> that Flex can live on forever, just not as an Adobe product.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 12
hat we need to do is get Adobe to invest more back into it (rather than
> doing the least amount without causing a revolt) or spin it off to it's own
> company. That and reduce all the misinformation out there about plugins.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Jesse Nichols
that the target platform is dead is just "FUD".
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Jesse Nicholson
wrote:
> https://www.lifeafterflex.com/AngularJSForFlexDevelopers/ That is you,
> right?
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Jesse Nicholson <
> ascensionsyst...@gmail
https://www.lifeafterflex.com/AngularJSForFlexDevelopers/ That is you,
right?
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Jesse Nicholson
wrote:
> Didn't you just publish a book to help people migrate away from Flex,
> implying that it's dead because it's stuck on flash?
>
> On
Didn't you just publish a book to help people migrate away from Flex,
implying that it's dead because it's stuck on flash?
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> On 12/9/2014 4:23 PM, Jesse Nicholson wrote:
>
>> I also disagree that the value of fle
T
functionality.:)
https://github.com/mozilla/shumway
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Jesse Nicholson
wrote:
> Like I said I'm new here, I respect everyone, I don't mean to be the
> armchair expert at flex and the apache-flex community. But, perhaps part of
> the issues faced
Like I said I'm new here, I respect everyone, I don't mean to be the
armchair expert at flex and the apache-flex community. But, perhaps part of
the issues faced here is a lack of a clear goal for the future and a lack
of a clear, independent identity, as a product and a team.
egarding the plight of flash player or if it
> really
> > > just boils down to outside forces screwing things up in one way or
> > another.
> > >
> > > If flex became a JavaScript only framework for targeting would that
> > > actually help it get us
. The limitation on loading compiled
> byte
> >> code is purely just a licensing and not a technical limitation that
> imposed
> >> by Apple.
> >> >
> >> > David
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -Original Message-
> >> > From: Harbs
> >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> > Sent: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 1:17 AM
> >> > Subject: Re: Let's talk about Flex 5
> >> >
> >> > Really? The only way I know of outputting ActionScript for iOS is
> using
> >> AIR for iOS which is just a swf with an embedded runtime.
> >> >
> >> > On Jun 5, 2014, at 4:26 AM, f...@dfguy.us wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> There's already the ability to cross compile to objective c for iOS
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
--
Jesse Nicholson
OK perfect thanks for clarifying that.
On 9 Dec 2014 14:18, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Jesse Nicholson <
> ascensionsyst...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > I'm not familiar with the code but it makes sense to abstract away
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Subscriptions <
> >> subscripti...@leeburrows.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> I do not like the sound of that!!!
> >>>
> >>> How do i turn off the new skins?
> >>>
> >>> Lee Burrows
> >>> ActionScripter
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 09/12/2014 17:29, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> >>>
> >>> And since we are issued CSS selectors, you don't have to
> >>>> change anything in your code. The new skins should just show up on
> your
> >>>> device when you recompile the app.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
>
--
Jesse Nicholson
ay, December 09, 2014 11:03 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Next version of Flex SDK
>
> I thought so too.
>
> Tom
>
> On 08/12/14 20:37, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> > Didn't Alex find that the current FB requires the leading 4?
> >
> > EdB
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Jesse Nicholson
peful we’ll close this particular issue down soon.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 12/8/14, 7:01 AM, "Jesse Nicholson" wrote:
>
> >Honestly guys this is getting ridiculous, it's been days now. I'm actually
> >considering making a world war 2 style do
t versioning our releases as 14, 15, etc.
>>
>> Technically, we need to make sure that either option would work with IDEs
>> (especially Flash Builder) and our own version checking logic in the SDK.
>>
>> Any thoughts on either of these suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/blob/develop/RELEASE_NOTES
>>
>>
>
--
Jesse Nicholson
sion on the process itself has already taken place on this
> > list and the result is the article in it's current revision. I suggest
> > *we use the usual wiki workflow to correct any mistakes*
> >
> > "
> > not apply ?
> > You could just have noted this one sentence needed clearing up there and
> > saved some time here for everyone else ?
> >
> > Please consider reviewing your vote,
> > Tom
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
--
Jesse Nicholson
y field1
> through
> > > reference with static
> > > type GroupingCollection2.
> > >
> > > Using Flex 4.5.1
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thank you in advance,
> > > Oleg.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thank you,
> Oleg.
>
--
Jesse Nicholson
est.
>
> For a prime example of generating AS code look in the PreLink class in the
> MXML compiler (in the sdk repo). Look at methods that start with "codegen".
> There are also velocity templates in the flex2.compiler.mxml.gen package.
>
>
> -Darrell
>
> On Wed, Dec
Yes that's what I was referring to. I've considered expanding flashdevelops
capabilities to include a design view and other such things required for a
truly complete ide and so have many others. But, they gave up, as did I.
Flashdevelop has become an all in one ide and frankly in comparison to
othe
perspective who may not have been following this project closely.
> Responses inline:
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Jesse Nicholson <
> ascensionsyst...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > I'll stop emailing on this thread, my apologize to people for the
> u
ts addressing in case others have the same impression.
>
>
> On 12/5/14, 10:04 AM, "Jesse Nicholson"
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Anyway yes I do have genuine concerns about corporate independence. Your
> >> profile says that you work for Adobe, right? I don
I'll stop emailing on this thread, my apologize to people for the unrelated
messages that have come through.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Jesse Nicholson wrote:
> My intention wasn't to hurt anyone. As a grown up, I'm open to
> conversations where subject matter i
ed given everything I've mentioned above.
Thanks. :)
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Jesse Nicholson
> wrote:
> > ...many of the leads here seem to double as adobe
> > employees... which makes me feel that this is s
I just have to say as a new member here looking to possibly get involved,
that all of this back and forth arguing over the release process and all
the terror of the legality of changing things really makes for a terrible
first impression. I'm pretty discouraged about any participation. Between
the
point me to it? Thanks and all the
best.
--
Jesse Nicholson
29 matches
Mail list logo
