lol I'm a little overkill with sarcasm and not everyone enjoys that. I apologize if I've offended anyone. Sooner or later, I'll contribute something more than sarcasm and sideline comments to this project. :) I do definitely plan on contributing (code that is, this is the real reason I joined the dev list), just tied up with other stuff right now.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > Hi Jesse, > > Truly, thank you for this kind of feedback. I hope you continue to be > honest about your perception of the project and community. > > I am hopeful we’ll close this particular issue down soon. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 12/8/14, 7:01 AM, "Jesse Nicholson" <ascensionsyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Honestly guys this is getting ridiculous, it's been days now. I'm actually > >considering making a world war 2 style documentary about this. "Battle For > >The Button: Release". Synopsis: "Join us as we recount the riveting tale > >of > >one mans battle against an army of contributors. He single-handedly > >repelled the efforts and input of absolutely everyone to maintain control > >the publish release button." > > > >What do think? For the sequel, it's still up in the air, but I'm playing > >with a title: "Apache Flex - Dead At Version 4.13". Or maybe "Apache > >Flex 4.13 - Over 9000 Commits Behind Master" > > > >Hopefully this is over before I hit the spam button. > > > >On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > > >> Sorry Tom, we seem to have crossed our beams. Let's hope we didn't > >> accidentally destroy the universe and somehow are not (yet) aware of > >> it ;-) > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> EdB > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com> > >>wrote: > >> > On 08/12/14 13:24, Justin Mclean wrote: > >> >> > >> >> that's not Apache policy. > >> > > >> > What did Bertrand *just say* in the post with subject "[TTH] it's not > >> that > >> > complicated" ? > >> > Stuff like this *doesn't have an Apache policy*. > >> > > >> > It's also very unclear who you were responding too and about what. > >> > Probably because you are replying to a bounce message or something, I > >> think > >> > ? > >> > > >> > Assuming you mean some minor point that you feel hasn't been discussed > >> > enough in the new release process we're adopting, why does what Erik > >> > suggested (my emphasis): > >> > > >> > " > >> > discussion on the process itself has already taken place on this > >> > list and the result is the article in it's current revision. I suggest > >> > *we use the usual wiki workflow to correct any mistakes* > >> > > >> > " > >> > not apply ? > >> > You could just have noted this one sentence needed clearing up there > >>and > >> > saved some time here for everyone else ? > >> > > >> > Please consider reviewing your vote, > >> > Tom > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Ix Multimedia Software > >> > >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 > >> 3521 VB Utrecht > >> > >> T. 06-51952295 > >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >Jesse Nicholson > > -- Jesse Nicholson
