"Although I don't think we should be bending over backwards for an IDE that
is now from our standpoint 3rd Party.  Especially since it's not being
updated."

+10 to that

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J <
mark.kessler....@usmc.mil> wrote:

> Although I don't think we should be bending over backwards for an IDE that
> is now from our standpoint 3rd Party.  Especially since it's not being
> updated.
>
>
> -Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:t...@extravision.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:03 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Next version of Flex SDK
>
> I thought so too.
>
> Tom
>
> On 08/12/14 20:37, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> > Didn't Alex find that the current FB requires the leading 4?
> >
> > EdB
> >
> >
> >
>



-- 
Jesse Nicholson

Reply via email to