On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:11 AM Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2019 17:48:06 -0500
> Erik Gabriel Carrillo wrote:
>
> > Due to an upcoming fix to allow the timer library to safely free its
> > allocations during the finalize() call[1], an ABI change will be
> > required. A new lock wil
Hi,
Amazed by the reported processing speed of DPDK, I'm trying to use DPDK as a
shared library. Running the rxtx_callbacks (and possibly other) example(s) it
exits on `unable to parse device` when enabling CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB. If
this behavior is as expected for some reason I'm curious
Anatoly,
Thank you very much for the detail elaboration on IOVA. Glad to know the memory
allocation model is changed since 18.05 which knowledge is fresh to me.
Thanks,
Robert
From: Burakov, Anatoly
Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 5:02 AM
To: Robert Nie; dev@dpdk.or
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 10:54 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Two public functions from EAL and metrics libraries need to return
> some new error codes instead of calling rte_panic or rte_exit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
> ---
> doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 6 ++
> 1 file chang
09/05/2019 09:34, David Marchand:
> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 10:54 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > +* eal: The function ``rte_eal_remote_launch`` will return new error codes
> > + after read or write error o
09/05/2019 01:01, Carrillo, Erik G:
> I like this idea; thanks for the suggestion. I went ahead and submitted a
> new version
> of this patch with this approach. It's dependent on one other new patch that
> allows
> secondary processes to reserve the memzone. I also submitted a deprecation
>
09/05/2019 00:50, David Christensen:
>
> > It seems your emails are not threaded at all.
> > It makes really hard to review them.
> > All patches of a patchset must be in the same thread,
> > ideally with a cover letter.
> > All versions of a patchset must be in the same thread,
> > ideally with t
There is no need to do such a check when set macsec for ixgbe,
reconfig_device_queueand is also useless. If ew do not delete this
unnessarycode, users have to sotp port before enable macsec, then
restart this port after make configuration. All these process is
useless. As this cmdline is a private
There is an error in function rxtx_port_config(), which may overwrite
offloads configuration get from function launch_args_parse() when run
testpmd app. So rxtx_port_config() should do "or" for port offloads.
Fixes: d44f8a485f5d ("app/testpmd: enable per queue configure")
cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Sign
> -Original Message-
> From: Nikhil Rao
> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 5:27 AM
> To: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Nikhil Rao
> Subject: [EXT] [RFC] eventdev: replace mbufs with events in Rx callback
>
> Replace the mbuf pointer array in the event eth Rx adapter callback
This .rx_queue_setup devop is called after ethdev already dereferenced
the mempool pointer.
No need to check and we can remove this rte_exit.
Fixes: 48cec290a3d2 ("net/virtio: move queue configure code to proper place")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: David Marchand
---
drivers/net/virtio/vi
09/05/2019 00:59, Dharmik Thakkar:
> This patch fixes 2 bugs-
> 1] Incorrect position returned to the free slots.
> 2] Incorrect computation of total_entries
Is it possible to split in 2 patches?
How critical is this bug? It looks old.
I'm afraid it will miss 19.05.
On 08-May-19 11:35 PM, Erik Gabriel Carrillo wrote:
By using a lock added to the rte_mem_config (which lives in shared
memory), we can synchronize multiple processes in init/finalize and
safely free allocations made during init.
Signed-off-by: Erik Gabriel Carrillo
---
changes in v3:
- The pr
Memory interface (memif), provides high performance
packet transfer over shared memory.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Grajciar
---
MAINTAINERS |6 +
app/test-pmd/testpmd.c |2 +
config/common_base |5 +
config/commo
On 09-May-19 8:05 AM, David Marchand wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:11 AM Stephen Hemminger
mailto:step...@networkplumber.org>> wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2019 17:48:06 -0500
Erik Gabriel Carrillo mailto:erik.g.carri...@intel.com>> wrote:
> Due to an upcoming fix to allow the timer li
Hi Ayuj,
Could you please address Thomas's comment? We need to close RC4 today, if it is
not getting closed today, we may need to defer it for next release.
Thanks,
Akhil
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2019 2:25 AM
> To: Ayuj Verma
> Cc: dev@dpdk.o
Hi Fiona/Shally,
Can we get a closure on this patch by today EOD(We are closing tree for RC4
today). Thomas will pick this patch directly on master.
Thanks,
Akhil
> -Original Message-
> From: Trahe, Fiona
> Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 7:31 PM
> To: Shally Verma ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ak
On 19/04/2019 10:22, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> Fixes: 04868e5bfddd ("net/cxgbe: add support to run Chelsio T6 cards")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
Hi Rahul,
Which stable release(s) is this change requested for? Have you tested
these devices on those branches to ensure they work with the cxgbe pmd
on
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 08:24:35AM +, Rik Huijzer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Amazed by the reported processing speed of DPDK, I'm trying to use DPDK as a
> shared library. Running the rxtx_callbacks (and possibly other) example(s) it
> exits on `unable to parse device` when enabling CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_S
> -Original Message-
> From: De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 1:53 PM
> To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Akhil Goyal ; Trahe, Fiona ;
> Anoob Joseph
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] doc: add cryptodev gcm iv deprecation notice
>
>
>
> > -Original Message---
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:33:32AM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 09-May-19 8:05 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:11 AM Stephen Hemminger
> > mailto:step...@networkplumber.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 8 May 2019 17:48:06 -0500
> > Erik Gabriel Carrillo >
09/05/2019 11:37, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 09-May-19 10:06 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:33:32AM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> >> On 09-May-19 8:05 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:11 AM Stephen Hemminger
> >>> mailto:step...@networkplumber.org>
On 09-May-19 10:06 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:33:32AM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 09-May-19 8:05 AM, David Marchand wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:11 AM Stephen Hemminger
mailto:step...@networkplumber.org>> wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2019 17:48:06 -0500
On 09/05/2019 10:38, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 09/05/2019 11:37, Burakov, Anatoly:
>> On 09-May-19 10:06 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:33:32AM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 09-May-19 8:05 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:11 AM Stephen
On Thursday, May 05/09/19, 2019 at 14:29:05 +0530, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 19/04/2019 10:22, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> > Fixes: 04868e5bfddd ("net/cxgbe: add support to run Chelsio T6 cards")
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
>
> Hi Rahul,
>
> Which stable release(s) is this change requested for? Ha
On 09-May-19 10:50 AM, Ray Kinsella wrote:
On 09/05/2019 10:38, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
09/05/2019 11:37, Burakov, Anatoly:
On 09-May-19 10:06 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:33:32AM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 09-May-19 8:05 AM, David Marchand wrote:
On Thu, Ma
Minutes 9 May 2019
--
Agenda:
* Release Dates
* RC3 status
* Subtrees
* OvS
* Conferences
* Opens
Participants:
* Arm
* Debian/Microsoft
* Intel
* Mellanox
* RedHat
Release Dates
-
* v19.05 dates:
* RC3 is released on Saturday, 4 May
* RC4 date pushed to: *Thur
On 09/05/2019 11:03, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> On Thursday, May 05/09/19, 2019 at 14:29:05 +0530, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>> On 19/04/2019 10:22, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
>>> Fixes: 04868e5bfddd ("net/cxgbe: add support to run Chelsio T6 cards")
>>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>>>
>>
>> Hi Rahul,
>>
>> Which s
HI Fiona
> -Original Message-
> From: Fiona Trahe
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 8:26 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: akhil.go...@nxp.com; Ashish Gupta ;
> lee.d...@intel.com; Sunila Sahu ; Shally Verma
> ; Fiona Trahe ;
> sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v2] doc/compress: clarify error hand
The Rx adapter flushes events only if it has BATCH_SIZE
events buffered where BATCH_SIZE is set to 32, e.g., if a
single packet is sent, it is never passed to
eventdev. Fix this issue by adding an event buffer flush
either when a Rx queue is found to be empty or the adapter service
function has pro
Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh
---
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_05.rst | 188 +
1 file changed, 188 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_05.rst
b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_05.rst
index 5044ac7..25fe88d 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_n
On Thursday, May 05/09/19, 2019 at 16:08:05 +0530, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 09/05/2019 11:03, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 05/09/19, 2019 at 14:29:05 +0530, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> >> On 19/04/2019 10:22, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> >>> Fixes: 04868e5bfddd ("net/cxgbe: add support to
The Rx adapter flushes events only if it has BATCH_SIZE
events buffered where BATCH_SIZE is set to 32, e.g., if a
single packet is sent, it is never passed to
eventdev. Fix this issue by adding an event buffer flush
either when a Rx queue is found to be empty or the adapter service
function has pro
Hi Akhil,
Sorry for delay.
I have sent v4 for this.
Thanks for the heads up.
Regards
Ayuj Verma
From: Akhil Goyal
Sent: 09 May 2019 14:23:25
To: Ayuj Verma
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com; fiona.tr...@intel.com; Shally
Verma; Sunila Sahu; Ka
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Elo, Matias (Nokia -
> FI/Espoo)
> Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 5:33 PM
> To: Mattias Rönnblom
> Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli ;
> dev@dpdk.org; nd
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] eventdev: sw rx adapter enqueue caching
>
>
09/05/2019 12:40, 胡林帆:
> This bug makes 'lock free reader/writer concurrency hash' unusable.
> There are two reasons:
> 1] memory leak because we cannot free keys which indexes greater than the
> number of total entries
>
> 2] the ring of free_slots may have unexpected key conflict with in use on
Currently some tests return TEST_SKIPPED/-1 when tests or params
are not supported for particular PMD because of which tests adds to
FAILED test counter in place of Skipped/Unsupported counter.
Since unsupported test is not a failure case,
replace return value TEST_SKIPPED/-1 with -ENOTSUP
- Retu
Currently some tests return TEST_SKIPPED/-1 when tests or params
are not supported for particular PMD because of which tests adds to
FAILED test counter in place of Skipped/Unsupported counter.
Since unsupported test is not a failure case,
replace return value TEST_SKIPPED/-1 with -ENOTSUP
Change
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Arek Kusztal
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:11 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: akhil.go...@nxp.com; fiona.tr...@intel.com;
> pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com; Arek Kusztal
>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: add cryptodev gcm iv deprecation
On 08-May-19 11:17 PM, Erik Gabriel Carrillo wrote:
Since memzones can be reserved from secondary processes as well as
primary processes, if the first call to the timer subsystem init
function occurs in a secondary process, we should allow it to succeed.
Fixes: c0749f7096c7 ("timer: allow manage
On 06-May-19 2:48 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
Reported by Coverity.
Maybe have a more descriptive commit message?
Fixes: a2a06860b8c4 ("ipc: fix memory leak on request failure")
Cc: Herakliusz Lipiec
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Cc: Anatoly Burakov
Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole
---
Acked-by: Anatoly B
On 08-May-19 11:48 PM, Erik Gabriel Carrillo wrote:
Due to an upcoming fix to allow the timer library to safely free its
allocations during the finalize() call[1], an ABI change will be
required. A new lock will be added to the rte_mem_config structure,
which will be used by the timer library to
On 09/05/2019 12:11, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> On Thursday, May 05/09/19, 2019 at 16:08:05 +0530, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>> On 09/05/2019 11:03, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
>>> On Thursday, May 05/09/19, 2019 at 14:29:05 +0530, Kevin Traynor wrote:
On 19/04/2019 10:22, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
>
> >>
> >> When esn is used then high-order 32 bits are included in ICV
> >> calculation however are not transmitted. Update packet length
> >> to be consistent with auth data offset and length before crypto
> >> operation. High-order 32 bits of esn will be removed from packet
> >> length in crypt
On 08-May-19 12:15 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
24/04/2018 08:41, Arnon Warshavsky:
The purpose of this patch series is to cleanup the library code
from paths that end up aborting the process,
and move to checking error values, in order to allow the running process
perform an orderly teardown or o
On Thursday, May 05/09/19, 2019 at 17:25:56 +0530, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 09/05/2019 12:11, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 05/09/19, 2019 at 16:08:05 +0530, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> >> On 09/05/2019 11:03, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, May 05/09/19, 2019 at 14:29:05 +053
> On May 9, 2019, at 6:25 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 09/05/2019 12:40, 胡林帆:
>> This bug makes 'lock free reader/writer concurrency hash' unusable.
>> There are two reasons:
>> 1] memory leak because we cannot free keys which indexes greater than the
>> number of total entries
>>
>> 2] the r
09/05/2019 14:05, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 08-May-19 12:15 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 24/04/2018 08:41, Arnon Warshavsky:
> >> The purpose of this patch series is to cleanup the library code
> >> from paths that end up aborting the process,
> >> and move to checking error values, in order to allo
08/05/2019 14:22, Bruce Richardson:
> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 02:12:12PM +0200, Marcin Smoczynski wrote:
> > Invalid statement is used to indicate header files to install.
> >
> > Fixed the statement and reformatted recipe file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcin Smoczynski
>
> Acked-by: Bruce Richa
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:03:48AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
This .rx_queue_setup devop is called after ethdev already dereferenced
the mempool pointer.
No need to check and we can remove this rte_exit.
Fixes: 48cec290a3d2 ("net/virtio: move queue configure code to proper place")
Cc: sta...@d
This patch series solves 2 bugs reported on Bugzilla (bug-261) within
the function rte_hash_free_key_with_postion(). It also adds a test case
to catch similar bugs in the future.
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261
---
v3:
* Split the patch and update commit logs (Thomas)
v2:
* Add commen
Currently, in rte_hash_free_key_with_position(), the position returned
to the ring of free_slots leads to an unexpected conflict with a key
already in use.
This patch fixes incorrect position returned to the ring of free_slots.
Bugzilla ID: 261
Fixes: 9d033dac7d7c ("hash: support no free on delet
In rte_hash, with current implementation, it is possible that keys
are stored at indexes greater than the number of total entries.
Currently, in rte_hash_free_key_with_position(), due to incorrect
computation of total_entries, application cannot free keys with
indexes greater than the number of to
This patch adds a unit test for rte_hash_free_key_with_position().
Suggested-by: Linfan
Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar
---
app/test/test_hash.c | 94
1 file changed, 94 insertions(+)
diff --git a/app/test/test_hash.c b/app/test/test_hash.c
index 390
09/05/2019 13:23, Ayuj Verma:
> Currently some tests return TEST_SKIPPED/-1 when tests or params
> are not supported for particular PMD because of which tests adds to
> FAILED test counter in place of Skipped/Unsupported counter.
It looks to be a bug that TEST_SKIPPED is not caught to increment
"s
09/05/2019 13:50, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 06-May-19 2:48 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> > Reported by Coverity.
>
> Maybe have a more descriptive commit message?
>
> >
> > Fixes: a2a06860b8c4 ("ipc: fix memory leak on request failure")
> > Cc: Herakliusz Lipiec
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Anatoly
03/05/2019 13:50, Anatoly Burakov:
> The word "syncrhonous" appears twice. Fix it.
[...]
> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/multi_proc_support.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/multi_proc_support.rst
> -For synchronous synchronous requests, the ``rte_mp_reply`` descriptor must
> also
> -be created. Thi
On 5/8/2019 9:54 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Two public functions from EAL and metrics libraries need to return
> some new error codes instead of calling rte_panic or rte_exit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit
03/05/2019 13:50, Anatoly Burakov:
> When handling synchronous or asynchronous requests, the reply
> must be sent explicitly even if the result of the operation is
> an error, to avoid the other side timing out. Make note of this
> in documentation explicitly.
>
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-o
Thanks, I’ve tested this patch and can confirm that it fixes the problem.
I didn’t do any performance comparison but at least with high packet rate
rte_eth_rx_burst() should already return close to BATCH_SIZE packets, so the
performance hit shouldn’t be that big.
-Matias
On 9 May 2019, at 14:
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yongseok Koh
> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 12:39 AM
> To: tho...@monjalon.net
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; jer...@marvell.com; shah...@mellanox.com;
> honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: add
> -Original Message-
> From: Tu, Lijuan
> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 5:37 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Kovacevic, Marko ; Mcnamara, John
> ; Tu, Lijuan
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] doc: add tested Intel platforms with Intel NICs
>
> Add tested Intel platforms with Intel NICs to v19.05 release
> -Original Message-
> From: Varghese, Vipin
> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 10:00 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Kovacevic, Marko ; Mcnamara,
> John
> Cc: Padubidri, Sanjay A ; Varghese, Vipin
>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] doc: remove redundant information from the guide
>
> Remove redundant informati
> -Original Message-
> From: Burakov, Anatoly
> Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 12:51 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Mcnamara, John ; Kovacevic, Marko
> ; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] doc: fix typo in ipc doc
>
> The word "syncrhonous" appears twice. Fix it.
Acked-by: John McNamara
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Fiona Trahe
> Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 5:16 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: tho...@monjalon.net; akhil.go...@nxp.com; Jozwiak, TomaszX
> ; Trahe, Fiona
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: update release notes for
> -Original Message-
> From: Tu, Lijuan
> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 5:37 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Kovacevic, Marko ; Mcnamara, John
> ; Tu, Lijuan
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] doc: update recommended versions for i40e
>
> add recommended DPDK/kernel driver/firmware version matching list f
> -Original Message-
> From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thak...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 6:39 AM
> To: Wang, Yipeng1 ; Gobriel, Sameh
> ; Richardson, Bruce ;
> De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com;
> zhongdahulin...@163.com; Dharmik Thak
09/05/2019 17:25, Mcnamara, John:
> From: Burakov, Anatoly
> > The word "syncrhonous" appears twice. Fix it.
"synchronous" ;)
Fixes: e2229e86 ("doc: add IPC guide")
> Acked-by: John McNamara
Series applied, thanks
06/05/2019 23:03, Erik Gabriel Carrillo:
> The eal_flags_autotest checks that no hugepage map files are left behind
> after a process exits, which can only be the case if all allocations made
> from DPDK heaps were freed back to the freelist, resulting in the
> hugepage map files being unlinked aut
In rte_hash, with current implementation, it is possible that keys
are stored at indexes greater than the number of total entries.
Currently, in rte_hash_free_key_with_position(), due to incorrect
computation of total_entries, application cannot free keys with
indexes greater than the number of to
This patch adds a unit test for rte_hash_free_key_with_position().
Suggested-by: Linfan
Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar
---
app/test/test_hash.c | 94
1 file changed, 94 insertions(+)
diff --git a/app/test/test_hash.c b/app/test/test_hash.c
index 390
This patch series solves 2 bugs reported on Bugzilla (bug-261) within
the function rte_hash_free_key_with_postion(). It also adds a test case
to catch similar bugs in the future.
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261
---
v4:
* Fix compilation failure (Yipeng)
v3:
* Split the patch and updat
Currently, in rte_hash_free_key_with_position(), the position returned
to the ring of free_slots leads to an unexpected conflict with a key
already in use.
This patch fixes incorrect position returned to the ring of free_slots.
Bugzilla ID: 261
Fixes: 9d033dac7d7c ("hash: support no free on delet
> On May 9, 2019, at 10:48 AM, Wang, Yipeng1 wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thak...@arm.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 6:39 AM
>> To: Wang, Yipeng1 ; Gobriel, Sameh
>> ; Richardson, Bruce ;
>> De Lara Guarch, Pablo
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; hon
On 4/24/2019 4:26 PM, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
> In no-shconf mode, there is no need to clean runtime directory
> because it's not created in the first place.
>
> Fixes: 0a529578f162 ("eal: clean up unused files on initialization")
>
> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov
Is this for 18.11.x LTS?
cc'ed
On 5/9/2019 6:50 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/24/2019 4:26 PM, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
>> In no-shconf mode, there is no need to clean runtime directory
>> because it's not created in the first place.
>>
>> Fixes: 0a529578f162 ("eal: clean up unused files on initialization")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: A
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of David Christensen
> Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 10:03 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: David Christensen
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] test: change memory barrier variables to
> uint64_t
>
> Memory barrier
On 09/05/2019 18:50, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 5/9/2019 6:50 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 4/24/2019 4:26 PM, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
>>> In no-shconf mode, there is no need to clean runtime directory
>>> because it's not created in the first place.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 0a529578f162 ("eal: clean up unused
03/05/2019 11:26, Hunt, David:
> On 8/4/2019 5:19 PM, Liang Ma wrote:
> > Fix the resource leaking issue
> >
> > Coverity issue: 337668
> >
> > Fixes: b60fd5f8b1ce8f0a2c ("power: add bit for high frequency cores")
>
> Confirmed that this issue is resolved by testing on our internel
> Coverity ser
It is planned to make the rte_mem_config struct of the EAL private to
remove it from the visible ABI. Add a notice to announce the intention.
Signed-off-by: Erik Gabriel Carrillo
---
changes in v2:
- Original deprecation notice announced a change to the rte_mem_config
struct that would break
05/05/2019 20:12, Mattias Rönnblom:
> The ACPI and PState CPU frequency scaling drivers used the
> __rte_cache_aligned attribute without including rte_memory.h, which
> turns what looks as the declaration of a cache line-aligned struct
> into a non-aligned struct declaration and the definition of a
23/04/2019 00:30, Thomas Monjalon:
> 29/03/2019 11:22, Lukasz Krakowiak:
> > Updated doc for JSON sample code related to vm_power_manager
> > fifo interface: "command": "destroy", "command": "power".
> > Corrected typo in doc vm_power_management.rst: 'json' instead
> > of 'jason'.
> >
> > ---
> >
On Thu, 9 May 2019 11:08:30 +0100
"Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
> >>> If the community agrees that primary/secondary processes should always
> >>> use the same DPDK version (regardless of static/dynamic builds etc.),
> >>> then this problem would probably be solved.
> >>
> >> +1 to document that pr
*New Venue for DPDK Userspace, *
*LA CITE DU VIN*
*Bordeaux, France*
*September 19 - 20, 2019*
*Call for Proposal is now open.*
https://events.linuxfoundation.jp/events/dpdk-userspace-2019-bordeaux/program/call-for-proposals-cfp/
Call For Paper submissions must be received by 11:59pm PST on *Fri
09/05/2019 06:50, Nikhil Rao:
> The Rx adapter flushes events only if it has BATCH_SIZE
> events buffered where BATCH_SIZE is set to 32, e.g., if a
> single packet is sent, it is never passed to
> eventdev. Fix this issue by adding an event buffer flush
> either when a Rx queue is found to be empty
On 2019-05-09 06:50, Nikhil Rao wrote:
The Rx adapter flushes events only if it has BATCH_SIZE
events buffered where BATCH_SIZE is set to 32, e.g., if a
single packet is sent, it is never passed to
eventdev. Fix this issue by adding an event buffer flush
either when a Rx queue is found to be empt
09/05/2019 19:19, Dharmik Thakkar:
> This patch series solves 2 bugs reported on Bugzilla (bug-261) within
> the function rte_hash_free_key_with_postion(). It also adds a test case
> to catch similar bugs in the future.
>
> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261
Yipeng, Sameh, should it enter
On 2019-05-09 21:17, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
09/05/2019 06:50, Nikhil Rao:
The Rx adapter flushes events only if it has BATCH_SIZE
events buffered where BATCH_SIZE is set to 32, e.g., if a
single packet is sent, it is never passed to
eventdev. Fix this issue by adding an event buffer flush
either
>-Original Message-
>From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thak...@arm.com]
>Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 10:19 AM
>To: Wang, Yipeng1 ; Gobriel, Sameh
>; Richardson, Bruce
>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
>
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com; zhongdahulin...@163.com;
>Dharmik Thak
>-Original Message-
>From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thak...@arm.com]
>Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 10:19 AM
>To: Wang, Yipeng1 ; Gobriel, Sameh
>; Richardson, Bruce
>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
>
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com; zhongdahulin...@163.com;
>Dharmik Thakkar
>-Original Message-
>From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thak...@arm.com]
>Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 10:19 AM
>To: Wang, Yipeng1 ; Gobriel, Sameh
>; Richardson, Bruce
>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
>
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com; zhongdahulin...@163.com;
>Dharmik Thakkar
>-Original Message-
>From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
>Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 12:24 PM
>To: Wang, Yipeng1 ; Gobriel, Sameh
>
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dharmik Thakkar ;
>honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com; zhongdahulin...@163.com
>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] hash: fix
Since memzones can be reserved from secondary processes as well as
primary processes, if the first call to the timer subsystem init
function occurs in a secondary process, we should allow it to succeed.
Fixes: c0749f7096c7 ("timer: allow management in shared memory")
Signed-off-by: Erik Gabriel C
<...snipped...>
> >
> > @@ -155,40 +156,41 @@ rte_timer_subsystem_init_v1905(void)
> > struct rte_timer_data *data;
> > int i, lcore_id;
> > static const char *mz_name = "rte_timer_mz";
> > + const size_t data_arr_size =
> > + RTE_MAX_DATA_ELS *
> sizeof(*rt
09/05/2019 21:39, Erik Gabriel Carrillo:
> Since memzones can be reserved from secondary processes as well as
> primary processes, if the first call to the timer subsystem init
> function occurs in a secondary process, we should allow it to succeed.
>
> Fixes: c0749f7096c7 ("timer: allow managemen
09/05/2019 09:46, Thomas Monjalon:
> 09/05/2019 00:50, David Christensen:
> > > It seems your emails are not threaded at all.
> > > It makes really hard to review them.
> > > All patches of a patchset must be in the same thread,
> > > ideally with a cover letter.
> > > All versions of a patchset mu
This bug makes 'lock free reader/writer concurrency hash' unusable.
There are two reasons:
1] memory leak because we cannot free keys which indexes greater than the
number of total entries
2] the ring of free_slots may have unexpected key conflict with in use one
The patch fixes these 2 issue
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 2:52 PM
> To: Carrillo, Erik G
> Cc: Burakov, Anatoly ; rsanf...@akamai.com;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] timer: allow first subsystem init from secondary
>
> 09/05/2019 21:
09/05/2019 22:08, Carrillo, Erik G:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> > 09/05/2019 21:39, Erik Gabriel Carrillo:
> > > Since memzones can be reserved from secondary processes as well as
> > > primary processes, if the first call to the timer subsystem init
> > > function occurs
> On May 9, 2019, at 2:27 PM, Wang, Yipeng1 wrote:
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thak...@arm.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 10:19 AM
>> To: Wang, Yipeng1 ; Gobriel, Sameh
>> ; Richardson, Bruce
>> ; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
>>
>> Cc: dev@dp
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo