09/05/2019 01:01, Carrillo, Erik G: > I like this idea; thanks for the suggestion. I went ahead and submitted a > new version > of this patch with this approach. It's dependent on one other new patch that > allows > secondary processes to reserve the memzone. I also submitted a deprecation > notice for the ABI break for the change to rte_mem_config. > > Thomas, I suspect that I should mark v3 of this patch as "deferred", so I've > gone ahead and > done that, but let me know if that's wrong.
Any patch targetting 19.08 should be marked as deferred, thanks.
