Probably too busy arguing over chads, or whatever they're called ;)
On 9/28/07, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I'll be more careful about vote-counting in the future. Being American,
> you'd think I'd watch that stuff more carefully :)
>
On 9/28/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/28/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 29/09/2007, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
Presuming that their licenses allow them to be used as a dependency,
and distributed, then you only need to add them if you distribute
them.
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html shows the ones we're allowed
to depend on.
Hen
On 9/30/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm n
Out of interest; related to a JIRA issue?
On 10/4/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in org.apache.commons.lang.text
>
> -Matt
>
>
>
>
> Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.
> http://sea
On 10/5/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I sent a note to theserverside.com this week (Joseph Ottinger)
> proposing an article on Commons Proxy to coincide with the 1.0 release
> to announce the release and show off some of its cool features. They
> said they were interested. For stu
On 10/5/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, I found it. So far, I've modified:
>
> commons-build\menus\components-items.ent
> commons-build\menus\sandbox-items.ent
> commons-build\parts\components-table.ent
> commons-build\parts\sandbox-table.ent
>
> Is there anything else? It sai
I've added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Commons Developers (it already
had Jakarta Developers).
Let me know if you use ggregory instead.
Hen
On 10/10/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed, then we need a JIRA admin to help with this (theres atleast a
> couple on this list).
>
> -Rahul
>
Looks good to me.
Hen
On 10/13/07, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something to add?
>
> --
> Apache Commons Board Report, October 2007
>
> Summary
> ===
>
> o We got a fair amount of "not the usual suspects" bringing up
> issues and suggestion.
> o Proxy moved from sandbox to
The apachecon logo isn't showing on commons.apache.org. Thought I'd mention it.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/25/07, Hanson Char <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would anyone be interested in including the proposed TextIterable in
> the commons lang or commons io library ?
>
> http://hansonchar.blogspot.com/2007/10/textiterable.html
Things that jump out:
* Definitely more IO than Lang.
* 1.5 specific
On 10/25/07, Hanson Char <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri,
>
> LineIterator is intended/designed to be a hidden implementation behind
> TextIterable. It's like putting the cart in front of the horse.
> Things don't make much sense if LineIterator is taken out of context
> as a standalone public
Afaiu, the main reluctance is that no one has stepped up and started
organizing it.
I seem to recall there being a strong view that we didn't want
Collections to be glossy painted with 1.5, but that whole APIs should
be rethought as they contained workarounds to the lack of generics.
+1 on pullin
Users use Websphere :)
The naive bit is that your vote to stop active development pre-1.5
will fail. Not everyone wants to dump pre 1.5, and there's not enough
activity amongst those who want to do so in making 1.5+ updates of the
components.
Both Collections and Lang have 1.5+ development branch
So, Lang 2.4 is starting to get pretty close.
Matt's got his new feature in the works, and I'm going to look through
the 3.0 ones for things to pull down (hint to anyone waiting... having
a patch is the criteria).
There's only one issue needing major discussion currently, and that's:
https://iss
On 10/26/07, Russel Winder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 15:58 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Brian, thank you for the information. I have checked the JIRA issues.
> > It seems to me that CLI 2 is kind of working and there is no big
> > problems. Do you agree? Or I be
On 10/28/07, Stephen Kestle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NB!!! Don't submit patches for CollectionUtils --- I have it 90%
> complete, and will find time to do the other 10% if people want to see
> it (are people actually using the generics branch? I am, but then I know
> it's as good as my own co
ExtendedMessageFormat uses the 1.5+ method of
StringBuffer.append(String, int, int). It's late here, so I've not
looked much, but I have tried a move to the older (char[], int, int)
and many tests fail. Presumably the methods aren't equal :)
Hen
On Nov 3, 0007 1:32 AM, Continuum VMBuild Server <[
Sounds good.
22 instances of Locale.US in Lang among 8 different tests.
Hen
On Nov 14, 2007 8:06 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> One of JMeter unit tests failed when it was run under Locale.DE where
> the decimal point is a comma...
>
>
> On 14/11/2007, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PR
What you want to do is find ones that aren't listed in the downloads.xml.
Ones that are in there should stay, ones that aren't should go away.
Hen
On Nov 19, 2007 9:49 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There seem to be quite a few old releases in various commons directories.
>
> I think thes
Especially as JDBC says:
"Calling the method close on a Connection object that is already
closed is a no-op."
I think this came up before though, so I suspect there's a good reason.
Hen
On Nov 19, 2007 4:28 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To Whom It May Concern:
>
> Why is it necessary to th
We've three 1.3 specific compile time problems. Do we move to 1.4, or
just fix these?
Two currently in SVN:
[javac]
/Users/hen/apache/commons-proper/lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/text/ExtendedMessageFormat.java:356:
MessageFormat(java.lang.String,java.util.Locale) has private access
Yeah, let me boot up my Solaris 8 box ;)
Hen
On Dec 3, 2007 10:15 AM, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Point taken :)
>
>
> On Dec 3, 2007 10:12 AM, Christoph Kutzinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That's not entirely true
> >
> > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/download.html
> > "On So
When you say it crashes the JVM; how is it crashing it?
Hen
On Dec 7, 2007 12:37 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To Whom It May Concern,
>
> Does anyone have a checklist for implementing Oracle JDBC OCI 10g driver
> in the Tomcat server DBCP connection pool. It seems very simple
> according to
Seems like a bad idea to me, but I might not be understanding it correctly.
1) Does this mean the LICENSE and NOTICE file are not sitting in svn
next to the source?
2) Does this mean each component is sharing a NOTICE file?
Hen
On Dec 9, 2007 4:50 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's the license for JAXP?
On Dec 24, 2007 12:55 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to call a vote whether, contingent on
> proper IP provenance through the Incubator IP
> clearance process, Commons agrees to accept a JAXP
> implementation over JXPath into JXPath's codebas
Any +1s to delete the STATUS.html files?
Many are out of date and I don't see that they add much value even
when they are in date as action items should be in the issue tracker
and much of the rest of the information is on the website.
Hen
Thanks for working on that Hasan; and our apologies for having a dated
STATUS file.
I've moved all of the action items into JIRA where they'll get a lot
more discussion - and we can see what discussion occurs for the
reverseSplit issue you've made.
Hen
On Dec 25, 2007 7:43 AM, Hasan Diwan <[EMAI
On Jan 1, 2008 12:57 PM, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2008 9:49 PM, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > H. It looks like something in maven is screwed.
>
> Rats! It's not in Maven.
>
> The pom file is below org.apache.commons, but the groupId in the pom
On Dec 28, 2007 4:35 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the meantime Stuart fixed the problem with the maven bundleplugin, so
> I think we can give it a test drive :)
>
> Attached is a patch for the parent pom of commons and one to demonstrate
> how to add support for OSGi
On Dec 28, 2007 6:56 AM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The tars/zips are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.4-RC1/
The build.xml uses the old way of running JUnit in which the
user has to point to a junit.jar; rather than which allows
junit to be placed in the ANT_HOME/l
Apologies - I should have voted given my license question.
Anyway, +1 to continuing along with this - dependency licensing will
need figuring out for sure.
Hen
On Jan 3, 2008 7:57 AM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This vote has been open for over a week and has
> received the followin
On Jan 3, 2008 11:53 AM, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 19:46 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Jan 3, 2008 6:56 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > > > On Jan 3, 2008 5:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Any opinions on which way to go with
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-381 would be very much
appreciated.
Currently my instinct is to go with making min/max obey the JDK - ie)
old IEEE, and adding a IEEE754rUtils class with its own set of methods
for the new way.
I'll go ahead and code t
+1 here too.
On Jan 5, 2008 3:08 PM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could be too late, but +1 and thanks!
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2008 6:30 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There have been quite a few changes to commons-parent since version 5
> > was released so I'd
On Jan 5, 2008 5:51 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to get an IO 1.4 release out in the near future. Looking
> thru the issues tagged for 1.4 I would suggest the following:
>
> 1) Resolve the following issues, which all have patches except IO-149
> which is trivial
>
On Jan 5, 2008 3:39 PM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phil Steitz wrote:
> > Yes. It may be ultimately best to make this configurable. If you are
> > OK with this approach, what I suggest is that you open a JIRA ticket,
> > attaching a version of your patch that supports configurability
Does it make sense to create a unit test that does dbcp testing on top of Derby?
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
omewhere.
> Configs (including connect urls, etc) for various databases for the
> dbcp tests would be good to have.
>
> Phil
>
> On Jan 6, 2008 2:09 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does it make sense
+1.
Hen
On Jan 6, 2008 8:06 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to release commons-sandbox-parent pom version 3 - then last
> release used commons-parent version 4 and the only real change is to
> upgrade to the latest version 6 of commons-parent.
>
> A full diff of
On Jan 8, 2008 3:11 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 10:50 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 8, 2008 3:44 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > In removing the remote-resources-plugin I ommitted to add back local
> > > resour
On Jan 8, 2008 4:03 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I understand that there are branches for introducing Generics
> and other Java5 and Java6 features into both Commons Lang and
> Commons Collections (collections_jdk5_branch and LangTwo-1.x
> respectively). I'd like to see these release
n 6, 2008 7:05 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1 to Commons IO 1.4!
> >
> > On Jan 6, 2008 4:58 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Jan 6, 2008 2:23 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Forwarding to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded message --
From: Markus Binsteiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Dec 28, 2007 7:48 AM
Subject: [vfs] Cancellation of copy/move operation / Overal project agility
To: Jakarta Commons Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi.
I saw there is a topi
On Jan 10, 2008 9:01 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AIUI, the NOTICE file is not about dependencies, it is about the
> artefacts that are actually included in the distribution.
Absolutely correct, I interpret as being about the copyright in our
source, not things we redistribute. And given
On Jan 11, 2008 2:49 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri Yandell writes:
> > In Lang's case, it's more of a playground than an active release branch.
>
> What about Collections?
Sorry - had meant to reply on that, though I've been less involved there.
T
On Jan 16, 2008 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to go through all the component m2 poms making them all
> consistent with 4 spaces indentation. IMO its easier to read and also
> if they're all consistent its easier to copy bits between them. Since
> many components ar
On Jan 16, 2008 12:13 AM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm ok with the graduate rule.
>
> Could you please grant me access to the sandbox SVN ?
Done.
> Is there some rule to follow for documentation, to best fit with other
> commons ?
You'll know when you break them ;)
Generally
+1
On Jan 16, 2008 11:48 AM, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 with thanks.
>
>
> On Jan 16, 2008 10:30 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to release commons-sandbox-parent pom version 3 - then last
> > >
If that's the only 1.4 bit, then we should target 1.3 and hit 1.5 with
Lang 3.0/LangTwo (depending on whether the API changes horribly).
Hen
On Jan 16, 2008 3:05 PM, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a dependency in StringEscapeUtils on a Java 1.4 method. Is this
> intentional?
Is development back on trunk yet?
Having it off on a branch worries me :)
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should the DatabaseConfiguration class be responsible for protecting
against SQL Injection, or should we make sure the javadoc states that
it offers no protection and leave that up to the user?
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI
On Jan 17, 2008 7:43 AM, Mark Fortner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Henri,
> I saw your posts earlier about the bugs you've found. Are you using
> FindBugs to locate these? Mario mentioned that he was going to be
> tied up for a while. Are there other committers to the project that
> would be
On Jan 17, 2008 1:17 PM, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri Yandell schrieb:
>
> > Should the DatabaseConfiguration class be responsible for protecting
> > against SQL Injection, or should we make sure the javadoc states that
> > it offers no protection
Just wanting to share concern about a couple of things:
1) Using Cobertura. It's reports are GPL.
2) Including sites in downloads.
If we have a component with Cobertura turned on, and with the site
included in the distribution, then things are very unhappy.
Findbugs doesn't seem to be the same i
+1
Brett - did things get anywhere on the continuum->m2 repo bit?
On Jan 27, 2008 8:05 AM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's probably not a bad idea to remove them until there is something
> in place again.
>
> My 2 cents
> --
> Torsten
>
>
> On 26.01.2008, at 07:07, Roland Weber wr
Definitely of interest I think - if components make sense being translated.
Only a few would be directly ported I think - most of the others would
be a case of using the general idea and writing from scratch.
Hen
On Jan 29, 2008 8:37 AM, Robert Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No I have not
On Feb 4, 2008 8:47 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've discussed moving to a minimum of JDK 1.5 for IO 2.0 previously -
> theres also an JIRA report here:
>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-140
>
> From memory the preference was to move to a new package name - how
> a
On Feb 5, 2008 5:27 AM, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 05.02.2008, at 06:44, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > For Collections it makes sense as there's a big API change planned.
> > For the others, I think they should charge in and see what kind of
> API
These are the blockers on releasing 2.4:
LANG-362 - Niall/Matt, it looks like this is close to resolution and
'just' needs the ideas to be coded?
LANG-366 - MultiFormat becoming package scoped?
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
On Aug 4, 2007 5:24 AM, Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 02:03:54AM -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > When it came up before, I thought there was a problem with enabling it
> > on an existing project? How do all the old issues look? Did they ge
Nope - sadly I won't be there. Too close to the hatching of the secondborn.
Hen
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yepp! I'll be around!
>
>
>
> On 20.02.2008, at 20:56, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
> > Niall Pemberton a écrit :
> >> Anyone planning to be at
Two issues left for the release;
1) Happiness over LANG-362. Niall, you were the -1 here, are you happy
with the solution?
2) OSGi; Niall (again, sorry :) ); you'd volunteered to do this?
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
I get somewhat confused by the existence of the writer subpackage.
We've a bug reported against it [it's not nullsafe - SANDBOX-209 ];
and I'm wondering if it's worth keeping?
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Sorry for the 2nd email. Any thoughts on removing the AllTests files?
With pom.xml as the only build, I don't see any need for them.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:12 AM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Two issues left for the release;
> >
> > 1) Happiness over LANG-362. Niall, you were the -1 here, are
Just as an FYI, I've folded the Latka project in JIRA into the Dormant project.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Grzegorz,
Could you open a JIRA issue for the idea and attach a patch file?
We're really close to releasing 2.4, so I'm not sure if it would go in
there or not. There was also a ticket about camel case in 2.4 that
you might want to look at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-192
Mat
Rules say anyone can simply start one.
Community meme is closer to:
* Send a proposal to the list.
* Listen to any ideas/objections/enthusiasm/cynicism.
* Start component.
Hen
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is our current policy on that? Any commi
On the adding components to the sandbox bit that Matt raised; here are
some I'd like to bring in. It's stuff from osjava that I haven't found
replacements that I like yet:
payload - self-extracting jar builder. Useful as an agile install tool.
gj-scrape - HTML scraping API. Scrapes as a String wa
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:06 AM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On the adding components to the sandbox bit that
> > Matt raised; here are
> > some I'd like to bring in. It&#
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Jörg Schaible
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
> > Via the incubator, yes?
> >
> > I'm the only committer on all three, so as I understand it I could
> > just commit stra
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Hen,
>
>
> > I'm the only committer on all three, so as I understand it I could
> > just commit straight into the Sandbox,
>
> I don't think so, see the highlighted box here:
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:04 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/2/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > This is a release vote for Commons Net 1.5. This release fixes a few
> > issues with TFTP errors, threading hangs, and a leap year date parsing
> bug.
>
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Julius Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri,
>
> Is your timing just a coincidence?
>
>
> http://lists.juliusdavies.ca/pipermail/not-yet-commons-ssl-juliusdavies.ca/2008-March/000102.html
Complete coincidence. I'm tiring of running a server in my attic just
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My component ideas:
>
> * I am still interested in incubating Morph as another
> shot at Commons-convert, though I'm not sure how it
> will be received given its overlap with BeanUtils, to
> which Niall has been giving qui
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> xmlwriter - output XML. Very simple API and I think still valuable. I
> know there are alternatives out there hidden away in other APIs
> though,
> so might be that someone kn
NOTE: This just made Codec JDK 1.4 dependent.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:00 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: bayard
> Date: Sat Mar 8 01:00:24 2008
> New Revision: 634911
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=634911&view=rev
> Log:
> Applying my second patch from CODEC-60; adding
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:45 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Author: bayard
> > Date: Sat Mar 8 01:40:15 2008
> > New Revision: 634917
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=634917&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Oops; u
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by
> >> mistake) it had used a patched copy of the
> >> maven-project-info-
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The bug entries for projects that have moved to JIRA were removed from
> > Bugzilla as part of a recent upgrade. There's an open issue to remove
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At this point in time it seems that automating this comes with a few
> hazards, that needs to be fixed. Until that is done I propose that we
> advertise this manually in one of the site files.
I'll go as far as to s
igured in the pom?
>
>
>
>
> 1.0
> 01/01/1970
> 1.2
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 3/9/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
I'd been struggling - Codec has some phonetic codecs to implement, but
there's not a huge amout there. CSV could be hooked to Performance.
There are lots of places that could use improved unit tests.
Generally though - it always feels that we lack something big enough.
Which makes sense; we're a v
All the issues for 2.4 are done; seems like it's release time?
Sounds like that means doing:
* Edit pom.xml and project.xml to be 2.4
* Tag as rc1
* Switch to JDK 1.4
* Run mvn -Prc clean package
* sign commons-lang-2.4*
* upload for inspection
* upload site [site gets OOMs with findbugs and cobe
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 5:30 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All the issues for 2.4 are done; seems like it's release time?
>
> There are a few Findbugs errors that look easy to fix, e.g
>
>
Here's the Lang 2.4 RC1 for your delectation:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc1/
It's built from an export of
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC1
and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3.
Note: The findbugs and cobertura r
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Strange Thing: The source distro unpacks to "commons-lang-2.4.1-src" -
> > don't know where the "2.4.1" version comes from - I re-built from your
> > 2.4 source distro and it created a source distro which unpacks
> > c
Sorry for the spam. Should be fixed now.
On Tue, Mar 13, 0008 at 7:48 PM, Continuum VMBuild Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Online report :
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=64963&projectId=114
-
r 2.4.
Hen
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I checked out trunk and built myself and could not reproduce the
> 2.4.1version in any of my artifacts. Everything is
> 2.4.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:
Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
It's built from an export of
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC2
and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3.
Note: The findbugs and cobertura re
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How does removing the parameter solve the leaking?
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I don't want to put you off, but I'm just in the process of writing up
>
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
> >
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we need in Sling a released jar of commons collections with the meta
> info for OSGi. We currently have two options :)
>
> a) We release a wrapper from the Felix project which just rebundles the
> latest coll
Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3
> X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.1
>
> I know our sources are 1.3 compatible since I just tried it (see report
> above).
>
> But 1.1 compatible? I doubt that. It seems like both should be 1.3.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
>
>
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Gary Gregory
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 11:11 PM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Su
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:32 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Compiling against 1.2, we have only one inconsistency. The enums
> > package uses WeakHashMap's Map constructor. That wasn't added
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd been struggling - Codec has some phonetic codecs to implement, but
> there's not a huge amout there. CSV could be hooked to Performance.
> There are lots of places that could use improved u
these jdk versions?
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:32 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 15/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> &g
Here's the Lang 2.4 RC3 for your delectation:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc3/
It's built from an export of
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC3
and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3.
Note: The findbugs and cobertura
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:24 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL
901 - 1000 of 1072 matches
Mail list logo
