Plus link to the javadoc and the release notes please. And maybe the license.

It's going to look like an xdoc page :)

Hen

On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:04 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps there could be a maven plugin report for this?  It could be
>  configured in the pom?
>
>  <configuration>
>   <releases>
>     <release>
>       <name>1.0</name>
>       <date>01/01/1970</date>
>       <minimumJavaVersion>1.2</minimumJavaVersion>
>     </release>
>   </release>
>  </configuration>
>
>
>
>
>  On 3/9/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >  >
>  >  >  At this point in time it seems that automating this comes with a few
>  >  >  hazards, that needs to be fixed. Until that is done I propose that we
>  >  >  advertise this manually in one of the site files.
>  >
>  >
>  > I'll go as far as to say automating is impossible.  It'll only work if
>  >  you make the bad assumption of site==documentation.
>  >
>  >  ie) The site should say what the JDK version is for _all_ releases.
>  >
>  >  Add it manually to:
>  >
>  >  http://commons.apache.org/lang/release-history.html
>  >
>  >  etc.
>  >
>  >  Hen
>  >
>  >
>
>
> >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to