+1 to push any inactive projects to the attic. they can always be
moved back if real activity begins.
2010/3/28 Henri Yandell :
> 2010/3/28 Phil Steitz :
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
2010/3/28 Rafał Krupiński :
> On 28.03.2010 20:13,
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=311674&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sun 28 Mar 2010 18:35:42 -0700
Finished at: Sun 28 Mar 2010 18:39:07 -0700
Total time: 3m 24s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
Bill Barker wrote:
>
>
> --
> From: "Phil Steitz"
> Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:40 PM
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Subject: Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module
> apache-commons) failed
>
>> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Gump a é
--
From: "Phil Steitz"
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:40 PM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons)
failed
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Gump a écrit :
To whom it may engage...
This
I am not sure about the placement of these files; but I wanted to
commit them as they are needed/useful for generating RCs.
The "siteMods" directory includes hacked pom, css, site.xml files
needed to generate the userguide by itself (or at least, that was my
hack). The sripts are what I use for p
+1 to the release. Release notes look good, pgp/md5/source-builds all check out.
I think Niall's question below should be better addressed in the text
in trunk, either by removing the Google entry in NOTICE as we have a
license to the ASF to distribute, or add an item to the LICENSE file;
but I do
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> In *proper* only Jelly and Attributes don't have m2 builds (although
Attributes should go to dormant/retired/whatever. So no concerns.
> there is one for Jelly in a branch[1] that could replace the m1
With Maven and JIRA both having mov
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
bay...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: bayard
> Date: Sun Mar 28 17:28:02 2010
> New Rev
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> bay...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bayard
Date: Sun Mar 28 17:28:02 2010
New Revision: 928454
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=9284
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> bay...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bayard
Date: Sun Mar 28 17:28:02 2010
New Revision: 928454
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=92845
2010/3/28 Phil Steitz :
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> 2010/3/28 Rafał Krupiński :
On 28.03.2010 20:13, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Unless anyone speaks up for it, I'm all for our making a Retired
> section and moving Transaction to it
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> bay...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: bayard
>>> Date: Sun Mar 28 17:28:02 2010
>>> New Revision: 928454
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=928454&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Updating note on what should be in the
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> bay...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: bayard
>> Date: Sun Mar 28 17:28:02 2010
>> New Revision: 928454
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=928454&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Updating note on what should be in the notice
>>
>> Modified:
>> co
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> 2010/3/28 Rafał Krupiński :
>>> On 28.03.2010 20:13, Henri Yandell wrote:
Unless anyone speaks up for it, I'm all for our making a Retired
section and moving Transaction to it. Possibly we could relabel
>>>
bay...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: bayard
> Date: Sun Mar 28 17:28:02 2010
> New Revision: 928454
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=928454&view=rev
> Log:
> Updating note on what should be in the notice
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/xdocs/releases/prepare.xml
>
>
--
From: "Phil Steitz"
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 8:31 PM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/
Distributions:
http://people.
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> 2010/3/28 Rafał Krupiński :
>> On 28.03.2010 20:13, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>
>>> Unless anyone speaks up for it, I'm all for our making a Retired
>>> section and moving Transaction to it. Possibly we could relabel
>>> 'Dormant' then to be mor
Niall Pemberton a écrit :
> Everything looks good except I have one question about the
> LICENSE/NOTICE files - in the NOTICE file it says it includes software
> developed by Benjamin McCann which is copyright Google - but I don't
> see anything related to that in the LICENSE file - what license is
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> Everything looks good except I have one question about the
> LICENSE/NOTICE files - in the NOTICE file it says it includes software
> developed by Benjamin McCann which is copyright Google - but I don't
> see anything related to that in th
Everything looks good except I have one question about the
LICENSE/NOTICE files - in the NOTICE file it says it includes software
developed by Benjamin McCann which is copyright Google - but I don't
see anything related to that in the LICENSE file - what license is/was
that code?
Niall
On Sun, Ma
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Gump a écrit :
>> To whom it may engage...
>>
>> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
>> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
>> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
>>
>> Project commons-math has
This vote has passed with four +1 votes from the following people:
Jörg Schaible
Phil Steitz
Rahul Akolkar
Niall Pemberton
Thanks for voting.
Niall
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the BeanUtils 1.8.2
> release, so I would l
+1
Niall
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the BeanUtils 1.8.2
> release, so I would like to release BeanUtils 1.8.3
>
> [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1
> [ ] -1 No, because...
>
> BeanUtils 1.8.3 RC1 is available f
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Possibly a query for IO too if it's 2.0 has large changes.
>
> Given the large API changes in Lang 3.0 and Collections 4.0, a beta
> release seems like a very useful thing (kudos to pbenedict for
> convincing of me that months ago on IM :) )
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 17:33
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [LANG][COLLECTIONS] Beta releases
>
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:30 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 27/03/2010, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> Hi Hen
2010/3/28 Rafał Krupiński :
> On 28.03.2010 20:13, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>> Unless anyone speaks up for it, I'm all for our making a Retired
>> section and moving Transaction to it. Possibly we could relabel
>> 'Dormant' then to be more Sandbox focused and consider some others for
>> Retired (Att
On 28.03.2010 20:13, Henri Yandell wrote:
Unless anyone speaks up for it, I'm all for our making a Retired
section and moving Transaction to it. Possibly we could relabel
'Dormant' then to be more Sandbox focused and consider some others for
Retired (Attributes, Discovery, Modeler jump to mind).
Unless anyone speaks up for it, I'm all for our making a Retired
section and moving Transaction to it. Possibly we could relabel
'Dormant' then to be more Sandbox focused and consider some others for
Retired (Attributes, Discovery, Modeler jump to mind).
Are the other useful parts worth putting in
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> On Mar 28, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 27, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>
Possibly a query for IO too if it's 2.0 has large changes.
>
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "CommonsResources" page has been changed by HenriYandell.
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/CommonsResources?action=diff&rev1=18&rev2=19
--
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "CommonsResources" page has been changed by HenriYandell.
The comment on this change is: Removing my opinion as it's out of date..
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/CommonsReso
On Mar 28, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Matt Benson
wrote:
On Mar 27, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Possibly a query for IO too if it's 2.0 has large changes.
Given the large API changes in Lang 3.0 and Collections 4.0, a beta
release
Hi Henri,
I'm far less active on Sanselan lately, due to competing
professional and personal responsibilities.
Charles Matthew
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> I'm noticing a bunch of sanselan questions on the user list without
> answers - anyone active on sanselan?
I'm noticing a bunch of sanselan questions on the user list without
answers - anyone active on sanselan?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> On Mar 27, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Possibly a query for IO too if it's 2.0 has large changes.
>>
>> Given the large API changes in Lang 3.0 and Collections 4.0, a beta
>> release seems like a very useful thing (kudos to pb
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:30 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 27/03/2010, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi Hen, well done to get the ball rolling. More below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com]
Adrian Crum wrote:
> --- On Sun, 3/28/10, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Adrian Crum a écrit :
>>> --- On Sat, 3/27/10, Phil Steitz
>> wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
> --- On Sat, 3/27/10, Rahul Akolkar
wrote:
>> Adrian Crum
>> wrote:
>>> I noticed all of the sandbox
>> sub-projec
Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:30 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 27/03/2010, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> Hi Hen, well done to get the ball rolling. More below.
>>>
>>>
>>> > -Original Message-
>>> > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com]
>>> > Sent: Saturday, March 27, 20
sebb wrote:
> On 28/03/2010, henrib wrote:
>> I'm considering releasing JEXL-2.0.1 which corrects 2 bugs; do I have to
>> publish an RC and call vote or is there any expedite process that can be
>> used?
>
> I would say yes, always create an RC for any official release.
Yes, we need to vote o
--- On Sun, 3/28/10, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Adrian Crum a écrit :
> > --- On Sat, 3/27/10, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
> >> Adrian Crum wrote:
> >>> --- On Sat, 3/27/10, Rahul Akolkar
> >> wrote:
> Adrian Crum
> wrote:
> > I noticed all of the sandbox
> sub-project
> >> links
> gene
On 28/03/2010, henrib wrote:
>
> I'm considering releasing JEXL-2.0.1 which corrects 2 bugs; do I have to
> publish an RC and call vote or is there any expedite process that can be
> used?
I would say yes, always create an RC for any official release.
> Sorry if this is a silly question.
>
I'm considering releasing JEXL-2.0.1 which corrects 2 bugs; do I have to
publish an RC and call vote or is there any expedite process that can be
used?
Sorry if this is a silly question.
Regards,
Henrib
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Is-the-release-process-for-micro-hotfi
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
On Mar 27, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Possibly a query for IO too if it's 2.0 has large changes.
Given the large API changes in Lang 3.0 and Collections 4.0, a beta
release seems like a very useful thing (kudos to pbenedict for
convincing of me that months ago on IM :) ).
I'm inte
On Mar 27, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Possibly a query for IO too if it's 2.0 has large changes.
Given the large API changes in Lang 3.0 and Collections 4.0, a beta
release seems like a very useful thing (kudos to pbenedict for
convincing of me that months ago on IM :) ).
I'm inte
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/
>
> Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/
>
> Maven artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/
>
> Documentation bundled with the binary distri
Gump a écrit :
> To whom it may engage...
>
> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
>
> Project commons-math has an issue affecting its commu
Adrian Crum a écrit :
> --- On Sat, 3/27/10, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Adrian Crum wrote:
>>> --- On Sat, 3/27/10, Rahul Akolkar
>> wrote:
Adrian Crum
wrote:
> I noticed all of the sandbox sub-project
>> links
generate a 404 error. I tried to update the
>> sandbox convert
sit
Folks!
While developing the 2.0 version of commons transaction I got stuck on
implementing a usable transactional file system. As I am convinced
this is not possible on top of an ordinary file system I suggest to
retire the project. Although there are other useful parts (as multi
level locking inc
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
50 matches
Mail list logo
