On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > bay...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: bayard >> Date: Sun Mar 28 17:28:02 2010 >> New Revision: 928454 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=928454&view=rev >> Log: >> Updating note on what should be in the notice >> >> Modified: >> commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/xdocs/releases/prepare.xml >> >> Modified: commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/xdocs/releases/prepare.xml >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/xdocs/releases/prepare.xml?rev=928454&r1=928453&r2=928454&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/xdocs/releases/prepare.xml (original) >> +++ commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/xdocs/releases/prepare.xml Sun Mar 28 >> 17:28:02 2010 >> @@ -466,6 +466,9 @@ The release notes should contain the min >> The basic content (excepting external attributes notes) should >> be: >> </p> >> <pre> >> + Apache Commons {Foo} >> + Copyright {earliest}-{latest} The Apache Software Foundation >> + >> This product includes software developed by >> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). >> </pre> >> >> > > We should port this to commons-site and probably deep six this whole > tree. Agreed?
Yes, but the Maven 1 builds still require commons-build, so until they are all gone we still need to keep it around. Niall > Phil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
