ListTemplateCommand() just reads the content present on secondary storage
through template.properties. How did you put the new template ? Was
template.properties and DB updated accordingly ?
On 27/09/13 11:30 AM, "Soheil Eizadi" wrote:
>I traced this to a problem with ListTemplateCommand() that
I guess you are referring to the same issue as discussed in the thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cloudstack.apache.org/msg15197.html
There is a bug created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4755
For this with the workaround.
On 27/09/13 1:48 PM, "Jeronimo Garcia" wrote:
>H
Gaurav - Were you trying this on a stopped vm ? If you try and start it
with an offering
above the host capacity (including over provisioning ) then it shouldn't
start. Let me know how it goes.
More details on scale vm feature @
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dynamic+scali
This generally should happen because of management server not able to
communicate with the SSVM agent.
Could you run the ssvm health check script to see if the connection is
healthy btwn ssvm and CS ?
On 03/10/13 3:39 AM, "benoit lair" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I have the same issue with cs 4.2 installe
hangeServiceForVirtualMachine API succeeded in
>allocating
>more than host capacity.
>
>What is the basic difference between these two operations?
>
>Regards,
>Gaurav
>
>
>On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Nitin Mehta
>wrote:
>
>> Gaurav - Were you trying this
vm can't ping to the nfs server, it can't mount it, if can't
>mount, it does not recognize the right size of the nfs server volume, so
>0kb.
>
>So, if dashboard says secondary storage at 0kb, there is probably a
>network
>issue with my nfs server.
>
>
&
What is your storage over provisioning factor ? Even that could be the
reason.
Regarding allocated vs used capacity I had written a wiki[1] sometime
back. Please see if it helps.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Understanding+Dashbo
ard
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 04/10/13 8:08
.org/r/14076/#comment52034>
timeout is generally is not a count...what is the value typically u will
keep ?
test/integration/component/test_templates.py
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/14076/#comment52033>
how long will the sleep will be for ?
- Nitin Mehta
tps://reviews.apache.org/r/14199/#comment52037>
Do check the state of the snapshot as well.
test/integration/component/test_snapshots_improvement.py
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/14199/#comment52045>
step 6 is happening before step 5
- Nitin Mehta
On Sept. 18, 2013, 11:25
> On Oct. 7, 2013, 5:18 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
> >
It would be great if you could show logs of a sample run. Please also let me
know if all the 5 cases are tested as well
- Nitin
---
This is an automatically generated e
Answers inline.
From: Jessica Wang mailto:jessica.w...@citrix.com>>
Date: Tuesday 8 October 2013 5:10 PM
To: "mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>"
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Cc: Alena Prokharchyk
mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>>, Nitin
Mehta mailt
I think (1) is the right way to go.
From: Jessica Wang mailto:jessica.w...@citrix.com>>
Date: Wednesday 9 October 2013 12:47 PM
To: Nitin Mehta mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com>>,
"mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>"
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>, Alena
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14076/#review26851
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On Oct. 8, 2013, 1:45 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14076/#review26852
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On Oct. 8, 2013, 1:45 p.m
?
- Nitin Mehta
On Oct. 8, 2013, 1:45 p.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
If my memory serves me right this was fixed in 4.2. Maybe the fixer forgot
to port it to master ?
On 10/10/13 2:46 PM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>Not sure if others experience the same issue. In 4.2, when MS starts, it
>will discover the IP address of MS and automatically set global setting
One of the use case where volume is on secondary storage is for the
uploaded volumes.
Until they are attached to the vm they reside on secondary storage and
hence should be counted for secondary storage usage.
On 11/10/13 1:15 AM, "sx chen" wrote:
>Hi,all:
>In 4.2,We can limit the secondary
and they
>are actually in the primary storage?
>
>
>2013/10/12 Nitin Mehta
>
>> One of the use case where volume is on secondary storage is for the
>> uploaded volumes.
>> Until they are attached to the vm they reside on secondary storage and
>> hence shoul
Soheil - I guess this is a bug that addition of new memory isn't detected.
File it if not already done.
I would suggest you to change the DB as of now. Right tables are host and
op_host_capacity (capacity_type=0).
You might have to keep in mind the over provisioning factors you have
kept. See if ch
Congrats Animesh.
On 21/10/13 12:51 PM, "La Motta, David" wrote:
>Awesome! Congrats, Animesh.
>
>
>David La Motta
>Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp
>Direct: 1.919.476.5042
>
>
>
>On 10/21/13 3:01 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
>>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for
Hi Darren,
Please find my reply inline.
On 22/10/13 12:47 AM, "Darren Shepherd"
wrote:
>I've noticed that when I bring up my mgmt server theres a period of
>time in which the storage capacity numbers are wrong. When the mgmt
>server starts I deploy a VM and it fails because the below message
>i
Probably cleaning up you workspace might help.
On 28/10/13 10:51 AM, "Prachi Damle" wrote:
>I had encountered this sometime back ... you need to check if your
>componentContext.xml or its equivalent has following defined. However I
>do see it is present in the 4.2 branch
>
>
>
>
>
Please grant me edit access.
Email - nitin.me...@citrix.com
On 28/10/13 5:17 AM, "Gaurav Aradhye" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>My username is gauravaradhye.
>Can anyone grant me edit permission?
>
>I need to update test plan automation columns.
>
>
>Regards,
>Gaurav
>
>
>On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Kisha
I guess it should be fine. Adding a parameter shouldn't break the
compatibility and if it does then it should be corrected from the client
side.
On 29/10/13 7:21 AM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote:
>I almost can't believe this doesn't already exist, but I noticed that
>listing a volume doesn't show you
Yeah, that should have cleaned the workspace. Did you see what Prachi
recommended below ?
On 29/10/13 2:02 AM, "sebgoa" wrote:
>
>On Oct 28, 2013, at 7:14 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote:
>
>> Probably cleaning up you workspace might help.
>
>Dummy question of the day
Unable to deploy vms in the latest master because of the commit below. Is
anyone noticing this on the latest master.
I checked the code and there was a commit made recently 3f5b8f which is where
the exception points to.
WARN [o.a.c.alerts] (CapacityChecker:ctx-4f1ef01f) alertType:: 2 //
data
Please find answers inline
On 07/11/13 3:32 AM, "Indra Pramana" wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I am using CloudStack 4.2.0, KVM hypervisors, Ceph RBD primary storage and
>NFS secondary storage.
>
>I tried to change the storage.overprovisioning.factor from 1 to 2 under
>Global Settings, and it doesn't seem
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/#comment55463>
Do we have a way to correct it for folks already on 4.2 ?
server/src/com/cloud/configuration/Config.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/#comment55462>
This needs to have corresponding upgrade fix as well.
- Nitin Me
tps://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/#comment55585>
4.2 --> 4.2.1 upgrading folks will not see this text change
- Nitin Mehta
On Nov. 11, 2013, 10:03 a.m., bharat kumar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To rep
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/#comment55729>
Why are the changes to VmwareResource gone ?
Otherwise its a Ship it !!
- Nitin Mehta
On Nov. 12, 2013, 12:26 p.m., bharat kumar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatica
I guess you are referring to the bug
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4716
On 12/11/13 3:57 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote:
>I'm wondering if someone can quickly help me figure out an issue with
>4.1 to 4.2 upgrade. I seem to be missing a bunch of types on existing
>accounts for my
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/#review28786
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On Nov. 13, 2013, 5:35 a.m
Congrats Sanjeev !!
On 14/11/13 7:30 AM, "Somesh Naidu" wrote:
>Congratulations Sanjeev!
>
>Regards,
>Somesh
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 4:15 PM
>To: dev
>Subject: Re: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu
>
+1.
Did some basic testing like creating vms, attaching volume, creating
snapshots etc. and they all worked fine.
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 14/11/13 8:40 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>+1 binding (I had not been clear on this in this thread it seems)
>
>On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Abhinandan Pratee
tps://reviews.apache.org/r/11296/#comment42938>
Can you please put the check above the if (cmd.getSnapshotId() == null)
else block because this should be working for both volume created from
snapshot or a fresh volume.
- Nitin Mehta
On May 21, 2013, 5:24 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11296/#review20822
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On May 21, 2013, 5:24 a.m
> On May 21, 2013, 5:45 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
> > server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java, line 920
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/11296/diff/1/?file=295144#file295144line920>
> >
> > Can you please put the check above the if (cmd.getSn
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11246/#review20824
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On May 20, 2013, 7:49 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11247/#review20826
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On May 20, 2013, 7:50 p.m
running the BVT
against this.
I see that CitrixHelper should be changed for this...maybe more places as well,
depending on what has changed in this version
- Nitin Mehta
On May 23, 2013, 9:45 a.m., venkata swamy babu budumuru wrote
Congrats Swamy.
On 24/05/13 2:59 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
>has asked Venkata Swamy to become a committer and we are pleased to
>announce that they have accepted.
>
>Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
>auto
Congrats Wei
On 24/05/13 2:53 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
>has asked Wei Zhou to become a committer and we are pleased to
>announce that they have accepted.
>
>Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
>autonomously
Congrats Sailaja. Well done
On 24/05/13 10:52 AM, "Bharat Kumar" wrote:
>Congrats Sailaja.
>
>On May 24, 2013, at 2:50 AM, Chip Childers
>wrote:
>
>> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
>> has asked Sailaja Mada to become a committer and we are pleased to
>> announce th
Agree with Koushik. Lets enforce the not null constraint on all the UUID
fields now that we are populating it.
Also wanted to ask why we are populating it with the ID and not a
generated UUID ? Doesn't break the backward compatibilty going either ways
but the later is more consistent right and can
Congrats Sangeetha :)
On 24/05/13 1:04 PM, "Prachi Damle" wrote:
>Congratulations Sangeetha!!
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Sowmya Krishnan [mailto:sowmya.krish...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 12:22 AM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sange
Agreed with Koushik. Now that the UUId is going to be populated for every
table lets keep it as not null else we will keep running into these issues.
Also whats the reason for populating the UUID column with ID ? Is it for
clients who have hardcoded values for system vms, service offerings etc.
or
Would this not be a problem for folks who are already on 4.0 ?
On 13/05/13 9:22 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
>---
>This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review20489
>---
ently on CS 4.0 and say upgrades to 4.1 then
schema-302to40.sql won't be executed for him but instead schema-40to41.sql
would be executed,
so in a nutshell the same changes need to be present in schema-40to41.sql
>
>-chip
>
>On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 09:49:12AM +, Nitin Mehta wrote:
>
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11373/#comment43564>
Can offering.getVolatileVm() be null ? If yes then we should set false.
- Nitin Mehta
On May 24, 2013, 12:22 p.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> ---
> This is a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11373/#review21063
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On May 24, 2013, 12:22 p.m
But, this will break backward compatibility no ?
Maybe change it in the next big release.
On 28/05/13 2:50 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam"
wrote:
>When I createFirewallRule I recieve a FirewallResponse but when I
>deleteFirewallRule I am expected to pass in an id I recieved as a
>FirewallRuleResponse?
Agree with Wido. This would be a great feature to have in 4.2. Yes, its a
lot of change and probably needs more education from Edison and Min maybe
through code walkthroughs, documentation, IRC meetings but I am +1 for
this to make it to 4.2 and would go as far to say that I would even
volunteer fo
Yes, congrats all and welcome onboard.
While working on these projects please do not hesitate to ask questions.
Please add/correct documentation, ask questions on coding practices and
logic, fix/file bugs if you see any.
Hope you guys have a lot of fun :)
On 28/05/13 12:53 PM, "Venkata SwamyBabu B
I don¹t know the UI doesn't show the status of the agent running on SSVM ?
This would greatly help the admin understand why the SSVM related
functionalities (like template, volume etc.) are not working.
I have created a UI bug - CLOUDSTACK-2760. Feel free to vote for this and
even bump the priorit
David - Can you please follow
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/ssvm-troubleshooting.html to
troubleshoot the issues ?
Let us know how it goes ?
On 30/05/13 7:02 PM, "La Motta, David" wrote:
>Hi EdisonŠ
>
>The table is empty, which would indicate the error message I see on the
>console is accu
Sorry for missing the mail. I would need the new volume view for my
feature to work.
On 24/05/13 1:45 AM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>It is related to this commit d1642a489ce76e055d60b2caf3ccfe4bb136b745.
>Schema-410to420.sql should have one section to define the new volume_view
>for 4.2.0.
>CC Nitin he
Not that I have heard of. You can at best replace the sec. storage (there
is a manual procedure for that), but since generally there is a single
sec. storage how can you implement maintenance mode ?
Can you please explain is your use case ?
On 30/05/13 7:32 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>LS,
>
>Has
Refer to this -
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mb
ox/%3c67ef18fdca335f489b366120481ab6c5f6be740...@banpmailbox01.citrite.net%
3E
On 01/06/13 4:18 AM, "Ahmad Emneina" wrote:
>I've hit this in the past when there was a mismatch between the actual
>guest
All the public templates will be replicated to all the secondary storage
for redundancy but private templates and uploaded volumes should be kept
in one of the randomly chosen secondary storage. Snapshots will be
randomly copied to one of the secondary storage (the chain of incremental
snapshots ar
+1, but hopefully only those features already proposed are allowed.
In future lets move the code freeze date before the freeze date :), makes
life easier for folks scrambling to get their feature in.
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 04/06/13 10:47 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote:
>+0 - similar concerns as Seba
In addition, please refer to the wiki below. Feel free to add
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/accounts-domains-and-admin-explained.ht
ml
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 09/06/13 10:03 PM, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote:
>Ian,
>
>In cloudstack a "Domain" is a unit of isolation that represents a
>customer
Ideally, we shouldn't be muddling the storage pool response here for this
attribute. We should try and move away from including all the various
attributes for the resource and make it one huge monolithic response. We
should include only the first class attributes, say the name, URI etc. in
the stor
Hi Min,
When you say tomorrow, what date is it 11th June or 12th ? Can the time be
preponed by an hour please - its too late here ?
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 11/06/13 11:06 AM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>To reach consensus on some remaining NFS cache issues on object_store
>storage refactor work i
William - good use case, CS has the ability to dedicate resources to an
account domain, but not restrict them. You can read about that here -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dedicated+Resources+
-+Private+zone%2C+pod%2C+cluster%2C+host+Functional+Spec
Do you want to raise an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11820/#review21783
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On June 12, 2013, 7:12 a.m
ing the same exception...else we are
just hiding the exception.
Same for the commented statement below.
- Nitin Mehta
On June 13, 2013, 10:55 p.m., Fang Wang wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To
Hi Rajesh,
Please find my comments inline
On 13/06/13 10:40 PM, "Rajesh Battala" wrote:
>Hi All,
>While fixing an issue ( https://reviews.apache.org/r/11862/ )in
>ssvm-check script I figured out some issues.
>
>1.There are two ssvm_check scripts(duplicates).
>
>./services/console-proxy/server/sc
ailing list.
>
>Thanks,
>-John
>
>On Jun 11, 2013, at 2:08 AM, Min Chen wrote:
>
>> It is 11th June. John is not free between 9:15am to 10am, that is why we
>> schedule it at 10:30am.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -min
>>
>> On 6/10/13 10:52 PM, "
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11874/#review21905
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On June 14, 2013, 10:09 a.m
> On June 14, 2013, 2:44 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
> > Ship It!
Hi Rajesh - I get the error below while trying to apply your fix. Could you
please correct and resubmit ?
Nitins-MacBook-Air:cloudstack nitinmehta$ git apply --whitespace=fix
../0001-CLOUDSTACK-3004-\[script\]-ssvm_che
Roxanne/Abhi - Thanks for following up. I guess this should be resolved by
the Object Store work going on.
Edison/Min - Would we still be having an entry for the secondary storage
in the host table ?
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 17/06/13 12:01 PM, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote:
>
>
>> On June 17, 2013, 5:06
/ListHostsCmd.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11324/#comment45376>
Can the result returned be null ?
- Nitin Mehta
On June 17, 2013, 1:40 p.m., Dave Brosius wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,
Congrats Jayapal :)
On 18/06/13 10:52 AM, "Sanjay Tripathi" wrote:
>Congratulations Jayapal :)
>
>--Sanjay
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 9:00 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New
erImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11906/#comment45382>
what if jobuuid = null
- Nitin Mehta
On June 17, 2013, 11:41 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>
tps://reviews.apache.org/r/10727/#comment40532>
Can we not use @ACL annotation for this ?
- Nitin Mehta
On April 25, 2013, 8:43 a.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,
Can you check the hypervisor admin guide to see if this version of guest
os is supported ?
Also can u please paste the complete logs (grep for job-626 would work as
well)
On 18/06/13 8:15 PM, "William Jiang" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We have a Ubuntu 12.04 VM with one disk on shared storage, it was workin
function which fetches it from details table
and does all this logic instead of muddling this function
- Nitin Mehta
On June 18, 2013, 7:05 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automa
Agree with Min. How about CRUD operations on staging - all apis available ?
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 19/06/13 6:44 AM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>Edison, we can just add a parameter in listImageStoreCmd to show cache
>store.
>
>Thanks
>-min
>
>On 6/18/13 6:06 PM, "Edison Su" wrote:
>
>>Currently, no, I can a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11936/#review22158
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On June 18, 2013, 2:38 p.m
use this pool's dcId: 3 , podId: 3 , and clusterId:
>> 3
>> 2013-06-14 12:28:59,757 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> (Job-Executor-16:job-626) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm:
>> random
>> 2013-06-14 12:28:59,758 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> (Job-Executor-16:job-626) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools
>> from dc:3, pod:3,cluster:3, requested cpu: 1000, requested r
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11989/#review22161
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On June 20, 2013, 9:42 a.m
> On June 20, 2013, 10:12 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
> > Ship It!
Please rebase
Nitins-MacBook-Air:cloudstack nitinmehta$ git apply
../0001-CLOUDSTACK-2916-admin-is-not-able-to-login-through-U.patch
error: patch failed:
server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl
After object store merge did you guys built the systemvm to get the new
systemvm iso ? I haven't tried it myself but contemplating that.
On 25/06/13 12:15 PM, "Pranav Saxena" wrote:
>+1 , I am getting it too !
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Sanjay Tripathi [mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.co
I thought we don¹t even call it cache but staging area :)
On 27/06/13 12:31 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote:
>It looks like Tom tried something similar and filed CLOUDSTACK-3221.
>Is object store without the NFS cache a supported configuration? I
>thought the cache was a reqd.
>
>On Tue, Jun 25,
Hi All,
I have been working on dynamic scaling vm memory and cpu and trying to tune it
for vmware hypervisor, but being a novice need some assistance.
Vmware publishes a list for vmware guest os and their supported capabilities
for each vmware release. Example for guest OS Ubuntu 10.04 and ESX s
g/r/12263/#comment46453>
only for XS ?
You need to also update templates.sql for fresh installs correct ?
- Nitin Mehta
On July 4, 2013, 8:33 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e
causing issues
for upgrade or anywhere else we are comparing. This is concerning
- Nitin Mehta
On July 4, 2013, 8:40 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
I guess there is a need for documentation here. Please open a doc bug as
well if you haven't already
On 04/07/13 10:50 AM, "Srikanteswararao Talluri"
wrote:
>I see the same error even after installing xen pv drivers. Filed a bug for
>this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3354
>
>
Shouldn't we have a better mechanism of pushing systemvm.iso onto XS ? Why
does it have to be manually done by clearing the tags ?
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 05/07/13 3:43 PM, "Rajesh Battala" wrote:
>After the new systemvm.iso is generated and tags/systemvm.iso are removed
>on xenserver host , when mgm
tter ideas?
>
>Cheers,
>
>Hugo
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 12:48 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: master not perfect:(
>>
>> Shouldn'
ttps://reviews.apache.org/r/12358/#comment47130>
Boiler plate code.
- Nitin Mehta
On July 10, 2013, 10:56 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visi
ot taking it from Config ?
- Nitin Mehta
On July 10, 2013, 10:56 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>
/CreateTemplateCmd.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/12324/#comment47138>
No, they should inherit the attribute from parent template. It shouldnt be
available through UI. It should be done similar to extractable attribute which
is inherited from parent template
- Nitin Mehta
On July 15, 2013,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12632/#review23356
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On July 17, 2013, 6:09 a.m
There is an upcoming meet up on July 20th at Hyderabad, India
There will be talks on CS architecture and hacking with devcloud.
Detailed info @
http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-Hyderabad-Group/events/125208462/
Thanks,
-Nitin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12324/#review23483
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On July 15, 2013, 12:10 p.m
o reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12324/
> -------
>
> (Updated July 15, 2013, 12:10 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Nitin Mehta.
>
>
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3358
>
>
&g
Welcome aboard Rene. Feel free to browse the wiki, JIRA bugs, code and ask
us questions :)
On 19/07/13 3:04 PM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote:
>Hi Rene!
>
>For everybody here: Rene works for the company I work for to as well. I
>encouraged him to start working on CloudStack. Fix what's broken as yo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12809/#review23625
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On July 22, 2013, 11:20 a.m
anks, I have one follow-up:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Nitin Mehta
>> wrote:
>> > All the public templates will be replicated to all the secondary
>>storage
>> > for redundancy but private templates and uploaded volumes should be
>>kept
&g
1 - 100 of 395 matches
Mail list logo
