Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Hi Bobby, I checked the 4.5-4.11 upgrade environment, due to the nature of how static checker with commands.properties work, admins will be required to add/update new API/ACLs in the commands.properties file. Adding the following to commands.properties file and restarting mgmt server fixes th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Hi Kris, We've managed to review, test and merge the two mentioned PRs on 4.11 (and fwd-merged on master) branch. RC2 will have the fixes, which we'll kick next week, until then please continue testing with RC1. - Rohit Fr

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Thanks Mike - do you see any blockers wrt to 4.11.0.0-rc1? - Rohit From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 8:09:50 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Yes: I de

Re: HA issues

Hi Lucian, Thanks for sharing, I still could not reproduce the issue. In my case, the KVM host went to "Down" state and VMs were started on other hosts. Given this may not be a generally reproducible issue, it could be marked Critical but may be not a blocker? Please open/update JIRA ticket

Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem

Can anyone help look into this issue, reproduce it and if it's a genuine bug help fix it? Any takers - Wido, Wei, Mike and others who may be using KVM+SG? - Rohit From: Özhan Rüzgar Karaman Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 9:5

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

Hi Kristian, I looked at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10141 If the new VM is deployed with a password and/or ssh-key enabled VM template, then VR should get new password and the user/account specific ssh-public key so the mentioned issues don't affect such new VMs. However

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Hi Rohit, That doesn’t sound much user friendly what do you think? Can we look for a way to automate this dependency in the upgrade process? Bobby. boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > On 19 Jan 2018, at 10:50,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Hi Bobby, Agree, it's not user-friendly which is why admins should migrate to the dynamic roles feature. But I'm not sure if this is a blocker and if an admin wants to stick to the old static (commands.properties) way, they need to manage changes themselves. We may add something to the release

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Thanks Rohit, That said I must agree it’s not a blocker but still it definitely should be part of upgrade guide. Bobby. boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue On 19 Jan 2018, at 11:27, Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@

Re: HA issues

Thanks Rohit, I'll do more tests, try to figure it out. This thing is happening to me consistently on this setup, I'll use another and basic networking, see if it yields different results. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > F

Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem

Hi; We solved the bug there and write a small workaround today, the problem is generally from the Java code which calls security_group.py. On 4.9.3 release it was using : character but from 4.11 release delimiter changed to ; character but security_group.py expects : as delimeter so security_group.

Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem

Hi Ozhan, Thanks for sharing. I traced the change to the following PR that changes the delimiter character to ';' than ":" to support ipv6 addresses: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2028/files Can you share with the workaround, if applicable send a pull request? Were you still u

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

All, We don't have any outstanding blocker as of today (please report if I've missed any), for some of the issues I've request for workaround/fixes to be shared that should make into the next RC. Based on your feedback, the voting/testing, and release-related bugfixing is extended till end o

Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem

Hi Rohit; This is a fresh install of 4.11 rc1 and we have only ipv4 setup on our test environment no ipv6 addresses, our VR's are new 4.11 rc1 system vms. Our workaround is 4 lines of code to convert ";" character to ":" on security_group.py code to make it operational for ipv4 addresses but i am

Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem

Özhan, this is sure to break ipv6. can you make it use another delimiter? On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman < oruzgarkara...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rohit; > This is a fresh install of 4.11 rc1 and we have only ipv4 setup on our test > environment no ipv6 addresses, our VR's ar

Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem

Hi Daan; Wido is the previous PR's owner, he will check it. By the way i have created a PR for this problem which is below: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10242 I select its priority as blocker, if its wrong developers will update its priority. Thanks Özhan On Fri, Jan 19, 2

Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem

This is not a PR but a ticket, Özhan. Do you plan to make a pull request on github with your solution for it? On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman < oruzgarkara...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Daan; > Wido is the previous PR's owner, he will check it. By the way i have > created a PR f

Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem

Hi Daan; Wido or others will write a fix, i am not a developer, i do not have a fix, i just only want to report it to make it official thats all :) Thanks Özhan On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > This is not a PR but a ticket, Özhan. Do you plan to make a pull request on >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Yes, but only one (for KVM) and it is trivial to fix. I’ll open a PR. Also, I’m almost done testing managed storage with VMware and all has gone well with that hypervisor. I’ll run the tests for managed storage with XenServer over the weekend. I suspect they will all pass just fine. > On Jan 1

RE: HA issues

Hey Nux, I've being testing out the host-ha feature against a couple of physical hosts. I've found that if the compute offering isn't ha enabled, then the vm isn't restarted on the original host when it is rebooted, or any other host.If the vm is ha-enabled, then the vm was restarted on th

Re: HA issues

Hi Paul, Thanks for checking. My compute offering is HA enabled, of course. Host HA is disabled as well as OOBM. I'll do the tests again on Monday and report back. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Paul Angus" > To: "

Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem

On 01/19/2018 02:03 PM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman wrote: Hi Daan; Wido or others will write a fix, i am not a developer, i do not have a fix, i just only want to report it to make it official thats all :) I'll look into this asap. The Python script should parse these rules properly and then it s

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

OK, just to confirm ‘we’ the community have basically deprecated the use of commands.properties? But for people upgrading from a version before dynamic roles, does the migration script take into account (or need to take into account) the ‘missing’ quotaIsEnabled=15 parameter? paul.an...@sh

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Hi Rohit, I have opened the following PR for 4.11 RC2: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2415 Also, I have completed running all the tests for managed storage for KVM and VMware. With the exception of the PR I opened, all tests passed. This weekend I plan to re-run the XenServer manage