This is not a PR but a ticket, Özhan. Do you plan to make a pull request on
github with your solution for it?

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman <
oruzgarkara...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Daan;
> Wido is the previous PR's owner, he will check it. By the way i have
> created a PR for this problem which is below:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10242
>
> I select its priority as blocker, if its wrong developers will update its
> priority.
>
> Thanks
> Özhan
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Özhan, this is sure to break ipv6. can you make it use another delimiter?
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman <
> > oruzgarkara...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Rohit;
> > > This is a fresh install of 4.11 rc1 and we have only ipv4 setup on our
> > test
> > > environment no ipv6 addresses, our VR's are new 4.11 rc1 system vms.
> Our
> > > workaround is 4 lines of code to convert ";" character to ":" on
> > > security_group.py
> > > code to make it operational for ipv4 addresses but i am sure it will
> > break
> > > Wido's "Add support for ipv6 address and subnets" PR. Workaround works
> > only
> > > for us because we have ipv4 only setup.
> > >
> > > If Wido could check parse_network_rules function on security_group.py
> > then
> > > that could be great. After his check and possible code fix i like to
> make
> > > test again on our environment.
> > >
> > > @Rohit i will create a JIRA ticket to follow it easily by team.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Özhan
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Rohit Yadav <
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Ozhan,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for sharing.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I traced the change to the following PR that changes the delimiter
> > > > character to ';' than ":" to support ipv6 addresses:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2028/files
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Can you share with the workaround, if applicable send a pull request?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Were you still using old 4.9.3 VRs post upgrade, does killing old 4.9
> > VRs
> > > > help fix the issue? /cc Wido
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Rohit
> > > >
> > > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Özhan Rüzgar Karaman <oruzgarkara...@gmail.com>
> > > > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 3:38:19 PM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem
> > > >
> > > > Hi;
> > > > We solved the bug there and write a small workaround today, the
> problem
> > > is
> > > > generally from the Java code which calls security_group.py. On 4.9.3
> > > > release it was using : character but from 4.11 release delimiter
> > changed
> > > to
> > > > ; character but security_group.py expects : as delimeter so
> > > > security_group.py could not parse & send rules to the iptables.
> > > >
> > > > Afternoon i will create a JIRA ticket and if anyone could fix the
> > > delimiter
> > > > character or code in the Java code for 4.11 release that would be
> great
> > > > because without this code Security Groups are not operational for
> 4.11.
> > > >
> > > > Also @Rohit do we need to check test codes for Security Groups?
> > Because i
> > > > do not understand how this bug passed our testing scenarios.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Özhan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:00 PM, Rohit Yadav <
> > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Can anyone help look into this issue, reproduce it and if it's a
> > > genuine
> > > > > bug help fix it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Any takers - Wido, Wei, Mike and others who may be using KVM+SG?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - Rohit
> > > > >
> > > > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > From: Özhan Rüzgar Karaman <oruzgarkara...@gmail.com>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 9:53:59 PM
> > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi;
> > > > > We made a test with 4.11 rc over Ubuntu16.04 KVM hosts and we
> noticed
> > > > that
> > > > > there is a problem on setting & applying security group changes on
> > KVM
> > > > > host.
> > > > >
> > > > > All instances could ping vr and they could access internet but no
> one
> > > > could
> > > > > access to the instances.
> > > > >
> > > > > I checked iptables rules and i noticed that iptables rules for vm
> is
> > in
> > > > all
> > > > > drop state for incoming packages while i gave access to all ingress
> > and
> > > > > egress tcp/udp traffic ports for that instances. Below are iptables
> > > > output
> > > > > for selected vm:
> > > > >
> > > > > Chain i-2-6-VM (1 references)
> > > > > target     prot opt source               destination
> > > > > DROP       all  --  anywhere             anywhere
> > > > >
> > > > > Chain i-2-6-VM-eg (1 references)
> > > > > target     prot opt source               destination
> > > > > RETURN     all  --  anywhere             anywhere
> > > > >
> > > > > Chain i-2-6-def (2 references)
> > > > > target     prot opt source               destination
> > > > > ACCEPT     all  --  anywhere             anywhere             state
> > > > > RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> > > > > ACCEPT     udp  --  anywhere             anywhere
>  PHYSDEV
> > > > match
> > > > > --physdev-in vnet9 --physdev-is-bridged udp spt:bootpc dpt:bootps
> > > > > ACCEPT     udp  --  anywhere             anywhere
>  PHYSDEV
> > > > match
> > > > > --physdev-out vnet9 --physdev-is-bridged udp spt:bootps dpt:bootpc
> > > > > DROP       all  --  anywhere             anywhere
>  PHYSDEV
> > > > match
> > > > > --physdev-in vnet9 --physdev-is-bridged ! match-set i-2-6-VM src
> > > > > RETURN     udp  --  anywhere             anywhere
>  PHYSDEV
> > > > match
> > > > > --physdev-in vnet9 --physdev-is-bridged match-set i-2-6-VM src udp
> > > > > dpt:domain
> > > > > RETURN     tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere
>  PHYSDEV
> > > > match
> > > > > --physdev-in vnet9 --physdev-is-bridged match-set i-2-6-VM src tcp
> > > > > dpt:domain
> > > > > i-2-6-VM-eg  all  --  anywhere             anywhere
> >  PHYSDEV
> > > > > match --physdev-in vnet9 --physdev-is-bridged match-set i-2-6-VM
> src
> > > > > i-2-6-VM   all  --  anywhere             anywhere
>  PHYSDEV
> > > > match
> > > > > --physdev-out vnet9 --physdev-is-bridged
> > > > >
> > > > > All management and agent logs could be accessed from:
> > > > > http://51.15.199.7/4.11r1_Test_20190116.tgz
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Özhan
> > > > >
> > > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > > > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> > > > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > > > > @shapeblue
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > > > www.shapeblue.com
> > > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > > > @shapeblue
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daan
> >
>



-- 
Daan

Reply via email to