Hi Daan;
Wido is the previous PR's owner, he will check it. By the way i have
created a PR for this problem which is below:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10242

I select its priority as blocker, if its wrong developers will update its
priority.

Thanks
Özhan



On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Özhan, this is sure to break ipv6. can you make it use another delimiter?
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman <
> oruzgarkara...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Rohit;
> > This is a fresh install of 4.11 rc1 and we have only ipv4 setup on our
> test
> > environment no ipv6 addresses, our VR's are new 4.11 rc1 system vms.  Our
> > workaround is 4 lines of code to convert ";" character to ":" on
> > security_group.py
> > code to make it operational for ipv4 addresses but i am sure it will
> break
> > Wido's "Add support for ipv6 address and subnets" PR. Workaround works
> only
> > for us because we have ipv4 only setup.
> >
> > If Wido could check parse_network_rules function on security_group.py
> then
> > that could be great. After his check and possible code fix i like to make
> > test again on our environment.
> >
> > @Rohit i will create a JIRA ticket to follow it easily by team.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Özhan
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ozhan,
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for sharing.
> > >
> > >
> > > I traced the change to the following PR that changes the delimiter
> > > character to ';' than ":" to support ipv6 addresses:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2028/files
> > >
> > >
> > > Can you share with the workaround, if applicable send a pull request?
> > >
> > >
> > > Were you still using old 4.9.3 VRs post upgrade, does killing old 4.9
> VRs
> > > help fix the issue? /cc Wido
> > >
> > >
> > > - Rohit
> > >
> > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Özhan Rüzgar Karaman <oruzgarkara...@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 3:38:19 PM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem
> > >
> > > Hi;
> > > We solved the bug there and write a small workaround today, the problem
> > is
> > > generally from the Java code which calls security_group.py. On 4.9.3
> > > release it was using : character but from 4.11 release delimiter
> changed
> > to
> > > ; character but security_group.py expects : as delimeter so
> > > security_group.py could not parse & send rules to the iptables.
> > >
> > > Afternoon i will create a JIRA ticket and if anyone could fix the
> > delimiter
> > > character or code in the Java code for 4.11 release that would be great
> > > because without this code Security Groups are not operational for 4.11.
> > >
> > > Also @Rohit do we need to check test codes for Security Groups?
> Because i
> > > do not understand how this bug passed our testing scenarios.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Özhan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:00 PM, Rohit Yadav <
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Can anyone help look into this issue, reproduce it and if it's a
> > genuine
> > > > bug help fix it?
> > > >
> > > > Any takers - Wido, Wei, Mike and others who may be using KVM+SG?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Rohit
> > > >
> > > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Özhan Rüzgar Karaman <oruzgarkara...@gmail.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 9:53:59 PM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Subject: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem
> > > >
> > > > Hi;
> > > > We made a test with 4.11 rc over Ubuntu16.04 KVM hosts and we noticed
> > > that
> > > > there is a problem on setting & applying security group changes on
> KVM
> > > > host.
> > > >
> > > > All instances could ping vr and they could access internet but no one
> > > could
> > > > access to the instances.
> > > >
> > > > I checked iptables rules and i noticed that iptables rules for vm is
> in
> > > all
> > > > drop state for incoming packages while i gave access to all ingress
> and
> > > > egress tcp/udp traffic ports for that instances. Below are iptables
> > > output
> > > > for selected vm:
> > > >
> > > > Chain i-2-6-VM (1 references)
> > > > target     prot opt source               destination
> > > > DROP       all  --  anywhere             anywhere
> > > >
> > > > Chain i-2-6-VM-eg (1 references)
> > > > target     prot opt source               destination
> > > > RETURN     all  --  anywhere             anywhere
> > > >
> > > > Chain i-2-6-def (2 references)
> > > > target     prot opt source               destination
> > > > ACCEPT     all  --  anywhere             anywhere             state
> > > > RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> > > > ACCEPT     udp  --  anywhere             anywhere             PHYSDEV
> > > match
> > > > --physdev-in vnet9 --physdev-is-bridged udp spt:bootpc dpt:bootps
> > > > ACCEPT     udp  --  anywhere             anywhere             PHYSDEV
> > > match
> > > > --physdev-out vnet9 --physdev-is-bridged udp spt:bootps dpt:bootpc
> > > > DROP       all  --  anywhere             anywhere             PHYSDEV
> > > match
> > > > --physdev-in vnet9 --physdev-is-bridged ! match-set i-2-6-VM src
> > > > RETURN     udp  --  anywhere             anywhere             PHYSDEV
> > > match
> > > > --physdev-in vnet9 --physdev-is-bridged match-set i-2-6-VM src udp
> > > > dpt:domain
> > > > RETURN     tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere             PHYSDEV
> > > match
> > > > --physdev-in vnet9 --physdev-is-bridged match-set i-2-6-VM src tcp
> > > > dpt:domain
> > > > i-2-6-VM-eg  all  --  anywhere             anywhere
>  PHYSDEV
> > > > match --physdev-in vnet9 --physdev-is-bridged match-set i-2-6-VM src
> > > > i-2-6-VM   all  --  anywhere             anywhere             PHYSDEV
> > > match
> > > > --physdev-out vnet9 --physdev-is-bridged
> > > >
> > > > All management and agent logs could be accessed from:
> > > > http://51.15.199.7/4.11r1_Test_20190116.tgz
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Özhan
> > > >
> > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> > > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > > > @shapeblue
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > > www.shapeblue.com
> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > > @shapeblue
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

Reply via email to