Hi Bobby,
Agree, it's not user-friendly which is why admins should migrate to the dynamic roles feature. But I'm not sure if this is a blocker and if an admin wants to stick to the old static (commands.properties) way, they need to manage changes themselves. We may add something to the release notes /cc @Paul Angus<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>. - Rohit <https://cloudstack.apache.org> ________________________________ From: Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 2:51:32 PM To: users Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Hi Rohit, That doesn’t sound much user friendly what do you think? Can we look for a way to automate this dependency in the upgrade process? Bobby. boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > On 19 Jan 2018, at 10:50, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > Hi Bobby, > > > I checked the 4.5-4.11 upgrade environment, due to the nature of how static > checker with commands.properties work, admins will be required to add/update > new API/ACLs in the commands.properties file. > > Adding the following to commands.properties file and restarting mgmt server > fixes the issue: > > quotaIsEnabled=15 > > > Please continue testing, thanks. > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > ________________________________ > From: Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 6:54:28 PM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > > I think I’ve hit a blocker when upgrading to 4.11 > > Here’s the jira id: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10236 > > I’ve upgraded from 4.5 to 4.11, then I’ve logged in with admin and got > session expired immediately. > > Regards, > Boris Stoyanov > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > On 17 Jan 2018, at 8:42, Tutkowski, Mike > <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com<mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > For the past couple days, I have been running the KVM managed-storage > regression-test suite against RC1. > > With the exception of one issue (more on this below), all of these tests have > passed. > > Tomorrow I plan to start in on the VMware-related managed-storage tests. > > Once I’ve completed running those, I expect to move on to the > XenServer-related managed-storage tests. > > I ran these XenServer and VMware tests just prior to RC1 being created, so I > suspect all of those tests will come back successful. > > Now, with regards to the one issue I found on KVM with managed storage: > > It relates to a new feature whereby you can online migrate the storage of a > VM from NFS or Ceph to managed storage. > > During the code-review process, I made a change per a suggestion and it > introduced an issue with this feature. The solution is just a couple lines of > code and only impacts this one use case. If you are testing this release > candidate and don’t really care about this particular feature, it should not > at all impact your ability to test RC1. > > Thanks! > Mike > > On Jan 15, 2018, at 4:33 AM, Rohit Yadav > <ro...@apache.org<mailto:ro...@apache.org>> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.11.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up for > testing and a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.0.0-RC20180115T1603 > Commit: 1b8a532ba52127f388847690df70e65c6b46f4d4 > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.0.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > The vote will be open for 72 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Additional information: > > For users' convenience, I've built packages from > 1b8a532ba52127f388847690df70e65c6b46f4d4 and published RC1 repository here: > http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/testing/4.11-rc1 > > The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvmtemplate > upgrade section has been updated. You may refer the following for > systemvmtemplate upgrade testing: > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/latest/index.html > > 4.11 systemvmtemplates are available from here: > https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/ > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav >
