Hi Rohit, I have opened the following PR for 4.11 RC2:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2415 Also, I have completed running all the tests for managed storage for KVM and VMware. With the exception of the PR I opened, all tests passed. This weekend I plan to re-run the XenServer managed-storage tests. I had run them just prior to you creating RC1, so I expect they will all pass. Thanks! Mike On 1/19/18, 6:56 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Yes, but only one (for KVM) and it is trivial to fix. I’ll open a PR. Also, I’m almost done testing managed storage with VMware and all has gone well with that hypervisor. I’ll run the tests for managed storage with XenServer over the weekend. I suspect they will all pass just fine. > On Jan 19, 2018, at 1:55 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > Thanks Mike - do you see any blockers wrt to 4.11.0.0-rc1? > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > ________________________________ > From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 8:09:50 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > > Yes: I definitely won’t be able to complete my regression tests within the 72-hour window. For 4.12, I plan to automate the remainder of my tests, but I’m not quite there with 4.11 (the vast majority of managed-storage tests are automated, but not yet all). > > On 1/17/18, 7:34 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > People, People, > > a lot of us are busy with meltdown fixes and a full component test takes about the 72 hours that we have for our voting, I propose to extend the vote period until at least Monday. > > Is that a good idea? > > On 17/01/2018, 14:33, "Kris Sterckx" <kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net> wrote: > > 4.11.0 looks like an awesome reason ! Special thanks to Rohit ! > > I vote +0 > > - I vote for including CLOUDSTACK-9749 [1] into 4.11.0 still > > - And if that is accepted, I vote for including CLOUDSTACK-10233 [2] also > (Nuage-internal fix) > > thanks > > Kris > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9749 > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10233 > > > > daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > >> On 15 January 2018 at 12:32, Rohit Yadav <ro...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I've created a 4.11.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up for >> testing and a vote: >> >> Git Branch and Commit SH: >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a= >> shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.0.0-RC20180115T1603 >> Commit: 1b8a532ba52127f388847690df70e65c6b46f4d4 >> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >> location): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.0.0/ >> >> PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >> >> The vote will be open for 72 hours. >> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate >> "(binding)" with their vote? >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> Additional information: >> >> For users' convenience, I've built packages from >> 1b8a532ba52127f388847690df70e65c6b46f4d4 and published RC1 repository >> here: >> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/testing/4.11-rc1 >> >> The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvmtemplate >> upgrade section has been updated. You may refer the following for >> systemvmtemplate upgrade testing: >> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack- >> release-notes/en/latest/index.html >> >> 4.11 systemvmtemplates are available from here: >> https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/ >> >> Regards, >> Rohit Yadav >> > > > >
