[DISCUSS] Top & Sampling Rates (kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource)

Hi Guys, Does anyone have any ideas about this? My main concern is the KVM resource collector and I assume the other hypervisor setups are receiving the wrong values. The CSAgent periodically runs the following command: [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Execut

Re: developers and mysql

Hey, StaticStrategy is an optional component, so it should be perfectly OK to include it at compile time in our source code. If i understand the apache rules correctly we can keep it in the code base without problems as long as it is optional. We should however move it to a separate project ins

Re: Looking for test folks on the community!

Certainly :-) On 27 feb. 2014, at 07:00, Raja Pullela wrote: > Hi, > > Can you please respond if you are actively involved or looking get involved > in testing 4.4 Release? > > Thanks, > Raja >

Not able to ping to outside network from system VMs

Hi All, I am setting up a 2-node cloudstack environment. Management Server :10.44.189.125 Host Server : 10.44.65.143 I am able to see the system VMs in running state. But not able ping to outside network from system VMs. I am not able to ping to corporate DNS or Google DNS from system

RE: Unable to deploy vm

Please follow the instructions given at : [1] to upgrade from 4.0.x to 4.1.0: [1]: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/docsite/html/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Release_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html#upgrade-from-4.0-to-4.1 Thanks, Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Teja

Fwd: Unable to deploy vm

Hi, thanks for replay, Is there any workaround for this ? OR how can I update 4.0.2 to 4.1.0 ? Regards, Tejas On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Sailaja Mada wrote: > Hi, > > Error log seems to be same as the bug @ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1403 - This got fixed in > 4.1

RE: Looking for test folks on the community!

I'm in! Cheers, Wilder -Original Message- From: Raja Pullela [mailto:raja.pull...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 7:01 AM To: CloudStack Dev (dev@cloudstack.apache.org) Subject: Looking for test folks on the community! Hi, Can you please respond if you are actively involv

Re: developers and mysql

Hey John, I'm just getting around now to trying to rebuild my CS environment using the new changes in 4.3-forward. When I run the following: mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb I receive the following error: > Running query: drop database if exists `cloud` SQL exception in t

Looking for test folks on the community!

Hi, Can you please respond if you are actively involved or looking get involved in testing 4.4 Release? Thanks, Raja

Re: developers and mysql

Immediately if there are no specific licensing issues we should maintain the status-quo. The fact is that some other HA solutions will not work as all the schema related scripts are mysql engine specific. When we decide to move the mysql dependency out of cloudstack we should do it for all such de

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

+1 for the 3/28 Feature Freeze. If we try to close on the Feature Freeze sooner than when we are ready, we will end up finding more blockers/criticals and end up spending more time on bug fixing. This could potentially result in moving the RC? So, bottom line - it is like we pay now or pay later

Re: developers and mysql

StaticStrategy is overriding the Mysql¹s HA Strategy. So it is more a part of the mysql jdbc driver providing a specific strategy that works as per the documented HA procedure. I think moving it to a separate github project that generates the additional mysql connector jar should be ok (any licens

RE: developers and mysql

Hi Damoder, I don't think I follow. There's clearly compile dependency on mysql in StaticStrategy. To me, when I look at StaticStartegy, it makes sense to move that into separate project in github and reference people to it if they want to use the specific setup outlined in the DB HA wiki.

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

Perhaps we just need to reduce overlap. Most people work on 4.3 until it's out the door, I think. Personally, I have a hard time straddling the two during this phase. On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Ram Ganesh wrote: > I agree on the RC process! Few thoughts from my end > > - I see a rus

RE: developers and mysql

Hi Alex, The mysql dependency is on for only " StaticStrategy.java" as mentioned by you. And this is not used anywhere in the code base as a compile time dependency rather used as a run time dependency in db.properties. this will be passed to mysql driver as part of mysql Database URL c

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

I agree on the RC process! Few thoughts from my end - I see a rush of "request to cherry pick 4.3" requests from committers. This may be a burden for an RM. We can simplify it by RM responding to the email with "OK to commit" or "Not ok to commit" email response. This should free up som

devcloud - new version (0.4) ready for testing

There is a new version of devcloud (version 0.4) ready for testing. See here for more information: https://github.com/snowch/devcloud/releases/tag/v0.4 It would be great if this release could be tested and any defects raised on the github project. The ultimate goal is that this project will repl

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

+1 to move feature freeze date in this case as 4.3 closure has impact on the next release cycle. There are 14 features targeted for 4.4 and all of them are in open state as of now. There are only 2 weeks left to close on coding and developers would rush to check in the code. This only resul

Re: developers and mysql

Great, John - thanks again! On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:10 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > I've cherry-picked these into 4.3-forward...will ask RM in a separate email > to pick them into 4.3. > > John > > On Feb 26, 2014, at 5:26 PM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote: > > Aw

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

I don’t see not moving the freeze date as a penalty. If a feature doesn’t make the current deadline, it moves to the next release, which is still a few months away. For significant issues, it’s not uncommon for us to allow them in late. What we have a stronger need for than shifting a date, by

Re: CloudStack-setup-management

​Can you paste logs file here ?​ Thanks, Yitao 2014-02-27 8:02 GMT+08:00 María Noelia Gil : > Hi, I installed the CloudStack-setup-management package, after I installed > the database and have made ​​the necessary settings, but I can not access > http://localhost:8080/client. > > Any solution?

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

I share it too. Many developers in the community went out of their way to get a cleaner RC and thereby impacting their feature development efforts. We shouldn't be penalizing them with this 2 week's feature freeze schedule Thanks, RamG > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [ma

[4.3] [Cherry-pick] developer mysql dependencies

Dearest RM - would like the following commits from 4.3-forward picked into 4.3. To the best of my knowledge they comply with ASF third-party licensing policy for build scripts [1]. 24dcf2948c2d4cdd98fcda0f766d82f40eee8be1 2c3cd90b5604cde8123968b15ef6c53bad43b5e2 f5aeac845df8b73b1525442461a8a811e

Re: developers and mysql

I’ve cherry-picked these into 4.3-forward…will ask RM in a separate email to pick them into 4.3. John On Feb 26, 2014, at 5:26 PM, Mike Tutkowski mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> wrote: Awesome! Thanks, John! On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:12 PM, John Kinsella mailto:j...@stratosec.co>> wro

Re: Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

Hi Alena, 2014-02-26 23:19 GMT+01:00 Alena Prokharchyk : > Antonio, > > I still don't quite see why false result returned from one of the > workers, should silently stop other workers if those workers are a) > independent b) have their own way of processing the failures in > asynchronous manne

Re: developers and mysql

Awesome! Thanks, John! On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:12 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > I've merged one of the commits, will get the other two in this evening > > On Feb 26, 2014, at 3:59 PM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote: > > Yeah, if we have a 4.3 workaround for this, th

Re: developers and mysql

I’ve merged one of the commits, will get the other two in this evening On Feb 26, 2014, at 3:59 PM, Mike Tutkowski mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> wrote: Yeah, if we have a 4.3 workaround for this, that would be great. Thanks On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Sonal Ojha mailto:sonal.o..

Re: Review Request 18552: Internal LB support for Juniper contrail VPC implementation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18552/ --- (Updated Feb. 27, 2014, 12:56 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes --

Review Request 18552: Internal LB support for Juniper contrail VPC implementation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18552/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

Just wondering if it would be easier to just make the management server into a virtual appliance then recoding everything to run on Windows (not to mention all the patches every month). The enterprises that I come in contact with don't seem to have an issue with vCD. I don't know how the foundation

Re: developers and mysql

Yeah, if we have a 4.3 workaround for this, that would be great. Thanks On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Sonal Ojha wrote: > I am seeing the issue on 4.3 branch, can someone help me how can that be > made to work ?? > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > > We are alr

CloudStack-setup-management

Hi, I installed the CloudStack-setup-management package, after I installed the database and have made ​​the necessary settings, but I can not access http://localhost:8080/client. Any solution? thanks

Re: [4.3] [Cherry-pick] CLOUDSTACK-6174, CLOUDSTACK-6175

Animesh, Can you cherry pick the following commits from 4.3-forward to 4.3? 4c83f80c809674cb8ff9561d546a6ade25d983f8 CLOUDSTACK-6174: Provide separate option for Windows Server 2012 R2 as an OS type when registering template. 94257c0fc85c7178e6ca3146662de08feee2c290 CLOUDSTACK-6175:s3.

RE: developers and mysql

@Hugo The mysql scripts is a legacy of we used to dump the mysql db to create the create-schema sql but it is at worst still a runtime dependency. We should fix it but I don't think it's as high a priority as the compile time dependency that has been introduced. @Damoder, Can you take a look

Re: Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

Antonio, I still don’t quite see why false result returned from one of the workers, should silently stop other workers if those workers are a) independent b) have their own way of processing the failures in asynchronous manner later as you stated. You also say "didn't want each worker to have

Re: Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

Hi Alena, Answer inline: 2014-02-26 22:24 GMT+01:00 Alena Prokharchyk : > Antonio, please see my 2 comments inline. > > -Alena. > > On 2/26/14, 1:17 PM, "Antonio Fornié Casarrubios" > wrote: > > >Hi Alena, > > > >I answer to your comments inline: > > > > > >2014-02-26 19:08 GMT+01:00 Alena Pr

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > I am still not convinced or comfortable with release manager's liability for > release content. It seems > we are going with practical approach but since legality has been called out > the legal instrument needs > to be clearly defined

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

Mike I share your opinion most of us have been pretty much on 4.3 until now, and pushing out the release seems reasonable. As I called out in earlier mail the feature proposal date was not called out for 4.4 and as such giving little extra room seems reasonable. Animesh > -Original Message

RE: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 6:44 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker? > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: > > > > Folks since the liab

Re: Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

Antonio, please see my 2 comments inline. -Alena. On 2/26/14, 1:17 PM, "Antonio Fornié Casarrubios" wrote: >Hi Alena, > >I answer to your comments inline: > > >2014-02-26 19:08 GMT+01:00 Alena Prokharchyk >: > >>This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >> https://reviews.

Re: Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

Hi Alena, I answer to your comments inline: 2014-02-26 19:08 GMT+01:00 Alena Prokharchyk : >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/17888/ > > Antonio, in general looks good to me. There are some minor fixes that need to > be done though.

Re: FYI: 4.3 and 4.3-forward branches not building

On Feb 26, 2014, at 1:31 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > Before we go to another vote - apidocs build is failing with: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/home/jlk/code/cloudstack/tools/apidoc/gen_toc.py", line 195, in > >category = choose_category(fn) > File "/home/jlk/code/clou

[GSoC] Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2013 Mentor Registration

Folks, ASF has been accepted has a mentoring organization for Google Summer of Code 2014. If you are interested and have the time to be a mentor for a CloudStack project please see below to register as a mentor. Also enter your project idea in JIRA and tag it with 'gsoc2014' Currently Mike Tut

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Sonal Ojha wrote: > I am attaching the patch with the email kindly let me know your comments. Sonal, Attachments are stripped by the listserv. You might have to include the text.

Re: cidrs in acls

H Kishan, I implemented point 1, even though I had some doubts at what you meant. If you have a minute please look at the last commit in acl-item-cidrs again. I will work on the migration code as time falls free. thanks, Daan On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > thanks, will

InsufficientServerCapacityException running "deployDataCenter.py -i devcloud.cfg"

I am running into the following error when I run "deployDataCenter.py -i devcloud.cfg". I get the same error when I run against Rohit's devcloud2 and my devcloud environments. I have tried stepping through the code in the eclipse debugger, but that hasn't helped my to identify the issue. I have

FYI: 4.3 and 4.3-forward branches not building

Before we go to another vote - apidocs build is failing with: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/jlk/code/cloudstack/tools/apidoc/gen_toc.py", line 195, in category = choose_category(fn) File "/home/jlk/code/cloudstack/tools/apidoc/gen_toc.py", line 175, in choose_category

Re: developers and mysql

I am seeing the issue on 4.3 branch, can someone help me how can that be made to work ?? On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > We are already pretty much locked in as all our database scripts are MySQL > specific. If we want to be neutral we should fix that. > > Cheers, > > H

Re: Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17888/#review35542 --- Antonio, in general looks good to me. There are some minor fixes tha

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

Just pushed a fix for that to master. On Feb 25, 2014, at 5:55 PM, Chiradeep Vittal mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com>> wrote: So how do you now Œprovide¹ the jdbc connector on a Mac? mvn -Pdeveloper -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator Š SQL exception in trying initDB: java.sql.SQLException: No

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

+1 this is reasonable. On 26/02/14 8:14 pm, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: >> >> Folks since the liability of Release manager has been called out >>explicitly for the release I want to call out that I cannot take >>personal liability for a re

Re: license analysis

We are still exploring but the initial goal is get 4.3 straight On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Thanks, Daan! > > By the way, are you having him perform this in-depth analysis on 4.3 or is > this going to be done first on master? > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Daa

Re: license analysis

Sounds good - I figured that's what you were going to say, but just wanted to confirm. Thanks On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > We are still exploring but the initial goal is get 4.3 straight > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote: > > Thanks, Daan! >

Re: Submitting a Feature Proposal

I will check out that link and put together any required documentation. Thanks for the info and pointers. > On 26 Feb 2014, at 16:03, "Mike Tutkowski" > wrote: > > Good point, John. > > >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:00 AM, John Kinsella wrote: >> >> Actually, if it's a Significant Feature, I l

Re: Submitting a Feature Proposal

Good point, John. On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:00 AM, John Kinsella wrote: > Actually, if it's a Significant Feature, I like seeing a spec put together > to be referenced by the [PROPOSAL] thread. Take a look at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Design and in > particular th

Re: Submitting a Feature Proposal

Actually, if it’s a Significant Feature, I like seeing a spec put together to be referenced by the [PROPOSAL] thread. Take a look at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Design and in particular the Design Document Template. John On Feb 26, 2014, at 7:34 AM, Mike Tutkowski m

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

+1 well put. On Feb 26, 2014, at 6:44 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: >> >> Folks since the liability of Release manager has been called out explicitly >> for the release I want to call out that I cannot take personal liability for >> a

Re: license analysis

Thanks, Daan! By the way, are you having him perform this in-depth analysis on 4.3 or is this going to be done first on master? On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > I made contact with Armijn Hemel (Tjaldur Software Governance Solutions) > who scans software for the p

Re: Submitting a Feature Proposal

Anyone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but I typically open up a JIRA ticket and a corresponding Review Board Request ( https://reviews.apache.org/dashboard/). If it's a brand-new feature, I would suggest sending a message to dev@ with the [PROPOSAL] tag in the subject line and filling peopl

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

I think we're having this discussion after every release because we're beginning to realize that a four-month release cycle has not been very realistic for us yet. The main issue I encounter is our month-long RC cycle where I spend a bunch of time validating the RC and (during that timeframe) less

Review Request 18516: CLOUDSTACK-6015: add apache license headers, add a new test: navigation test and related code.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18516/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta, Parth Jagirdar, and Sebastien Goasgu

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

-1 on postponing the feature freeze. We are having this discussion after every release, however we agreed to do a 4 month cycle so let's stick to it. If there are important features that are currently being developed but might not make this cut-off date we should discuss that separately, but as

Fwd: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Mar 2014

Any volunteers to pull together a first draft of the report? -- Forwarded message -- From: ASF Board Date: Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:15 AM Subject: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Mar 2014 To: Chip Childers This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > Folks since the liability of Release manager has been called out explicitly > for the release I want to call out that I cannot take personal liability for > a release and I am not sure why would anyone else in Release Manager role >

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

+1 to Daan. Tracy Phillips Weberize, Inc. On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > -1 for postponing the feature freeze. It will amount to more features > in the release. I'd rather shorten the cycle and do more releases then > to pack more bugs in a single go. > > On Wed, Feb 26

Submitting a Feature Proposal

Firstly, thanks to all those who took part in the discussion on the 4.4 FF date. I think we should have a discussion on altering the release/development schedule. That said, what is the process to submit a feature proposal? Regards, Alex Hitchins VP Software Engineering D: +44 1892 523 587

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-slowbuild #304

See

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

-1 for postponing the feature freeze. It will amount to more features in the release. I'd rather shorten the cycle and do more releases then to pack more bugs in a single go. On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Guo Star wrote: > +1 > > > 2014-02-26 20:01 GMT+08:00 Abhinandan Prateek >: > >> +1 for 4

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)

Hello Murali, I have started working on the changes required to control publishing of events on the event bus based on the event category config parameter. While working on the changes I could come across the following approach a.) Changed the routing key and binding key format to the following a

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

+1 2014-02-26 20:01 GMT+08:00 Abhinandan Prateek : > +1 for 4.4 feature freeze on 3/28. > > On 26/02/14 10:01 am, "Sateesh Chodapuneedi" > wrote: > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > >> Sent: 26 February 2014 04:46 > >> To: dev@clou

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

+1 for 4.4 feature freeze on 3/28. On 26/02/14 10:01 am, "Sateesh Chodapuneedi" wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] >> Sent: 26 February 2014 04:46 >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze >> >> I think th

Re: CLOUDSTACK-5663

Thank you very much. I will follow up on this with Parth. Saurav On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > Thank you, Dave. > > Saurav, I¹ve assigned the bug to you. > > -Alena. > > On 2/25/14, 10:15 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: > > >> As for th

license analysis

H, I made contact with Armijn Hemel (Tjaldur Software Governance Solutions) who scans software for the purpose of making sure no unwanted licenses are in products. I am going to ask him to look at a Jenkins 4.3 build and talk about the results. He does this for a living so money may be involved

Re: Failed to create a template

Hi Sailaja, Thanks for replay, I am always running Management server under root. Do I need to delete stale systemvm.iso and try it? Regards, Tejas On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Sailaja Mada wrote: > Hi, > > This seems similar to the bug @ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #300

At a desk in 20 :/ mobile bilingual spell checker used Op 26 feb. 2014 10:19 schreef "Hugo Trippaers" : > Daan, > > You have the dubious honor to be the first victim of the findbugs check :-) > > Can you check your commit b0c6d4734724358df97b6fa4d8c5beb0f447745e? > > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > On 26

[jira] punith shared "CLOUDSTACK-6173: Implement a CloudByte storage plugin." with you

punith shared an issue with you > Implement a CloudByte storage plugin. > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-6173 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6173 > Pro

RE: Failed to create a template

Hi, This seems similar to the bug @ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3604 . It is root caused to permissions set on the folder. Can you please check the permissions set on the secondary storage folder . Thanks, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #300

Daan, You have the dubious honor to be the first victim of the findbugs check :-) Can you check your commit b0c6d4734724358df97b6fa4d8c5beb0f447745e? Cheers, Hugo On 26 feb. 2014, at 01:05, jenk...@cloudstack.org wrote: > See

Failed to create a template

Hi, I am trying to create template on vmware with CS 4.0.2, its giving 2014-02-26 14:21:44,578 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (AgentManager-Handler-1:null) Seq 39-1804402824: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 345051457089, via: 39, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, [{"storage.CreatePrivateTemplateAnswer":{"_virtu

Re: Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17888/ --- (Updated Feb. 26, 2014, 9:12 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokhar

Re: Yet another mail on code quality

Thank Rajani! I’ve put the information on using FindBugs here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Using+FindBugs Cheers, Hugo On 26 feb. 2014, at 07:31, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > intellij findbugs plugin can be downloaded @ > http://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/3847 > onc

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #303

See -- [...truncated 17678 lines...] Running com.cloud.gate.testcase.BaseTestCase Configure log4j with default properties Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0 sec

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #2357

See

RE: Review Request 18310: dnsmasq fix for bridged networks

Cool! Thanks :) Kind regards, Joris van Lieshout Schuberg Philis Boeingavenue 271 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk schubergphilis.com +31 207506672 +31651428188 _ -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: dinsdag 25 februari 2014 23:51 To: Joris

Re: devcloud - can't mount 192.168.56.10:/opt/storage/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1

Ah, just noticed the link on Rohit's page to here [1]. Looks like the packer build will need to checkout and build cloudstack, install the templates and then remove the install and m2 dir afterwards. --- [1] http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/html/Installa

[4.3] [Cherry-pick] CLOUDSTACK-6146

Animesh, Can you cherry pick 8cb03ddb2387c7aebf20dc0aa011e41f227e9f68 and c652ff45dffaafa1cb0de29103e90fe936382028 from 4.3-forward to 4.3? Thanks, Likitha

Re: Review Request 17995: Added fix for CLOUDSTACK - 6164

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17995/ --- (Updated Feb. 26, 2014, 8:34 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shi

Re: cidrs in acls

thanks, will find some time to add those. On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Kishan Kavala wrote: > Daan, > I looked at the code in acl-item-cidrs. Persisting cidrs in separate table > looks good. > Pending items: > > 1. All references to NetworkACLItemVO.getSourceCidrList() should call > Networ

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

I don't know if you guys already know this, but the mounting of sec storage on the management server to pass the systemvm.iso is also done when using hyper-v as well. So for hyper-v, samba support is required on the management server. Regards Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: