Fwd: System VM trouble with fresh CloudStack 4.2.1 and XenServer 6.2 SP1

Sorry for cross posting, but I'm really out of ideas I've just done a fresh installation of ACS 4.2.1 with XS 6.2 SP1 hosts. Primary and secondary storage are on NFS. ssvm and cpvm launches, as in they get created and starts, but for some reason they do not seem to use/provision the systemvm.iso

Re: Review Request 18016: CLOUDSTACK-5626: Simplifying VM Migrate code

> On Feb. 12, 2014, 4:39 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_cpu_project_limits.py, line 294 > > > > > > Keep the function find_suitable_host, and use it test modules. Use the > > new ap

RE: [PROPOSAL] List VM API enhancement

I see that there are 2 different opinions 1. Use 'id' for multiple ids as well. This is simple and compact and nothing breaks. 2. Have both 'id' and 'ids'. This can lead to confusion if 'id' is not deprecated (breaking change and would require a version change). Daan, Is it ok to move ahead wit

Re: Review Request 18016: CLOUDSTACK-5626: Simplifying VM Migrate code

> On Feb. 12, 2014, 10:09 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_cpu_limits.py, line 580 > > > > > > Do we need to skip the test or fail it? It's not a failure since the setup is not equipp

Re: Difference between "Guest Network" and "Isolated Network" under Advanced Networking

In my understanding, "Guest Network" Sachin said is called "Shared Network" in the document. [1] The word "Guest Network" refers "Shared Network" and "Isolated Network" in some cases. Why don't we avoid using "Guest Network" to point "Shared Network" in GUI? [1] http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/

Re: Difference between "Guest Network" and "Isolated Network" under Advanced Networking

I can see how that is confusing, because 'guest' traffic type is where isolated networks are created. They are largely synonymous in many areas of cloudstack. On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Yitao Jiang wrote: > Guest network is same as public ip, which vm's traffic go through switch > directly.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round) UPDATE

Hi Animesh, I am able to reproduce the cidr issue. I will commit the fix it in an hour. Thanks, Jayapal On 13-Feb-2014, at 10:58 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > While the official 72 hours or rather 3 weekdays for this VOTE has passed and > we have required +1 (binding) votes following is

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round) UPDATE

While the official 72 hours or rather 3 weekdays for this VOTE has passed and we have required +1 (binding) votes following issues have been called out: 1. CLOUDSTACK-6083 : Missing CIDRs in firewall rules after upgrade => Waiting on Jayapal to confirm and update the list with findings 2. CLOUD

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)

Paul Based on the response from Min and Devdeep IMO the compatibility is not broken. Do you have any more reason to keep a -1. Thanks Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 4:14 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apach

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)

Alex Based on the response from Min and Devdeep IMO the compatibility is not broken. Do you have any more reason to keep a -1. Thanks Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Alex Hitchins [mailto:alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 4:26 AM > To: dev@cloudsta

XEN | CentOS | Cloud 4.2 | Error Message - Agent Disconnected.

Hello, Can someone shed some light on this error message? * Something went wrong; please correct the following: Cannot transit agent status with event AgentDisconnected for host 1, mangement server id is 161344192609,Unable to transition to a new state from Creating via AgentDisconnect

XEN | CentOS | Cloud 4.2 | Error Message - Agent Disconnected.

Hello, Can someone shed some light on this error message? * Something went wrong; please correct the following: Cannot transit agent status with event AgentDisconnected for host 1, mangement server id is 161344192609,Unable to transition to a new state from Creating via AgentDisconnect

Re: [DOCS] Release notes in new format

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:07 AM, sebgoa wrote: > Hi, > > I finished moving what will be the 4.3 release notes to the new format. I > believe I took the latest from what was committed in docbook but it needs > checking. > > http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/about.h

Re: Difference between "Guest Network" and "Isolated Network" under Advanced Networking

Guest network is same as public ip, which vm's traffic go through switch directly.​​ Isolated Network is a virtual network, all traffic go through VRouter. And if you assigned tag on Physical Network, if so you should set same tag on n/w offering. The ​effective​ way is compare your new n/w offerin

Difference between "Guest Network" and "Isolated Network" under Advanced Networking

Hi, Under "Networks" Tab in UI for Admin user, Cloudstack provides 2 options to create networks 1) Add guest network 2) Add Isolated Network. - What is the difference between these 2 networks. Also, I created and Enabled a new "Network Offering". But when I create an Isolated Ne

RE: Hyper-v via the UI drops the password

We don't log the password as it is sensitive. As Devdeep told can you update the agent and try it. From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 9:46 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Rajesh Battala; Devdeep Singh Subject: Hyper-v via the UI drops the pa

RE: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

The "details" mess should be easily fixed by using POST + JSON object, such as: POST addimagestore with json content: { Key1:value1, Key2: value2 } It really takes you a while to understand what hell is " details[0].key=accesskey&details[0].value=s389ddssaa&details[1].key=secretkey&details[1]

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #282

See

RE: Exposing PCIe capabilities to the Cloud Scheduler

Welcome, my dear Intel friends:) Last year, community has contributed code regarding to add PCI passthrough into CloudStack, see the patch: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12098/, but unfortunately, this patch doesn't get checked in, due to lack of support from committer: http://markmail.org/messag

Re: 4.2 max volume size hard-coded

IIRC there was a limitation in Xen…if you search the dev archives you might find mention of it. We have multi-TB disks with KVM/ACS no problemo. On Feb 12, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Marcus mailto:shadow...@gmail.com>> wrote: This doesn't seem to be an issue with 4.3, but I noticed that in 4.2 we hav

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)

Adding Murali as well. Daan I am not sure if there was any specific work done on this during 4.3 to cause it to regress. Did you debug this further? Thanks Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:42 AM

Re: [PROPOSAL][QUESTION] Map parameters in API Commands

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Antonio Fornié Casarrubios wrote: > Hi Rohit, > > I didn't mean changing the format of the HTTP request, but only changing the > intermediate format in which we keep it in the property of the Command > class. I mentioned the format in the request just to explain wh

Exposing PCIe capabilities to the Cloud Scheduler

Hello CloudStack-ers! PCIe (Peripheral Component Interconnect Express) devices exist for graphics processing, storage, digital signal processing, accelerating encryption/decryption, and more. Further, within a function class, devices can exhibit different capability levels. Exposing such platfo

Re: Review Request 18027: CLOUDSTACK-6072 vxlan networks not deallocating vnet ids

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18027/ --- (Updated Feb. 12, 2014, 8:44 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Marcus Sor

Review Request 18027: CLOUDSTACK-6072 vxlan networks not deallocating vnet ids

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18027/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Marcus Sorensen. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6072 ht

Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

concerning api breakage please see my remarks on creating a vpc with private gateway. On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Marcus wrote: > If I'm not mistaken, I think the primary concern wasn't about breaking > compatibility, but simply this: > > "The format seems very cumbersome compared to accessk

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

H Karl, I wouldn't say so. The network is redundant by instantiation and not by design I would say. Maybe you are thinking of an other implementation then you are. I haven't read any recent docs by you so maybe I lack context. I would say that the network(s) are plain (sdn) networks and the redund

Re: devs looking to get involved?

Does it need to go to review board though? I generally only post patches that can actually be applied to reviewboard. This is more or less just a blueprint for someone who is willing to make it work in master. On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Alex Hitchins wrote: > Thanks for the patch Marcus! T

RE: devs looking to get involved?

Thanks for the patch Marcus! This needs to go on the review board though and not on the Jira site. It's good to add a note to Jira with the link to the review board. It's a simple process to sign up, go to https://reviews.apache.org/dashboard/ and take a look. It's good to include the Jira refe

Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

If I'm not mistaken, I think the primary concern wasn't about breaking compatibility, but simply this: "The format seems very cumbersome compared to accesskey= secretkey= - has this been a community decision to move in this direction that I've missed?" I'd say yes, it was a community decision, an

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Karl Harris wrote: > Would implementing a VPC Redundant Router Network Guru using the an > extension of the NetworkGuru interface be an appropriate way to create a > VPC network with redundant routers. It seems that extending Network Guru > interface or extending o

Re: devs looking to get involved?

I dropped a patch into https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6088, and if someone can get to it, great, otherwise I'll try to circle back around to it. On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Marcus wrote: > Yeah, I just don't know where to capture them. If I have a patch for > 4.2, but I know

Re: Hyper-v via the UI drops the password

Hi Paul, Can you check if the hyperv agent is latest? The agent seems to be out of sync on the host. Regards, Devdeep

Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

Paul, AddImageStore is a new API added in 4.2, it has been designed like that to handle different meta information required by different image store provider. This API does not have any backwards compatibility issue. I was never aware of any community consensus to pass extra detail informat

Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

AddImageStore has no such issues of breaking existing scripts at all. There has no change on that API in 4.3. Thanks -min Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 12, 2014, at 9:36 AM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" > wrote: > > Can you call out which scripts in particular? Copying min for S3 comment. May > be i

Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

Can you call out which scripts in particular? Copying min for S3 comment. May be i am missing something but i dont think Devdeep's change breaks compatibility. If we do not specify password in details not sure how else the password special characters can be handled without double encoding of t

Re: Review Request 17702: CLOUDSTACK-2232: Adding automation test cases for Persistent Networks feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17702/#review34292 --- test/integration/component/test_persistent_networks.py

BVT report on master branch

>On XenServer 6.2/Test Run: #2 > >Out of 17 failures, except for the following 3 bugs rest of the failures >are intermittent test script/env issues >Failed to create private gateway - >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6084 >exception while destroying CPVM/SSVM - >https://i

4.2 max volume size hard-coded

This doesn't seem to be an issue with 4.3, but I noticed that in 4.2 we have hard-coded the max custom disk offering size to 1024. I'm going to fix this (assuming we ever release a 4.2.2), but the use of 'final', and the fact that the min size is already set up to be configurable, made me thin

Re: Review Request 18016: CLOUDSTACK-5626: Simplifying VM Migrate code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18016/#review34291 --- test/integration/component/test_cpu_limits.py

Re: [PROPOSAL][QUESTION] Map parameters in API Commands

Hi Rohit, I didn't mean changing the format of the HTTP request, but only changing the intermediate format in which we keep it in the property of the Command class. I mentioned the format in the request just to explain what I meant. My proposal is to leave the request format as it is, but then wh

RE: [DOCS] Release notes in new format

Awesome :-) Let me give some more publicity on FB.. -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 9:38 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi; Radhika Puthiyetath Subject: [DOCS] Release notes in new format Hi, I finished

copying a template from random zone

LS, It seems that when instantiating a vm from a template cloudstack tries to copy the template from a random secondary storage https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6024 the result is that the copy from secondary storage to primary fails and thus instantiation of the vm. This is in 4

Hyper-v via the UI drops the password

Hi, So trying to add storage to hyper-v via the ui as I can't figure out how to do it via cloudmonkey - the password appears to get dropped when the api call is made - details[2] is truncated to just . I assume this is why I can't add primary storage via the UI. 2014-02-12 16:08:27,458 DEBUG

Review Request 18016: CLOUDSTACK-5626: Simplifying VM Migrate code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18016/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CL

[DOCS] Release notes in new format

Hi, I finished moving what will be the 4.3 release notes to the new format. I believe I took the latest from what was committed in docbook but it needs checking. http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/about.html It's available for patching, editing etc. there are a f

Build failed in Jenkins: build-systemvm64-4.2 #171

See -- Started by timer [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on devcloud-continuous-tests in workspace

RE: router deployment is failing in master

Yep, systemvm.iso is latest at local store and sec storage. Cloud-early-config should patch the authorized keys from systemvm.iso. But I see authorized_keys are not updated. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com] Se

Re: [DOCS] update on move to rst

On Feb 12, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > Sebastian, > > fyi > > I believe still the docs are going changes. I found few issues at the docs > link below. > > 1. At link, > http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/user_services.html, > under section, > "Usi

RE: [DOCS] update on move to rst

Sebastian, fyi I believe still the docs are going changes. I found few issues at the docs link below. 1. At link, http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/user_services.html, under section, "Using an LDAP Server for User Authentication", there are few example urls overalig

Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

All, If the API is backwards compatible, any scripts using 4.2 APIs should work without modification on 4.3. If they don't, then we either have a bug or API breakage that requires a bump to 5.0. Put another way, if we had an API test suite, the 4.2 tagged version should completely pass on 4.3 th

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

Would implementing a VPC Redundant Router Network Guru using the an extension of the NetworkGuru interface be an appropriate way to create a VPC network with redundant routers. It seems that extending Network Guru interface or extending one of it's children eg the abstract class GuestNetworkGuru wo

RE: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

In the case of hyper-v - technically no, as it's a new feature to 4.3 it only breaks 'beta' versiosn of 4.3 In the case of addimagestore - I'm not sure how long that's been there, I came across it because I've just recently been testing S3 as secondary storage. My initial query was around whet

RE: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 7:43 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details) > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Devdeep Singh > wrote: > > The user name a

RE: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

I think that what Paul was saying. Scripts that have run no longer do. I don't think they are scripts written only in 4.3 environments either but I could be wrong. Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7788 423 969 alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com -Original

Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Devdeep Singh wrote: > The user name and password were never there in the key value pair for > creating storage pool. This was done for adding smb as a primary storage and > was done in 4.3 (adding smb as a pool type wasn't available in earlier > release). > > I

RE: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

The user name and password were never there in the key value pair for creating storage pool. This was done for adding smb as a primary storage and was done in 4.3 (adding smb as a pool type wasn't available in earlier release). Initially user details were passed in the url query string (for smb)

Re: Missing cidrlist in 4.3 adv zone firewall

On 12.02.2014 13:12, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: Hi Nux, I found this issue in upgraded setup with external firewall srx. I looking into this issue. Thanks, Jayapal No, thank you :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro

Re: Missing cidrlist in 4.3 adv zone firewall

Hi Nux, I found this issue in upgraded setup with external firewall srx. I looking into this issue. Thanks, Jayapal On 10/02/14 7:28 PM, "Nux!" wrote: >On 10.02.2014 13:28, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Cidr showing correctly in our setup. >> Is cidr stored in db table firewall_ru

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)

On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote: On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, KVM, NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG. I'm also making it -1, based on https://

Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:25 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > Hi Devs, > > I’ve noticed that a few newer API commands are requiring a slightly different > format, which is to require a details parameter. > > # cloudmonkey create storagepool scope=cluster clusterid=$CLUSTERID name=Pri1 > podid=$POD1ID

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)

-1 As below - I don't think this can go out given it breaks API on a non-major release. Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7788 423 969 alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 12 Fe

Re: Review Request 17116: Phase1 Marvin Changes.Fix-for-CLOUDSTACK-5674, 5498, 5500( Fixed Few issues in patch 17113 )

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17116/#review34278 --- Commit f3364ca6a465e3ffd645d858eabe05b29442dfe6 in branch refs/heads

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)

-1 See dev list thread 'Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)' There seem to be some API syntax changes/additions which mean passing an array of details i.e details[0].key=<>&details[0].value=<>&details[1].key=<>&details[1].value=<> I don't think this is fully understood (at least by me

RE: router deployment is failing in master

One thing to check - If systemvm folder on secondary storage is having the latest systemvm.iso Regards, Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] > Sent: 12 February 2014 17:26 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: router deployment is f

Re: Review Request 17116: Phase1 Marvin Changes.Fix-for-CLOUDSTACK-5674, 5498, 5500( Fixed Few issues in patch 17113 )

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17116/#review34274 --- Commit 3dbb2ae48819bfae6cfa17637fe23752e3906de7 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 17116: Phase1 Marvin Changes.Fix-for-CLOUDSTACK-5674, 5498, 5500( Fixed Few issues in patch 17113 )

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17116/#review34272 --- Commit c1d34369aa44e06be5909b823d73063f34be0f86 in branch refs/heads

router deployment is failing in master

Hi All, Am facing router deployment failure on master branch. Root cause is ssh to VR is failing with access denied. I checked the authoriezed keys, they are different. But the systemvm.iso and the mgmt server has the right keys. VR is getting patched but authorized keys are not. Am testing on Hyp

RE: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

Yes, it's 4.3 rc4 I'm testing - built yesterday Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 12 February 2014 11:23 To: dev Cc: Sebasti

Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

Paul, I heard rumours (Alex in the room) but can you confirm that 4.3 is the version which you are testing? regards, Daan On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > Hi Devs, > > > > I've noticed that a few newer API commands are requiring a slightly > different format, which is to r

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #281

See Changes: [likitha.shetty] CLOUDSTACK-6056. Enabling static NAT rule for a portable public IP fails with error "Failed to enable static nat". -- [...truncated 1680 lines...] [debug] execute

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)

Tested on latest devcloud, found no issues either. So, +1. Santhosh From: Amogh Vasekar [amogh.vase...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:06 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round) +1 Tested on

Review Request 18000: Added misc changes for 5674

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18000/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5674 h

Re: Review Request 17998: Added few changes related to 5674

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17998/ --- (Updated Feb. 12, 2014, 10:51 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Sh

Review Request 17998: Added few changes related to 5674

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17998/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5674 h

Review Request 17996: Added changes for 6082

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17996/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6082 h

Re: Problems with Cloudstack 4.2.1 installation

Hello Mardan,  I tried 4.2.0, still the same old problem. The settings: JAVA_HOME=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_51 M2=/usr/local/apache-maven/apache-maven-3.1.1/bin M2_HOME=/usr/local/apache-maven/apache-maven-3.1.1 CATALINA_HOME=/usr/share/tomcat6/ PATH=/usr/local/apache-maven/apache-maven-3.1.1/bin:/usr/j

API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

Hi Devs, I've noticed that a few newer API commands are requiring a slightly different format, which is to require a details parameter. # cloudmonkey create storagepool scope=cluster clusterid=$CLUSTERID name=Pri1 podid=$POD1ID zoneid=$ZONEID provider=smb url='"cifs://10.0.1.27/hypervPri/stor/

RE: Problems with Cloudstack 4.2.1 installation

1. Try below mvn command with -X option. mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install 2. Delete the m2 directory under your home for cloudstack contents and retry one more time. Regards, Santhosh From: Giri Prasad [g_p...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, February

Re: Problems with Cloudstack 4.2.1 installation

Hello Mardan,  Thanks for your comment. I try to install 4.2.0 and keep you posted, of the status. Regards, Giriprasad From: Mardan Raghuwanshi To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Giri Prasad Sent: Wednesday, 12 February 2014 12:32 PM Subject: Re: Problems wit

Re: Problems with Cloudstack 4.2.1 installation

Thanks for your comments. The problem is still there after the mvn -P developer ... mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] Reactor Build Order: [INFO] [INFO] Apach