Adding Murali as well. Daan I am not sure if there was any specific work done on this during 4.3 to cause it to regress. Did you debug this further?
Thanks Animesh > -----Original Message----- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:42 AM > To: dev > Cc: Kishan Kavala > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6069 > > I will try in master as well. And look for a solution there. > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > Daan > > > > Can you create a tracking bug for this issue? Adding Kishan for his > > input > > > > Animesh > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 10:25 AM > >> To: dev > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round) > >> > >> H, > >> > >> -1 (binding) > >> > >> I have a backwards compatibility issue with 4.3. It might turn out to > >> be a setup thing but I have verified that 4.2.1 works with my setup. > >> I have four basic test cases|: > >> 1. create network and vm on top - works 2. create bridged network and > >> create vm on it - works 3. create a vpc with private gateway (and > >> ...) - fails 4. create a vpc with nicira based private gateway - > >> works > >> > >> I haven't actually tried 1,2 and 4 on this rc because 3 was always > >> giving me the most problems. The others worked on the previous rc. > >> Having discussed this with Hugo, we'll probably not stop using 4.3 if > >> it passes but it needs fixing asap. > >> > >> setup > >> 1 zone > >> 1 pod > >> 1 cluster > >> 2 hosts (xen 6.0.2) > >> > >> 2 physnets > >> - physnet 1 vlan based (Public, Guest(tagged "vlan-based"), > >> Management, > >> Storage) > >> - physnet 2 nicira based (Guest (tagged "nicira-based")) > >> > >> Now creating a private gateway on the vpc using marvin I get a 530 > >> server error. I dare to put a -1 here as it is a majority vote. One > >> of the things that makes me hesitate is > >> 4.2.1 code (succeeding): > >> 2014-02-10 15:43:45,621 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] > >> (DirectAgent-4:null) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.41 on device > >> tunnel0 > >> 4.3.0 code (failing) > >> 2014-02-10 17:33:51,083 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] > >> (DirectAgent-4:ctx-6d5f0cd4) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.42 > >> on device tunnel0 > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: > >> > On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Hi All, > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for > >> >>> a > >> >>> vote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, > >> >> +KVM, > >> >> NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG. > >> > > >> > > >> > There might be a problem with the HA engine, please see > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065 > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >> > > >> > Nux! > >> > www.nux.ro > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Daan > > > > -- > Daan
