If I'm not mistaken, I think the primary concern wasn't about breaking
compatibility, but simply this:

"The format seems very cumbersome compared to accesskey=<value>
secretkey=<value> - has this been a community decision to move in this
direction that I've missed?"

I'd say yes, it was a community decision, and out of necessity,
because various storage types are going to require various data. We
can't (easily) hack on a table column/api param every time a new
storage type needs a custom piece of data, so the 'details' abstracts
that. This allows even third party vendors who simply ship a plugin,
with no community involvment, to have custom parameters that don't
need to be api params.

That said, we could probably add optional API params for a common
subset of community maintained storage types, as a convenience, but
whether to use the details parameter or create new ones is up to the
API designer(s).

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
> AddImageStore has no such issues of breaking existing scripts at all. There 
> has no change on that API in 4.3.
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Feb 12, 2014, at 9:36 AM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" 
>> <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can you call out which scripts in particular? Copying min for S3 comment. 
>> May be i am missing something but i dont think Devdeep's change breaks  
>> compatibility. If we do not specify password in details  not sure how else 
>> the password special characters can be handled without double encoding of 
>> the URL ( first just the password and then the URL). But double encoding 
>> means server implementation is leaking into API. The API caller would have 
>> to encode the password first if it is in URL and then encode the URL.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Animesh
>>
>>> On Feb 12, 2014, at 6:19 AM, "Alex Hitchins" <alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think that what Paul was saying. Scripts that have run no longer do.
>>>
>>> I don't think they are scripts written only in 4.3 environments either but 
>>> I could be wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Alex Hitchins
>>>
>>> D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
>>>
>>> alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
>>> Sent: 12 February 2014 14:13
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Devdeep Singh <devdeep.si...@citrix.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> The user name and password were never there in the key value pair for 
>>>> creating storage pool. This was done for adding smb as a primary storage 
>>>> and was done in 4.3 (adding smb as a pool type wasn't available in earlier 
>>>> release).
>>>>
>>>> Initially user details were passed in the url query string (for smb). 
>>>> However, it would mean adding a password with special characters could 
>>>> fail if the password wasn't encoded and then the entire url encoded again. 
>>>> So I updated it to pass smb user information in details. This is required 
>>>> only if a storage pool being added is of type smb.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Devdeep
>>>
>>> Except it breaks backward compat, right?
>>> Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
>>> Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
>>> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the 
>>> best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.
>>>
>>> Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
>>>
>>> **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 
>>> training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>> 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. 
>>> Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>> 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
>>> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>> 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
>>> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>> 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
>>> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>> 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
>>> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>>
>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
>>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
>>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
>>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
>>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
>>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender 
>>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
>>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a 
>>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
>>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil 
>>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a 
>>> registered trademark.

Reply via email to