S3 Object Storage - secret key handling

Hi guys, I created a bug regarding the handling of the S3 secret key information. My opinion is that it should be treated more carefully like a password and not displayed in the UI at least. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3342 Tom. -- Cloudian KK - http://www.cloudian.com/

disk resize support on VMWare

I am not able to find whether this review request has been submitted to master https://reviews.apache.org/r/9241/ . I could not find the code changes in the latest master. Did I miss anything here? Thanks, ~Talluri

Re: Coding Convention Reminder

On 07/03/2013 12:11 AM, Alex Huang wrote: I like to remind everyone to review our coding conventions. Our coding conventions have been going all over the place recently. Please take a look. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Coding+conventions I also like to propose that

Re: Query String Request Authentication(QSRA) support by S3 providers

Excellent. The link is there now. Thank you Min. I verified that bug and closed it. However - now that I can finally click the download link... I ran into the issue that the link doesn't work on AWS or Cloudian. Please see this bug for details (latest 4.2 updates included in my test). https:/

[ACS42] Unresolved Features and Improvement Tickets needs update

Now that we have passed the feature freeze date I would really like us to update these open 'new features / improvement' tickets updated. If your contribution did not make it to 4.2 branch please move out these tickets and corresponding design documents out of 4.2 to future. Issue Type

Re: Review Request 12191: removed EnumerationImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12191/#review22701 --- Ship it! f15a6e4 - Prasanna Santhanam On July 3, 2013, 4:33 a.m.

RE: ACS plugins

Yes , Mike's right . That command would help you copy your UI changes to the server and then you just need to refresh your browser for your changes to reflect on the CloudStack UI . The active destination where the code gets copied is - cloudstack/ client/target/cloud-client-Snapshot-4.2.0 /sc

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

> On July 2, 2013, 10:15 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > Over VNC/RDP I've seen the login page take somewhere around 2minutes to > > load. This would definitely be useful. > > Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Here's the screen grab over RDP demonstrating the issue > http://www.youtube.co

Re: Review Request 12191: removed EnumerationImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12191/ --- (Updated July 3, 2013, 4:33 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes

Re: [ECLIPSE] Atlassian plugin...

Anything like that for intellij or I should be reverting back to eclipse to use this cool plugin :-( On 03/07/13 9:28 AM, "Alex Huang" wrote: >Hi All, > >Hugo showed me this really cool eclipse plugin from Atlassian which makes >Jira. It allows you to list all of the bugs assigned to you and th

[ECLIPSE] Atlassian plugin...

Hi All, Hugo showed me this really cool eclipse plugin from Atlassian which makes Jira. It allows you to list all of the bugs assigned to you and then changes the workspace and the files opened based on which bug you're working on. You can also make changes to the bug itself. Very cool! Tha

Re: Async Job / Event Bus issue

What do we break if we fix it now? Since instance id, instance type are also part of the 'AsyncJobResponse' its appropriate to pass full details. Clearly from the Ryan use case, details of job are needed by external systems and since this is the only book-keeping of a job, we need to retain the hi

RE: Coding Convention Reminder

I checked it into tools/eclipse/eclipse.epf. On Saving a file, it performs the following actions: - reorganizes imports to the following order: java, javax, org. com, org.apache.cloudstack. com.cloud. This places all of the CloudStack imports at the bottom of the import list. - Removes all

RE: Coding Convention Reminder

+1. Please check-in the preferences file. > -Original Message- > From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati [mailto:vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 5:58 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: Coding Convention Reminder > > +1 to checking in the epf file to

DNS Network Domain

I found that the DNS Network Domain set for Basic Networking is not getting passed down to Network Plugins. I am trying to figure out how DNS Network Domain is suppose to work for my plugin integration. I was getting a NULL value for Basic Networking for the DNS Domain even though I had set a v

[DISCUSS] System vm template and upgrade from 4.1 to 4.2

Updated the [DISCUSS] tag on this to get more visibility. +1 on this. We need to make sure that we keep these upgrades for every version. This helps to maintain our security hardening on the system VMs and thus the systems running behind them. Thanks Matt On 7/2/13 1:00 PM, "Abhinandan Pratee

Re: CloudStack Collab 2013 - videos

Will the speakers' slides be uploaded, too? --- Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Reasearcher Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories / Cloud Computing Laboratory ryan...@cht.com.tw

RE: Coding Convention Reminder

+1 to checking in the epf file to source, will be good to have it as a reference for those using other IDEs as well. Regards, Vijay -Original Message- From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 5:21 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Coding Conve

Re: Review Request 12180: Fix NPE when adding invalid primary datastore

> On June 29, 2013, 7:33 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > engine/storage/volume/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/manager/PrimaryDataStoreProviderManagerImpl.java, > > line 59 > > > > > > This block should

Re: Review Request 12180: Fix NPE when adding invalid primary datastore

> On June 29, 2013, 7:24 a.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: > > engine/storage/volume/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/manager/PrimaryDataStoreProviderManagerImpl.java, > > line 61 > > > > > > LGTM. > > C

Re: Review Request 12180: Fix NPE when adding invalid primary datastore

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12180/ --- (Updated July 3, 2013, 12:25 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers

Re: Coding Convention Reminder

+1. It is better to check in your eclipse.eps into git repo, so anybody who checked out the CloudStack can access the preference file. -min On 7/2/13 5:17 PM, "Prachi Damle" wrote: >+ 1 >Please upload the code template for reference. > >-Original Message- >From: Edison Su [mailto:edison

RE: Coding Convention Reminder

+ 1 Please upload the code template for reference. -Original Message- From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 5:08 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Coding Convention Reminder We'd better export the code template from Eclipse, then everybody

RE: Coding Convention Reminder

We'd better export the code template from Eclipse, then everybody can import the template into their IDE, then possible, everybody will have the same configuration. > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 3:11 PM > To: dev@clo

RE: changing bug severity

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:27 PM > To: CloudStack Dev > Subject: changing bug severity > > I've noticed bugs change severity from Major->Critical->Blocker and > vice-versa without reason. Can the bug reporte

Re: Review Request 11984: Fix primary datastore NPE/incorrect db entry/exception propagation for KVM on cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11984/ --- (Updated July 2, 2013, 11:09 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers

Re: Async Job / Event Bus issue

He has a point though, why go to the trouble of removing the data to tell that a job is no longer active, when there's a field that tells us if the job is active? Was there some other reason? On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Kelven Yang wrote: > Fields in job record are tend to be used to reflect

Re: Query String Request Authentication(QSRA) support by S3 providers

Hi Tom, I investigated this issue through the db dump you provided in the bug, this is an issue with our db view template_view creation script, and it has been fixed in resolving another bug (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3314). I have verified the fix using your db dump

Re: Async Job / Event Bus issue

Fields in job record are tend to be used to reflect job status in job's life cycle instead of history. Kelven On 7/2/13 1:35 PM, "Ryan Dietrich" wrote: >Ok. I see the "reset attached object" calls now. > >I'm curious why those columns are being wiped out. If you wanted to see >outstanding cal

Coding Convention Reminder

I like to remind everyone to review our coding conventions. Our coding conventions have been going all over the place recently. Please take a look. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Coding+conventions I also like to propose that we extend the 120 column limit to 180 column

Re: ACS plugins

I wonder if this would work for you to reload (I've only used it when making changes to existing JavaScript files, though)? mvn -P developer -pl :cloud-client-ui -DskipTests=true On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:59 PM, CK wrote: > Thanks Brian, the UI plugins work on the master branch. > > However, af

Re: Review Request 11984: Fix primary datastore NPE/incorrect db entry/exception propagation for KVM on cloudstack

> On June 20, 2013, 10:37 p.m., edison su wrote: > > engine/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/subsystem/api/storage/DataStoreLifeCycle.java, > > line 44 > > > > > > If stoagemanager wants to delete datastore, then j

Re: ACS plugins

Thanks Brian, the UI plugins work on the master branch. However, after registering a plugin the Wiki says "Reload the UI – rerun the build UI portion of the mvn build, if not in the active Tomcat/jetty folder, and then refresh the browser. You should see your new plugin in the side navigation bar!

RE: Hyper-V plugin - IP Dependencies

Donal, I could not find a response to this. The dependencies that are Apache or MIT licensed are fine. I think the .NET run time dep is fine as well. I expect it will be pre-installed, just like ESXi is today. We just have to document that in the install guide. I know there was some discus

Re: Query String Request Authentication(QSRA) support by S3 providers

Tom, this seems like an issue with entry stored in our DB. I will take a look at this bug and update you. Just to clarify, this symptom only happens when you register these templates to Amazon S3, not for Cloudian or RiakCS S3, right? Thanks -min On 7/1/13 7:27 PM, "Thomas O'Dowd" wrote: >Yes t

Re: Async Job / Event Bus issue

Ok. I see the "reset attached object" calls now. I'm curious why those columns are being wiped out. If you wanted to see outstanding calls for an ID or Type, wouldn't you just query where the jobStatus is still equal to zero? Wiping out those columns seems to destroy history, no? On Jul 2, 2

RE: Async Job / Event Bus issue

Ryan, There's explicit code to remove those two columns. IIRC, the reason is because asyncjob actually uses those two fields to sequence jobs on the same id and type. So when the job is done, then it removes those two fields so it doesn't block the next job. --Alex > -Original Message--

Re: Async Job / Event Bus issue

Ryan, Those fields were added to indicate the instances (volumes, vms, etc) having pending/active async jobs. The customers' main use case was - by instance id, find out the jobs that are currently being executed for this instance. Once the job is completed, the field is offset to NULL. -Alena.

Re: Review Request 12191: removed EnumerationImpl

> On July 1, 2013, 3:07 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Ship It! > > Hugo Trippaers wrote: > master: 16b7509a234158b536155be9278cfee33b93a5c7 > 4.2: 00e99a08169b60b0449d67dfc891053cf4469bf7 > > Hugo Trippaers wrote: > This was the wrong patch, this is the removed CleanupDelegate pat

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

> On July 2, 2013, 10:15 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > Over VNC/RDP I've seen the login page take somewhere around 2minutes to > > load. This would definitely be useful. > > Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Here's the screen grab over RDP demonstrating the issue > http://www.youtube.co

Async Job / Event Bus issue

I've found a bug that I am having trouble determining the cause. Basically, my instance_type and instance_id columns are showing up when the job is submitted, but they do not show up when the job is completed or updated. When I look in the database, those columns are null, however, they are pub

Re: qemu-kvm not required by cloudstack-agent rpm package?

Hi, On 07/02/2013 06:00 PM, David Nalley wrote: So I just installed a new 4.1.0 instance and found that qemu-kvm isn't installed when the agent is. Is this by design or did we accidentally omit this? Unless someone tells me otherwise, I will plan on fixing this prior to 4.1.1 Checked the Deb

Re: Review Request 12158: CLOUDSTACK-3089-[ZWPS]-NPE-while-cancelling-the-Storage-Maintenance

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12158/#review22679 --- Commit d660bc7e8da57d94049d55e53ffe18df8016e4e5 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 11992: CLOUDSTACK-2571 ZWPS issues with Enabling/Clearing the Maintenance State of the Storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11992/#review22680 --- Commit 2bc4cbf9fb20ff770ea672815886e2c6d9cb8276 in branch refs/heads

RE: CloudStack Collab 2013 - videos

Mark mentioned up to 3 weeks.. > -Original Message- > From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf > Of Rohit Yadav > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:08 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: CloudStack Collab 2013 - videos > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5

Re: Review Request 12158: CLOUDSTACK-3089-[ZWPS]-NPE-while-cancelling-the-Storage-Maintenance

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12158/#review22675 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On June 28, 2013, 9:23 a.m., Rajes

Re: Review Request 12158: CLOUDSTACK-3089-[ZWPS]-NPE-while-cancelling-the-Storage-Maintenance

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12158/#review22673 --- Commit deaf10cad22a8fcf42663276df66365dea1ee3c7 in branch refs/heads

RE: ACS plugins

Hello, >> I have DevCloud2 running with ACS 4.1 pulled in via git. You'll want to make sure you are on either the master or 4.2 branch for UI plugins to work, since they didn't exist on 4.1 or earlier. -Brian -Original Message- From: CK [mailto:cloudw...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July

Re: ACS plugins

Hi Pranav, To keep things simple, I have exactly followed the wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/UI+Plugin+Tutorial but it did not work :-( I have DevCloud2 running with ACS 4.1 pulled in via git. The /ui/plugins folder did not exist so I created it and followed the wiki

Re: ACS development

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:45 PM, CK wrote: > Thanks Rohit. > > I found vmops.log under src, I assume that is the management server log? > +1 > > In DevCloud2, is the command to run the management server: mvn -pl > :cloud-client-ui jetty:run > but this does not run in the background, can I add &

RE: help needed

CloudStack 101? https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-101.html > -Original Message- > From: gaurav jain [mailto:tashan1...@yahoo.com] > Sent: 02 July 2013 5:29 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: help needed > > Hello Everyone, > I am completely new to cloudstack, to

RE: ACS plugins

Please see my comments inline and shoot any queries you may have with UI plugins - Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- From: CK [mailto:cloudw...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:36 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: ACS plugins Hi, Are UI plugins implemented/deployed d

RE: Secondary Storage/TinyLinux

I debugged this to another symptom of secondary storage VM network connectivity problem. (The Ready state of the template was "No"). Thanks, -Soheil From: Devdeep Singh [devdeep.si...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 4:59 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache

Re: Reg: System vm template and upgrade from 4.1 to 4.2

Additionally ipv6 support is also there in newer templates apart from several performance related enhancements. On 02/07/13 10:18 PM, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote: >I think making it mandatory is good due to following: > >1. The guestOS version is upgraded over time the support for old OSes may >b

Re: Reg: System vm template and upgrade from 4.1 to 4.2

I think making it mandatory is good due to following: 1. The guestOS version is upgraded over time the support for old OSes may be withdrawn, a this point I do not have exact dates on those though. 2. We are bundling Hypervisor tools onto the system Vms and with dynamic scaling they will work seam

help needed

Hello Everyone, I am completely new to cloudstack, to be more precise I am completely new to how these cloud services work. How should I begin with this? Moreover I have to give a project proposal on a project on cloudstack, for which I need to start with it. Thank You Gaurav

Re: Review Request 12232: CLOUDSTACK-3324: Fix/Improve upgrade system vm templates 41 to 42

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12232/ --- (Updated July 2, 2013, 4:24 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pra

Review Request 12233: CLOUDSTACK-3324: Fix/Improve upgrade system vm templates 41 to 42 (Stable master Patch)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12233/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOU

Review Request 12232: CLOUDSTACK-3324: Fix/Improve upgrade system vm templates 41 to 42

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12232/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOU

Re: ACS development

Thanks Rohit. I found vmops.log under src, I assume that is the management server log? In DevCloud2, is the command to run the management server: mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run but this does not run in the background, can I add & to make it so, or is there another command I should be using to

ACS plugins

Hi, Are UI plugins implemented/deployed differently to other types such as API, Storage or Networking plugins (reside under /cloudstack/plugins) I am looking at writing a UI plugin, browsing the wiki I have come across this page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/UI+Plugin+Tu

qemu-kvm not required by cloudstack-agent rpm package?

So I just installed a new 4.1.0 instance and found that qemu-kvm isn't installed when the agent is. Is this by design or did we accidentally omit this? Unless someone tells me otherwise, I will plan on fixing this prior to 4.1.1 However, in 4.2, we have the situation with LXC now entering the fold

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

Prasanna, this category is already added in log4j-cloud.xml.in. Thanks for taking care of this. -min Sent from my iPhone On Jul 2, 2013, at 2:43 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:50:58PM +, Min Chen wrote: >> Hi Prasanna, >> >>Can you add the following logg

RE: Review Request 12227: NPE wile deployVM in kvm due to capacityIops

Hi Sateesh, For this patch https://reviews.apache.org/r/12158/ it is dependent on https://reviews.apache.org/r/11992/ . It is already committed by Edison in 4.2 only. Thanks Rajesh Battala > -Original Message- > From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, Ju

RE: Review Request 12227: NPE wile deployVM in kvm due to capacityIops

The issue is that, this patch is dependent on the review https://reviews.apache.org/r/12158/ . I had kept that dependency while creating the review request. First this patch should be committed https://reviews.apache.org/r/12158/ and then the current patch. Thanks Rajesh Battala From: Sateesh C

Re: [DISCUSS] [GSoC] Caching of password on Cloudstack side

On Jul 2, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Ian Duffy wrote: >> A user should probably be tied to a specific authenticator (IMO only), >> so that there isn't a backdoor option for getting them into the >> system. > > This is an issue I have come across too. With the way the > authenticators are implemented it

Re: Review Request 12227: NPE wile deployVM in kvm due to capacityIops

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12227/#review22666 --- Rajesh, Can you re-upload patch again. Diff is showing following err

Re: Review Request 12227: NPE wile deployVM in kvm due to capacityIops

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12227/#review22665 --- Rajesh, Can you re-upload patch again. Diff is showing following err

RE: In-Development Release Naming

I definitely understand the easy aspect to carry over defects to version number for committers and contributors. But we should triage them and move them to future or next release and get ready for GA. That is one of GA readiness tasks. Below is simple workflow to explain the reason what I am r

Re: Review Request 12224: Cloudstack-3313 Ipv6 - Not able to deploy a new VM in IPV6 network

> On July 2, 2013, 3:09 p.m., Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > Ship It! The patch needs to be rebased. - Abhinandan --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12224/#review22663 ---

Re: Review Request 12224: Cloudstack-3313 Ipv6 - Not able to deploy a new VM in IPV6 network

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12224/#review22663 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On July 2, 2013, 7:06 a.m

Re: event bus details

Patch submitted. https://reviews.apache.org/r/12223/ Things that still need to be thought through: 1. Should the async command event type be a column on async job (and be an attribute of AsyncJobVO)? 2. Should getInstanceId and getInstanceType of AsyncCmd be abstract instead of implemented wit

Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #575

Test Run: #575 Total:94 Fail :9 Skip :2 name passfailskip test_vm_life_cycle/ 9 1 0 test_global_settings/ 1 0 0 test_affinity_groups/

Re: ACS development

Hey CK, On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:21 PM, CK wrote: > Hi > > I am new to ACS development and intend on using DevCloud2 as my self > contained dev+test environment. I have the management server running in > VirtualBox and have browsed the ACS website/wiki and not found answers to > the following qu

Re: London CloudStack Meetup on July 4th

Cannot attend this, as i stay in india. On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > Definitely going to catch the digest version of CloudStack Collab. > > Note that the new location since last quarter's meeting. > > DL > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mail

Re: In-Development Release Naming

Sudha, I think it would make tickets easier to comprehend for the casual project contributor/follower. Additionally, the reality is that all tickets don't get closed during the development cycle. As I think through it, changing the JIRA release name when cut the branch to "x.y.z (codename)" w

ACS development

Hi I am new to ACS development and intend on using DevCloud2 as my self contained dev+test environment. I have the management server running in VirtualBox and have browsed the ACS website/wiki and not found answers to the following questions and hope you can help: 1) Where can I find the manageme

RE: In-Development Release Naming

Yes - it can be changed in JIRA unless some workflow is set up not to do that in ACS. However I think we can leave the defects logged before release with codename. I do not see a reason that they should be moved to version number post GA. -Original Message- From: John Burwell [mailto:j

Re: [DISCUSS] [GSoC] Caching of password on Cloudstack side

> A user should probably be tied to a specific authenticator (IMO only), > so that there isn't a backdoor option for getting them into the > system. This is an issue I have come across too. With the way the authenticators are implemented it would be very easy for a user to keep their account despi

Re: DevCloud2 problem

Added the following and it sprung to life: export MAVEN_OPTS="-Xms512m -Xmx1024m -XX:PermSize=256m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m" Thanks On 2 July 2013 10:20, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > On 7/2/13 11:10 AM, CK wrote: > >> To start off with I did allocate 2048 MB RAM and hit the problem, I then >> incre

Re: [GSoC] Unit testing with Spock

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 01:28:24PM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if there would be any objections to using Spock for > writing unit tests for a plugin instead of junit and mockito. > > Spock is JUnit under the hood but an excellent DSL. It supports > behavior driven developmen

Re: In-Development Release Naming

Sudha, In JIRA, is it possible to change an exist release name? If so, we use the code name until the release is cut, and change the JIRA release name to x.y.z (codename) which would make tracking consistent throughout the cycle. Otherwise, as part of the branch creation process, we could cre

RE: In-Development Release Naming

+1 to use code name during dev cycles and name the version for GA release for reasons outlined by John B. When querying metrics also would help to identify which defects are logged pre release and which came in post release i.e GA. -Original Message- From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@

Re: [GSoC] Unit testing with Spock

The framework promises good things. Just a little warning; there are a lot of frameworks for testing. Let's not have a jungle of them in. If it does something very good that is not done by the present ones go ahead. But what about testng and fixture and xmlunit and htmlunit and All do things v

Re: [DISCUSS] [GSoC] Caching of password on Cloudstack side

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:58:06PM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote: > tldr: should ldap passwords be cached within cloudstack? > > Hi Guys, > > I wanted to get your opinion on something. I seen a JIRA ticket for > adding support for multiple LDAP because if the single LDAP server > fails you lose access t

Re: In-Development Release Naming

Sebastien, Actually, you are completely correct. When we cut a release branch, we know the scope of change and can apply of the semantic versioning rules to service the correct version number (i.e. whether to increment x, y, or z). However, we have a 4 month period of development on feature r

Re: CloudStack Collab 2013 - videos

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > When (approximately) will the videos be uploaded of the collab > conference? Looking forward to some talks. > +1 Me too > > -- > Prasanna., > > > Powered by BigRock.com > >

RE: London CloudStack Meetup on July 4th

Definitely going to catch the digest version of CloudStack Collab. Note that the new location since last quarter's meeting. DL > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: 01 July 2013 8:28 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Lo

Re: [GSoC] Unit testing with Spock

On 7/2/13 2:28 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: Hi, I was wondering if there would be any objections to using Spock for writing unit tests for a plugin instead of junit and mockito. Spock is JUnit under the hood but an excellent DSL. It supports behavior driven development style of testing with criteria br

[GSoC] Unit testing with Spock

Hi, I was wondering if there would be any objections to using Spock for writing unit tests for a plugin instead of junit and mockito. Spock is JUnit under the hood but an excellent DSL. It supports behavior driven development style of testing with criteria broken down into given, when, then. I h

[DISCUSS] [GSoC] Caching of password on Cloudstack side

tldr: should ldap passwords be cached within cloudstack? Hi Guys, I wanted to get your opinion on something. I seen a JIRA ticket for adding support for multiple LDAP because if the single LDAP server fails you lose access to your Cloudstack console. I plan to add support for multiple ldap server

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:04:49PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:33:39PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote: > > Hello Prasanna, > > > > While adding rest of the affinity rules tests I had removed affinity rules > > test from smoke. But while > > going through various i

CloudStack Collab 2013 - videos

When (approximately) will the videos be uploaded of the collab conference? Looking forward to some talks. -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com

Re: Review Request 12230: Cloudstack-3168: test_network.py. Fixed two test cases.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12230/#review22659 --- Ship it! b8d876fff806e33e859016c252bd208c1ea28c2d - Prasanna Santh

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 06:07:24PM +, Prachi Damle wrote: > Hi Prasanna, > > For the following two test failures: > > - > integration.smoke.test_affinity_groups.TestDeployVmWithAffinityGroup.test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup > >It looks to be some issue with

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:33:39PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote: > Hello Prasanna, > > While adding rest of the affinity rules tests I had removed affinity rules > test from smoke. But while > going through various iterations on the review board this hunk to remove test > from smoke was dropped

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

> On July 2, 2013, 10:15 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > Over VNC/RDP I've seen the login page take somewhere around 2minutes to > > load. This would definitely be useful. Here's the screen grab over RDP demonstrating the issue http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVCMSlBPX0E Because we use tomc

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/#review22657 --- Over VNC/RDP I've seen the login page take somewhere around 2minutes

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

Hello Prasanna, While adding rest of the affinity rules tests I had removed affinity rules test from smoke. But while going through various iterations on the review board this hunk to remove test from smoke was dropped. The same test is now included in component. I think we should remove test_a

Re: Review Request 12229: Fixing script issue

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12229/#review22656 --- Ship it! 479f89c - Prasanna Santhanam On July 2, 2013, 9:38 a.m.

  1   2   >