The framework promises good things. Just a little warning; there are a lot of frameworks for testing. Let's not have a jungle of them in. If it does something very good that is not done by the present ones go ahead. But what about testng and fixture and xmlunit and htmlunit and .... All do things very good. None do it all.
So if we replace all junit/mockito tests in one go, or if we have a clear view of what to do with spock and what not, +1. otherwise -2 On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/2/13 2:28 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering if there would be any objections to using Spock for >> writing unit tests for a plugin instead of junit and mockito. >> >> Spock is JUnit under the hood but an excellent DSL. It supports >> behavior driven development style of testing with criteria broken down >> into given, when, then. I have been really impressed by the articles >> I read about it and seems to offer a quicker and richer mechanism for >> writing tests. >> >> For more reading - >> https://code.google.com/p/**spock/<https://code.google.com/p/spock/>and >> https://code.google.com/p/**spock/wiki/SpockBasics<https://code.google.com/p/spock/wiki/SpockBasics> >> >> Looking forward to feedback, >> Ian >> >> > None from me, the main issue to look is the license. Seems that spoke is > Apache license 2.0 so we should be good. > > Let's wait for others to chime in, > > -sebastien >
