Re: Review Request: just an organize import

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11152/#review21233 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Prasanna Santhanam On May 15, 2013, 9:05 a.m

Re: Review Request: test and cleanup for getBase64Keystore

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11563/#review21234 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Prasanna Santhanam On May 31, 2013, 1:13 a.m

Re: Review Request: add zone wide primary storage tests

> On May 31, 2013, 4:43 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > test/integration/smoke/test_zwps.py, line 127 > > > > > > This test is not required. If I deploy a zone with zone-wide storage > > then the regular deployVM

Re: CloudMonkey handling of Job Status Error Code

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 01:49:02AM +, Soheil Eizadi wrote: > I don't know if the following is a known issue, while testing some > negative test case, I added a device that was not part of network > provider associated with the physical network from CloudMonkey, from > the log I could see that t

Re: maintenance mode for secondary storage?

The current way of altering secondary storage is error prone. So +1 to your maintenance proposal. We don't store any checksums for the images we backup to secondary storage in our db today. So I'm interested to know how, when we bring up the new secondary storage we ensure consistency with previo

Re: 4.2 snapshot: setting up ISOs - no go

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:34:00PM +, La Motta, David wrote: > Nothing in cloud.out--I have some old messages which don't make me > feel that great about things, but a tail -f on the file keeps it > static when I attempt to add the ISO. The old messages are: > > 18:47:27,229 WARN NioConnecti

Re: [GSOC] Community Bonding Period

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 04:38:18AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi Dharmesh, Meng, Ian, Nguyen and Shiva, Welcome all! Exciting proposals and hope to see them in CloudStack at the end of summer. > > Congratulations again on being selected for the 2013 Google Summer of Code. > > The progra

Re: Review Request: add zone wide primary storage tests

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11462/#review21227 --- Rest of the patch looks fine save for the test_zwps module test/in

[MERGED] UI for Explicit-Dedication of Resources(zone/pod/cluster/host)

UI support for explicit dedication of resources has now been merged into master . People willing to test and document this feature could pick it up now . Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 1:23 AM To: dev@

Re: Review Request: Added a test related to db changes for storage xenmotion

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11526/#review21226 --- test/integration/component/test_storage_motion.py

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storage plug-in for 4.2

Mike don't feel bad it's my fault I think everyone knew you were working on the plugin actively and I assumed the proposal was already in place. Can you call out your dependencies on Edison's framework? John I added as you as reviewers for Mike's contribution, can you pass on your comments.

[PROPOSAL] Storage plug-in for 4.2

Hi everyone, I apologize for being unfamiliar with how I should have gone about getting consensus for the storage plug-in I developed for 4.2. I talked with Animesh and he has asked me to send out this proposal related to the storage plug-in I built for 4.2 and submitted to Review Board earlier t

RE: Review Request: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-2662 Preferred implicit dedication fails with insufficient capacity even if shared hosts are available.

Prachi, I had removed the unsed inject which is causing the issue. I had uploaded the patch. Please review it. Thanks Rajesh Battala > -Original Message- > From: Prachi Damle [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of > Prachi Damle > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:55 PM > To: P

Re: Review Request: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-2662 Preferred implicit dedication fails with insufficient capacity even if shared hosts are available.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11510/ --- (Updated May 31, 2013, 2:51 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

On May 30, 2013, at 1:57 PM, "John Burwell" wrote: > All, > > I apologize for a lack of clarity in the original proposal, but I intended > for 4 week extension on the feature freeze to be added onto the release and > not encroach on the test window. > > Thanks, > -John > [Animesh] So what

Re: 4.0.2 nonoss , can't connect to vsphere

Hi, Andrew I guess the install-non-oss.sh has something incorrect. I shared RPM packages (actually yum repo) here: http://pan.baidu.com/share/link?shareid=431835&uk=1261729203#dir/path=%2Fcs-book%2Fdist-nonoss%2FRPMS You can try this, if it's ok for your installation, I'll share the build steps.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

Mike please start your proposal in a separate email thread. Thanks Animesh On May 30, 2013, at 6:26 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > Here is my design document: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Implement+SolidFire+(storage)+plug-in+and+expose+control+of+IOPS+to+admins+

CloudMonkey handling of Job Status Error Code

I don't know if the following is a known issue, while testing some negative test case, I added a device that was not part of network provider associated with the physical network from CloudMonkey, from the log I could see that they system returned an error as expected, but looks like CloudMonkey

Re: Review Request: Store NetworkServiceProvider connectivity service configuration in database.

Oh.. thanks for pinging. I'll look into. (2013/05/31 9:42), Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8294/ On January 29th, 2013, 9:43 a.m., *Hugo Trippaers* wrote: The change looks good. Could you update t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

Here is my design document: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Implement+SolidFire+(storage)+plug-in+and+expose+control+of+IOPS+to+admins+and+end+users I apologize for not understanding the process when it comes to adding plug-ins to CloudStack. Thanks for taking a look! :)

Re: Review Request: test and cleanup for getBase64Keystore

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11563/ --- (Updated May 31, 2013, 1:13 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Description

Review Request: test and cleanup for getBase64Keystore

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11563/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- ConfigurationServerImpl.get

Re: Review Request: Bugfix CLOUDSTACK-1594: Secondary storage host always remains Alert status

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9818/ --- (Updated May 31, 2013, 1:01 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prat

Re: Review Request: Typos fixed

> On April 11, 2013, 1:26 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > Hi - the content looks good, but the actual patch looks wonky. Doesn't > > apply. Can you reformat and make sure that it applies against master? > > (Actually try applying it to master as a patch, if you haven't.) Thanks! > > Pascal Bor

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2756: Stratosphere SSP plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11540/ --- (Updated May 31, 2013, 12:44 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Hugo Trippaer

Re: Review Request: Store NetworkServiceProvider connectivity service configuration in database.

> On Jan. 29, 2013, 9:43 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > The change looks good. Could you update the patch to the latest state of > > master? > > Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Hiroaki can you update the patch to latetst master. Any updates Hiroaki? - Animesh -

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1194: fix that isolation method does not show in Firefox

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11327/ --- (Updated May 31, 2013, 12:41 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Sax

RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2178 : "Add guest network" button is not responding

Pranav Can you review the updated patch and submit if it is good to go Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Isaac Chiang [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of > Isaac Chiang > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 12:37 AM > To: Pranav Saxena > Cc: cloudstack; Isaac Chiang > Subject: Re:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

I have created the following JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2778 On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Thanks, Animesh...I will take a look at the Design Documents link you > provided. > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 a

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:42:29PM +, Edison Su wrote: > And that's one of reason I don't care that much about the issue with nfs > cache storage, couldn't we put our energy on cloud style storage solution, > instead of on the un-scalable storage? I'll try to think through your whole email a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

Thanks, Animesh...I will take a look at the Design Documents link you provided. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > Accidently sent too soon, updated my response in-line to Mike > > > -Original Message- > > From: Animesh Chaturved

Re: Review Request: SolidFire storage plug-in and enhancements to the storage framework and GUI

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11479/ --- (Updated May 31, 2013, 12:08 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su and

RE: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

Accidently sent too soon, updated my response in-line to Mike > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 4:50 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze > > > > > -

Re: 4.0.2 nonoss , can't connect to vsphere

Hmm, I have tried those instructions now (not sure how I missed them). The instructions still have incubator references, which I have removed I don't think I need ant steps if not doing dev ? i just want to build, get running, so these steps are just to get the rpms done to install on a new mgmt

RE: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 1:20 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze > > Hi Animesh, > > I know you and I talked about this earlier in the month, b

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-681: Dedicated Resources - Explicit Dedication, Private zone, pod, cluster or host

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10797/#review21214 --- Commit 8ece25c1f2bd6d0126c2a22b42e1c4da65fc2856 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-681: Dedicated Resources - Explicit Dedication, Private zone, pod, cluster or host.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11379/#review21213 --- Commit 8ece25c1f2bd6d0126c2a22b42e1c4da65fc2856 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: Patch 2: CLOUDSTACK-681: Dedicated Resources - Explicit Dedication, Private zone, pod, cluster or host

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11380/#review21212 --- Commit 8ece25c1f2bd6d0126c2a22b42e1c4da65fc2856 in branch refs/heads

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 3:24 PM > To: > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round) > > Check the by laws for the project. [Animesh>] Thanks Chip > > On May 30, 2013, at 5:49 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

Check the by laws for the project. On May 30, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:38 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack

Re: 4.2 snapshot: setting up ISOs - no go

did you restart the management service after modifying that global param? it's required. It will then add an exception to the ssvm's firewall, to allow for that traffic. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:34 PM, La Motta, David wrote: > Nothing in cloud.out--I have some old messages which don't make me

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:38 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round) > > John, note that releases are majority approval, so -1 votes are not > veto

RE: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

> -Original Message- > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 7:43 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master > > Edison, > > Please see my comment in-line. > > Thanks, > -John > > On May 29, 2013, at

Re: 4.2 snapshot: setting up ISOs - no go

Nothing in cloud.out--I have some old messages which don't make me feel that great about things, but a tail -f on the file keeps it static when I attempt to add the ISO. The old messages are: 18:47:27,229 WARN NioConnection:110 - Unable to connect to remote: is there a server running on port

RE: [DISCUSS] Baremetal and UCS UI when to check in

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 1:34 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Baremetal and UCS UI when to check in > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:19:53PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] We have a videographer. What videos do we want to make?

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:12:40PM -0700, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > Now Urgent!! Gregg will be starting in just a couple of weeks. Last year, > we churned for several weeks after his arrival. Let's avoid that this time. > > What do we want? > Education videos from Sebastien's list? > How-to videos

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

Chip, To clarify as well, I too -1 this merge until the technical issues I have identified on the list and Review Board are addressed and the patch is re-reviewed. Thanks, -John On May 30, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Just so that we are 100% clear... I'm -1 (binding veto) on

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

All, I apologize for a lack of clarity in the original proposal, but I intended for 4 week extension on the feature freeze to be added onto the release and not encroach on the test window. Thanks, -John On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti < sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com> wrote: > +

RE: maintenance mode for secondary storage?

Alez, This api call would then have to check if the new secondary storage contains a compatible set of data in comparison to the prior one, would it? Or do I misunderstand the procedure? Regards, On 30 May 2013 22:25, "Alex Huang" wrote: > Daan, > > We have a procedure for doing that. The probl

RE: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

+1 on limiting feature proposals for 1 week so scope would not increase dramatically. +1 on the time line proposed - The extension proposed by Animesh would help to close feature which are almost ready for check-in but need quality checks. This would help for overall quality. -Original

Re: [DISCUSS] Baremetal and UCS UI when to check in

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:19:53PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > As you may recall we had disabled Baremetal in 4.1 and master because of > blocker issues. Frank unfortunately has been tied up with $dayjob > responsibilities and now plans to start fixing baremetal issues the > following

RE: maintenance mode for secondary storage?

Daan, We have a procedure for doing that. The problem in general has to do with the large capacity of the secondary storage so it's actually better to do migration of data outside of cloudstack with some manual process in stages and then just fix up the secondary storage in the database. I

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

Hi Animesh, I know you and I talked about this earlier in the month, but I just wanted to make sure we were OK with me not providing a feature proposal for the storage plug-in work I'm doing for 4.2. As you may recall, I have developed a storage plug-in for SolidFire, enhanced the storage framewo

Re: [DISCUSS] We have a videographer. What videos do we want to make?

I'm not sure if this video is usable for you for this purpose, but I was recorded doing a "How to create a storage plug-in for CloudStack"-type video in April. Feel free to use it for CloudStack training videos: http://buildacloud.org/cloud-computing-vids/video/latest/storage-plug-ins-by-mike-tut

RE: [DISCUSS] How to best do time sync. (WAS: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round))

John No need for apologies, if we are all in agreement, should I create feature request and issue tracker? Thanks ilya > -Original Message- > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:42 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] H

RE: [MERGE] UI for Explicit-Dedication of Resources(zone/pod/cluster/host)

Sure Chip , no problems. I'll go ahead and merge my branch tomorrow in that case and take up localization tasks thereafter. Thanks for reviewing the code and your feedback. Regards, Pranav -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Friday, May 31,

Re: [DISCUSS] We have a videographer. What videos do we want to make?

Now Urgent!! Gregg will be starting in just a couple of weeks. Last year, we churned for several weeks after his arrival. Let's avoid that this time. What do we want? Education videos from Sebastien's list? How-to videos left over from last year's Video Plan? Need to know in the next few days, so

RE: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

> -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:42 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze > > > > On 05/30/2013 07:43 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > I'm actually OK with delay

Re: 4.2 snapshot: setting up ISOs - no go

can you check the output of /var/log/cloud/cloud.out when adding the iso. Also if youre adding the iso from an internal web server, make sure you have secstorage.allowed.internal.sites set to the internal ip or range of where you host those images. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:25 PM, La Motta, Davi

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

That's why I brought up the cycle. If we make an exception, it feels like bending the rules, which everyone can point to in the future. I'd rather change the rules, and in the process attempt to head-off future attempts to bend the rules, but at some point I suppose it's just academic. Change is ch

Re: [MERGE] UI for Explicit-Dedication of Resources(zone/pod/cluster/host)

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:38:18PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote: > So currently they are not localized. Usually we localize all the labels , > dialog messages whenever a feature is into master and I had planned to do > the same with this one as well . Since that doesn't affect the feature > func

Re: 4.2 snapshot: setting up ISOs - no go

Ok, so I took a gander at some of the suggestions on that page, and though I feel I am close… I am not there yet. Just so you all have a bit of context how my environment is setup: I am running MS in a CentOS 6.4 VM, inside XS 61. Cluster XS is another 6.1 VM MS has a public and private (vlan)

RE: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

> -Original Message- > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 6:51 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze > > David and Chip, > > To be clear about my proposal, I did not intend to propose that we

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

On 05/30/2013 07:43 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: I'm actually OK with delaying the release (as you pointed out, 4.1 impacted 4.2 in a big way). *I* like flexibility. But it behooves the community to have a stable set of rules. It is the cognitive dissonance that bothers me. Theoretically a time

Re: [DISCUSS] How to best do time sync. (WAS: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round))

Ilya and Chip, I stand duly corrected. Sorry for diverting the conversation. -John On May 30, 2013, at 2:22 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: > I forgot to mention, with option 1, you should have the least issues > regardless of what hypervisor technology you use - even if you go with HyperV > :) >

Re: maintenance mode for secondary storage?

Yes Chiradeep, That or maintenance on the secondary storage machine itself. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > I can see a use for that: that the secondary storage becomes read-only > during the maintenance (so no template creation/snapshot

Re: Review Request: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-2662 Preferred implicit dedication fails with insufficient capacity even if shared hosts are available.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11510/#review21201 --- Unit test is failing while trying mvn clean install Tests in error

RE: [DISCUSS] How to best do time sync. (WAS: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round))

I forgot to mention, with option 1, you should have the least issues regardless of what hypervisor technology you use - even if you go with HyperV :) And I think Chiradeep is right, it should be Zone based, since this is when SSVM and CPVM gets created. > -Original Message- > From: Musa

Re: [DISCUSS] How to best do time sync. (WAS: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round))

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:14:04PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > John, > > For vmware, you have 2 options, clock sync will work with native NTP daemon > using local ntp servers in your datacenter or use vmware tools native time > keeping technique. > > We have over 2500 VMs, and while we have v

Re: [GSOC] Community Bonding Period

I agree with Chip, lets keep all discussion open, and we can create a [DISCUSS] thread if need be. I am currently working on a Flask based UI/API for cloud platforms management(The layer above CloudStack). - Original Message - From: "Chip Childers" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: T

RE: [DISCUSS] How to best do time sync. (WAS: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round))

John, For vmware, you have 2 options, clock sync will work with native NTP daemon using local ntp servers in your datacenter or use vmware tools native time keeping technique. We have over 2500 VMs, and while we have vmware tools installed on all vms, we choose to use native linux NTPD for tim

Re: [DISCUSS] How to best do time sync. (WAS: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round))

+1 for zone-level NTP server setting. If not set, use the default one (e.g., the ntpd package in Debian automatically use the ntp pool) On 5/30/13 10:43 AM, "John Burwell" wrote: >IIya, > >I can't speak to KVM, but on VMWare, clock sync won't work without tools. > It's not an option. > >Thanks,

Re: [ACS41] Features that are still in Open / Resolved State

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:48:02PM +, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Hi All, > > While voting is in progress for 4.1, can you take a look at the following > features which are still in open/resolved state. > If a story is in resolved state, can reporter review it and close it?? > If a story is in

[ACS41] Features that are still in Open / Resolved State

Hi All, While voting is in progress for 4.1, can you take a look at the following features which are still in open/resolved state. If a story is in resolved state, can reporter review it and close it?? If a story is in open state( there are 4 in the below list) I would think it will be moved to

Re: vhd-util missing in 4.2 snapshot?

Ok, that's fine. Thanks--I figured it would be simpler to ask the group, rather than chase somebody in NetApp internally ;-) If anybody has any NetApp-related questions, I may be able to help, so feel free to send them my way. David La Motta Technical Marketing Engineer Citrix Solutions Net

Re: maintenance mode for secondary storage?

I can see a use for that: that the secondary storage becomes read-only during the maintenance (so no template creation/snapshots/etc). This allows for stuff like migration to new (file server) hardware. On 5/30/13 10:20 AM, "Nitin Mehta" wrote: >Not that I have heard of. You can at best replace

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

Yes, I don't think it's a blocker either, now that I know what's going on. I'll get that added. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Prachi Damle wrote: > Marcus, > > After a clean build did your problem disappear? I don't see a reason for a > NoSuchMethodError popping up, except that as you say cl

Re: [DISCUSS] How to best do time sync. (WAS: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round))

IIya, I can't speak to KVM, but on VMWare, clock sync won't work without tools. It's not an option. Thanks, -John On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > I'd say Cluster setting. > > We should let users pick if they want to use hypervisor tools based sync > or local/external

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

I'm actually OK with delaying the release (as you pointed out, 4.1 impacted 4.2 in a big way). *I* like flexibility. But it behooves the community to have a stable set of rules. It is the cognitive dissonance that bothers me. Theoretically a time-based release doesn't care about such impacts, but

RE: [MERGE] UI for Explicit-Dedication of Resources(zone/pod/cluster/host)

So currently they are not localized. Usually we localize all the labels , dialog messages whenever a feature is into master and I had planned to do the same with this one as well . Since that doesn't affect the feature functionality , I thought of merging the feature before so that people(QA )

Re: 4.1 release manager

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:35:36PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Thanks Chip. > > Officially accepted, I'm going to create git-monitor scripts to email me of > daily git changes and see if they are applicable to 4.1.x. > > I'll share the script once I have it working, perhaps it can be used by o

RE: 4.1 release manager

Thanks Chip. Officially accepted, I'm going to create git-monitor scripts to email me of daily git changes and see if they are applicable to 4.1.x. I'll share the script once I have it working, perhaps it can be used by other RMs. Regards ilya > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childer

Re: [MERGE] zone wide primary storage support for VMware into MASTER

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:18:27PM +, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to merge support for zone wide primary storage for VMware > resources in CloudStack deployment. This is incremental piece of work to > extend zone wide primary storage pool support to VMware. > Earlier

RE: [DISCUSS] How to best do time sync. (WAS: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round))

I'd say Cluster setting. We should let users pick if they want to use hypervisor tools based sync or local/external NTP servers. I'm all for local/external NTP servers, as I know how those never gave me issues in past (especially when you go through hypervisors upgrades and vm tools upgrades).

Re: 4.1 release manager

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:18:51PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > I will tentatively say yes - pending my discussion with Chip on Thursday on > the process. > > Regards > ilya Ilya and I spoke. There are a couple of things that *we* should probably document about the role / process within our co

Re: [MERGE] UI for Explicit-Dedication of Resources(zone/pod/cluster/host)

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:29:36PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote: > Thanks Chip for reminding me of that . I have rebased my branch off latest > master now and there are no conflicts . Please go ahead and have a look at > the diff . > Please let me know in case there are any concerns. > > Thanks,

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

Marcus, After a clean build did your problem disappear? I don't see a reason for a NoSuchMethodError popping up, except that as you say cleaning the repository is needed. -Prachi -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:4

Re: maintenance mode for secondary storage?

Not that I have heard of. You can at best replace the sec. storage (there is a manual procedure for that), but since generally there is a single sec. storage how can you implement maintenance mode ? Can you please explain is your use case ? On 30/05/13 7:32 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >LS, > >Has

Re: [GSOC] Community Bonding Period

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:42:40PM +0530, Shiva Teja wrote: > I was about to send an email off-list with updates. On-list is best please (probably with a distinct subject like to start a new thread). Welcome by the way!

Re: [GSOC] Community Bonding Period

Oops, pressed send by mistake. Yes, the wrapper API will use Flask. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Shiva Teja wrote: > Hey Kelcey, > > I was about to send an email off-list with updates. > Yes, the wrapper API > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Kelcey Jamison Damage > wrote: > >> Hell

Re: [GSOC] Community Bonding Period

Hey Kelcey, I was about to send an email off-list with updates. Yes, the wrapper API On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Kelcey Jamison Damage wrote: > Hello Shiva, I am your mentor, lol. > > How's it going? I'm pretty excited about your project. > > Are you still planning to integrate Flask into

Re: [GSOC] Community Bonding Period

Hello Shiva, I am your mentor, lol. How's it going? I'm pretty excited about your project. Are you still planning to integrate Flask into your project? - Original Message - From: "Shiva Teja" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:54:26 AM Subject: Re: [GSOC] Commu

Re: Create View Question

Sounds reasonable So, anyways, I left them both in my patch file since I figured we could resolve this later (obviously only the second "volumes" view is really being used anyways). On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Min Chen wrote: > The reason is simple, just two people are trying to change

Re: [DISCUSS] How to best do time sync. (WAS: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round))

Ilya, One very important note is that NTP is only used for Xen. For KVM and VMWare, time sync is accomplished through kernel drivers/system daemons with NTP configured in the hypervisor configuration. Therefore, this model would need to be conditional based on the hypervisor type -- possibly

Re: Create View Question

The reason is simple, just two people are trying to change that view for their own features, but didn't check if there is one already in that script to modify that instead of creating their own. Thanks -min From: Mike Tutkowski mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> Date: Thursday, May 30, 20

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

Marcus, I think it best to defer the larger release cycle length question to another time and place. As Chip stated earlier, the consensus is to maintain the current freeze date. Given the time sensitivity, my proposal can be considered resolved. Thanks, -John On May 30, 2013, at 11:34 AM,

RE: [DISCUSS] How to best do time sync. (WAS: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round))

Thanks Chip. I've posted this response under CLOUDSTACK-2492.. curious what others may think about a long term solution to this problem.. -- I think we should make the whole NTP schema more modular and robust. For example, in my experience working for several companies, not even on

Re: Create View Question

Hi Nitin, I left both of the "volumes" views in the codebase when I submitted my patch for review. Just curious, though...can you tell me why there are two places where the view is created? Thanks! On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > Sorry for missing the mail. I would need

Re: Create View Question

Please work with Jessica to consolidate the two views created by you two to come up with a final volume_view. Thanks -min On 5/30/13 6:46 AM, "Nitin Mehta" wrote: >Sorry for missing the mail. I would need the new volume view for my >feature to work. > >On 24/05/13 1:45 AM, "Min Chen" wrote: >

Re: [GSOC] Community Bonding Period

Hi, I am Shiva Teja, 2nd year computer science undergrad student from IIT Mandi, India. I'll be working on #CLOUDSTACK-1778 "Create a new bootstrap based GUI for CloudStack". I like algorithm research, web development and a bit of system administration. I'll be creating a new UI for CloudStack us

  1   2   >