Please work with Jessica to consolidate the two views created by you two to come up with a final volume_view.
Thanks -min On 5/30/13 6:46 AM, "Nitin Mehta" <nitin.me...@citrix.com> wrote: >Sorry for missing the mail. I would need the new volume view for my >feature to work. > >On 24/05/13 1:45 AM, "Min Chen" <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote: > >>It is related to this commit d1642a489ce76e055d60b2caf3ccfe4bb136b745. >>Schema-410to420.sql should have one section to define the new volume_view >>for 4.2.0. >>CC Nitin here to see if his new volume_view should be used or the one >>before his commit in this file. >> >>THanks >>-min >> >> >>On 5/23/13 12:50 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> >>wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I've added a few fields (min, max, burst IOPS) to two tables and - in >>>the >>>process - noticed the following view is dropped and created twice: >>> >>>DROP VIEW IF EXISTS `cloud`.`volume_view`; >>>CREATE VIEW `cloud`.`volume_view` AS >>> >>>I assume this is a bug and have removed (in my sandbox) the >>>first occurrence. >>> >>>If anyone knows of a reason why we want to keep this code as is, please >>>let >>>me know as this change will otherwise be submitted when I submit my code >>>for review tomorrow or early next week. >>> >>>Thanks! >>> >>>-- >>>*Mike Tutkowski* >>>*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* >>>e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com >>>o: 303.746.7302 >>>Advancing the way the world uses the >>>cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> >>>** >> >
