Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-702 Multiple Ip ranges in different subnets

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11027/ --- (Updated May 10, 2013, 6:54 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pra

RE: [ACS41] Release Blocker Update for 2013-05-08

> -Original Message- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013 9:45 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS41] Release Blocker Update for 2013-05-08 > > > On May 9, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Kishan Kavala wrote: > > > > > > >> -Origin

Re: Review Request: Fix test_global_settings.py which is checking for the wrong global setting

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11006/#review20414 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Harikrishna Patnala On May 8, 2013, 9:15 a.m

Re: [GSOC] Student interviews

Please don't take it otherwise May i know on how to submit proposal? I would like to do this, I was unaware on this. Regards, RK On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:21 AM, ADAMA COULIBALY wrote: > Hi Sebastien, > > My phone number is (1) 267-243-3954 > The best time to call me : 10:00 am to 12:00 >

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1603 : Management server .log Java Exceptions are displayed with Alerts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11004/#review20412 --- Commit 3aed20c9d27cbe97afc32fd47909a2f08c4550c8 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2419 : Localization - Some Japanese are not working

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11021/#review20411 --- Commit fa9987753c530c8e9560297986ac8848b7526854 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-658: Scaling up CPU and RAM for running VMs - Vmware

Pushed with commit 75a2457af639e6bcf751c2e97d1360df1a0265e4 into master On 09/05/13 7:32 PM, "Nitin Mehta" wrote: > >--- >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >https://reviews.apache.org/r/11025/#review20378 >

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-658: Scaling up CPU and RAM for running VMs - Vmware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11025/#review20410 --- Commit 75a2457af639e6bcf751c2e97d1360df1a0265e4 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: PVLAN provisioning support for vmware Distributed Virtual Switch deployments on cloudstack.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11019/ --- (Updated May 10, 2013, 2:32 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers,

RE: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1325) add password in response of RestoreVM

Abhi following up on this can you review and apply > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf > Of Prasanna Santhanam > Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2013 10:13 PM > To: Harikrishna Patnala; Abhinandan Prateek > Cc: Sateesh Chodapuneedi; Prasanna

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

Don't know. We can use Ubuntu package for now if it possible. or just use sid packages if possible? dnsmasq version is 0.62, which is good enough for ipv6. --Sheng On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > How old? When did it disappear? > > I pr

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

How old? When did it disappear? I propose using the Ubuntu package. In tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/postinstall.sh wget http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/h/haproxy/haproxy_1.4.18-0ubunt u2.1_i386.deb dpkg -i haproxy_1.4.18-0ubuntu2.1_i386.deb Also do we know if the s

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

No idea. Probably we should just grab some old generated systemvm for now. --Sheng On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Should we use the Ubuntu package for now? > > On 5/9/13 2:03 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote: > > >HAproxy is missing in Debian 7.0

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

Should we use the Ubuntu package for now? On 5/9/13 2:03 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote: >HAproxy is missing in Debian 7.0's repo, due to old maintainer is missing. > >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674447 >http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2013/04/msg00039.html > >The new maintainer t

RE: Suggestion needed for CLOUDSTACK-212

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 6:31 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Suggestion needed for CLOUDSTACK-212 > > Dharmesh, > > I'd also suggest that you actually plan on submitting this after th

RE: Suggestion needed for CLOUDSTACK-212

+1 to 4.3. 4.2 is too close to freeze date. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 6:31 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Suggestion needed for CLOUDSTACK-212 > > Dharmesh, > > I'd also suggest

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

HAproxy is missing in Debian 7.0's repo, due to old maintainer is missing. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674447 http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2013/04/msg00039.html The new maintainer took over it at Apr 20th, but there is no schedule of recovering yet. That's why depends o

Re: Cloud Stack compile error

I get this password request all the time, too. If you hit ENTER about five or six times, the management-server startup just continues OK. On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Soheil Eizadi wrote: > Hi Mehdi, > Your subject said you have compile error but your problem happens when you > are running

RE: Cloud Stack compile error

Hi Mehdi, Your subject said you have compile error but your problem happens when you are running CloudStack, i.e. mvn ... jetty:run. You might want to look at the email thread below, there is a known issue that causes a Warning similar to error message you are getting. The CloudStack should sti

Eclipse Unit Testing

I have a problem with log4j when running my unit tests. It is not major as the tests run, but I want to get the logging to work. Here are the warning messages I get: log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient). log4j:WARN Please initialize the log

Re: Review Request: PVLAN provisioning support for vmware Distributed Virtual Switch deployments on cloudstack.

> On May 9, 2013, 6:54 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/mo/HypervisorHostHelper.java, > > line 746 > > > > > > Reason to remove type converting? > > Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bham

Re: "_Enhancer" Question

Thanks for the info on this! On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Kelven Yang wrote: > Thanks for the tip, done. > > Kelven > > On 5/9/13 5:31 AM, "Alex Huang" wrote: > > >You should be able to do that yourself. > > > >Click Browse and select Pages > >Click on the Tree link > > > >From there you ca

Re: Review Request: PVLAN provisioning support for vmware Distributed Virtual Switch deployments on cloudstack.

> On May 9, 2013, 6:54 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Thanks for the review Sheng. Please find my comments below. I'll upload newer diffs with some of the suggested changes shortly. > On May 9, 2013, 6:54 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkModelImpl.java, line 933 >

Re: [MERGE] CLOUDSTACK-747 "nTier Apps 2.0 : Internal Load Balancing between the VPC tiers"

The code is in master; the merge commit is 2660a6b7a7f226ab757d2175222db62571813120. -Alena. On 5/9/13 9:52 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >If nobody objects, I'm going to merge code from interanllb branch into >master branch today, May 9th. > >-Alena. > >On 5/8/13 4:46 PM, "Chip Childers" wro

Re: [jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-2307) Egress rules are not getting created under security groups.

Hi, I think this is duplicated by CLOUDSTACK-2319 which has been fixed. 2013/5/9, Jayapal Reddy (JIRA) : > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > ] > > Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-2307: > ---

[QA][PROPOSAL][ACS4.2] Test plan review: "Better Vm Sync"

HI, Please review the test plan for the feature "Better Vm sync" and let me know the review comments. Test Plan: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Better+Vm+Sync Functional Spec: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+VM

Cloud Stack compile error

Hi Dears Developers I want to build cloud stack according to  https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/how-to-build-on-master-branch.html . I downloaded cloud stack from  git clone https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git and I thick that is a latest version. When I run mvn -pl :cloud-clie

Re: Review Request: PVLAN provisioning support for vmware Distributed Virtual Switch deployments on cloudstack.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11019/ --- (Updated May 9, 2013, 7:09 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers,

Re: Review Request: PVLAN provisioning support for vmware Distributed Virtual Switch deployments on cloudstack.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11019/#review20387 --- server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkModelImpl.java

Re: [GSOC] Student interviews

Hi Sebastien, My phone number is (1) 267-243-3954 The best time to call me : 10:00 am to 12:00 2:pm to 5: pm any day after this Wednesday 15th May, ( From Monday to Wednesday I will be busy with my final) So let know the day and time then I will be ready for your

RE: NetApp Storage Integration

Hi, Do we have anyone working on storage integration with NetApp? I just got out of a non-nda meeting with them where they told me they are integrating both Swift and PNFS. Considering they are the primary curators of the NFS kernel, I'm hoping we might have at least 1 dev interested in maybe w

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2419 : Localization - Some Japanese are not working

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11021/#review20386 --- Ship it! ship it! looks good - Fang Wang On May 9, 2013, 12:29 p

Re: [MERGE] PVLAN branch to MASTER

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 04:25:31PM -0700, Sheng Yang wrote: > > FS at: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/pvlan-for-isolation-within-a-vlan.html > > > > PVLAN branch has been under development for some time, and now the > > functionalit

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-869-nTier-Apps-2.0_Support-NetScalar-as-external-LB-provider

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10858/#review20385 --- Commit 2e2106002865cff8eb06b5c3a42bfd6f0f6848fb in branch refs/head

[REMINDER] The CloudStack Conference CFP Deadline is Approaching! Submit Talks by Sunday

Are you using, supporting, or helping develop Apache CloudStack? Doing interesting work around Apache CloudStack? If so, you should be speaking at the second [1]CloudStack Collaboration Conference this June in Santa Clara. ## TL;DR The deadline for submissions is Sunday, May 12th. You can submit

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-869-nTier-Apps-2.0_Support-NetScalar-as-external-LB-provider

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10858/#review20382 --- Commit 2e2106002865cff8eb06b5c3a42bfd6f0f6848fb in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: PVLAN provisioning support for vmware Distributed Virtual Switch deployments on cloudstack.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11019/ --- (Updated May 9, 2013, 5:47 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers,

RE: [ACS42] Schedule Remember - Feature freeze on 2013-05-31

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 10:39 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS42] Schedule Remember - Feature freeze on 2013-05-31 > > Yes...I believe I will have it working for XenServer by th

Re: [ACS42] Schedule Remember - Feature freeze on 2013-05-31

Yes...I believe I will have it working for XenServer by that time with VMware and KVM to follow shortly thereafter. It depends a bit on how many storage-framework issues I come across. For example, last night I ran into code that assumed zone-wide storage was only for KVM (at one time in developme

RE: [ACS42] Schedule Remember - Feature freeze on 2013-05-31

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 10:55 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS42] Schedule Remember - Feature freeze on 2013-05-31 > > Hi Animesh, > > I have a quick question for you. > > As

Re: [MERGE] CLOUDSTACK-747 "nTier Apps 2.0 : Internal Load Balancing between the VPC tiers"

If nobody objects, I'm going to merge code from interanllb branch into master branch today, May 9th. -Alena. On 5/8/13 4:46 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:33:51AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to merge the Internal LB feature from asf/in

[GSOC] Student interviews

Hi, I would like to schedule phone/skype interviews with all the students who submitted proposals. (This is authorized and recommended by ASF gsoc guidelines) Please get in touch with me on IRC or direct email to set a meeting time. Once the times are set I will send it to the list and welcome

Re: [ACS41] Release Blocker Update for 2013-05-08

On May 9, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Kishan Kavala wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May 2013 10:48 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Cc: Kishan Kavala >> Subject: [ACS41] Release Blocker Update for 2013-05-08 >

Review Request: Cloudstack-702 Multiple Ip ranges in different subnets

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11027/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Koushik Das. Description

Re: "_Enhancer" Question

Thanks for the tip, done. Kelven On 5/9/13 5:31 AM, "Alex Huang" wrote: >You should be able to do that yourself. > >Click Browse and select Pages >Click on the Tree link > >From there you can move the pages. > >--Alex > >> -Original Message- >> From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citr

Re: [ACS41] Release Blocker Update for 2013-05-08

Thanks. On May 9, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Kishan Kavala wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May 2013 10:48 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Cc: Kishan Kavala >> Subject: [ACS41] Release Blocker Update for 2013-0

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-658: Scaling up CPU and RAM for running VMs - Vmware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11025/#review20378 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Nitin Mehta On May 9, 2013, 1:22 p.m., Harik

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-702: Tests for Multiple IP Ranges

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11026/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santhanam and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-658: Scaling up CPU and RAM for running VMs - Vmware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11025/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta and Sateesh Chodapuneedi. Descriptio

Re: Review Request: generalisation of network code (needed for CLOUDSTACK-1532)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10970/ --- (Updated May 9, 2013, 1:02 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes -

RE: [ACS41] Release Blocker Update for 2013-05-08

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 8 May 2013 10:48 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Kishan Kavala > Subject: [ACS41] Release Blocker Update for 2013-05-08 > > Here's where we stand: > > CLOUDSTACK-2309 > Upgrade fr

Re: Review Request: Fixed Volume which is added thru upload volume is failed to attach to the instance saying Volume state must be in Allocated, Ready or in Uploaded state( Though uploaded Volume stat

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11022/ --- (Updated May 9, 2013, 12:49 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh

RE: "_Enhancer" Question

You should be able to do that yourself. Click Browse and select Pages Click on the Tree link From there you can move the pages. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 11:31 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subj

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2419 : Localization - Some Japanese are not working

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11021/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Fang Wang and Animesh Chaturvedi. Description --

[QA][Test Plan][ACS4.2]Granular Global Configuration Parameters

Hi, I have prepared test cases for "Granular Global Configuration Parameters" feature, please review and give your valuable comments . Details 1-Test plan https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Granular+Global+Configuration+Parameters 2-FS https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/d

Re: Review Request: ACL on private gateway feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10942/ --- (Updated May 9, 2013, 12:08 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pra

Re: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-2277

I agree with you, provide message to user for adding case Regards Mice On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Saksham Srivastava < saksham.srivast...@citrix.com> wrote: > Mice, no need to revert. I also had similar issues that the NIC was > present even after reboot. > May be we need to look into the

Re: Suggestion needed for CLOUDSTACK-212

I have finished the refactoring (ran into eclipse refactoring bugs). I am now trying to test. But I realized that it will be good to have tool/script that does most of this refactoring rather than using eclipse. Anyone knows any such tool/script ? Otherwise I plan to make one. Thanks, Dharmesh O

RE: Suport for Conserve Mode in a shared Network for Network Offering

Thanks Murali . I'll make the changes accordingly and commit the fix now . From: Murali Reddy Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 4:43 PM To: Pranav Saxena; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Suresh Sadhu; Alena Prokharchyk Subject: Re: Suport for Conserve Mode in a shared Network for Network Offering Yes, c

Re: Suport for Conserve Mode in a shared Network for Network Offering

Yes, conserve mode is supported for network offerings for shared networks. Its likely that original UI behaviour was to disable the check box, it did not make sense when shared networks just had DNS, DHCP services. Checkbox should be enabled when any of source NAT, static NAT, LB, FW services ar

RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB in VPC

> -Original Message- > From: Rajesh Battala > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 3:15 PM > To: Sowmya Krishnan; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB in > VPC > > There are two things, upgrading VPC, and upgrading VPC network off

Suport for Conserve Mode in a shared Network for Network Offering

Hi , Could anyone confirm if CloudStack supports enabling conserve mode while creating a Network Offering in a SHARED network . From what I know CloudStack used to support it only for Isolated Networks . Also as per Suresh , we can create a network offering for a shared network with Conserve

Re: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-2277

Mice, no need to revert. I also had similar issues that the NIC was present even after reboot. May be we need to look into the difference in behavior. But for now, I guess at-least the add api must be allowed to pass. Your thoughts? Thanks, Saksham On Thursday 09 May 2013 02:37 PM, Mice Xia wrot

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-869-nTier-Apps-2.0_Support-NetScalar-as-external-LB-provider

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10858/#review20375 --- Ship it! Commit: 2e2106002865cff8eb06b5c3a42bfd6f0f6848fb - Murali

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-869-nTier-Apps-2.0_Support-NetScalar-as-external-LB-provider

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10858/#review20374 --- Commit 2e2106002865cff8eb06b5c3a42bfd6f0f6848fb in branch refs/heads

RE: network guru refactor proposal

Ok, got it. My picture won't be as pretty but I will put some wording there. -Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: woensdag 8 mei 2013 19:14 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: network guru refactor proposal See for example the extens

RE: error on starting devcloud2

Hi Nazri, Create a Adapter, of type Host-only Adapter and enable the adapter. It should work. Thanks Rajesh Battala > -Original Message- > From: Nazri Abdulah [mailto:na...@kth.se] > Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 2:51 PM > To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: error on starti

error on starting devcloud2

Hi, I just want to start my 1st DevCloud2 on my virtualbox in OSX Lion OS, but the following error appears, please advice? Could not start the machine DevCloud2 because the following physical network interfaces were not found: vboxnet0 (adapter 1) Regards Nazri

Re: [MERGE] CS-2163

Updated the FS [1] as per the discussion. So the plan is to introduce a generic api to add semantic meta data to the first class objects. AddResourceDetail - Add details to resource * resourceIds - List of resource ids * resourceType - Example - volume, nic etc. * details - Map of key/value pairs

RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB in VPC

There are two things, upgrading VPC, and upgrading VPC network offering. Upgrading VPC is not supported. Upgrading VPC networking offering (only valid scenario is LB vpc to NS Lb). upgrading the network where External device is involved changing the cidr. Will update in FS. > -Original Me

Re: [MERGE] CS-2163

On 03/05/13 7:58 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 04:11:21AM +, Murali Reddy wrote: >> On 02/05/13 11:20 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" >> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >On 5/2/13 6:24 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >> > >> >>On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:40:45PM +0530, Abhinandan Prateek w

RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB in VPC

Thanks Rajesh. Could you please let me know the technical reason why we are not supporting Upgrade of VPC network offering or network tier LB? This limitation needs to be documented. Also, could you please update the same in FS too. > -Original Message- > From: Rajesh Battala > Sent: Th

RE: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-2277

Saksham, Really sorry I didn’t notice it's in progress until I pushed the commit.. I can revert it if necessary. Yes, without vmtool, a reboot of the VM can bring up the added NIC, but removing NIC fails in my environment, the nic is still there even after a reboot, can you confirm it in your

Fix for CLOUDSTACK-2277

Hi Mice , I just saw your commit for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2277 So I recently picked this bug, marked it as "in progress" as I was working on it and was about to submit the patch for the same, but then I saw that you already fixed it :) A quick comment : The fix ma

RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB in VPC

Please see my comments in-line. Please let me know your comments. > -Original Message- > From: Sowmya Krishnan > Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2013 3:34 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Rajesh Battala > Subject: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB in VPC > > I am

RE: [ACS42][Discuss] Netscaler as External LB Provider in VPC

> -Original Message- > From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 10:23 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [ACS42][Discuss] Netscaler as External LB Provider in VPC > > Hi Rajesh, > > Few clarifications after going thru the FS : >