How old? When did it disappear?

I propose using the Ubuntu  package.
In tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/postinstall.sh

wget 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/h/haproxy/haproxy_1.4.18-0ubunt
u2.1_i386.deb

dpkg -i haproxy_1.4.18-0ubuntu2.1_i386.deb

Also do we know if the system vm template contains the version of dnsmasq
that is known to work for ipv6 support?

--
Chiradeep

On 5/9/13 3:48 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote:

>No idea. Probably we should just grab some old generated systemvm for now.
>
>--Sheng
>
>
>On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
>chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Should we use the Ubuntu package for now?
>>
>> On 5/9/13 2:03 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote:
>>
>> >HAproxy is missing in Debian 7.0's repo, due to old maintainer is
>>missing.
>> >
>> >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674447
>> >http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2013/04/msg00039.html
>> >
>> >The new maintainer took over it at Apr 20th, but there is no schedule
>>of
>> >recovering yet.
>> >
>> >That's why depends on everyday generated systemvm template is
>>dangerous.
>> >
>> >--Sheng
>> >
>> >
>> >On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Rohit Yadav <bhais...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Abhinandan Prateek <
>> >> agneya2...@hotmail.com
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > The haproxy and port map services are not installed on VMWare
>>system
>> >>VM
>> >> > template. Is the path used to create the templates different for
>> >> different
>> >> > Hypervisor templates ? I was under the assumption that the services
>> >> > installed on all the system VM templates meant for different
>> >>hypervisors
>> >> > should be same ?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> No? Pl. see tools/appliance/systemvmtemplate/postinstall.sh, if it's
>> >>there
>> >> those pkgs will be installed.
>> >> For the template I created, I had built it with veewee on my system
>>and
>> >> then imported it in vmware fusion to install the vmware-tools.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > -abhi
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
>>

Reply via email to