Thank you for doing this!
I try to stay engaged with the releases and would be happy to be kept on
this list. At the same time I agree with Robert, release managers should
take precedence over PMC members if we cannot get the number to 6.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 10:32 AM Robert Bradshaw via dev <
Well, I don't know that PMC should take precedence over release managers if
it comes to that.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 10:11 AM Danny McCormick
wrote:
> I can ask if we can keep 6 seats instead of 5 (and keep Ahmet in that
> seat). If not, my vote would be to stick with the 5 that I suggested, bu
I can ask if we can keep 6 seats instead of 5 (and keep Ahmet in that
seat). If not, my vote would be to stick with the 5 that I suggested, but
if that's not acceptable then I'll drop one of the people (probably myself
since I just finished a release and will probably be last up out of the
group).
I think it'd be good if the intersection between this list and the PMC had
cardinality greater than 1. Ahmet might be a good person to keep there.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 9:25 AM Danny McCormick via dev
wrote:
> Yeah, that is part of the proposal. To be clear, our end state would be a
> single g
Yeah, that is part of the proposal. To be clear, our end state would be a
single group with
- damccorm
- jrmccluskey
- kennknowles
- lostluck
- abacn
Thanks,
Danny
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 12:24 PM Kerry Donny-Clark
wrote:
> +1, should there also be an update to remove folks who are not active
+1, should there also be an update to remove folks who are not active on
the project?
Kerry
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:40 AM Jack McCluskey via dev
wrote:
> +1 to simplifying the infra side, especially with an aim towards
> automating the processes we can. The more we can streamline and simplify
+1 to simplifying the infra side, especially with an aim towards automating
the processes we can. The more we can streamline and simplify the better.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:18 AM Danny McCormick via dev <
dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
> Hey everyone, in an effort to reduce the burden of running
Hey everyone, in an effort to reduce the burden of running a Beam release,
a few committers (self included) have volunteered to try to take a larger
role in releases (including both running them and contributing to making
them better going forward). To aid in that process, I would like to request
t
