Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22227] - available task should support references IMO

My apologies for having missed this new condition. Thanks! -Matt --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG > > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE > AT > . > ANY REPLY MADE TO THI

beating the dead Ant 1.6 horse

I know the quote is "there is no timeframe yet on this release". But is there a ballpark? 2003? Some particular half of 2004? Thanks, Matt __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ---

LineTokenizer

Or you could just strike that last question... I get it now. :) __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-m

LineTokenizer

Peter (Reilly): I will direct this question to you. What is the purpose of the LineTokenizer class, and how does it compare to java.io.BufferedReader? Thanks, Matt __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilde

Re: Retry task container pt2

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that we should wait for the ant 1.7.1 branch > to > be made. > > The retry task container is similar to containers in > ant-contrib (limit, outofdate, for and if). > > There is actually a task called "relentless" that > executes a sequence o

Re: Retry task container pt2

d. > > I guess the name of the task confused me. That's okay, I was only trying to eliminate confusion on the whole. Sounds like a miniaturization of Ant's basic keep-going option, no? -Matt > > Peter > > > On 5/17/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

applyjava

Example name for the task we've talked about before but have not written for inclusion, the counter-argument being that the correct thing to do here would be write a custom task. But there are Java programs (which shall remain nameless) that are ridiculously complicated to call API-style due to th

Re: applyjava

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/17/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Example name for the task we've talked about > before > > but have not written for inclusion, the > > counter-argument being that the cor

Re: svn commit: r537344 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/ResourceContains.java

--- Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi guys. Sorry I've been having trouble keeping > up > > lately. Saw this stuff but missed the intervening > > discussion. Started playing today with adding > refid > > support, etc., but after awhile it occurred to me > that > > we already had

Re: svn commit: r540950 - in /ant: core/trunk/dist/ core/trunk/dist/lib/ sandbox/antlibs/debian/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/debian/ sandbox/antlibs/debian/trunk/src/tests/antunit/

;) I assumed that was accidental and removed them. -Matt --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why are you adding the dist and dist/lib directories > to > source code code, they should only get > created as part of the build process. > > Peter > > On 5/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL

Re: LocationLogger

--- Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've just had time to play around with this : > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32897 > > It seems to work quite well producing the desired > output etc. > > Any problems putting this in 1.7.1? Anyone else had > chanc

RE: Seeing log output when running tests with AntUnit

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >It's being saved to a log where you can make > assertions about > >output text, using > assertion, which > >itself uses the the condition > > How would I print the content of that log? > > >Maybe we could tweak antunit also print the buffer > on an > >asser

Re: Task for substringing?

--- Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > In the project I'm working on I have a need to be > able to substring an > expanded property value > > > property="new"> > ${new} > > -> 23 > > Is there a way of achieving this already? Looking > through the manual > I don't see a

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

Thoughts inline: --- Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > After throwing together a quick hack to support my > substring > properties use case, Matt suggested instead > significant changes to the > property helper class. Sorry! :) > > After looking through the code this aft

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

Urgh, looking over the PropertyHelper stuff, I wonder if we shouldn't refactor it somewhat. It seems to be overly complex to allow full PropertyHelper delegates. It seems that we might be better off using a single PropertyHelper (still replaceable) and adding Lists of getPropertyResolvers and set

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/14/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Urgh, looking over the PropertyHelper stuff, I > wonder > > if we shouldn't refactor it somewhat. It seems to > be > > overly complex to all

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/14/07, Peter Reilly > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > interface SetPropertyResolver { > > boolean setProperty(Project a, String > property, String value) > > returns true if property consumed > > return false if not > > } > > I

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/14/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I don't understand the SetPropertyResolver > aspect. > > > > On fur

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/15/07, Peter Reilly > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't get the Set part. How would that be > used? The GetPR comes into > > > play in a ${scheme:...} expansion, but how would > the SetPR work? --DD > > Thanks for the example Peter.

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/15/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I am actively working on this as we speak, > actually, > > and I'm pleased so far with my results. > > FTR Matt, I still haven't read

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Meanwhile I'll try restricting properties to > strings and see if we > > break anything internal. > > We have had bug rep

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/22/07, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On 6/22/07, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Funnily enough I did restrict Properties to > Strings > > > > and all the tests passed. :) > > > > > > You mean I didn't w

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/22/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Can we keep this discussion afloat? I've done a > lot > > of thinking on this issue over the past week and a > few > > day

Re: svn commit: r549684 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/FileUtils.java

--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Reilly wrote: > > On 6/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Author: mbenson > >> Date: Thu Jun 21 20:10:20 2007 > >> New Revision: 549684 > >> > >> URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=549684 > >> Log: > >> de

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/22/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Let me divert the topic for a moment--the other of > the > > two most important property handling extension > points > > can be expressed w

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

Hi all-- Just wanted to be sure everyone who cares about this thread noticed http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42736 and the companion antlib at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/antlibs/props . br, Matt --- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

am willing to entertain differing opinions, however. :) -Matt > > Peter > > > On 6/26/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi all-- > > Just wanted to be sure everyone who cares about > this > > thread noticed > > > http://issu

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

PropertySetter would know how to retrieve its own properties? As for consensus on the property setting extension point, I think we stand at: You (Peter): +1 DD: strong -0? Me (Matt): +0 So I think we can do this unless DD clarifies his position as being a full -1. That's not his customar

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/28/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > As for consensus on the property setting extension > point, > > I think we stand at: > > > > You (Peter): +1 > > DD: strong -0? > >

Re: svn commit: r551592 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/optional/AbstractScriptComponent.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/optional/ScriptCondition.java src/t

Steve or anyone else: Let me know if you feel this change is too risky; it just seemed intuitive to me. br, Matt --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: mbenson > Date: Thu Jun 28 08:14:04 2007 > New Revision: 551592 > > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=551592 > Log: > now pref

Re: PropertyHelper thoughts

h if > not impossible.]] The PropertyEvaluator interface is our attempt to accommodate use case 3. I don't see anything in your above example that can't be accomplished with the new approach. Again, our goal is to improve the overall design, not to take away any abilities you current

Re: PropertyHelper patch & property changes

--- Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm just testing out the props antlib. > > First, it looks like it will be perfect for my > usecase, ta Matt ;) > > Second, is the patch at > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42736 > divisive? If > this was a simple a

Re: Props Antlib

--- Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just got the props antlib working within my odd > usecase. > > I'm using mvn + antrun plugin and I've installed the > patched version > of ant and the props antlib. Then in a parent pom, > I've got the > complete etc setup for th

[antrun-plugin] impending PropertyHelper compatibility issues

Forgive my ignorance of the subject line conventions of this mailing list, and please note in advance that I personally am not subscribed to any Maven lists (I believe Kevin Jackson is subscribed to one or more of them). At any rate, it has come to the attention of the Ant developers that Maven's

1.7.x branch

I'd like to create one. Any objections? -Matt Luggage? GPS? Comic books? Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz --

Re: PathTokenizer

--- Charles McLouth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A newbie question: > Is there a particular reason why the PathTokenizer > (src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/PathTokenizer.java) > isn't coded to handle quoted > windows paths? > ex: > "C:\a whitespace path\a whitespace file" > Can you give a bette

Re: svn commit: r557013 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant: AntClassLoader.java ComponentHelper.java

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Matt, > Is is necessary to apply these formatting changes at > the > moment? I suppose I can revert, read onward: > Normally when a branch is set up, there will be a > lot of > merging from the branch to the MAIN as minor bugs > get > fixed and h

Re: svn commit: r557025 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/PropertyHelper.java

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that the cloning is not complete. Thanks for pointing that out; I certainly need(ed) to clone the delegates and (*)properties maps. I am purposely not doing anything with hooks, etc., since the operative idea is to discard that whole (sub-)A

Re: svn commit: r557062 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/LoadProperties.java

The refactoring is much bigger than the formatting here, FYI... wanted to reassure you that I am taking your comments to heart, Peter. -Matt --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: mbenson > Date: Tue Jul 17 14:35:26 2007 > New Revision: 557062 > > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&re

Re: svn commit: r559096 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/Path.java

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt, did you test this? You write that derive > classes can override > delegateIteratorToList() to return false, but this > is used to init a > class member of Path, i.e. the *super* class of the > one supposed to do > the overriding... > > As

Re: is broken with Jython in the recent trunk builds

--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: > > Recent trunk ANT fails in my builds because > does > > something with the script that Jython cannot > digest (new lines?). > > with the same code works fine. This is a > test script: > > > > > >

Re: is broken with Jython in the recent trunk builds

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: > > > Recent trunk ANT fails in my builds. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt Benson wrote: > > Fairly recently I added

Re: is broken with Jython in the recent trunk builds

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/31/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > originally behaved such that a > > default value can be declared on the task as an > > attribute, and the embedded script can set the > > condit

Re: svn commit: r554390 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/Resource.java

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 08 Jul 2007, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=554390 > > Log: > > fmt > > These changes make lines longer than 80 chars that > used to be our > standard. > > It's not too important to me, b

Re: svn commit: r554390 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/Resource.java

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> It's not too important to me, but in a way I'd > prefer to stick with &g

Re: is broken with Jython in the recent trunk builds

ed it here to allow expression handling from > property callbacks > > - something like > > > > > (I cannot test at the moment due to > (bsf/log4j/commons > > logging/jython.jar issues) > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > On 7/31/07, Domi

Re: is broken with Jython in the recent trunk builds

that wanted to support a return value could just switch to calling evaluate and prefer a return value to whatever its "legacy" mechanisms were. How does this sound? -Matt > - Alexey. > > On 7/31/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > &g

Re: is broken with Jython in the recent trunk builds

e arbitrary scripty stuff is done to calculate a final result, then return it. It seems that experience has shown we shouldn't discriminate between an attribute and nested text. Maybe a different attribute name would better express the concept I am after. -Matt > - Alexey. > > O

Re: PropertyHelper breaks ant-contrib

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > see > > > Apparently AntCallBack's test tries to install a > PropertyHelper (I'm > not familiar with either the task's no

Re: Last chance: vmbuild migration & ant nightlies

Brett: Am I too late in speaking up for the group? AFAIK we do want our nightly builds to continue; at least *I* do. -Matt --- Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Antoine, all, > > A reminder from my earlier mail... > > Currently, it appears that Ant is running nightly > builds on v

Re: PropertyHelper breaks ant-contrib

( taskName ); > 208 newProject.addTaskDefinition( > taskName, taskClass ); > 209 } > > easy fix would be to remove the constructor from > PropertyHelperTask. > the project attribute would be injected as usual by > IH. > > Peter > > > On 8/

Re: componentdef

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/9/07, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Peter Reilly > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I am ready to commit the componentdef patch > > > see: > > > http://marc.info/?t=11581423414&r=1&w=2 > > > and

Re: is broken with Jython in the recent trunk builds

need to > decide if we want 100% backward compatibility or > slightly less. I guess at this point I'd just roll it back until we can come up with a solution that pleases everyone. -Matt > > - Alexey. > > Matt Benson wrote: > > --- Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Last chance: vmbuild migration & ant nightlies

nt the same set up. Yeah, that's fine. > > Alternatively, you might consider whether it's worth > having an > individual zone you can self administer instead. > Dunno, I/we can keep it in mind. Thanks, Matt > Cheers, > Brett > > On 08/08/2007, at 2:16 AM

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15388] - [PATCH][embed proposal] Add lenient mode and java functions to JXpath task

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR > BUG· > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE > AT > . > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED > AND· > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABA

Re: svn commit: r568096 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/IntrospectionHelper.java

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: peterreilly > Date: Tue Aug 21 05:26:21 2007 > New Revision: 568096 > > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=568096&view=rev > Log: > Allow reflection on setX(Object x) to be an xml > attribute > Normally x will be of String type, however with the > new

Re: svn commit: r568511 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/PropertyHelper.java

I had looked into something like this, but what about the case when a delegate needs to re-call PH? The delegate in question would need the NullReturn object (should we refactor this to be just a PSF Object on PropertyHelper?). Maybe we can have a PropertyHelper store a proxy to itself, that does

Re: svn commit: r568511 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/PropertyHelper.java

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/22/07, Peter Reilly > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that I'm lost in this discussion... > > > "${el:project.targets.get('not-present')}" should > resolve to > > "null" rather than > "${el:project.targets.get('not-present')}". > > - t

Re: Local Properties

Apologies for the top post but yours was rather long. ;) I like the approach patch; I have applied it but don't have time to exercise it ATM. The only issue I see is that I am apparently too stupid to understand how copying the current stack for new threads works. What I see: kicks off a give

Re: svn commit: r568511 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/PropertyHelper.java

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/22/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: [SNIP] > > though I'd still like an opinion on the proxy > > mechanism I suggested for delegate recursion... > :) > > I did not reply because I di

Re: svn commit: r568511 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/PropertyHelper.java

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/22/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > On 8/22/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

BTW, is this stuff truly broken and needs attention, or is this ongoing breakage due to some (unfixable?) Gump weirdness? -Matt --- Gump Integration Build <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To whom it may engage... > > This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited > one. For > more in

Re: [VOTE] Ben Burgess as committer

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > I would like to propose Ben Burgess as a committer > for the ant project, with a special interest in > maintaining > the starteam tasks. > > Ben as been of help on the Ant user and dev lists > for a long > time and has provided a number of p

Re: Rev 568096 breaks ant-contrib

Thanks for the note. One or more of us will be looking into it. :) -Matt --- Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ant-contrib-test has been started failing on Gump > sometime between > 2007-08-21T00:00 and 2007-08-22T00L:00 (I believe > Pacific DT, but > could be wrong) with the follow

Re: Rev 568096 breaks ant-contrib

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > The offending rev does deal with Introspection and > seems that it > > could interfere with proper initialization of > tasks, but I don't see > > any obvious error in the patch. It

Re: Rev 568096 breaks ant-contrib

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 05 Sep 2007, Stefan Bodewig > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Instead of what we have in Equals it should > probably be > > > > public void setArg1(Object a) { > > if (a instanceof String) { > > setArg1((String) a); > > }

Re: race conditions in Ant

--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Loughran wrote: > > > > > > I've been running the new build and havent seen > any more loops; I think > > race conditions are gone. > > > > Incidentally, given we didnt see any way that the > thing could loop, > > given we were using thre

Re: race conditions in Ant

--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Benson wrote: > > --- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Steve Loughran wrote: > >>> > >>> I've been running the new build and havent seen > >> any mor

Re: svn commit: r586283 - /ant/core/branches/ANT_17_BRANCH/build.xml

Kev--I don't get it. The ANTLR task isn't compatible with Antlr 3, though a compatible version is available at antlr.org . Did I miss something? -Matt --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: kevj > Date: Fri Oct 19 00:00:50 2007 > New Revision: 586283 > > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?re

Re: svn commit: r586283 - /ant/core/branches/ANT_17_BRANCH/build.xml

--- Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > Kev--I don't get it. The ANTLR task isn't > compatible > > with Antlr 3, though a compatible version is > available > > at antlr.org . Did I miss something? > > Sorry, I was getting all dependencies for the build > and just > downloaded

Re: adding a waitfor to a sequence

--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How do I go (new Sequential).addTask(new > WaitFor())? > > Because WaitFor is not a task, just a project > component with an execute > method. Can't you use a TaskAdapter in code? -Matt > > -steve > > -

Re: adding a waitfor to a sequence

Sorry, guys--multitasking and responded to Steve's query without updating my inbox first. Then had a race condition with Jan to add the convenience constructor. ;) -Matt --- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: getting const strings into antunit tests

--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now, one more feature for someone to add, which is a > variant of what we > added to smartfrog last week. > > 1. In junit tests, you can reference the Java string > in the java code, > so your tests dont break if the message changes. > > 2. I

Re: 1.7.1 nearly there - alpha

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Gilles Scokart > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I run RAT against it, and I got some missing > headers (or missing > > > indication that it is generated files) : > > What's RAT? It's a bit too overloaded a search word >

Re: Ant Documentation

You can also read about the gendoc sandbox Antlib at http://ant.apache.org/antlibs/sandbox.html . For some reason this has been in the sandbox over 2.5 years. I don't know where the time has gone... -Matt --- Tony Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the response. :) > >

Re: nested mkdir tasks

--- Tony Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just out of curiosity, has there been any work done > towards making the > task nest-able? > > For example: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which would create: > > > --- + dir > | - subdir > | + another_subdir

Re: nested mkdir tasks

--- Tony Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Benson wrote: > > Why not simply > > > > > > > > > > ? > > > > -Matt > > > > That works fine. But in certain situations I've > really wanted to be > able to

Re: [DISCUSS] EasyAnt: Ant based pre packaged build system for java projects

Xavier: I think it would be good to have a system that pretty much bundles alternatives for everything Maven provides, but without all the black magic that makes Maven difficult to customize. Basically antlibs for all parts of the Maven lifecycle, including, especially, Ivy. :) In fact, I alre

Re: ProjectHelper : parsing from InputStream

Wait: I think Gilles has just given me the spark I needed... ProjectHelper2 simply uses instanceof checks to see what it can read from. What if we accept a ResourceFactory as a source, and request Main.DEFAULT_BUILD_FILENAME (build.xml) for the Resource to parse. Then it's the implementation's

Re: [DISCUSS] EasyAnt: Ant based pre packaged build system for java projects

--- Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 10, 2008 9:33 PM, Dominique Devienne > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 10, 2008 2:13 PM, Xavier Hanin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 10, 2008 7:21 PM, Peter Arrenbrecht > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Providing > > > > overrid

Re: AW: ProjectHelper : parsing from InputStream

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > >> Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> The problem is a bit more complex than just > allowing a different > >> source. The main problem are build files that

Re: 1.7.1 Status Update :)

I am running OS X with a case-insensitive fs (didn't realize that was the case until I was already going). Anyway, I got: ! /Users/mbenson/oss/asf/ant17x> svn up ! /Users/mbenson/oss/asf/ant17x> ./build.sh -Dant.install=$PWD install-lite . . . ! /Users/mbenson/oss/asf/ant17x> ./bin/ant test . . .

Re: Suppress redirector input stream?

--- Jeffrey E Care <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to tell redirector to not pump stdin > to a forked process? > Hi Jeff--I think you should be able to do: or, fancier: Would any of this help? -Matt > In the WAS build we have to fork quite a few times > (either w

Re: svn commit: r617460 - /ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreTypes/resources.html

Thanks! I've made a couple of tweaks and moved the restrict example to restrict from sort. ;) -Matt --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: jhm > Date: Fri Feb 1 02:47:14 2008 > New Revision: 617460 > > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=617460&view=rev > Log: > Examples for > * > *

Building IvyDE

how? Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ ---

Re: Building IvyDE

I looking in the right place? Thanks, Matt > > HTH, > > Xavier > > On Feb 8, 2008 4:37 PM, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > how? > > > > > > > > > ___

Re: Building IvyDE

--- Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le 8 févr. 08 à 18:57, Matt Benson a écrit : > > > > > --- Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> We don't have automated scripts for that yet, but > >> here is the p

Re: Building IvyDE

Thanks Nicolas! -Matt --- Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le 8 févr. 08 à 18:57, Matt Benson a écrit : > > > > > --- Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> We don't have automated scripts for that yet, but > >

Re: Building IvyDE

--- Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 8, 2008 7:43 PM, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > --- Nicolas Lalevée > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Le 8 févr. 08 à 18:57, Matt B

Re: Building IvyDE

--- Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le 8 févr. 08 à 20:08, Matt Benson a écrit : > > > Still breaks. Same problem. :( > > > > -Matt > > > > --- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > >> --

Re: Building IvyDE

Still breaks. Same problem. :( -Matt --- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 8, 2008 7:43 PM, Matt Benson > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] add Nicolas Lalev�e as committer

No more Eclipse freezes! ;) Especially important if we're to adopt Ivy at work in the future. +1 -Matt --- Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Nicolas Lalevée has contributed a lot of patches to > Ivy and IvyDE [1 to 10], > and has been actively involved in several > discu

Re: 1.7.1 test results

FWIW, no failures on MacOS X Intel 10.4.11 on JDK 1.5.0_13 -Matt --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Kevin Jackson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (Would love a Solaris, HPUX and MacOSX test) > > MacOS X PPC 10.4.11 on JDK 1.5.0 (_13 IIRC) - all > tests pass

Re: [OT] BugZilla new look?

I believe ASF infra just decided to upgrade BZ to a later version. :) -Matt --- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have to confess going to BugZilla for the first > time in a while, and > was surprised by the new look. It's much different > and "bigger" (more > scrolling, bigger

Re: Is our objective for 2.0 too ambitious? (was Re: Ivy 2.0 planning)

--- Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Bruce Atherton > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Typically you would use a new Status, but I am > uncertain about how much > > control you have over the Apache Jira instance. > Can you introduce new > > workflow for

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

I think I was going to revert these... in fact, I thought I already did it. :( -Matt --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is due to: > [au:antunit] Build File: > /srv/gump/public/workspace/ant/src/tests/antunit/types/scriptcondition-test.xml > [au:antunit] Tests run: 16, Failures:

Re: Including builder resolver in ivy

RE "Builder": it just struck me that this resolver is sort of a decorator over existing URL functionality. What about [Decorator|Decorated]Resolver? -Matt --- Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Archie Cobbs > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'd like to

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45135] Ant 1.7.0: a patternset reference cannot be redefined through itself

Can someone add either props antlib or sandbox antlibs as a component in BZ? Thanks, Matt --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45135 > > > Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: > >What|Removed

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45135] Ant 1.7.0: a patternset reference cannot be redefined through itself

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can someone add either props antlib or sandbox > antlibs > > as a component in BZ? > > Props Antlib is there now.

Re: Locking in Project and PropertyHelper

Stefan: Your suggested changes on PropertyHelper sound reasonable; I'm playing with them now. -Matt --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > while looking into > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45194 > I realized > that we are currently pretty inconsisten

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >