Thanks for the note.  One or more of us will be
looking into it.  :)

-Matt

--- Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ant-contrib-test has been started failing on Gump
> sometime between  
> 2007-08-21T00:00 and 2007-08-22T00L:00 (I believe
> Pacific DT, but  
> could be wrong) with the following test failures:
> 
> run-test:
>      [junit] Testsuite:
> net.sf.antcontrib.design.VerifyDesignTest
>      [junit] Tests run: 41, Failures: 0, Errors: 0,
> Time elapsed:  
> 15.651 sec
>      [junit]
>      [junit] Testsuite:
> net.sf.antcontrib.logic.AntCallBackTest
>      [junit] Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0,
> Time elapsed:  
> 0.886 sec
>      [junit]
>      [junit] Testsuite:
> net.sf.antcontrib.logic.AssertTest
>      [junit] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 2,
> Time elapsed:  
> 0.317 sec
>      [junit]
>      [junit] Testcase:
> test4(net.sf.antcontrib.logic.AssertTest):     
> Caused an ERROR
>      [junit] both arg1 and arg2 are required in
> greater than
>      [junit]
>
/srv/gump/public/workspace/ant-contrib/test/resources/
> 
> logic/asserttest.xml:34: both arg1 and arg2 are
> required in greater than
>      [junit]  at
> net.sf.antcontrib.logic.condition.IsGreaterThan.eval
> 
> (IsGreaterThan.java:64)
>      [junit]  at
>
net.sf.antcontrib.logic.Assert.execute(Assert.java:102)
>      [junit]  at
> net.sf.antcontrib.logic.AssertTest.test4 
> (AssertTest.java:57)
>      [junit]
>      [junit]
>      [junit] Testcase:
> test5(net.sf.antcontrib.logic.AssertTest):     
> Caused an ERROR
>      [junit] both arg1 and arg2 are required in less
> than
>      [junit]
>
/srv/gump/public/workspace/ant-contrib/test/resources/
> 
> logic/asserttest.xml:42: both arg1 and arg2 are
> required in less than
>      [junit]  at
> net.sf.antcontrib.logic.condition.IsLessThan.eval 
> (IsLessThan.java:64)
>      [junit]  at
>
net.sf.antcontrib.logic.Assert.execute(Assert.java:102)
>      [junit]  at
> net.sf.antcontrib.logic.AssertTest.test5 
> (AssertTest.java:61)
>      [junit]
>      [junit]
>      [junit] Test net.sf.antcontrib.logic.AssertTest
> FAILED
>      [junit] Testsuite:
> net.sf.antcontrib.logic.ForTest
>      [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0,
> Time elapsed:  
> 0.076 sec
> 
> ...
>      [junit]
>      [junit] Testsuite:
> net.sf.antcontrib.process.LimitTest
>      [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 1,
> Time elapsed:  
> 2.072 sec
>      [junit]
>      [junit] Testcase:
> test2(net.sf.antcontrib.process.LimitTest):    
> Caused an ERROR
>      [junit] both arg1 and arg2 are required in less
> than
>      [junit]
>
/srv/gump/public/workspace/ant-contrib/test/resources/
> 
> logic/limittest.xml:32: both arg1 and arg2 are
> required in less than
>      [junit]  at
> net.sf.antcontrib.logic.condition.IsLessThan.eval 
> (IsLessThan.java:64)
>      [junit]  at
>
net.sf.antcontrib.logic.Assert.execute(Assert.java:102)
>      [junit]  at
> net.sf.antcontrib.process.LimitTest.test2 
> (LimitTest.java:35)
>      [junit]
>      [junit]
>      [junit] Test
> net.sf.antcontrib.process.LimitTest FAILED
>      [junit] Testsuite:
> net.sf.antcontrib.property.PathToFileSetTest
>      [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0,
> Time elapsed:  
> 0.112 sec
> 
> ...
> 
> and continues in that state see
> http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ 
> ant-contrib/ant-contrib-test/index.html.
> 
> There were no changes to ant-contrib during that
> time, but there were  
> many changes to Ant.  I went through and ran the
> ant-contrib-tests  
> against various revisions and it appears that
> ant-contrib would pass  
> with rev 568091 and failed with 568096 and every
> later release I tried.
> 
> To run the test, check ant-contrib out from SVN:
> 
> $ svn co
>
https://ant-contrib.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/ant-contrib/
> 
> ant-contrib/trunk ant-contrib
> $ cd ant-contrib
> '
> '
> ' will run ant-contrib against Ant 1.6.5, but will
> also download  
> dependencies.  Should pass.
> $ mvn package
> '
> '  will pass or fail depending on whether a pre or
> post rev 568096  
> ant is on the path
> '
> $ ant -Dno-ivy=true clean gump-safe-test -lib
> ~/.m2/repository/junit/ 
> junit/3.8.1/junit-3.8.1.jar
> 
> The offending rev does deal with Introspection and
> seems that it  
> could interfere with proper initialization of tasks,
> but I don't see  
> any obvious error in the patch.  It doesn't have a
> related bug  
> report, so I don't know what it is trying to fix.
> 
> Index:
>
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/IntrospectionHelper.java
>
===================================================================
> ---
>
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/IntrospectionHelper.java
> (revision  
> 568091)
> +++
>
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/IntrospectionHelper.java
> (revision  
> 568096)
> @@ -943,6 +943,17 @@
>           final Class reflectedArg =
> PRIMITIVE_TYPE_MAP.containsKey(arg)
>               ? (Class) PRIMITIVE_TYPE_MAP.get(arg)
> : arg;
> +        // Object.class - it gets handled
> differently by  
> AttributeSetter
> +        if (java.lang.Object.class == reflectedArg)
> {
> +            return new AttributeSetter(m, arg) {
> +                public void set(Project p, Object
> parent, String value)
> +                        throws
> InvocationTargetException,
> +                    IllegalAccessException {
> +                    throw new BuildException(
> +                        "Internal ant problem -
> this should not get  
> called");
> +                }
> +            };
> +        }
>           // simplest case - setAttribute expects
> String
>           if
> (java.lang.String.class.equals(reflectedArg)) {
>               return new AttributeSetter(m, arg) {
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 



       
____________________________________________________________________________________Ready
 for the edge of your seat? 
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. 
http://tv.yahoo.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to