Urgh, looking over the PropertyHelper stuff, I wonder if we shouldn't refactor it somewhat. It seems to be overly complex to allow full PropertyHelper delegates. It seems that we might be better off using a single PropertyHelper (still replaceable) and adding Lists of getPropertyResolvers and setPropertyResolvers. One obvious problem of the current implementation seems to be that you can't do this:
<property name="foo" value="foo.value" /> <registerpropertyhelper> <chain> <bashextendedpropertyhelper /> </chain> </registerpropertyhelper> <echo>${foo:1,1}</echo> Because the PH that knows how to handle the extended syntax wasn't around when "foo" was set and thus won't know about the foo property (I could be wrong but this is my impression of what the code is doing). This seems broken and extremely counter-intuitive to me. I am going to look into an extensive refactor of PH and if we determine that necessitates 1.8, well, so be it. :| -Matt [SNIP] ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]