--- Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It is just a thought - should ScriptFilter,
> ScriptMapper, ... also return a
> value instead of setting it?
> 

mmmm.... I don't know!  :)  In hindsight maybe it
would have been better to leave this can of worms
unmolested rather than deal with these concepts of
consistency...  I suppose that in either of those
cases it might well be reasonable to handle a return
value.  But with good old Python, what--you can't
execute arbitrary junk, return a value, and consider
that an evaluation?  Jython seems to be a pain
overall... seems like every time I have to deal with
it there's a headache involved.  If we do extend this
concept, I suppose we could pull up "expression" to
AbstractScriptComponent, and have evaluate() delegate
to execute() and return null when expression ==
false... then any type that wanted to support a return
value could just switch to calling evaluate and prefer
a return value to whatever its "legacy" mechanisms
were.  How does this sound?

-Matt

> - Alexey.
> 
> On 7/31/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Old code was executing self.setValue() and the
> > > current behaviour breaks
> > > backward compatibility. I have tried old
> > > ScriptCondition.eval() and it fixed
> > > the problem. I think we should add "expression"
> > > attribute to
> > > AbstractScriptComponent and change it to use it
> with
> > > evaluateScript(),
> > > otherwise nested text will be executed with old
> > > executeScript() call.
> >
> > Thanks for running this down, Alexey.  I see where
> > you're coming from with the "expression"
> attribute,
> > though I'm not sure I agree it should live all the
> way
> > up in AbstractScriptComponent, because we can't
> use it
> > to automatically drive anything.  I am going to
> add it
> > to ScriptCondition directly; if we change our
> minds
> > later pulling it up shouldn't cause any problems.
> >
> > -Matt
> >
> > >
> > > - Alexey.
> > >
> > > On 7/31/07, Peter Reilly
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > For BSF there are two methods to run a script:
> > > >   eval and exec,
> > > >
> > > > In ant 1.6.* the only method supported was
> exec.
> > > Hence all
> > > > the <script*> types called methods on self to
> set
> > > the return
> > > > value.
> > > >
> > > > For ant 1.7.0, I modified the scripting code
> to
> > > allow access to
> > > > eval and exec, but did not modify any calling
> > > types to use
> > > > eval rather than exec. (In fact I did not test
> the
> > > eval on anything)
> > > > I placed it here to allow expression handling
> from
> > > property callbacks
> > > > - something like <if test='${groovy: abc ==
> > > "abc"}"> ..., but did
> > > > not follow up.
> > > >
> > > > I assume that jython does not like a new line
> in
> > > its expression.
> > > >
> > > > one can in python do
> > > > a = 1
> > > > if a > 0:
> > > >    b = 2
> > > > however, one cannot do
> > > > if #
> > > >   a > 0:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > > So I think that this is a clear case of BC
> > > problem.
> > > > It would be nearly impossible to use
> > > <scriptcondition> with
> > > > jythton in it's current state.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > (I cannot test at the moment due to
> > > (bsf/log4j/commons
> > > > logging/jython.jar issues)
> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 7/31/07, Dominique Devienne
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On 7/31/07, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > <scriptcondition> originally behaved such
> that
> > > a
> > > > > > default value can be declared on the task
> as
> > > an
> > > > > > attribute, and the embedded script can set
> the
> > > > > > condition value.  I preserved this
> behavior,
> > > but added
> > > > > > a preference for a return value, if any,
> from
> > > the
> > > > > > script:  again, on the basis that this
> seemed
> > > a (more)
> > > > > > natural behavior to me.  DD, you said "not
> > > returning a
> > > > > > value is fine by you"... and that's what
> > > > > > <scriptcondition> always did, and _should_
> > > still
> > > > > > allow... am _I_ missing anything (other
> than
> > > whatever
> > > > > > I've apparently done to break python
> > > compatibility)?
> > > > >
> > > > > Ah, sorry, I meant that "not returning a
> value
> > > is meaningless to me".
> > > > > Sure, if a default value for the condition
> is
> > > set as an attribute, why
> > > > > not (although I don't see why that's
> necessary
> > > or useful), but a
> > > > > scriptcondition is supposed to be a script
> > > fragment which returns a
> > > > > boolean value, and I don't see the point of
> not
> > > returning a value.
> > > > > --DD
> > > > >
> > > > > PS: The error message could be nicer though
> ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alexey N. Solofnenko
> > > Home: http://trelony.cjb.net/
> > > Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 usually)
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Choose the right car based on your needs.  Check
> out Yahoo! Autos new Car
> > Finder tool.
> > http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Alexey N. Solofnenko
> Home: http://trelony.cjb.net/
> Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 usually)
> 



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. 
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to