DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22326] - remove deprecated / 1.1 issues packages ant and ant.filters - ant.loader

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

beating the dead Ant 1.6 horse

I know the quote is "there is no timeframe yet on this release". But is there a ballpark? 2003? Some particular half of 2004? Thanks, Matt __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ---

Re: beating the dead Ant 1.6 horse

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 06:53 am, Matt Benson wrote: > I know the quote is "there is no timeframe yet on this > release". But is there a ballpark? 2003? Some > particular half of 2004? > Ant 1.6 is very much alive, IMHO. 2003. :-) IMHO, I would hope to have it soon (where soon is undefined :-)) b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22338] New: - add a "minversion" and a "version" attribute to taskdef

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22326] - remove deprecated / 1.1 issues packages ant and ant.filters - ant.loader

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[PMC-VOTE] Ant 1.5.4

[It is the PMC's responsibility to ensure that our releases are OK, so only PMC member votes are binding, that shouldn't stop anybody else from speking her/his mind.] Conor has created the 1.5.4 distribution, it can be found at . In addition I've diffed

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22326] - remove deprecated / 1.1 issues packages ant and ant.filters - ant.loader

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22326] - remove deprecated / 1.1 issues packages ant and ant.filters - ant.loader

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PMC-VOTE] Ant 1.5.4

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 05:09 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Please vote for/against these archives as the 1.5.4 release. Here's > my +1 for starters. > +1 Conor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

cvs commit: ant/xdocs mail.xml

bodewig 2003/08/12 00:25:00 Modified:docs mail.html xdocsmail.xml Log: mail-archives should be used now, even if it doesn't work either Revision ChangesPath 1.23 +3 -3 ant/docs/mail.html Index: mail.html

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22297] - Patch for new version of Kaffe

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22298] - "Copy" could take filelists where files are on different drives

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PMC-VOTE] Ant 1.5.4

+1 On Tuesday, August 12, 2003, at 03:09 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: [It is the PMC's responsibility to ensure that our releases are OK, so only PMC member votes are binding, that shouldn't stop anybody else from speking her/his mind.] Conor has created the 1.5.4 distribution, it can be found at

Recursive properties resolution ?

Hi, I read the archive about the recursive properties and I am not convinced so i would like to reopen the debate. (Or i may have missed the good mail, if so correct me). Excuse the long mail, but i prefer explain all my problem. I do the all J2EE project build of my firm, the build process is e

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22345] New: - In J2SDK 1.5.0 (Tiger) enum is a keyword

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22326] - remove deprecated / 1.1 issues packages ant and ant.filters - ant.loader

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PMC-VOTE] Ant 1.5.4

On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 09:09:27AM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > [It is the PMC's responsibility to ensure that our releases are OK, so > only PMC member votes are binding, that shouldn't stop anybody else > from speking her/his mind.] -1 doesn't build for me, though this could be me :( Building

Re: [PMC-VOTE] Ant 1.5.4

+1 It builds fine for me. ./bootstrap.sh ./build.sh export ANT_HOME `pwd`/dist cd dist/bin ./ant -version On Tuesday 12 August 2003 10:03, Paul Nasrat wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 09:09:27AM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > [It is the PMC's responsibility to ensure that our releases are OK,

Re: beating the dead Ant 1.6 horse

On Tuesday 12 August 2003 04:20, Conor MacNeill wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 06:53 am, Matt Benson wrote: > > I know the quote is "there is no timeframe yet on this > > release". But is there a ballpark? 2003? Some > > particular half of 2004? > > Ant 1.6 is very much alive, IMHO. > > 2003. :-)

Re: [PMC-VOTE] Ant 1.5.4

On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 10:23:25AM +0100, peter reilly wrote: > +1 > > It builds fine for me. > > ./bootstrap.sh > ./build.sh > export ANT_HOME `pwd`/dist > cd dist/bin > ./ant -version Hmm, any idea why it might barf on mine (mine's not an official vote anyway). If I run stuff manually it buil

Re: [PMC-VOTE] Ant 1.5.4

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Paul Nasrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -1 doesn't build for me, though this could be me :( I think so. ./bootstrap.sh works for me. > core : 1.5.3 indicates that you have an older version of ant.jar in your CLASSPATH somewhere - even though I cannot see it in the output.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22323] - Problem with Copy when todir has a space in it

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: beating the dead Ant 1.6 horse

> > The others are antlib/namespace/polymorph stuff. I'm wondering if we can > > get to the point where the ant optional tasks are packaged as antlibs and > > potentially not added to the root loader if their supporting libraries are > > not also available to the root loader. This would allow them

Re: [PMC-VOTE] Ant 1.5.4

On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 11:25:06AM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Paul Nasrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe the wrapper script is pulling in an older ant.jar > from somewhere (/etc/ant.conf?, /usr/share/java via rpm_mode being > true?) I mv'd /etc/ant.conf and it worked,

Re: [PMC-VOTE] Ant 1.5.4

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Paul Nasrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I mv'd /etc/ant.conf and it worked, now I have to work out how to > get it to do this in the spec. I assume that ant-conf is setting rpm_mode to true. Maybe you can override this in your spec somehow? Stefan

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22297] - Patch for new version of Kaffe

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22338] - add a "minversion" and a "version" attribute to taskdef

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Patch] namespace and antlib

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ant:core is ant's namespace and the default namespace for > definitions. does that include the optional tasks? If you reserve the ant* URI space, does that mean it will be impossible to add third party tasks to the default namespace o

Re: [Patch] namespace and antlib

On 12 Aug 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... you've already answered my questions in your response to DD, sorry. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Patch] namespace and antlib

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > uri="antlib:net.sf.antcontrib" >classpath="/tmp/ant-contrib.jar"/> wouldn't the resource attribute be redundant in that case? > 3) reserved uri's +1 on reserving the ant* protocol. > 5) antlibs in the class

Re: [Patch] namespace and antlib

On Tuesday 12 August 2003 12:36, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>uri="antlib:net.sf.antcontrib" > >classpath="/tmp/ant-contrib.jar"/> > > wouldn't the resource attribute be redundant in that case? Not in this case.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22345] - In J2SDK 1.5.0 (Tiger) enum is a keyword

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Patch] namespace and antlib

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 12 August 2003 12:36, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >uri="antlib:net.sf.antcontrib" >> >classpath="/tmp/ant-contrib.jar"/> >> >> wouldn't

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22347] New: - java task with BufferedReader hangs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22345] - In J2SDK 1.5.0 (Tiger) enum is a keyword

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Patch] namespace and antlib

On Tuesday 12 August 2003 13:24, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 12 August 2003 12:36, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >>> >uri="antlib:net.sf.antcontrib"

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22345] - In J2SDK 1.5.0 (Tiger) enum is a keyword

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22345] - In J2SDK 1.5.0 (Tiger) enum is a keyword

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22345] - In J2SDK 1.5.0 (Tiger) enum is a keyword

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: beating the dead Ant 1.6 horse

I'm also interested PropertyHelper, and in particular Costin's experimental XPath based one. I'd like to be able to define functions (defined as part of an AntLib) to operate directly on property values, kind of like XPath functions, and it sounds like property helper is the way to get this!?!? --D

[VOTE] Let's use archive.apache.org

Hi, as some of you may know, there is a new virtual host called archive.apache.org that is supposed to be the source for software archeologists, much as our ant.apache.org/old-releases folder is now. archive.apache.org is setup to rsync from www.apache.org/dist without ever deleting anything, thi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22298] - "Copy" could take filelists where files are on different drives

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22347] - java task with BufferedReader hangs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22347] - java task with BufferedReader hangs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/net FTP.java

Antoine, Since you have recently been playing with symlinks/FTP what are your thoughts on bug 14320? http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14320 -Gus Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) concerning the inclusion of "" in inclu

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/net FTP.java

Antoine, Since you have recently been playing with symlinks/FTP what are your thoughts on bug 14320? http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14320 -Gus Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) concerning the inclusion of "" in inclu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22179] - Wrong Class Version

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22347] - java task with BufferedReader hangs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22345] - In J2SDK 1.5.0 (Tiger) enum is a keyword

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant AntClassLoader.java ComponentHelper.java

conor 2003/08/12 08:15:06 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant AntClassLoader.java ComponentHelper.java Log: Rename some enums ... Revision ChangesPath 1.75 +3 -3 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/AntClassLoader.java Index: AntCl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22345] - In J2SDK 1.5.0 (Tiger) enum is a keyword

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22020] - [PATCH] addition to task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PMC-VOTE] Ant 1.5.4

Stefan Bodewig wrote: [It is the PMC's responsibility to ensure that our releases are OK, so only PMC member votes are binding, that shouldn't stop anybody else from speking her/his mind.] Conor has created the 1.5.4 distribution, it can be found at . In

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/net FTP.java

- Original Message - From: "Gus Heck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 4:10 PM > Antoine, > > Since you have recently been playing with symlinks/FTP what are your > thoughts on bug 14320? > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14320 > First the bad news

Re: Recursive properties resolution ?

Emmanuel FELLER wrote: Hi, I read the archive about the recursive properties and I am not convinced so i would like to reopen the debate. (Or i may have missed the good mail, if so correct me). Excuse the long mail, but i prefer explain all my problem. I do the all J2EE project build of my firm, th

[DOCPATCH] javac task doc

The default for verbose is off. Let's mention that in the docs. :) (Sorry if my mailer wraps this, sometimes attachments don't make it through, but the patch should be pretty straight forward as what to do). -- Larry Index: docs/manual/CoreTasks/javac.html ===

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/net FTP.java

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: - Original Message - From: "Gus Heck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 4:10 PM Antoine, Since you have recently been playing with symlinks/FTP what are your thoughts on bug 14320? http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14320 F

RE: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/option al/net FTP.java

VFS is very interesting, but if you make Ant dependent upon it, then there's a circular dependency between the two, since VFS is dependent upon Ant to build *and* for its own custom Ant tasks... Which is why Ant core still is standalone, except for the XML parser. I'm not against this dependency,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22326] - remove deprecated / 1.1 issues packages ant and ant.filters - ant.loader

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

CVS down?

Hi, Can it be that public CVS is currently down? I seem to not be able to do updats / create patches anymore. Kind Regards, Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22361] New: - Copy with glob mapper maps AND copies originals

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [PMC-VOTE] Ant 1.5.4

+1 > [It is the PMC's responsibility to ensure that our releases > are OK, so only PMC member votes are binding, that shouldn't > stop anybody else from speking her/his mind.] > > Conor has created the 1.5.4 distribution, it can be found at . In addi

Re: [PMC-VOTE] Ant 1.5.4

At 09:09 AM 8/12/2003 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Please vote for/against these archives as the 1.5.4 release. Here's my +1 for starters. +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO