I'm also interested PropertyHelper, and in particular Costin's experimental XPath based one. I'd like to be able to define functions (defined as part of an AntLib) to operate directly on property values, kind of like XPath functions, and it sounds like property helper is the way to get this!?!? --DD
> -----Original Message----- > From: Knut Wannheden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 4:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: beating the dead Ant 1.6 horse > > > > The others are antlib/namespace/polymorph stuff. I'm wondering if we > can > > > get to the point where the ant optional tasks are packaged as antlibs > and > > > potentially not added to the root loader if their supporting libraries > are > > > not also available to the root loader. This would allow them to be > > > taskdef'd in later in a build. > > > > I would rather leave this for after 1.6 release. > > And how about the new PropertyHelper which lets you plugin additional > PropertyHelpers to process properties prefixed with a namespace, i.e. > "foo:my-property"? > > -- > knut --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
