On Tuesday 12 August 2003 04:20, Conor MacNeill wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 06:53 am, Matt Benson wrote: > > I know the quote is "there is no timeframe yet on this > > release". But is there a ballpark? 2003? Some > > particular half of 2004? > > Ant 1.6 is very much alive, IMHO. > > 2003. :-) > > IMHO, I would hope to have it soon (where soon is undefined :-)) but I want > to resolve a few things first ... > > Import is one of them - and it is important to get right. There are many > different views on this from simple include to include with simple renaming > to something close to an object model and even xslt style operation. I've > been a little busy lately to push this along. I'll be back ... > > The others are antlib/namespace/polymorph stuff. I'm wondering if we can > get to the point where the ant optional tasks are packaged as antlibs and > potentially not added to the root loader if their supporting libraries are > not also available to the root loader. This would allow them to be > taskdef'd in later in a build.
I would rather leave this for after 1.6 release. Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
