DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326 remove deprecated / 1.1 issues packages ant and ant.filters - ant.loader ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-12 19:44 ------- Currently I am also looking at packages types - zip, and I think about marking some methods and classes deprecated for their only purpose is to work around 1.1 - 1.2 differences, is this ok? Further I would like to bring up the question if it is really good to introduce WeakishReference in 1.6 (at least according to the @since tags in the code). As 1.6 need not compile against 1.1 and the only purpose of this class (and WeakishReference12 is to work around a 1.1 / 1.2 difference. (I would definetely have marked it deprecated if it is ok to mark them deprecated, but it seems a bit silly to introduce a new class in a new release that is deprecated from the start.) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
