Re: Your new site design

2021-01-04 Thread Hai Nam
Hi, > We are working on a complete new fresh download web page which will > address a broader audience. Just want to say I did have the same problem when looking for other images to download. The homepage is too light. Glad to hear that a new download page is being worked on. PS: sorry Thomas f

Re: Your new site design

2021-01-04 Thread Thomas Lange
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2021 13:29:38 +0100, Hans said: > Please let me explain: > Debian is downloadable for so many different hardware, that you should not > just "force" people to download just a special installer version. Hi Hans, we know that Debian supports a long list of do

Your new site design

2021-01-04 Thread Hans
Happy new year dear debian web team! I took a look at the new webdesign for debian.org and was very impressed of the fresh design. It looks great, but there is one point, I think, that IMHO should be improved. Your big fat "Download"-Button is pointing to the netinst-iso, which clicking on it,

Re wordpress post: Free web site design / wordpress setup offer.

2009-10-27 Thread James
I saw your post on Wordpress and I thought you might be someone who may need a custom website built for free to further your cause. I am supervising design students right now who are looking for a few real projects to build in exchange for a good reference and to use the site as an example site

Re: site design philosophy/plan

2002-10-24 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 08:56:42AM -0700, Christian C. Benito wrote: > Okay. I have a fair amount of experience with xhtml and css. > Are stylesheets being used at all? I see some embedded styling, > but no externel sheets. What would it take to begin the > conversion to xhtml? Is there any pla

Re: site design philosophy/plan

2002-10-24 Thread Christian C. Benito
> You can start reading that : > > http://www.debian.org/devel/website/ Just browsed it. > P.S.: Did you subscibe to the Mailing-list ? Yew. Okay. I have a fair amount of experience with xhtml and css. Are stylesheets being used at all? I see some embedded styling, but no externel sheets.

Re: site design philosophy/plan

2002-10-24 Thread Pierre Machard
Hello, On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 08:28:46AM -0700, Christian C. Benito wrote: > I am interested in helping out, but first I wanted to read > any documentation that might exist (for the web site). > Where should I look? You can start reading that : http://www.debian.org/devel/website/ P.S.: Did yo

site design philosophy/plan

2002-10-24 Thread Christian C. Benito
I am interested in helping out, but first I wanted to read any documentation that might exist (for the web site). Where should I look? Christian C. Benito

Debian web site design

2000-11-24 Thread Robert Marlow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Debianers I heard Debian needed a site facelift and I can understand why since it's had basically the same look for the 2 years that I know of ;> Anyway, I've thrown together a quick page just as an example to get some idea of what you guys thi

Re: debian site design thoughts (was Re: [michael@itd.utech.de: A big THANK YOU!])

2000-11-11 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 04:00:04AM -0500, brent verner wrote: > | > ok, this weekend I played HTML-designer... the product of my toils > | > can be viewed at debian.rcfile.org. you _will_ need a browser that > | > renders HTML-4.01 strict properly (meaning Mozilla M18) right now. > | > if the desig

Re: debian site design thoughts

2000-11-10 Thread peter karlsson
brent verner: > don't be surprised if it looks horrible. If it looks horrible it's your fault. Opera's CSS support is one of the best available. (Okay, I'm not only saying that because I'm an Opera employee). > if so, would you mind checking out debian.rcfile.org and > screenshotting it for me?

Re: debian site design thoughts (was Re: [michael@itd.utech.de: A big THANK YOU!])

2000-11-10 Thread brent verner
On 10 Nov 2000 at 11:27 (+0100), peter karlsson wrote: | brent verner: | | > that I can't understand - can you screenshot it? it is set to | > min-width: 140px; | | I'll do that when I get home. | | > What browser are you viewing it with? | | Opera 4. don't be surprised if it looks horrible. t

Re: debian site design thoughts (was Re: [michael@itd.utech.de: A big THANK YOU!])

2000-11-10 Thread peter karlsson
brent verner: > that I can't understand - can you screenshot it? it is set to > min-width: 140px; I'll do that when I get home. > What browser are you viewing it with? Opera 4. -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:

debian site design thoughts (was Re: [michael@itd.utech.de: A big THANK YOU!])

2000-11-10 Thread brent verner
On 06 Nov 2000 at 22:15 (+0100), peter karlsson wrote: | Josip Rodin: | | > Is that fixed size? I can't parse ".9em" offhand, but I'm guessing | > it's not variable because I remember setting up my fonts preferences | > to use bigger font size. | | ".9em" means "I think the user is stupid and don

debian site design thoughts (was Re: [michael@itd.utech.de: A big THANK YOU!])

2000-11-10 Thread brent verner
Hi, wow... sorry for not replying sooner -- a procmail filter stuffed all of this mail into an old 'debian' mail folder (I now have deb lists by -devel -user) On 06 Nov 2000 at 21:38 (+0100), Josip Rodin wrote: | On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 11:07:48PM -0500, brent verner wrote: | > | > > Now coming t

Re: API (debian site design ripped?)

2000-06-12 Thread Joey Hess
Darren O. Benham wrote: > 2) violate the stricter copyright of the "Official Logo" "This logo or a modified version may be used by anyone to refer to the Debian project" (for the plain swirl). At the top of the web page, where we have " Debian", they have " API". So it is clear to me that they ar

Re: API (debian site design ripped?)

2000-06-12 Thread Darren O. Benham
I havn't seen it and I'm not in a position to look right now, but my first impressing based on the topic is -- Free Software (Open Source). They're welcome to use the parts that make sense to them as long as they don't: 1) violate the Debian(tm) trademark 2) violate the stricter copyright of the "

API (debian site design ripped?)

2000-06-11 Thread Bart Schuller
Hi, (I'm not on debian-www, so please CC any replies). I wonder if you've seen http://www.491.org/projets/api/ and what you think about it. And apologies if you did see it already, I didn't see this subject in the list archives. The very good NTK http://www.ntk.net/ reported this. -- The idea

Re: Site design

1999-11-17 Thread Darren O. Benham
On Tue, Nov 16, 1999 at 11:04:28PM -0500, Bart Szyszka wrote: > Hi, > > Since the Debian logo now is only black and red, isn't the red and > blue color scheme at www.debian.org just something left over from > the old logo? Have you guys considered redesigning the site? I'm sure > me and my partner

Re: site design again

1998-04-11 Thread David Stern
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >David Stern wrote: >> >> One suggestion I have is to rotate the "What is Debian?" section with >> others, to maintain variety and keep web surfers interest. Some >> potential substitues may include a select news story, particularlyone >> which advocates

Re: site design again

1998-04-10 Thread James A . Treacy
> > One suggestion I have is to rotate the "What is Debian?" section with > > others, to maintain variety and keep web surfers interest. Some > > potential substitues may include a select news story, particularly one > > which advocates Debian or gives the latest breaking news on release > > infor

Re: site design again

1998-04-10 Thread Thomas Apel
David Stern wrote: > > One suggestion I have is to rotate the "What is Debian?" section with > others, to maintain variety and keep web surfers interest. Some > potential substitues may include a select news story, particularly one > which advocates Debian or gives the latest breaking news on rel

Re: site design again

1998-04-08 Thread David Stern
On Wed, 08 Apr 1998 14:51:17 EDT, "James A. Treacy" wrote: > Feel 'free' to edit the page and post the new text. Think of it as > submitting proposed changes to upstream source. It is the OpenSource > model for text. :) Hehe. Now I see Open Source and DFSG are not merely compatible, they are the

Re: site design again

1998-04-08 Thread Georg Hitsch
Hi! > Regarding the choice of server: not true. cgi scripts are the only thing > that aren't affected by which server you use. The idea is that everyone > have a complete copy of the pages and only use cgi.debian.org for > running cgi. This makes it much easier to mirror the pages. > > Also, the

Re: site design again

1998-04-08 Thread James A . Treacy
> Very nice work. I see you validate the HTML (I like validated > SGML) I think I would like a more prominent positioning of the > choose server nearest you (seems like it is only relevant to searches > as it is), but this is a very minor nit. Also, is there a way to have > a small Capta

Re: site design again

1998-04-08 Thread James A . Treacy
> On this note, I've wondered if anyone has noticed that the word "free" > is used an awful lot in the "about Debian" page? From what I've been > reading, "free" is not a good way to describe Linux, because it conveys > the perception of reduced quality. I don't want to start any battles, > a

Re: site design again

1998-04-08 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Very nice work. I see you validate the HTML (I like validated SGML) I think I would like a more prominent positioning of the choose server nearest you (seems like it is only relevant to searches as it is), but this is a very minor nit. Also, is there a way to have a small Captain

Re: site design again

1998-04-08 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Sorry, I must be going blind. I totally missed captain blue eyes, perched right on top. As I said before, me likum. manoj -- "Failing to get them to do it your way might mean they're stupid, but it also means you failed to get them to do it your way." Cal Keegan M

Re: site design again

1998-04-08 Thread David Stern
On Wed, 08 Apr 1998 12:48:36 +0200, Thomas Apel wrote: > James A.Treacy wrote: > > > > If you feel you have good ideas, please convert a few more pages > > to what you'd like to see and get back to us. People like what you > > have done so far so keep going. If we like that too, I'd love it if > >

Re: site design again

1998-04-08 Thread Enrique Zanardi
On Wed, Apr 08, 1998 at 01:10:32PM -0400, James A.Treacy wrote: [...] > > Take a look at it: > > http://www.koeln.netsurf.de/~thomas.apel/debian/index.html > > > > Comments are welcome. Especially about the usability with Lynx. It's > > difficult for me to judge about this as I never really used L

Re: site design again

1998-04-08 Thread James A . Treacy
> In addition to the index I also converted the following pages. Just > follow the links on the index page. > > - About Debian > - Distribution > - Packages > - Download via FTP > - Debian on CD > > Take a look at it: > http://www.koeln.netsurf.de/~thomas.apel/debian/index.html > > C

Re: site design again

1998-04-08 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998, Thomas Apel wrote: > BTW are there any figures available how often the site is visited with > which browser? http://www.debian.org/~jgg/debian.org.stats.html I also have berlin.org and opersource.org Jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Re: site design again

1998-04-08 Thread Thomas Apel
James A.Treacy wrote: > > If you feel you have good ideas, please convert a few more pages > to what you'd like to see and get back to us. People like what you > have done so far so keep going. If we like that too, I'd love it if > you became a developer so I could give you access to the web pages

Re: site design again

1998-04-06 Thread James A . Treacy
> After there seem to be quite a lot of people who think the web site > could need a change I think we should now decide if we do it or not. > It has been my intention to change the site - at least the main page. > If we decide to change the site one should announce this to the public. > So every

site design again

1998-04-05 Thread Thomas Apel
After there seem to be quite a lot of people who think the web site could need a change I think we should now decide if we do it or not. If we decide to change the site one should announce this to the public. So everyone interested can join debian-www to discuss the hows and to help. I don't know