Re: Changing language on the Debian site is too cumbersome

set up per-lang virtualhosts such as www-en.debian.org, www-de.debian.org, etc. (of course using en.www..., de.www will also be OK here) and set different prefer-language env variable. then as long as all internal links are relative (not http(s)://...), following links will stay under the

Re: Changing language on the Debian site is too cumbersome

al one. Or would this not work? Remember, these links (in the language-specific HTML pages) would only be used if the user at some point clicked a specific language - if they didn't, they will still be surfing around on the general HTML pages which does not have a specific language in

Re: Changing language on the Debian site is too cumbersome

work AFAIK. Sure, having just static HTML is great and genuine in many ways, but at the cost of functionality. >> the Debian site is just messier to read in my native language than it is to >> read it in English > > You might want to help out with translations to fix that.

Re: Changing language on the Debian site is too cumbersome

d like this: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/mirror/dsa-puppet.git/tree/modules/roles/templates/apache-www.debian.org.erb > the Debian site is just messier to read in my native language than it is to > read it in English You might want to help out with translations to fix that. https://www

Changing language on the Debian site is too cumbersome

site. I presume there is some add-on for changing it per site, but that's AFIAK not part of the default browser features - feel free to correct me if I'm mistaken. Just to add more background, the use case I have is that while I want most pages in my native language if possible, the Debi

Re: Error on Debian Site

Hello Krish, Il giorno lun, 29/11/2010 alle 12.42 +0530, Krishnendu Manna ha scritto: > Hi, > > I am writing this mail to report an error occurring on the debian > site. > > None of the official torrents are opening. While clicking on the > respective url it throws t

Error on Debian Site

Hi, I am writing this mail to report an error occurring on the debian site. None of the official torrents are opening. While clicking on the respective url it throws this error: Not Found The requested URL /debian-cd/5.0.6/i386/bt-dvd/ was not found on this server. Apache/2.2.14

Re: Debian site misfeature

On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:41:24PM +0300, Владислав wrote: > Yes this page http://www.debian.org/mirror/list is very hard to find. > I've try to do it many times :) > > I mean that on page http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages should be > info and link to the http://www.debian.org/distrib/package

Re: Debian site misfeature

> for apt repos links, but I can't find them on debian site. At last >> google helps me to find something in the web. > > The installation program should have filled in sources.list.  Would > you please file a bug report against the installation package? > >> I think

Re: Debian site misfeature

On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:14:58AM +0300, Владислав wrote: > One time I was use Debian net install CD. After installation I've find > that apt sources is empty - no records at all. This force me to search > for apt repos links, but I can't find them on debian site. At last &

Re: Debian site misfeature

One time I was use Debian net install CD. After installation I've find that apt sources is empty - no records at all. This force me to search for apt repos links, but I can't find them on debian site. At last google helps me to find something in the web. I think that apt sources li

Re: Debian site misfeature

On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 06:02:21PM +0300, Владислав wrote: > I have some trouble with debian.org site. I can't easy find on your > site deb repositories links list. > I (and many others as I think) searching for links like this: "deb > ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org/debian/ stable main contrib non-free"

Debian site misfeature

Hello. I have some trouble with debian.org site. I can't easy find on your site deb repositories links list. I (and many others as I think) searching for links like this: "deb ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org/debian/ stable main contrib non-free" Every time when it needed I prefer search this for links in

Re: New Debian Site

Johan Haggi wrote: > > As long as there's enough contrast I don't see an immediate problem > > with it. Dark blue on darker blue is not good. However, dark blue on > > light blue seems to fit. Maybe it would be better to choose an even > > lighter blue, I don't know. > [...] > > Debian's leftco

Re: New Debian Site

On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 03:11:40PM (GMT+0100), Martin Schulze wrote: > Mathieu Stumpf wrote: [...] > > What about the blue text on a blue background for > > As long as there's enough contrast I don't see an immediate problem > with it. Dark blue on darker blue is not good. However, dark blue on

Re: Re: New Debian Site

Mathieu Stumpf wrote: > It's seems you only see arguments that enable you to say things > supposed to hurt me. What about the blue text on a blue background for I usually only comment on things I can comment on. You can consider me neutral on the others, I may be undecided or feel not competent e

Re: Re: New Debian Site

It's seems you only see arguments that enable you to say things supposed to hurt me. What about the blue text on a blue background for example? And it seems you steel didn't read the whole thread, to see others criticisms (or are you ignoring it like mine?). Nevermind, I didn't post to create a

Re: Re: New Debian Site

Martin Schulze wrote: > Mathieu Stumpf wrote: > > As I say, what I find ugly, is the menu colors, which means the white text > > on > > a dark blue background on the red brackground, and the text in blue on a > > blue > > Aha. So you don't like the white on dark blue on red. Since the > colo

Re: Re: New Debian Site

d box, and makes appear an > > > horizontal scrollbar. I tried whith the css i proposed and it works even > with > > > a 640*480 resolution under epiphany (others browsers I tried didn't have > the > > > problem of the line break). > > > > Did you che

Re: New Debian Site

xists) as soon as you tell me which way I should go. > > Ok, I made a first css, what do you think about this: > http://psychoslave.free.fr/debian/site/planche2/ Wuuuh! I'm blind! Wow, that was horrible! I can describe *what* I believe is so horrible on that page: 1. too much b

Re: Re: New Debian Site

Mathieu Stumpf wrote: > > That's why I would first like to see detailed criticism on what's > > wrong with the current site or layout before we can start discussing > > how to change this and see how it can be improved. If the site is > > fine as it is, there's no need to change anything. > > > >

Re: New Debian Site

* Mathieu Stumpf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061115 12:28]: > Okay, I'm open to any criticism on what I did. > I've made some modifications on the html this time (but nothing important): > look the planche2.* > http://psychoslave.free.fr/debian/site/ I know that it is a bit unfai

Re: New Debian Site

Hi, On Tuesday 14 November 2006 16:03, Mathieu Stumpf wrote: > Ok, I made a first css, what do you think about this: > http://psychoslave.free.fr/debian/site/planche2/ I think the font of the "debian" text should not be changed. People are familar with it and recognize Debian w

Re: New Debian Site

ght by chance have only > seen the examples I personally didn't like). Okay, I'm open to any criticism on what I did. I've made some modifications on the html this time (but nothing important): look the planche2.* http://psychoslave.free.fr/debian/site/ Also any criticism on

Re: New Debian Site

* Mathieu Stumpf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061115 11:10]: > Honestly, do you really think it's the first thing someone will think about > when coming on the debian main page? Here is what basic users propably > think : "this page sucks!" ;P > > Really can't you see how ugly is the current layout? Tha

Re: Re: New Debian Site

On 2006-11-14 18:55, Martin Schulze wrote: > Mathieu Stumpf wrote: > > > They look so totally different form the current form - they probably > > > won't reach many seconds. > > > > > > I believ it would be more helpful to determine the parts on the > > > current layout that need improvement and d

Re: Re: New Debian Site

Mathieu Stumpf wrote: > > They look so totally different form the current form - they probably > > won't reach many seconds. > > > > I believ it would be more helpful to determine the parts on the > > current layout that need improvement and develop a better layout for > > these instead of overhau

Re: New Debian Site

t do you think about this: http://psychoslave.free.fr/debian/site/planche2/ The only thing I changed in the html document is the "debian" picture (not the logo).

Re: Re: New Debian Site

auling the entire start page. I'm not sure to understand what you mean, the website structure is realy well designed, so it could really looks like this forms. In fact I allready begin a css based on the #2, here you can see what the debian website could looks like : http://psychoslave.free.

Re: Re: New Debian Site

Mathieu Stumpf wrote: > I've worked on some new design for the debian website, tell me what you think > about, which once you like the most (if any), what's good/bad, I'll take the > best, and make a css with it. They look so totally different form the current form - they probably won't reach ma

Re: New Debian Site

Hi Mathieu, from my point of view the problem with design #1 && #3 are those round content boxes because you always loose a lot of space. My personal favour is design #4. Mathieu Stumpf schrieb: Hello, I've worked on some new design for the debian website, tell me what you think about, whi

Re: Re: New Debian Site

Hello, I've worked on some new design for the debian website, tell me what you think about, which once you like the most (if any), what's good/bad, I'll take the best, and make a css with it. You can see my work here: http://psychoslave.free.fr/debian/ You should use inkscape to watch it. Once

Re: New Debian Site

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:01:24PM +0200, Augusto Frausin wrote: > >Sorry, I do not know anything about web crumblers, is it something > >similar (maybe clickable)? I use the up button of Konqueror to go up > >but Firefox misses such a functionality IIRC. > > Basically, if you go in a section then

Re: New Debian Site

This code should be sufficient for the print css:print.css h1 { text-align: center; }#header {    display: none;}#leftcol {    display: none;}#footer {    display: none;} also these lines should be added to the main css: type="text/css" media="print" href="" />I tested it and seems to be worki

Re: New Debian Site

Wouter Verhelst wrote: > That does not require using a "print this page" or "printer-friendly > version" link; CSS has "media types" which allow you to modify the > lay-out of a page depending on whether you're viewing it in a graphical > browser, printing it out, or using a speech synthesizer to l

Re: New Debian Site

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 04:41:33PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > There are things that are totally useless on a printout of a webpage. > The blue menu on the main page, the options to select another language > or mirror, etc, make no sense on a printout. It is sensible to hide them > there. > >

Re: New Debian Site

On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:45:10AM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote: > > 4) Last I would also put a "print page" in each page so that users don't > > have to > > print with all the colors in the way. (this can be easily done with CSSs.) > > I would not like this. Each browser has a printing function and t

Re: New Debian Site

HXC wrote: > > If you are interested in my proposal, please let me know, > > > > Thank you for your time, hope to hear from you soon, > > Augusto Frausin > > Nice post and I rally agree with your assesment. Unfortunatly there is > not a lot going on in these lists. I also offered my help but find i

Re: New Debian Site

Reply to:Hi Augusto,thanks for your many suggestions instead of just proposing to add colors everywhere ...On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 04:16:24PM +0200, Augusto Frausin wrote:> I started pulling down some notes on what I think we could do to improve the> site's> usability:> > 1) I noticed that when yo

Re: New Debian Site

Frans Pop wrote: > HXC: Please learn to *ONLY* quote the parts of the mail you reply to that > are relevant to your reply! This is basic mailing list etiquette! > I have requested this before, and am disappointed to have to ask again Sorry, first time I read that. > . > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: New Debian Site

HXC: Please learn to *ONLY* quote the parts of the mail you reply to that are relevant to your reply! This is basic mailing list etiquette! I have requested this before, and am disappointed to have to ask again. On Wednesday 18 October 2006 11:59, HXC wrote: > I am afraid this discussion is going

Re: New Debian Site

Jens Seidel wrote: Hi Augusto, thanks for your many suggestions instead of just proposing to add colors everywhere ... On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 04:16:24PM +0200, Augusto Frausin wrote: I started pulling down some notes on what I think we could do to improve the site's usability:

Re: New Debian Site

Hi Augusto, thanks for your many suggestions instead of just proposing to add colors everywhere ... On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 04:16:24PM +0200, Augusto Frausin wrote: > I started pulling down some notes on what I think we could do to improve the > site's > usability: > > 1) I noticed that when yo

Re: New Debian Site

I started pulling down some notes on what I think we could do to improve the site'susability: 1) I noticed that when you get into a page of debian.org from google.comusually you have no clue where you have ended up inside the site. I was thinking that maybe a web crumbler could be useful to help t

Re: New Debian Site

I am very happy everyone took this very seriously. I understand that implementing a newCMS would be a way to arduous job, so I think I will try to work on a new CSS (since I saw that the html file looks easy to work on, being well organised) to see if I can make a new interesting proposal as a sta

Re: New Debian Site

(Please delete text irrelevant to your reply from the mail you reply to.) On Monday 16 October 2006 21:33, HXC wrote: > Fait enough. In my opinion only more reason to start exploring the > possibilities. One can wonder why it is not possible for Debian to the > same as other Linux distributions (e

Re: New Debian Site

Steve Kemp wrote: > The big problem is that many people offer to help without fully > understanding the size and scope of the problem. > > Right now we have a system which allows us to publish pages in > multiple languages and store those pages under revision control. > > The pages are stat

Re: New Debian Site

The big problem is that many people offer to help without fully understanding the size and scope of the problem. Right now we have a system which allows us to publish pages in multiple languages and store those pages under revision control. The pages are static, do not require the instal

Re: New Debian Site

Augusto Frausin wrote: I was going through Debian's lists and came across this conversation which left me a bit perplexed: ___ > > Hello, I was wondering why you don't ever change your site template? > Cause i

RE: New Debian Site

I was going through Debian's lists and came across this conversation which left me a bit perplexed:___> > Hello, I was wondering why you don't ever change your site template? > Cause it's not so easy and most developers have better things

Re: New Debian Site

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Augusto Frausin wrote: > I would love to help out the linux world and would be very happy to > collaborate in creating a new site for Debian or if you would like I > could send you a gif of what I think could be an interesting idea > for a new site. The code for debian-www is

Re: New Debian Site

user and came across Ubuntu > and Debian, after having visited the two sites, I would have no doubt > of choosing Ubuntu: > The Ubuntu has a more friendly look, compared to that of the too > serious and, if I may say, "old", of the Debian site. > Now I personally think tha

New Debian Site

two sites, I would have no doubt of choosing Ubuntu: The Ubuntu has a more friendly look, compared to that of the too serious and, if I may say, "old", of the Debian site. Now I personally think that most of the times a site reflects the quality of the product it's selling, and I

Re: Debian Site Hacked?

On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 08:22:55PM -0500, Michael Forbes wrote: > The debian.org site and many of its subpages have a banner for stopping > EU software patents in agriculture. While I agree with banning software > patents, this is odd. Is there a problem? No, that's perfectly normal - it's calle

Re: Debian Site Hacked?

On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 08:22:55PM -0500, Michael Forbes wrote: > The debian.org site and many of its subpages have a banner for stopping EU > software patents in agriculture. While I agree with banning software patents, > this is odd. Is there a problem? We're participating in the web demonstra

Debian Site Hacked?

The debian.org site and many of its subpages have a banner for stopping EU software patents in agriculture. While I agree with banning software patents, this is odd. Is there a problem? Thank you. -Michael Forbes Student System Oper

Re: new design for debian site

Op za, 18-12-2004 te 00:56 -0800, schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > In my opinion, somes have a fixed idea about site layout. That's not true; however, we do not necessary think that the current layout is bad. It isn't shiny-fancy-super-graphical; however, from a purely functional point of view, it su

Re: new design for debian site

Quoting David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 11:45 +0200, F I R A T wrote: > > i post your replies to many art sites. They said me "Are They > > Kidding ..?" > > What about sending the replies to functionality, compatibility and > accessibility sites? BTW, what art site

Re: new design for debian site

On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 11:45 +0200, F I R A T wrote: > i post your replies to many art sites. They said me "Are They > Kidding ..?" What about sending the replies to functionality, compatibility and accessibility sites? BTW, what art sites? > so let us make survey about this issue. Go ahead, plea

Re: new design for debian site

Op vr, 17-12-2004 te 11:45 +0200, schreef F I R A T: > i post your replies to many art sites. They said me "Are They > Kidding ..?" Debian is not an art project. > so let us make survey about this issue. Feel free; don't expect it to have any result, though. As said, if you have specific ideas,

Re: new design for debian site

Gerfried Fuchs wrote: * F I R A T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-16 11:47]: David Moreno Garza wrote: What's the difference between 99's websites and the ones nowadays? If Debian's site is not nice now, what would you do to change it? can be xhtml 1.0

Re: new design for debian site

Am Donnerstag, 16.12.04 um 15:03 Uhr schrieb Gerfried Fuchs: for instance some sapmle open-source project web pages: http://www.netbeans.org/ Animated GIF as news ticker... come on. That's not really what is helpful, do you think so? It uses javascript, is not valid while using loose DTD,

Re: new design for debian site

* F I R A T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-16 11:47]: > David Moreno Garza wrote: >>What's the difference between 99's websites and the ones nowadays? If >>Debian's site is not nice now, what would you do to change it? >> > can be xhtml 1.0 transitional Please read up on

Re: new design for debian site

David Moreno Garza wrote: On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 11:19 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 01:28:22PM -0600, David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 11:02 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i just thought,

Re: new design for debian site

On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 11:19 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 01:28:22PM -0600, David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 11:02 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > i just thought, we may make a nice web site > > > like the other distros site. I j

Re: new design for debian site

On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 10:42:43AM +0100, Ionel Mugurel Ciobica wrote: > On 13-12-2004, at 14h 20'15", [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "new design for > debian site" > > hi everyone, > > i am new to debian lists, > > i want to redesign web site, what

Re: new design for debian site

On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 01:28:22PM -0600, David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 11:02 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > i just thought, we may make a nice web site > > like the other distros site. I just wanted to help. > > But the website is already nice! :-)

Re: new design for debian site

Hi there! * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041214 20:02]: > i just thought, we may make a nice web site > like the other distros site. I just wanted to help. > sorry if i am wrong. Well, perhaps it is a good idea, if you could start your work by telling us, what you miss and what you thi

Re: new design for debian site

On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 11:02 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > i just thought, we may make a nice web site > like the other distros site. I just wanted to help. But the website is already nice! :-) -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/ If you fall and break your leg,

Re: new design for debian site

Quoting Ionel Mugurel Ciobica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 14-12-2004, at 02h 08'26", Firat KUCUK wrote about "Re: new design for > debian site" > > > > i just wanto redesign 'debian.org'. > > i guess it is impossible. > &

Re: new design for debian site

On 14-12-2004, at 02h 08'26", Firat KUCUK wrote about "Re: new design for debian site" > > i just wanto redesign 'debian.org'. > i guess it is impossible. > > thanks for your support. > > best regards, > Firat. > Redisig

Re: new design for debian site

Quoting Ionel Mugurel Ciobica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 13-12-2004, at 14h 20'15", [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "new design for > debian site" > > hi everyone, > > i am new to debian lists, > > i want to redesign web site, what must i do? >

Re: new design for debian site

On 13-12-2004, at 14h 20'15", [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "new design for debian site" > hi everyone, > i am new to debian lists, > i want to redesign web site, what must i do? > or may i redesign? > Hi Firat, Which web site you want to redesign? Yours? If

new design for debian site

hi everyone, i am new to debian lists, i want to redesign web site, what must i do? or may i redesign? Firat [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://firat.kucuk.org/

new Debian site popcon.debian.org

Hello Debian-www, On behalf of the popularity-contest project, I would like to announce that it is now a somewhat official Debian project, since it is now hosted at . Probably, it would be good idea to link it from the main Debian web site. popularity-contest report inf

Re: Having problems accessing an English Debian Site

* Joshua Brickel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-26 17:29]: > You may like to look into your English web server. I'm trying to access > the US version, but when I try to touch on any of the links I keep on > going to pages in different languages. That is if the link doesn't > simply fail. Most of

Debian Site

Hello,   When I access http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages it is in german.  I was hoping for english.   Thank you for all you do.   Keith Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now

Having problems accessing an English Debian Site

Hi,   You may like to look into your English web server.  I’m trying to access the US version, but when I try to touch on any of the links I keep on going to pages in different languages.  That is if the link doesn’t simply fail.   Regards,   Joshua Brickel AlphaCell Wireless System

link problem on debian site

ciao, there is a problem in debian site. home page / support / Mailing List Archives should link to http://lists.debian.org/ but it goes to http://www.debian.org/distrib/ftplist thank you -- /* Paolo Pedaletti, * Referente Informatico * Dipartimento di Matematica e Applicazioni Milano

Re: Can't find page in the Debian site

Hi Luis, Thursday den 23.10.2003 um 19:47 CEST +0200, wrote Luis Eduardo Vivero P: >Mrs: > > > >There is an inexistent page in the Debian web site, it's > > > >http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/project-history/ > hmm, I can visit it maybe it was temporary problem Thanks

Can't find page in the Debian site

Mrs:   There is an inexistent page in the Debian web site, it's   http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/project-history/   about the Debian history.     Best Regards (from Chili).  Luis Eduardo Vivero Peña-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-Version: 3.1GE d- s:+ a- C++ UL++>UL P+++>PL++ !E W++ N ?o

Re: Dutch debian site in wrong language (indonesian?)

On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 06:40:17PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > Anyway in this case I cannot find a difference between our config > and http://www.debian.org/mirror/webmirror#configure , so > it should work? I reloaded apache just in case .. I think I found the culprit. The nb variant of

Re: Dutch debian site in wrong language (indonesian?)

On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 06:40:17PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > > Sorry to bother you about this again, but I'm getting the same thing from > > www.nl.debian.org now. > > > > $ wget -q -O - --header="Accept-Language: nl" http://www.nl.debian.org/doc/ > > | grep 'html lang=' > > > > $ >

Re: Dutch debian site in wrong language (indonesian?)

According to Remco Blaakmeer: > Sorry to bother you about this again, but I'm getting the same thing from > www.nl.debian.org now. > > $ wget -q -O - --header="Accept-Language: nl" http://www.nl.debian.org/doc/ | > grep 'html lang=' > > $ > Is there something wrong again? It's not a question of

Re: Dutch debian site in wrong language (indonesian?)

On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:12:34 +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > According to Josip Rodin: >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:56:10PM +0100, Coert Klaver wrote: >> > While checking out the debian websites, I found it rather confusing to find >> > the dutch debian site in

Re: Dutch debian site in wrong language (indonesian?)

According to Josip Rodin: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:56:10PM +0100, Coert Klaver wrote: > > While checking out the debian websites, I found it rather confusing to find > > the dutch debian site in another language than dutch ( is it indonesian / > > malayan?). Ch

Re: Dutch debian site in wrong language (indonesian?)

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:56:10PM +0100, Coert Klaver wrote: > While checking out the debian websites, I found it rather confusing to find > the dutch debian site in another language than dutch ( is it indonesian / > malayan?). Check yourself at: http://www.nl.debian.org/ Like the

Re: Dutch debian site in wrong language (indonesian?)

* Coert Klaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-02-12 20:56]: > While checking out the debian websites, I found it rather confusing to find > the dutch debian site in another language than dutch ( is it indonesian / > malayan?). Check yourself at: http://www.nl.debian.org/ It's

Re: Dutch debian site in wrong language (indonesian?)

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:56:10PM +0100, Coert Klaver wrote: > While checking out the debian websites, I found it rather confusing to find > the dutch debian site in another language than dutch ( is it indonesian / > malayan?). Check yourself at: http://www.nl.debian.org/ Mh, this m

Dutch debian site in wrong language (indonesian?)

Hi, While checking out the debian websites, I found it rather confusing to find the dutch debian site in another language than dutch ( is it indonesian / malayan?). Check yourself at: http://www.nl.debian.org/ Best regards, Coert Klaver Netherlands

Re: debian site design thoughts (was Re: [michael@itd.utech.de: A big THANK YOU!])

On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 04:00:04AM -0500, brent verner wrote: > | > ok, this weekend I played HTML-designer... the product of my toils > | > can be viewed at debian.rcfile.org. you _will_ need a browser that > | > renders HTML-4.01 strict properly (meaning Mozilla M18) right now. > | > if the desig

Re: debian site design thoughts

brent verner: > don't be surprised if it looks horrible. If it looks horrible it's your fault. Opera's CSS support is one of the best available. (Okay, I'm not only saying that because I'm an Opera employee). > if so, would you mind checking out debian.rcfile.org and > screenshotting it for me?

Re: debian site design thoughts (was Re: [michael@itd.utech.de: A big THANK YOU!])

On 10 Nov 2000 at 11:27 (+0100), peter karlsson wrote: | brent verner: | | > that I can't understand - can you screenshot it? it is set to | > min-width: 140px; | | I'll do that when I get home. | | > What browser are you viewing it with? | | Opera 4. don't be surprised if it looks horrible. t

Re: debian site design thoughts (was Re: [michael@itd.utech.de: A big THANK YOU!])

brent verner: > that I can't understand - can you screenshot it? it is set to > min-width: 140px; I'll do that when I get home. > What browser are you viewing it with? Opera 4. -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:

debian site design thoughts (was Re: [michael@itd.utech.de: A big THANK YOU!])

On 06 Nov 2000 at 22:15 (+0100), peter karlsson wrote: | Josip Rodin: | | > Is that fixed size? I can't parse ".9em" offhand, but I'm guessing | > it's not variable because I remember setting up my fonts preferences | > to use bigger font size. | | ".9em" means "I think the user is stupid and don

debian site design thoughts (was Re: [michael@itd.utech.de: A big THANK YOU!])

up there... mostly i was trying to decide if there should be some graphic/icon links in that space... the letters were just space-fillers which happen to be the first letter of each section of the debian site... | The incompatibility with old-class Nescaffe browsers would pose a large | problem -- Moz

Re: API (debian site design ripped?)

Darren O. Benham wrote: > 2) violate the stricter copyright of the "Official Logo" "This logo or a modified version may be used by anyone to refer to the Debian project" (for the plain swirl). At the top of the web page, where we have " Debian", they have " API". So it is clear to me that they ar

Re: API (debian site design ripped?)

I havn't seen it and I'm not in a position to look right now, but my first impressing based on the topic is -- Free Software (Open Source). They're welcome to use the parts that make sense to them as long as they don't: 1) violate the Debian(tm) trademark 2) violate the stricter copyright of the "

API (debian site design ripped?)

Hi, (I'm not on debian-www, so please CC any replies). I wonder if you've seen http://www.491.org/projets/api/ and what you think about it. And apologies if you did see it already, I didn't see this subject in the list archives. The very good NTK http://www.ntk.net/ reported this. -- The idea