* F I R A T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-16 11:47]: > David Moreno Garza wrote: >>What's the difference between 99's websites and the ones nowadays? If >>Debian's site is not nice now, what would you do to change it? >> > can be xhtml 1.0 transitional
Please read up on <http://annevankesteren.nl/archives/2004/12/mozilla-faq-on-xhtml> about the so-called "benefits" of using xhtml. What would it gain us, really? > more graphics (anti-aliased) And making the webpage load longer? And cutting off handicapped persons? > rss for news We have feeds for the security announces already. Granted, we should add one for the news, too. I think I'll try to work on it. But please understand that you should suggest _tangible_ enhances. Just saying "there should be something changed" without mentioning it /what/ should be changed and especially *how* is not really helpful. > for instance some sapmle open-source project web pages: > http://www.netbeans.org/ Animated GIF as news ticker... come on. That's not really what is helpful, do you think so? > http://www.sleepycat.com/ Header lines as images.... Great. > http://www.blender3d.com/ Blender is all about a graphics program. Of _course_ there are mainly pictures... And almost no informations on the main page, to come back to it. > http://www.mono-project.com/ IMHO mono page doesn't look too much different to ours. Not? So long, Alfie -- > Wozu ein Forum, wenn's Usenet gibt? Fuer jedes neue Forum eine neue Oberflaeche zu lernen, bringt mehr Abwechslung ins Leben -- Alexander Talos in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature