On Thu 26 Aug 2021 at 11:31:30 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 04:25:54PM +0100, Brian wrote:
[...]
> > I also forgot: after carrying out the corrected procedure, log out and
> > log back in.
>
> This is the part that I don't quite understand.
but you might need to log out/log back
> in to pick up the added/changed groups for the user.
log out/log back is *definitely* necessary. Not "might need to...".
--
Brian.
ot it sorted, though.
(Incidentally, why you have any need for the Brother drivers is beyond
me).
--
Brian.
>
> >
> > 5) If you screwed up and logged in as yourself, restart the web browser
> > so that you can get the HTTP basic authentication dialog box again. Go
>
On Sat 28 Aug 2021 at 15:38:40 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 08:31:56PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > Nobody should be logging into the web interface as root.
>
> As far as "nobody should...", I don't see the harm. It's not like the
> pass
t still a
good question :).
--
Brian.
kage and the name of the service.
The OP doesn't say whether he can scan or or not.
He could give the name of the scanner he is using and what is given
by
scanimage -L
--
Brian.
On Tue 31 Aug 2021 at 15:27:13 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 07:54:43PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 31 Aug 2021 at 14:48:02 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 07:31:22PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> > > >
On Tue 31 Aug 2021 at 23:15:22 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 31 Aug 2021 at 15:27:13 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 07:54:43PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > The OP doesn't say whether he can scan or or not.
> > >
>
ing
> 20210704 14:02:33 user root stopped saned saying "interfering with new
> printer?"
>
> Yeah, that would be nice.
As a non-professional sysadmin, this "Brian person" is wondering why
the OP's question (clearly relating to saned) is sidelined in favour
of
ing Greg Wooledge's exhortations to provide information about
an issue: You were asked explicity to provide some; you never did.
As it happens, I do not think the problems you have encountered
have anything to do with saned. You have picked the wrong target.
--
Brian.
> --
> Key ID4BFEBB31
>
On Thu 02 Sep 2021 at 21:06:59 +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-09-02 17:57, Brian wrote:
>
> > Regarding Greg Wooledge's exhortations to provide information about
> > an issue: You were asked explicity to provide some; you never did.
> > As it happens, I do no
On Fri 03 Sep 2021 at 00:03:08 +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-09-02 23:28, Brian wrote:
[...]
> > Please go back and read your very first post. You asked three questions.
> > Which one has not been answered?
>
> Please understand you are talking to an idiot, you have
t; unavailable, otherwise.
Surely - if you have a package installed from a previous release,
it does not get removed simply because testing does not have it?
It looks to me that the first line in sources.list does not help
in this situation.
--
Brian.
On Fri 03 Sep 2021 at 13:40:52 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 06:24:31PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 03 Sep 2021 at 10:40:32 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> > > deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
> > > deb http
ctual executable, /usr/bin/ls, and not a shell builtin.
>
> But is there an easier/better way? Can 'type' be asked to recursively decode
> aliases?
>
> I looked at the relevant section of bash(1) (when I eventually found it),
> but was not particularly enlightened.
Use 'help type' and try 'type -a ls'.
--
Brian.
h Firefox on buster and bullseye.
Mine works, reliably.
Maybe there are reports that say otherwise?
> Flatpaks and appimages are fine if they can be built - there's every
> chance that they, too witll be hit by this sort of thing at some
> point.
Why bother with what Debian does not provide by default.
--
Brian.
t; deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates main contrib non-free
>
> [Including non-free]
>
> >From https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList - the canonical source on the Wiki
I've always thought contrib and non-free as not being supported by
the security team.
--
Brian.
first and the third are legitimate lines. I am unsure about the
other two, particulary the last one.
--
Brian.
On Mon 06 Sep 2021 at 11:21:03 +0100, Brian wrote:
[...]
> I've always thought contrib and non-free as not being supported by
> the security team.
I think I'll change my mind. The result of self-education follows: :)
https://www.debian.org/security/faq#contrib
...If it is
On Mon 06 Sep 2021 at 08:34:44 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 11:42:52AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 06 Sep 2021 at 06:53:25 -0300, riveravaldez wrote:
> > > after reading the various sources of documentation (handbook,
> > > wiki, FAQs, Relea
list of sources could not be read.
The updates service has been switched off for bullseye.
For all those users who "know what they are doing" when upgrading, this
may be seen as a wake-up call.
--
Brian.
e
is. In your case it seems to involve stale files. URLs in the body of
the mail to *support* the report are OK. A URL that requires some
time to read needs thinking about including.
You could submit a new (revamped) report and close #994068. Why wait?
--
Brian.
On Sat 11 Sep 2021 at 12:44:30 -0400, Steve Dondley wrote:
> On 2021-09-11 06:27 AM, Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 10 Sep 2021 at 20:22:43 -0400, Steve Dondley wrote:
> >
> > > On 2021-09-10 08:15 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 0
#x27;t get release until the next version of debian. But I may be
> totally wrong on this.
If it is a Debian bug, the fix woudld be applied in unstable and work
its way through the system. The same happens with an upstream fix.
> So would I just be wasting my time and everyone else's by reporting this?
No! Please submit the report.
--
Brian.
"Resolved bugs -- Normal bugs"
> the bug number 958402 is shown with a strikethrough font
> (ie it has a horizontal line through the digits).
A good tip. However, a point to bear in mind is that Resolved bugs are
only visible for a few months (3?, 6?) after being closed.
--
Brian.
gt; >
> Actually, it appears they get archived after some time.
>
> You can access them by appending "&archive=yes" to the URL of the package on
> the BTS.
>
> For example regarding sudo package:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=sudo&archive=yes
Tha's another excellent tip!
--
Brian.
huge jumps between LTS releases with other
> distros.
About the closest in Debian to this concept is the unstable
distribution (sid).
--
Brian.
a cost to disk space or bandwidth.
4. And finally do
apt install task-xfce-desktop
--
Brian.
Xfce.
>
> The mini.iso can be used to install unstable directly.
I have used this technique many times over ethernet. It deserves to be
more widely known.
--
Brian.
On Tue 14 Sep 2021 at 16:33:55 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 9/13/2021 11:02 AM, Brian wrote
> > On Mon 13 Sep 2021 at 10:18:54 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> So, I'm considering Debian for a new homebrew MX gateway I want to set
&g
On Tue 14 Sep 2021 at 22:42:12 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-09-14 at 16:33, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
> > On 9/13/2021 11:02 AM, Brian wrote
> >
> >> On Mon 13 Sep 2021 at 10:18:54 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
&g
but nice would be to only run after a spezial
> package was updatet.
It looks like you could do something useful with the advice at
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/236833/apt-hook-to-check-for-specific-package-changes
--
Brian.
On Wed 15 Sep 2021 at 10:22:55 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 14 sep 21, 18:55:20, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 14 Sep 2021 at 16:50:15 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > > On Ma, 14 sep 21, 12:27:34, Joe wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I will soon be
tials
>
>
> If you get any errors for this please copy-paste the full output as well
> as the output of `apt policy`.
build-essential, I think (no "s").
Why Sriram needs to build any xfce packages is beyond me.
As for network-manager - what has been installed from the netinst ISO
and after first boot is unknown.
--
Brian.
On Fri 17 Sep 2021 at 01:42:46 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Jo, 16 sep 21, 14:04:05, Brian wrote:
> > On Thu 16 Sep 2021 at 10:48:02 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > > On Jo, 16 sep 21, 05:06:02, Sriram wrote:
> > > > Hi Team
> > > &
; for example, a log. Compression would reduce its
size and is advised.
--
Brian.
out "unofficial" installer with non-free
>
> Unofficial denotes unsanctioned, unauthorized, unauthoritative, etc., so
> the term quite naturally makes some people a little wary.
Indeed. However, users can rest assured they are downloading an official
unofficial ISO that is 100% kosher.
--
Brian.
rg/support
> >
>
> +1
It is under More... on the LHS of the page in Firefox.
--
Brian.
t you got fron installing the gutfeeling package? :)
>What do I need to be looking at here?
xserver-xorg-legacy?
--
Brian.
3. pure hodgepodge
> "
> >
> > If something doesn't work, install required components using winetricks.
> > Simply install package winetricks, open it, and navigate graphically to
> > install .Net Frameworks, C++ redistributables and whatever else your
> > Windows app needs to operate.
>
> Is not that paragraph sufficient justification for my question?
Without a doubt it is.
--
Brian.
rash due to
it (or anything else, for that matter). What am I doing wrong?
Firefox? Works. Well.
> But my unstable desktop, including hardware, is in its last weeks of
> life, so I'm not putting too much effort into fixing things. A new
> installation should fix a multitude of sins.
New installation? Another sid? That should make a difference.
--
Brian.
I presume that this is OK, since
> mini.iso contains only a boot image
> and not really a full blown install.
> 7. Next got following error:
> "Installation step failed."
Try a Daily Image:
https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/netboot/
--
Brian.
On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 11:36:59 -0500, Igor Korot wrote:
> Hi, Brian,
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 3:31 AM Brian wrote:
> >
> > On Tue 28 Sep 2021 at 22:33:39 -0500, Igor Korot wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Very simple and straightforward process:
ourself. That's beyond the expectations
> of most unstable users, but if you can do it, great. Include your patch
> in your bug report. That will help the maintainer.
The repository *has* to be avilable at that stage of installation with
the mini.iso. *All* other packages are obtained over the net afterwards.
--
Brian.
On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 11:34:22 -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> Thanks, Reco. That is useful to me.
Your question and Reco's response were also useful to me, if only
because I had not come across F2FS previously. On a USB device I
use ext44 without any noticable problems.
--
Brian.
On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 12:47:35 -0500, Igor Korot wrote:
> HI, Brian,
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:37 PM Brian wrote:
> >
> > On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 13:18:47 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:39:59AM -0500, Igor Korot wrote
On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 13:31:25 -0500, Igor Korot wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:03 PM Brian wrote:
[...]
> > The mini.iso contains the bare minimum to start d-i and connect to a
> > network to obtain everything else.
> >
> > > and that's why it fails?
>
On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 19:12:16 -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 19:02:56 +0100
> Brian wrote:
>
> > > Are you saying that mini.iso does not contain a proper repository
> >
> > The mini.iso contains the bare minimum to start d-i and conn
ke very often doesn't lead to
a satisfactory outcome. Advising going back to basics is likely to
be of the greatest benefit to both parties.
> And it is not the case that I do not want them to learn. Quite the
> opposite is true.
This is very believable. I wouldn't doubt it.
--
Brian.
sh I had used the default method to connect via
WiFi to my Debian machine. I am doomed!
[Splash.]
[ tomas wonders whether a more proactive stance could have put
the situation on a more even keel.]
[Exit stage left and right.]
--
Brian.
ge (but maybe not). In
this case, I see nothing wrong with 'man -t | lp'.
BTW, I do not think gv accepts an output piped to it.
--
Brian.
No reflection on Lee was
> intended. Still isn't.
Nitpicking time :). You specified "...so what we save is exactly what
we see." Neither Cindy Sue Cause's mor Lee's give *exactly* what is
seen onscreen. If bolded headings are unwanted, either method gives a
nice text file to print.
--
Brian.
On Sat 02 Oct 2021 at 16:51:59 +0100, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Saturday, 2 Oct 2021 at 15:39, Brian wrote:
> > BTW, I do not think gv accepts an output piped to it.
>
> Well, it does on my Debian system. YMMV, of course.
>
> I did try the command before posting. ;-)
Eye
On Sat 02 Oct 2021 at 15:43:33 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 02 October 2021 11:13:09 Brian wrote:
>
> > On Fri 01 Oct 2021 at 17:32:37 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Friday 01 October 2021 17:17:53 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
&
hich page, is access control described?
--
Brian.
On Tue 05 Oct 2021 at 10:17:06 -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:16:10 +0100
> Brian wrote:
>
> > In which manual section, or on which page, is access control
> > described?
>
> I take it you mean for the printer, not CUPS. For the printer, it is o
On Tue 05 Oct 2021 at 13:43:07 -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:01:16 +0100
> Brian wrote:
>
> > The emphasis is on mobile devices. I wonder why they are singled out?
> > Interesting.
> >
> > I would set a Username and Password a
192.168.1.1
Just in passing: The line with netmask 255.255.255.0 can be deleted.
It is a deprecated option, as is broadcast. See #912220.
--
Brian.
On Wed 06 Oct 2021 at 16:40:55 +0100, Thomas Pircher wrote:
> Brian wrote:
> > Just in passing: The line with netmask 255.255.255.0 can be deleted.
> > It is a deprecated option, as is broadcast. See #912220.
>
> Crikey, it is indeed deprecated. Just removing the line wil
> incorrectly redirects to debian.org via http, not https. IDK who is the
> operator but doesn't sound professional.
Users may be interested in
https://bits.debian.org/2021/08/debianuserforums.html
There are at least three people there to express concerns to.
--
Brian.
statement of this policy?
--
Brian.
On Sun 10 Oct 2021 at 19:46:39 +, fxkl47BF wrote:
[Mangled quoted text deleted]
> > You have a link to a statement of this policy?
> >
> > -
> >
> > Brian.
>
> i do not
> only a personal email from supp.
ng to do. In case he has
ceased to follow this thread, there is a Cc to him.
> In this case, my server bounced a mail, and so the listserver is correct in
> sending me that notification. And since it was just one email, I did not get
> unsubscribed.
>
> However, perhaps the listserver should have not accepted that email with the
> (possibly) invalid From header in the first place.
Postfix is used by bendel. I trust the RFC compliancy of Exim.
--
Brian.
>
>
nd post them?
>
> Because there is a risk it will kill the motivation of volunteers.
As has happened in the past:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/10/msg00260.html
This occasioned (I think) Joey Schulze ceasing his involvement with
the Debian Weekly News.
--
Brian.
; you can expect from it.
>
> I'm almost 100% certain this is true.
You can be 100% certain. The ISO size is indicative and there is a
packages file.
--
Brian.
On Tue 12 Oct 2021 at 20:24:32 +0530, Ibrahim Vanak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can someone please help me with this? I am seeing this as a blocker for my
> work.
Any use?
http://ftp.swin.edu.au/debian/indices/
--
Brian.
t;
> > The usual place - kernel documentation.
> > Specifically, it's Documentation/networking/cdc_mbim.rst.gz.
> >
> > Reco
>
> No such file on my system.
> Using DuckDuckGo to search for "cdc_mbim.rst.gz" or "cdc_mbim.rst" gives
> hits for either term :{
Try "cdc_mbim".
--
Brian.
>
>
>
ink they got it wrong?
> Engineering or marketing?
Both.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Alcatel-MW40V-2AALGB1-LINKZONE-MIFI-150MBPS-Black/dp/B07791Y58K
> Hint:
> Marketing ASSUMES a one person household requires a dozen independent
> computers connected to web at *ALL* times.
Really? You think that is not a useful technical facility?
--
Brian.
could I have found the answer?
> >
> > By trying it out :)
>
> *BAD* answer.
> Obviously I was asking how could I have found the appropriate documentation.
0/10? I reckon my answer deserves 10/10 :). Look at what d-i offers
in its partitioning menu.
--
Brian.
On Sat 16 Oct 2021 at 07:42:39 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 10/16/2021 07:19 AM, Brian wrote:
> > On Sat 16 Oct 2021 at 06:27:49 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> > > On 10/16/2021 06:01 AM, Linux-Fan wrote:
> > > > Richard Owlett writes:
> > >
Installer Guide dots many i's and crosses many t's. However,
you yourself have sent many fine text screeshots of the installer
in action to -user.(I have never found out how they were produced).
One picture is worth..., etc. I wonder whether the Guide would
benefit from an appendix showing something similar.
--
Brian.
a small business quite successfully, on
> Unstable, because it's a darned sight more stable than Windows.
I am not sure that that criterion is sufficient to advocate unstable on
critical systems. Comparisons with other OSs are always fraught. If it
works for you, well and good.
> I can't remember the last time I got a window freeze on Unstable.
> Testing a package, even before it is released into the Unstable
> branch, appears to be quite rigorous.
I suspect the maintainer ensures the package meets quality control
standards for inclusion in Debian. It is then bunged into unstable,
bugs and all. If you think the maintainer rigorously checks out
every aspect of the software, well ...
--
Brian.
On Mon 18 Oct 2021 at 11:07:05 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 16 Oct 2021 at 18:47:25 (+0100), Brian wrote:
> > On Sat 16 Oct 2021 at 10:12:34 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > [Lots of snipping]
> >
> > > If you want to see a blow-by-blow example of the
ll people doing it, is a
> testament of how good debian is. Just don't abandon us:)
You will not be abandonned but your desires, whatever they are, will
not be catered for in the way you want. CUT was tried; it failed.
Stick with what you are doing if it keeps you happy.
--
Brian.
le ever since it was created and have never needed
> to do this.
Ditto. I have never come across this requirement.
--
Brian.
running is equivalent to a
power outage, I have found that running the specific command afterwards
is generally successful.
--
Brian.
ion of mine does not have a
DE but does have xorg, the commands
apt install task-desktop task-xfce-desktop
apt install task-xfce-desktop
tell me that 759 packages are needed in both cases. None of the packages
you cite are mentioned in either list or already present on the sytem..
--
Brian.
t
> one. E.g. if you choose, say, the XFCE live iso, it would default to
> XFCE not Gnome. Would be a bit perverse otherwise.
I rather thought the Live images contained a copy of d-i but am not
going to download an ISO to refresh my menory. I will offer
https://live-team.pages.debian.net/live-manual/html/live-manual/customizing-installer.en.html
I'd see it as a bit unusual for this copy to differ from the regular d-i.
--
Brian.
endency on "www-browser" virtual
> package by one of the desktop metapackages.
Interesting that hv3 hasn't any Reverse Depends: and that 'apt install
task-desktop task-xfce-desktop' does not propose it for installation'.
--
Brian.
On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 16:44:04 +, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 16:28:36 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 12:50:23PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
> > wrote:
> > > hv3
> >
> > This is a web browser written in
On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 17:02:01 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 04:04:17PM +0000, Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 13:43:29 +, Tixy wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 07:47 -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> > > > On Fri
ead
https://wiki.debian.org/CUPSQuickPrintQueues
A user with a device such as yours does not need proprietary,
non-free printing or scanning drivers in 2021.
--
Brian.
On Thu 11 Nov 2021 at 14:34:20 -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>
>
> On 11/11/2021 02:06 PM, Brian wrote:
> > On Thu 11 Nov 2021 at 12:38:33 -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > I am running buster on my Linux platform.
> > >
> > > I ha
On Fri 12 Nov 2021 at 07:30:36 -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>
>
> On 11/11/2021 03:11 PM, Brian wrote:
> > On Thu 11 Nov 2021 at 14:34:20 -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 11/11/2021 02:06 PM, Brian wrote:
> > > > On T
On Sat 13 Nov 2021 at 09:53:41 -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>
>
> On 11/12/2021 02:01 PM, Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 12 Nov 2021 at 07:30:36 -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 11/11/2021 03:11 PM, Brian wrote:
> > > > On T
e installer,
> about the keyboard variant (see the attached image)
>
> For instance, I can select British, and then, the installation continues.
Perhaps not exactly what you want, but I preseed language and keyboard
with boot paramters:
locale=en_GB.UTF-8 keymap=gb
--
Brian.
On Sat 13 Nov 2021 at 11:50:00 -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> On 11/13/2021 11:33 AM, Brian wrote:
> > Eduardo M KALINOWSKI provided what looks like a useful link. Any help
> > there?
> >
> I am certainly embarrassed. Solution #1 of the 6 in that link solved the
>
nstallation at critical priority, which avoids many
> unimportant questions. See Section B.2.3 for details.
A good FTR. However, when I tried this a few years ago it didn't work
for me. Maybe I lacked patience to sort it out properly. That is why
I went to boot parameters for language and keyboard.
The OP does not say how the preseed file is provided to the installer.
My recollection (not checked) is that putting it in the initrd is the
only way of ensuring language and keyboard preseeding from the start
of the installation.
--
Brian.
On Sun 14 Nov 2021 at 18:48:54 +0100, john doe wrote:
> On 11/14/2021 6:34 PM, Brian wrote:
> > On Sun 14 Nov 2021 at 10:54:38 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun 14 Nov 2021 at 08:14:49 (+), André Rodier wrote:
> > > > On 14/11/2021 07:39, john
3. What should I consider (if anything) during the update?
To broad a questiom. Upgrade to Debian 10. Then go to Debian 11. Enjoy
the ride.
--
Brian.
s required on my system. The GW criteria
would rate it at 100/100.
--
Brian.
On Wed 17 Nov 2021 at 22:39:21 +0100, Arkadiusz Dabrowski wrote:
> Hi all
> I have a problem with unison sync termination when it is started from
> .xsessionrc.
.xsessionrc is for stting environment variables for an X session. This
your intentio?
--
Brian.
On Thu 18 Nov 2021 at 14:43:07 -0500, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Hi,
> Where can I get a "Buster" (10) install image.
> I can only find the 11 version on Debian Server.
https://www.debian.org/releases/buster/debian-installer/
--
Brian.
$HOME/.xsessionrc. Closes: #411639
This file, if present, will get sourced during the start of your
X session. This allows you to set session-wide environment variables
easily for things like locale information. Patch adapted from one by
Yves-Alexis Perez. Thanks also to Holger Levsen and Osamu Aoki for
advice.
--
Brian.
ompted.
>
> Once that's done: reboot.
>
> Only at that point install a desktop using tasksel as root/root equivalent.
>
> Hope this helps, I don't particularly have a gaming laptop to install on.
--
Brian.
On Sun 21 Nov 2021 at 17:53:57 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 05:46:13PM +0000, Brian wrote:
> > On Sun 21 Nov 2021 at 16:30:06 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 05:38:56PM +0300, John Berden wrote:
> >
On Sun 21 Nov 2021 at 18:06:53 +, Brian wrote:
[...]
> Assuming a wireless connection is established by the installer it will
> remain available after first boot, irrespective of whether a DE is
> installed or not.
This completely contradicts what I said before. Substitute "
On Tue 23 Nov 2021 at 18:02:03 +, Tim Woodall wrote:
> I have an old machine that I've just upgraded to bullseye. Now that it's
> upgraded it does not power off when I do halt -p.
What happens with 'poweroff'?
--
Brian.
On Tue 23 Nov 2021 at 18:56:23 +, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2021, Brian wrote:
>
> > On Tue 23 Nov 2021 at 18:02:03 +, Tim Woodall wrote:
> >
> > > I have an old machine that I've just upgraded to bullseye. Now that it's
> > > up
On Tue 23 Nov 2021 at 21:01:34 +0300, nikita stepanov wrote:
> How to use intel gpu via nvidia gpu (without connecting monitor to the
> intel gpu)?
The mind boggles!
--
Brian.
101 - 200 of 9990 matches
Mail list logo
