On Sun 10 Oct 2021 at 22:07:28 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > On 10/10/2021 17:18, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > although i seem not to be worth to be targeted by our bounce assassin, > > my mail provider and bendel.debian.org are at odds enough to produce > > a real bounce message, which then causes a warning mail from > > listmas...@lists.debian.org . > > > > I am trying to make sense out of the given bounce report > > > > https://lists.debian.org/bounces/79gUBBa56gHKY3wtHzNKdg > > > > It is hard to distinguish the hearsay by bendel.debian.org from the > > message parts which come from my provider's server mx00.emig.gmx.net. > > Especially i wonder from where bendel takes the association to my > > mail address (and which mentionings show its conclusions about my > > address). > > > > Whatever, the reason for the bounce is that GMX accuses debian-user > > of not meeting its requirements > > https://www.gmx.net/mail/senderguidelines > > All points there look like they are not volatile problems but rather > > persistent ones. But listmas...@lists.debian.org wrote i had > > > 1 bounce out of 68 mails in one day (1%, kick-score is 80%) > > So why did the other 67 succeed ? > > That seems unrelated to the OVH bounces.
Agreed. > My mailserver bounced the same email (and I got a warning like that). Since > I run my own mailserver, and can look at the logs and see exactly why it has > been rejected, and here's what I got: > > 2021-10-10 16:07:37 1mZeAb-0005Mc-Hn H=bendel.debian.org > [2001:41b8:202:deb:216:36ff:fe40:4002] > X=TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256 CV=no > F=<bounce-debian-user=eduardo=kalinowski.com...@lists.debian.org> rejected > after DATA: header syntax (malformed address: >\n may not follow > Pierre-Elliott =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=A9cue?= <p...@debian.org>: failing address in > "From:" header is: Pierre-Elliott =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=A9cue?= <p...@debian.org>>): > malformed address: >\n may not follow Pierre-Elliott =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=A9cue?= > <p...@debian.org>: failing address in "From:" header is: Pierre-Elliott > =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=A9cue?= <p...@debian.org>> Confirmed. > And this is From header: > > From: Pierre-Elliott =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=A9cue?= <p...@debian.org>> > > (There does seem to be an extra > in there.) It is real enough and can be seen in the list archives at https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2021/10/msg00429.html The extra > is not evident at https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/04/msg00015.html It looks like Pierre-Elliott Bécue has some fixing to do. In case he has ceased to follow this thread, there is a Cc to him. > In this case, my server bounced a mail, and so the listserver is correct in > sending me that notification. And since it was just one email, I did not get > unsubscribed. > > However, perhaps the listserver should have not accepted that email with the > (possibly) invalid From header in the first place. Postfix is used by bendel. I trust the RFC compliancy of Exim. -- Brian. > >
