rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
...
> ... Sometimes I feel
> like an idiot.
>
> All seems well.
:)
i've had days like that... glad you figured it out.
completely OT from your issue, but today i finally upgraded
my stable partition from whatever it was on (last major update
was probably a year
Intentionally top posting:
Thanks to all who replied, I got the Arris DG2470A modem (/ router) working in
bridge mode with my existing router (Ubiquiti Edge Router X).
I made a dumb mistake -- I had my router and another computer plugged into the
Arris (I used the other computer to configure th
On Fri 28 Apr 2023 at 14:25:20 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Some key phrases / sub topics:
>* Astound (cable based) ISP in eastern Pa. area
>* Arris DG2470A modem / router in bridge mode with Ubiquiti Edge Router X
>* Ubiquiti Edge Router X in DMZ
[ … ]
> I
On 4/28/23 20:25, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Some key phrases / sub topics:
* Astound (cable based) ISP in eastern Pa. area
* Arris DG2470A modem / router in bridge mode with Ubiquiti Edge Router X
* Ubiquiti Edge Router X in DMZ
I'm tired but I'm lost at your set up and
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Some key phrases / sub topics:
>* Astound (cable based) ISP in eastern Pa. area
>* Arris DG2470A modem / router in bridge mode with Ubiquiti Edge Router X
>* Ubiquiti Edge Router X in DMZ
> I've now signed up to a new ISP (Astound
Some key phrases / sub topics:
* Astound (cable based) ISP in eastern Pa. area
* Arris DG2470A modem / router in bridge mode with Ubiquiti Edge Router X
* Ubiquiti Edge Router X in DMZ
Aside: I'm in a catch 22 -- my new, cable-based ISP (Astound / RCN) says my
questions are o
30 mars 2023, 23:56 de debianl...@potentially-spam.de-bruyn.de:
I was successful at downloading the video with:
yt-dlp --verbose -k --ignore-config -c
https://manifest.prod.boltdns.net/manifest/v1/hls/v4/clear/1241706627001/83ddeca4-2e3a-4149-840f-0ca907c2cb59/10s/master.m3u8?fastly_token=Nj
Am 31.03.2023 um 00:28 schrieb l0f...@tuta.io:
> How do you get that URL? Via your browser resource/code inspector?
Hi, i had been asking not having to answer that question, because i
myself do not really understand, how it works.
I stumbled across an explanation while skimming through open issue
Hi,
30 mars 2023, 23:56 de debianl...@potentially-spam.de-bruyn.de:
> I was successful at downloading the video with:
>
>> yt-dlp --verbose -k --ignore-config -c
>> https://manifest.prod.boltdns.net/manifest/v1/hls/v4/clear/1241706627001/83ddeca4-2e3a-4149-840f-0ca907c2cb59/10s/master.m3u8?fastl
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 23:28:23 +0200 (CEST)
l0f...@tuta.io wrote:
Hello l0f...@tuta.io,
>Interesting theory but I can play that specific video in my browser
>without being logged in ;)
Weird; I had to log in first. No idea why your experience differs.
Still, as this doesn't forward the core issu
Am 30.03.2023 um 20:20 schrieb Bret Busby:
> On 31/3/23 02:08, David Wright wrote:
>> On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
>>> On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
> I had previously been able to use youtu
Hello Brad,
30 mars 2023, 23:20 de b...@fineby.me.uk:
> >In your case, yt-dlp falls back on its generic extractor (documentation
> >says "Generic downloader that works on some sites") but it doesn't work
> >for familysearch.org visibly...
>
> Largely, I suspect, it's because to access video on th
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 22:55:05 +0200 (CEST)
l0f...@tuta.io wrote:
Hello l0f...@tuta.io,
>In your case, yt-dlp falls back on its generic extractor (documentation
>says "Generic downloader that works on some sites") but it doesn't work
>for familysearch.org visibly...
Largely, I suspect, it's becaus
Hello,
30 mars 2023, 20:46 de b...@busby.net:
> Fri Mar 31 02:18:31 bret@bret-Precision-Tower-5810:~$yt-dlp
> https://www.familysearch.org/rootstech/session/expanding-your-family-tree-with-sideview-and-more-innovations-from-ancestrydna?lang=eng
> [generic]
> expanding-your-family-tree-with-side
On 31/3/23 02:08, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from
youtube, but, it no longer work
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 01:08:19PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
[...]
> Writing "did not work" just doesn't cut it on this list:
> we need some specifics. Here's an example I ran this
> morning on a reference given by David Christensen:
T
On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
> On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
> >
> > > I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from
> > > youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube.
> >
On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from
youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube.
AIUI youtube-dl is now obsolete, and its new spelling is yt-dlp.
You can downlo
On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
> I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from
> youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube.
AIUI youtube-dl is now obsolete, and its new spelling is yt-dlp.
You can download it from bullseye-backports. If you'
On 2023-03-30, Bret Busby wrote:
>
> I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from
> youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube.
>
If you're not using the latest version, this is it:
https://youtube-dl.org/downloads/latest/youtube-dl-2021.12.17.tar.gz
I used this (or
. Conspiracy
theories tossed aside, that's still a rational possibility that needs
pursued on my end here.
BUT THEN... Google Chrome does work properly. That's why I haven't
wasted any time nor brain storage on actively investigating local ISP
throttling as a most likely answer. :)
tossed aside, that's still a rational possibility that needs
> pursued on my end here.
>
> BUT THEN... Google Chrome does work properly. That's why I haven't
> wasted any time nor brain storage on actively investigating local ISP
> throttling as a most likely answe
ally run under Exim’s
> own uid and gid.
Sure, but "local" messages are those from hostS to hostS, and
hostR to hostR; not those from hostS to hostR, which are remote.
And that doesn't seem difficult until you realise that with the
smarthost configuration on hostS, either all y
Le 04/01/2018 à 05:32, Michael Stone a écrit :
No, it's a pretty common shorthand to say "routable" to mean "routable
on the public internet", especially where there's no real possibility of
confusing it with specifically non-routable blocks like 127.0.0.0/8.
This is still a mistake. In tec
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 07:04:46PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
(In view of
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2018/01/msg00126.html
do you mean public?)
No, it's a pretty common shorthand to say "routable" to mean "routable
on the public internet", especially where there's no real possibility
On Wednesday, January 03, 2018 01:39:14 PM Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 10:36:32AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> >I've read in this thread) that traceroute may provide a way forward:
> In general, no. Many ISPs use RFC1918 space internally, so you need to
> skip an unknown nu
On Wed 03 Jan 2018 at 13:39:14 (-0500), Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 10:36:32AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> >I've read in this thread) that traceroute may provide a way forward:
>
> In general, no. Many ISPs use RFC1918 space internally, so you need
> to skip an unknown nu
Le 03/01/2018 à 03:19, David Wright a écrit :
For example, and sticking to unroutable addresses, they
might be on 192.168.… in one place, 10.… in another etc.
Private addresses are routable. They are just not routed over the public
internet. Link local addresses (169.254.0.0/16) are not routa
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 10:36:32AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I've read in this thread) that traceroute may provide a way forward:
In general, no. Many ISPs use RFC1918 space internally, so you need to
skip an unknown number of hops before you get to a routeable IP, at
which point you m
rhkra...@gmail.com (2018-01-03):
> I hope the OP is still "listening".
If he is, he is probably enjoying the time wasted by his nonsensical
question.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
) that traceroute may provide a way forward:
* Connect to (any of) your ISP(s).
* traceroute somewhere (I'm not sure where atm--maybe some neutral party
like google)
* Parse the results of the ping to get the numeric address of your ISP
* whois that numeric address
I think that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 02 Jan 2018 at 11:15:16 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:03:46PM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
>> > Max Power wrote:
>> > > My problem is to know the ISP [e.g. GATEW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:03:46PM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Max Power wrote:
>> > My problem is to know the ISP [e.g. GATEWAY = Vodafone
On Tue 02 Jan 2018 at 11:15:16 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:03:46PM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
> > Max Power wrote:
> > > My problem is to know the ISP [e.g. GATEWAY = Vodafone, Telecom or AT&T]
> > > before starting br
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:03:46PM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Max Power wrote:
> > My problem is to know the ISP [e.g. GATEWAY = Vodafone, Telecom or AT&T]
> > bef
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:03:46PM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
>> Max Power wrote:
>> > My problem is to know the ISP [e.g. GATEWAY = Vodafone, Telecom or AT&T]
>> > before starting browsing or any remote connection...
>>
>> Check
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 02:47:39PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Hi, Max. I don't know what your intentions are in repeating your
qualms after two solutions were offered to you. Either get along
with the new "ip" or just install the old net-tools. They are not
going away (at least not as long as
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:03:46PM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
> Max Power wrote:
> > My problem is to know the ISP [e.g. GATEWAY = Vodafone, Telecom or AT&T]
> > before starting browsing or any remote connection...
>
> Checking the hostname of an RFC1918 address will n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Max Power wrote:
> My problem is to know the ISP [e.g. GATEWAY = Vodafone, Telecom or AT&T]
> before starting browsing or any remote connection...
Checking the hostname of an RFC1918 address will nearly never provide
you with an ISP'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 01:05:58PM +, Curt wrote:
[...]
> There just was another thread around here initiated by Max Power, the
> current OP, I do believe [...]
Indeed, it was Max (cc'ing him/her just in case). I didn't remember, but
checked now
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 12:42:35PM +0100, Max Power wrote:
My problem is to know the ISP [e.g. GATEWAY = Vodafone, Telecom or AT&T]
before starting browsing or any remote connection...
With the 'route' command it was so easy '# route' and goal!
With le last release '
On 2018-01-02, wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 12:42:35PM +0100, Max Power wrote:
>> My problem is to know the ISP [e.g. GATEWAY = Vodafone, Telecom or AT&T]
>> before starting browsing or any remote connection...
>> With the 'route' command it was so ea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 12:42:35PM +0100, Max Power wrote:
> My problem is to know the ISP [e.g. GATEWAY = Vodafone, Telecom or AT&T]
> before starting browsing or any remote connection...
> With the 'route' command it was so
My problem is to know the ISP [e.g. GATEWAY = Vodafone, Telecom or AT&T]
before starting browsing or any remote connection...
With the 'route' command it was so easy '# route' and goal!
With le last release 'Stretch' the net-tools packet is not installed by d
On Friday, February 10, 2017 06:56:10 AM Dan Purgert wrote:
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Eh, I was thinking more stuff like Minecraft, Space Engineers, or other
> "real time" multiplayer games, where there is a fair bit of
> communication between the client and server.
I guessed that, which was w
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, February 09, 2017 07:36:50 AM Dan Purgert wrote:
>> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > 2. I'm sure that I'm looking at the download flows from my ISP as the
>> > ratio of the octets / bytes between the two flows is general
Old India like new india and oceania are all old British colonies, no
native English speakers there. Ask the Scots and the Irish to tell you
all about their native languages.
rhkra...@gmail.com:
> I have to be ready to deal with the support people in
> India--IIRC from last time, I can insist on
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, February 09, 2017 07:21:58 AM Dan Purgert wrote:
>> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > I noticed today that those statistics pages do tell me the size of the
>> > MTUs
>> >
>> > On the: MTU is:
>> > WAN VC1540
>> > Ethernet 1500
>>
>> Yuck.
On Thursday, February 09, 2017 07:36:50 AM Dan Purgert wrote:
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 2. I'm sure that I'm looking at the download flows from my ISP as the
> > ratio of the octets / bytes between the two flows is generally
> > something like 10 to 1. I&#x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 08:00:15AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, February 09, 2017 07:21:58 AM Dan Purgert wrote:
> > rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > I noticed today that those statistics pages do tell me the size of the
> > > MTUs
>
On Thursday, February 09, 2017 07:21:58 AM Dan Purgert wrote:
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I noticed today that those statistics pages do tell me the size of the
> > MTUs
> >
> > On the: MTU is:
> > WAN VC1540
> > Ethernet 1500
>
> Yuck. Hate it when people start mucking ar
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> [...]
> But I do have two quick comments:
>
> 1. I am definitely comparing the IN on one side of the modem to the
> OUT on the other, and
Okay, good (people misinterpret the directions a lot ;) )
>
> 2. I'm sure that I'm looking
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> I noticed today that those statistics pages do tell me the size of the MTUs
>
> On the: MTU is:
> WAN VC1540
> Ethernet 1500
>
Yuck. Hate it when people start mucking around with MTUs ...
--
|_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947
|_|_|O| Github:
Thanks! Maybe I will have to do some wiresharking ;-) I guess though, that
without something like a smart router, I'd only be able to look at data going
in and out of my Linux / Debian computers (by loading wireshark on each), and
not the other devices on the system.
I will probably spend at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 08:26:46AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Dan (and Lisi): Thanks for the responses!
>
> On this one I will need to cogitate a little before either understanding
> fully
> (and reaching "enlightenment") or responding with
dem to the OUT on the
other, and
2. I'm sure that I'm looking at the download flows from my ISP as the ratio of
the octets / bytes between the two flows is generally something like 10 to 1.
I'm sure that I am not uploading 10 times (or even the same number) of bytes
as I am down
I noticed today that those statistics pages do tell me the size of the MTUs
On the: MTU is:
WAN VC1540
Ethernet 1500
So, the numbers are a little different, but still relate the same way Dan
mentioned, that is, the WAN VC MTU is larger than the Ethernet MTU. (So this
doesn'
ckets are about the same, and the difference
> mainly is that the packet size on the VC WAN "Data Out" are about
> twice the size of the packets on the Ethernet / LAN side.
Don't forget that the routing device itself will be generating traffic,
such as DNS lookups for you LAN
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, February 06, 2017 06:24:40 PM Dan Purgert wrote:
>> Could be MTU differences, and the router needing to do something (e.g.
>> 1500 on the LAN side, and 1452 on the WAN, which is usually typical for
>> DSL / PPPoE connections).
>
> BTW, thanks Dan for your resp
I'm the guy who was gobsmacked by the amount of data we (my son and I) are
sucking down from our ISP (Earthlink via DSL).
I've found something else that I don't understand. I'm going to keep this
general at first--if anybody needs specifics, I'll try to provide them.
On Tuesday 07 February 2017 00:13:42 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, February 06, 2017 06:24:40 PM Dan Purgert wrote:
> > It's a bit hard to figure out what you're actually seeing happen though,
> > since your post somehow repeated itself several times, in a pretty big
> > mess (there wasn't
On Monday, February 06, 2017 06:24:40 PM Dan Purgert wrote:
> Could be MTU differences, and the router needing to do something (e.g.
> 1500 on the LAN side, and 1452 on the WAN, which is usually typical for
> DSL / PPPoE connections).
BTW, thanks Dan for your response--I hope the resent email is a
On Monday, February 06, 2017 06:24:40 PM Dan Purgert wrote:
> It's a bit hard to figure out what you're actually seeing happen though,
> since your post somehow repeated itself several times, in a pretty big
> mess (there wasn't a given start / end of one post, but rather several
> copies interleav
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>* Why are there twice as many bytes measured coming in (from
>Earthlink) measured on the WAN VC side of the router as measured on
>the Ethernet / LAN side of the router (or, I guess the analagous
>question is why are the packets twice as big? (I mean, i
I'm the guy who was gobsmacked by the amount of data we (my son and I) are
sucking down from our ISP (Earthlink via DSL).
I've found something else that I don't understand. I'm going to keep this
general at first--if anybody needs specifics, I'll try to provide them.
Hello there,
Hope you having a great day!
Would you be interested in acquiring the list of customers or companies using
Internet Service Provider (ISP)?
Please review and let me know your thoughts I will get back to you with counts,
pricing and more information in my next email.
Await
t decent DSL service. So I use cable from Videotron...the
only other ISP is Bell Canada...at least as far as non-DSL services. So
I am stuck between a rock and a hard place :)
Frank
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
On 05/31/2015 12:10 PM, Frank wrote:
I really would like to switch ISPs but basically the only other one
available is Bell Canadawhom I dislike more than Videotron!!
I live in California. Apparently, there are laws here that require the
telephone company -- AT&T in my case -- to allow sma
On Sun, 31 May 2015 13:03:32 -0400
"John D. Hendrickson" wrote:
Hello John,
>yes and no.
Etc, etc.
Don't Cc a message to me. I'm subbed to the list, so will see messages
here.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
eir login
credentials got into spammers' hands, yet their account was being used
to relay spam. I'm not saying it is what happened, just that your ISP
might not be entirely wrong.
Have you tried asking them for logging?
Mart
> I did as part of a general email I sent them. We
eir login
credentials got into spammers' hands, yet their account was being used
to relay spam. I'm not saying it is what happened, just that your ISP
might not be entirely wrong.
Have you tried asking them for logging?
Mart
I did as part of a general email I sent them. We'll see
ing a wireless network where
someone is running a sniffer, or having a keylogger on your Windows
install (I read you dual-boot?)
I *have* seen this happen; customers who had no idea how their login
credentials got into spammers' hands, yet their account was being used
to relay spam. I'm not sayin
On Saturday 30 May 2015 07:40:02 Charlie wrote:
> A compromised account would have to be just so much smoke.
>
> Why would they keep giving you new passwords if they thought that?
Because with a new password it might no longer be compromised?
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ..
On Fri, 29 May 2015 08:31:49 +0200 Petter Adsen sent:
> I don't quite see why they have any reason to believe your system is
> compromised, unless there is something they aren't telling you (and
> that would be irresponsible of them, IMHO).
A compromised account would have to be just so much smok
On 05/29/2015 06:04 AM, ken wrote:
...the above stuff should do the trick on a fully upgraded system.
I meant to say "updated".
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lis
On 05/29/2015 06:52 AM, Mart van de Wege wrote:
Frank writes:
On 05/28/2015 02:44 AM, Emil Payne wrote:
On 05/27/2015 10:16 PM, Charlie wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2015 21:06:10 -0400 Frank sent:
When I went into Thunderbird at mid-day one of my accounts with my
ISP Videotron.ca registered a
On 05/29/2015 06:04 AM, ken wrote:
On 05/27/2015 09:06 PM, Frank wrote:
This is long so I hope all can read till the end.
I access all my mail through Thunderbird using IMAP. It has always been
flawless until yesterday.
When I went into Thunderbird at mid-day one of my accounts with my
ISP
into Thunderbird at mid-day one of my accounts with
my ISP Videotron.ca registered a logon failure..despite the fact
nothing had changed.
I have no answer. However, with my ISP I periodically have the
same problem. I attempt to log on with claws-mail, without
changing anything, no update, no
On 05/28/2015 10:06 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 05/27/2015 06:06 PM, Frank wrote:
I access all my mail through Thunderbird using IMAP. It has always been
flawless until yesterday.
snip///
When I went into Thunderbird at mid-day one of my accounts with my
ISP Videotron.ca registered a
ISP Videotron.ca registered a logon failure..despite the fact
nothing had changed.
I have no answer. However, with my ISP I periodically have the same
problem. I attempt to log on with claws-mail, without changing
anything, no update, no upgrade to the system. No tinkering,
nothing at all and of the
Frank writes:
> On 05/28/2015 02:44 AM, Emil Payne wrote:
>> On 05/27/2015 10:16 PM, Charlie wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27 May 2015 21:06:10 -0400 Frank sent:
>>>
>>>> When I went into Thunderbird at mid-day one of my accounts with my
>>>> ISP Videot
On 05/27/2015 09:06 PM, Frank wrote:
This is long so I hope all can read till the end.
I access all my mail through Thunderbird using IMAP. It has always been
flawless until yesterday.
When I went into Thunderbird at mid-day one of my accounts with my
ISP Videotron.ca registered a logon
Hi.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 01:42:14PM -0400, Deb wrote:
>
>
> On 05/28/2015 01:23 PM, John Hasler wrote:
> >Frank writes:
> >>It's the ISP security guys who are insisting in their words "the
> >>account or perhaps your whole computer is infected"
ent:
> > >>
> > >>> When I went into Thunderbird at mid-day one of my accounts with
> > >>> my ISP Videotron.ca registered a logon failure..despite the fact
> > >>> nothing had changed.
> > >>
> > >> I have no answer. However,
On Thu, 28 May 2015 09:21:05 -0400
Frank wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 02:44 AM, Emil Payne wrote:
> > On 05/27/2015 10:16 PM, Charlie wrote:
> >> On Wed, 27 May 2015 21:06:10 -0400 Frank sent:
> >>
> >>> When I went into Thunderbird at mid-day one of my
On 05/27/2015 06:06 PM, Frank wrote:
I access all my mail through Thunderbird using IMAP. It has always been
flawless until yesterday.
When I went into Thunderbird at mid-day one of my accounts with my
ISP Videotron.ca registered a logon failure..despite the fact nothing
had changed.
They keep
:44 -0400
Frank wrote:
[cut]
One more thing on this problem:
Are there in fact any viruses that can infect Linux systems? I
know about rootkits but I gather they are rare. But the guys at my
ISP are so insistent I am beginning to wonder
There are viruses that run on Linux
On 05/28/2015 06:39 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
I once told a lawyer that she couldn't do arithemetic. She was put out
and said that she had an A in A level Mathematics. I said that she
still couldn't do arithmetic. Lisi
A mathematician told me that, once you start doing fourth-year
university mat
Thu, 28 May 2015 11:34:44 -0400
> >>>> Frank wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> [cut]
> >>>>
> >>>>> One more thing on this problem:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Are there in fact any viruses th
Janis
Am 28.05.2015 um 03:06 schrieb Frank:
> This is long so I hope all can read till the end.
>
> I access all my mail through Thunderbird using IMAP. It has always been
> flawless until yesterday.
> When I went into Thunderbird at mid-day one of my accounts with my
> ISP V
-day one of my accounts with
my ISP Videotron.ca registered a logon failure..despite the fact
nothing had changed.
That's odd. I have 6 gmail and 8 yahoo accounts. Yesterday all six
gmail accounts wanted the passwords reentered. I have thunderbird
set to remember passwords. At first I couldn&#
On 28/05/15 03:20 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Brad writes:
In any event, you're not obliged to use your ISP's mail service. With
plenty of other choices out there for email, many of them free, I wonder
why you're putting yourself through this on/off aggravation.
I've been with newsguy.com for year
in fact any viruses that can infect Linux systems? I
know about rootkits but I gather they are rare. But the guys at my
ISP are so insistent I am beginning to wonder
There are viruses that run on Linux. Wikipedia has a non-exhaustive
list at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_malware#Viruses
As
One more thing on this problem:
> >>>
> >>> Are there in fact any viruses that can infect Linux systems? I
> >>> know about rootkits but I gather they are rare. But the guys at my
> >>> ISP are so insistent I am beginning to wonder
> &
Brad writes:
> In any event, you're not obliged to use your ISP's mail service. With
> plenty of other choices out there for email, many of them free, I wonder
> why you're putting yourself through this on/off aggravation.
I've been with newsguy.com for years. I'm very pleased with their
service
been seen in the wild.
about rootkits but I gather they are rare. But the guys at my ISP are
so insistent I am beginning to wonder
Your ISP should know just what little real risk their is; Most of their
hardware is run on *nix based OS. What it boils down to is that the
scripts they have
hunderbird at mid-day one of my accounts with
> >>>> my ISP Videotron.ca registered a logon failure..despite the fact
> >>>> nothing had changed.
> >>
> >> That's odd. I have 6 gmail and 8 yahoo accounts. Yesterday all six
> >> gmail acco
fact any viruses that can infect Linux systems? I
know about rootkits but I gather they are rare. But the guys at my
ISP are so insistent I am beginning to wonder
There are viruses that run on Linux. Wikipedia has a non-exhaustive
list at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_malware#Viruses
As
On 05/28/2015 01:23 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Frank writes:
It's the ISP security guys who are insisting in their words "the
account or perhaps your whole computer is infected".
The only Linux malware in the wild attacks Web sites via vulnerabilities
in things like PHP.
Frank writes:
> It's the ISP security guys who are insisting in their words "the
> account or perhaps your whole computer is infected".
The only Linux malware in the wild attacks Web sites via vulnerabilities
in things like PHP. Aside from the difficulty there is no mo
1 - 100 of 961 matches
Mail list logo
