Might try "file rc.custom.gz" and make sure it says:
rc.custom.gz: gzip compressed data, was "rc.custom", last modified: ...
to look at rc.custom.gz's magic(5) header.
John
Martin McCormick writes:
> Greg Wooledge writes:
> > Sounds unlikely.
> >
> > > $ gzip -d rc.custom.gz
> > >
>
Greg Wooledge writes:
> Sounds unlikely.
>
> > $ gzip -d rc.custom.gz
> >
> > gzip: rc.custom.gz: not in gzip format
>
> Where did you get this file?
tomsrtbt-2.0.103
Here's what happened:
The rc.custom.gz file you posted is 961 bytes long. My
corrupt copy is also 961 bytes l
On 19-08-19 22:50, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 19, 2019 04:17:26 PM steef wrote:
On 19-08-19 17:45, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 19, 2019 08:27:57 AM steef wrote:
On 19-08-19 00:41, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that the problem you are concerned about?
well,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 03:57:32PM -0500, Christopher Marlow wrote:
On 8/19/19 3:41 PM, Michael Stone wrote:
And, there are paid mail services which are nonetheless pretty
terrible. All that using a paid mail service means is that you
aren't using a free mail service.
I disagree... I like h
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:01:02PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:19:58 +0200
> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > So for Mr. Hardt, Kerberos doesn't exist. Or he's talking HTTP context
> > only.
> >
>
> MS has used Active Directory in some form or other since Win2000, and
> AD is basically Kerbe
On 8/19/19 3:41 PM, Michael Stone wrote:
And, there are paid mail services which are nonetheless pretty
terrible. All that using a paid mail service means is that you aren't
using a free mail service.
I disagree... I like having my domain and email.. I just didn't like the
way the free emai
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:33:22PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
Besides, even when paying for your mail provider does not mean
Google won't read the mail received on the Gmail inbox of your
And, there are paid mail services which are nonetheless pretty terrible.
All that using a paid mail ser
David Wright, on 2019-08-19:
> On Mon 19 Aug 2019 at 13:35:13 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> > TANSTAAFL, TINSTAAFL, TNSTAAFLetc ;/
> > I have a *PAID* email provider.
> > I have a *PAID* Usenet provider.
> >
> >
> > IOW
> > *CHEAPSKATES LOSE*
> >
> >u get what you paid for!
On Mon 19 Aug 2019 at 13:35:13 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> TANSTAAFL, TINSTAAFL, TNSTAAFLetc ;/
> I have a *PAID* email provider.
> I have a *PAID* Usenet provider.
>
>
> IOW
> *CHEAPSKATES LOSE*
>
>u get what you paid for
It's reasonable to demand to know what yo
On 19-08-19 17:45, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 19, 2019 08:27:57 AM steef wrote:
On 19-08-19 00:41, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 05:27:07 PM steef wrote:
On 18-08-19 22:04, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 01:16:59 PM nektarios wrote
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:50:05 +0100
Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:19:37 -0400
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:23:44 +0200
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 06:26:20PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > ..
On Lu, 19 aug 19, 15:15:03, Neo wrote:
> Hi Debian lovers
>
> I struggle to find the current changelog for slapd/openldap.
Try 'apt changelog slapd'.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:19:58 +0200
wrote:
>
> So for Mr. Hardt, Kerberos doesn't exist. Or he's talking HTTP context
> only.
>
MS has used Active Directory in some form or other since Win2000, and
AD is basically Kerberos plus LDAP. An AD 'domain' is basically a realm.
So yes, all their tech
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:20:29 -0400
Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:33:55 +0200
> Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>
> > On Mon 19/Aug/2019 18:05:57 +0200 Celejar wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:21:40 +0200
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wro
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:19:37 -0400
Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:23:44 +0200
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 06:26:20PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
> > > wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > >I certainly need to use numerous
Franco Martelli, on 2019-08-19:
> I was thinking to submit a bug report against gcc-8 package. Now that I
> have a work around, "bdver1" compiles without warnings, I can say
> enough, what do you think about?
I don't know, to me it sounds more like little bugs on kernel
side, patches silencing war
Hi.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:08:10PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 19 aug 19, 09:54:08, john doe wrote:
> > Hi Rico, thanks for your answer.
> > On 8/19/2019 9:37 AM, Reco wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:25:56AM +0200, john doe wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Here is the requested o
On Lu, 19 aug 19, 09:54:08, john doe wrote:
> Hi Rico, thanks for your answer.
> On 8/19/2019 9:37 AM, Reco wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:25:56AM +0200, john doe wrote:
> >>
> >> Here is the requested output from a test server:
> >>
> >> $ apt purge dbus -s
> > <...>
> >> dbus* libpam-sys
I was thinking to submit a bug report against gcc-8 package. Now that I
have a work around, "bdver1" compiles without warnings, I can say
enough, what do you think about?
Best regards
--
Franco Martelli
On 19/08/2019 19:35, Richard Owlett wrote:
TANSTAAFL, TINSTAAFL, TNSTAAFL etc ;/
I have a *PAID* email provider.
I have a *PAID* Usenet provider.
IOW
*CHEAPSKATES LOSE*
u get what you paid for
Er, glad you got that off your chest!
--
Mike Howard
TANSTAAFL, TINSTAAFL, TNSTAAFLetc ;/
I have a *PAID* email provider.
I have a *PAID* Usenet provider.
IOW
*CHEAPSKATES LOSE*
u get what you paid for
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:33:55 +0200
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Mon 19/Aug/2019 18:05:57 +0200 Celejar wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:21:40 +0200
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>> I'd love to run my own mail stack, and I
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 08:03:42PM +0200, Hans wrote:
> Isn't it "gunzip rc.custom.gz"???
That's identical to gzip -d rc.custom.gz.
Isn't it "gunzip rc.custom.gz"???
Best
Hans
> I cannot reproduce that with gzip 1.9-3, it decompresses the file just
> fine. Is your rc.custom.gz identical to what I have and what is
> attached?
>
> Cheers,
>Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 2019-08-19 12:39 -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
> I am trying to unzip rc.custom.gz from tomsrtbt so I can
> give it a serial console. All you need do is modify /etc/inittab
> and add a line defining one of the serial ports as a console
> login.
>
> Normally, this is trivial and one
On Mon 19 Aug 2019 at 09:17:21 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:03:48PM -0400, Kenneth Parker wrote:
> > >From looking at an Ubuntu 16.04 System I administer, User "man" (uid 6) is,
> > apparently the owner of /var/cache/man, which appears to be an area for
> > translating
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:39:47PM -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
> The problem is that in 2002, gzip apparently worked
> differently so if you use modern gzip on it, it just complains
Sounds unlikely.
> $ gzip -d rc.custom.gz
>
> gzip: rc.custom.gz: not in gzip format
Where did you get t
I am trying to unzip rc.custom.gz from tomsrtbt so I can
give it a serial console. All you need do is modify /etc/inittab
and add a line defining one of the serial ports as a console
login.
Normally, this is trivial and one should just give the
command
gzip -d rc.custom.gz
and,
On Mon 19/Aug/2019 18:05:57 +0200 Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:21:40 +0200
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I'd love to run my own mail stack, and I think I could handle the
>>> software deployment reasonably well, but from every
[note: veering dangerously off-topic. If anyone kicks us out,
I'll accept without protesting]
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:03:25PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:19:58 +0200
> wrote:
[...]
> > Edited by D. Hardt, Microsoft. Hmmm.
>
> Ad hominem.
rather ad corporationem. Mr. Hard
On Mon 19 Aug 2019 at 09:24:59 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:42:12PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > Difficult to say. My reaction would be to check the ownership of all
> > non-root-owned files. Because of the potential for trouble like the
> > above, I routinely keep a
bw wrote:
> It's a small thing, but very annoying. Using synaptics driver
> (xserver-xorg-input) on stretch, kde-standard 5:92 (kde-plasma-desktop)
> I want to setup the touchpad so that the vertical scroll area on the right
> of the touchpad does not register a click when scrolling.
>
> What
Le lundi 19 août 2019 à 10:15 -0400, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:41:33AM +0200, Bastien Durel wrote:
> > Ok, there muste have been an error somewhere ...
> >
> > root@corrin-2:~# apt-cache policy systemd-container
> > systemd-container:
> > Installed: (none)
> > Candid
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:21:40 +0200
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I'd love to run my own mail stack, and I think I could handle the
> > software deployment reasonably well, but from everything I've read,
> > the headaches required to make sure
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:19:58 +0200
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:47:55AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:32:31 +0200
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:15:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:29:04AM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> Google could evaluate the non-browser software in use and pass what is
> secure and fail the other packages with explanations for the authors of
> failed packages [...]
I think it's more subtle than that. "Traditional" (i.e. non-Web
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:19:58
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: webmail and email from command line
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:47:55AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:32:31 +0200
> > wro
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
[...]
> I'd love to run my own mail stack, and I think I could handle the
> software deployment reasonably well, but from everything I've read,
> the headaches required to make sure that major mail operators will
> actually accept my mail a
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:47:55AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:32:31 +0200
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:15:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> >
I tried the suggestions by Curt to add "snd_hda_intel.probe_mask=0x01" and
it seemed to work after boot.
Nektarios suggestion to run "alsactl init" which returned this:
Found hardware: "HDA-Intel" "Realtek ALC269VC"
"HDA:10ec0269,17aa380f,00100203 HDA:8086280d,80860101,0010" "0x17aa"
"0x3807"
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:41:33AM +0200, Bastien Durel wrote:
> Ok, there muste have been an error somewhere ...
>
> root@corrin-2:~# apt-cache policy systemd-container
> systemd-container:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 241-5
> Version table:
> 241-5 500
> 500 http://ftp.fr.
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:33:52 +0200
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Mon 19/Aug/2019 03:15:45 +0200 Celejar wrote:
> > I think terming Google's decision to call software that doesn't
> > implement OAuth "less secure" "evil" is hyperbole that doesn't help our
> > broader cause of opposing its breakin
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:32:31 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:15:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200
>
> [...]
>
> > I think terming
Hi Debian lovers
I struggle to find the current changelog for slapd/openldap.
[root@host ~]# dpkg -l | grep slap
ii slapd 2.4.40+dfsg-1+deb8u5 amd64 OpenLDAP
server (slapd)
[root@host ~]# cat /etc/*version
8.11
https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/o/
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:42:12PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Difficult to say. My reaction would be to check the ownership of all
> non-root-owned files. Because of the potential for trouble like the
> above, I routinely keep a list on each system.
>
> # find / -mount \( ! -group 0 -o ! -user 0
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:23:44 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 06:26:20PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
> > wrote:
...
> >I certainly need to use numerous sites (bill
> > paying, banking, etc.) that require JS to function.
>
> Th
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:03:48PM -0400, Kenneth Parker wrote:
> >From looking at an Ubuntu 16.04 System I administer, User "man" (uid 6) is,
> apparently the owner of /var/cache/man, which appears to be an area for
> translating man pages. Who creates this User?
I don't know about Ubuntu, becau
On 19-08-19 00:41, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 05:27:07 PM steef wrote:
On 18-08-19 22:04, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 01:16:59 PM nektarios wrote:
--< snip >--
I have a similar setup as yours but am getting no popups from my browser
(firefo
Hi,
Hope you are doing great.
Did you get a chance to review my previous email. Please let me know your
thoughts.
Thanks & Regards,
Lillie Simmons.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:41:33AM +0200, Bastien Durel wrote:
> Le lundi 19 août 2019 à 11:54 +0300, Reco a écrit :
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:23:54AM +0200, Bastien Durel wrote:
> > > Le lundi 19 août 2019 à 10:37 +0300, Reco a écrit :
> > > > > $ apt purge dbus -s
> > > > <.
Le lundi 19 août 2019 à 11:54 +0300, Reco a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:23:54AM +0200, Bastien Durel wrote:
> > Le lundi 19 août 2019 à 10:37 +0300, Reco a écrit :
> > > > $ apt purge dbus -s
> > > <...>
> > > >dbus* libpam-systemd*
> > >
> > > So, dbus is not needed th
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:09:50 -0400
John Kerr Anderson wrote:
> Here is the output when it is working:
>
> aplay -l
> List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
> card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 0: ALC269VC Analog [ALC269VC
> Analog] Subdevices: 1/1
> Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
> card 0: P
On Mon 19/Aug/2019 03:15:45 +0200 Celejar wrote:
> I think terming Google's decision to call software that doesn't
> implement OAuth "less secure" "evil" is hyperbole that doesn't help our
> broader cause of opposing its breaking of standards, imposing various
> sorts of lock-in, invasions of priv
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:32:31 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:15:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200
>
> [...]
>
> > I think terming
Hi.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:23:54AM +0200, Bastien Durel wrote:
> Le lundi 19 août 2019 à 10:37 +0300, Reco a écrit :
> > > $ apt purge dbus -s
> > <...>
> > >dbus* libpam-systemd*
> >
> > So, dbus is not needed there.
>
> Hello. Same here, but with dbus removed, my jobs using sys
On Sunday, 18 Aug 2019 at 22:52, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> This is actually for me a filter criterion: if a site doesn't work
> with javascript, chances are high that I avoid it. I do make some
> exceptions, but very few.
Ditto. My exceptions are my bank and flickr. All else I access via eww
in
Le lundi 19 août 2019 à 10:37 +0300, Reco a écrit :
> > $ apt purge dbus -s
> <...>
> >dbus* libpam-systemd*
>
> So, dbus is not needed there.
Hello. Same here, but with dbus removed, my jobs using systemd-nspawn
fails with:
Failed to open system bus: Connection refused
So testing your syst
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:54:08AM +0200, john doe wrote:
> >> If things goes well on this server, which is a test server, I'll
> >> consider purging dbus from my production server(s) on which a reboot is
> >> to be avoided.
> >>
> >> Here is the requested output from a test server:
> >>
> >> $ apt
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:15:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200
[...]
> I think terming Google's decision to call software that doesn't
> implement OAut
On 2019-08-18, John Kerr Anderson wrote:
>
> Aug 18 13:45:13 ideapad kernel: [ 4269.876500] snd_hda_codec_realtek
> hdaudioC0D0: Unable to sync register 0x1f0e00. -5
> Aug 18 13:49:47 ideapad kernel: [ 4543.985442] snd_hda_codec_realtek
> hdaudioC0D0: Unable to sync register 0x1f0e00. -5
Looks li
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 06:26:20PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
> wrote:
[... on disabling javascript]
> Question: is this due to a belief that such sites are (at least for
> your use cases) at best marginally more useful than their non-JS
> utilizing alternatives,
Hi Rico, thanks for your answer.
On 8/19/2019 9:37 AM, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:25:56AM +0200, john doe wrote:
>> On 8/18/2019 4:59 PM, Reco wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 04:56:34PM +0200, john doe wrote:
On 8/18/2019 3:19 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 18 Au
Hi.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:25:56AM +0200, john doe wrote:
> On 8/18/2019 4:59 PM, Reco wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 04:56:34PM +0200, john doe wrote:
> >> On 8/18/2019 3:19 PM, Brian wrote:
> >>> On Sun 18 Aug 2019 at 12:17:59 +0200, john doe wrote:
> >>>
> On 8/17/2019 8:15
On 8/18/2019 4:59 PM, Reco wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 04:56:34PM +0200, john doe wrote:
>> On 8/18/2019 3:19 PM, Brian wrote:
>>> On Sun 18 Aug 2019 at 12:17:59 +0200, john doe wrote:
>>>
On 8/17/2019 8:15 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 13 Aug 2019 at 20:07:49 +0200, john doe wrote:
>
On Du, 18 aug 19, 14:06:57, John Kerr Anderson wrote:
> Hello today, I've got an Ideapad and after I suspend I cannot get the
> audio to work when the system resumes.
>
> lspci -v returns the following for the audio section:
[...]
> Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel
> Kernel modules: snd_hda_
65 matches
Mail list logo
