On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:19:37 -0400
Celejar <cele...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:23:44 +0200
> <to...@tuxteam.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 06:26:20PM -0400, Celejar wrote:  
> > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
> > > <to...@tuxteam.de> wrote:  
> 
> ...
> 
> > >                            I certainly need to use numerous sites
> > > (bill paying, banking, etc.) that require JS to function.  
> > 
> > There's no clear-cut, generally valid thing here. I've the luck to
> > live in a country (Germany) where an open protocol for banking
> > exists (HBCI), and a free software implementing that protocol. So,
> > thanks $DEITY, I just can do my bank things from the command line.
> > There are other things (tax decl), where I've to use my browser,
> > with javascript. This browser runs in a separate user session, with
> > another user ID.  
> 
> Yes, I'm a bit jealous of you Europeans in this regard ;) 

In the UK, pretty much all retail sites that do some kind of product
display need JS. I compromise in that I'll allow JS from the named site
and other sites clearly related to it but not from anyone else.

I'm sort of learning Laravel at the moment, but most of the tutorials
connected with Laravel itself contain lots of JS. Third party tutorials
are more likely to be JS-free. It appears that sites that are
mobile-friendly generally do so by including third-party JS.

-- 
Joe

Reply via email to