Re: [draft] need your help on the AI-DFSG general resolution prepration

2025-02-10 Thread Christian Kastner
Hi Mo, your effort in driving this is much appreciated. There's a second thread going on ("A different Take on AI") where many have chimed into the deeper specific issues, so I'll include my specific replies there, and here will only reply to formalities: On 2025-02-02 06:56, M. Zhou wrote: > (2

Re: [draft] need your help on the AI-DFSG general resolution prepration

2025-02-07 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 12:56:59AM -0500, M. Zhou wrote: > (5) what is the actionable outcome of this generaal resolution? Is this actually unclear? The linked text claims this issue is urgent - usually, something is urgent because some issue demands action. > (6) is a neutral tone necessary for

Re: [draft] need your help on the AI-DFSG general resolution prepration

2025-02-04 Thread Jacinto Dávila
(1) do you know any important but missing reference materials? You may want to include references to currents cases in court, like: https://www.npr.org/2025/01/14/nx-s1-5258952/new-york-times-openai-microsoft Maybe not that particular one, but something to the effect. By supporting proposal B: "

Re: [draft] need your help on the AI-DFSG general resolution prepration

2025-02-04 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
Hello lumin, and thanks a lot for this work. On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 12:56:59AM -0500, M. Zhou wrote: > https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/gr-ai-dfsg > (I turned the issues on. Feel free to open issues there) before discussing specific details, my first reaction (and associated question) is that the

Re: [draft] need your help on the AI-DFSG general resolution prepration

2025-02-03 Thread Holger Levsen
hi, about https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/gr-ai-dfsg/-/blob/main/README.txt On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 12:56:59AM -0500, M. Zhou wrote: > (2) are the options clear enough for vote? Considering lots of the readers may > not be faimiliar with how AI is created. I tried to explain it, as well as > the i

[draft] need your help on the AI-DFSG general resolution prepration

2025-02-02 Thread M. Zhou
Hi all, I heard that people were looking for me during FOSDEM. I spent a couple of hours and finally get something draft-ish for the previously mentioned general resolution on the software freedom interpolation with respect to AI software. https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/gr-ai-dfsg (I turned the

Re: [draft] need your help on the AI-DFSG general resolution prepration

2025-02-01 Thread Jamie Bainbridge
On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 at 15:57, M. Zhou wrote: > (1) do you know any important but missing reference materials? Is it worth explicitly mentioning weights are also released under very restrictive non-free licenses? The list of Apache/MIT licenses might mislead a reader into believing all weights are