On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 at 15:57, M. Zhou <lu...@debian.org> wrote: > (1) do you know any important but missing reference materials?
Is it worth explicitly mentioning weights are also released under very restrictive non-free licenses? The list of Apache/MIT licenses might mislead a reader into believing all weights are licensed freely. For example, LG's EXAONE license is strictly non-commercial and says they own the model, and all derivative models, and even all output of the model (i.e. all text that users generate): https://ollama.com/library/exaone3.5 https://huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE/EXAONE-3.5-7.8B-Instruct/blob/main/LICENSE Also a small correction, just after heading "# Problem 1: "Preferred form of modification" there is a "udner" instead of "under". Jamie
