Hi Mo,
your effort in driving this is much appreciated.
There's a second thread going on ("A different Take on AI") where many
have chimed into the deeper specific issues, so I'll include my specific
replies there, and here will only reply to formalities:
On 2025-02-02 06:56, M. Zhou wrote:
> (2) are the options clear enough for vote? Considering lots of the readers may
> not be faimiliar with how AI is created. I tried to explain it, as well as
> the implication if some components are missing.
> (5) what is the actionable outcome of this generaal resolution?
In a similar vein as Holger's reply, I would factor out the
non-normative, non-actionable part, possibly even into a separate document.
Precisely because of point (5): because this is a GR, reading the text
from the beginning, I kept thinking that I'm reading text that might be
material to the normative/actionable choices I'd be voting on.
For the final draft, it might help to start backwards, by beginning with
a blank document and adding the three proposals (which I think turned
out well), then adding context that would be material to making an
informed decision, and moving anything "merely" supplemental to a
separate section or document.
This, of course, only once discussion has produced the clarity that you
seek. I assume that at that point, others (including myself) might be
able to help contribute to improving the draft.
Best,
Christian
