hi, about https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/gr-ai-dfsg/-/blob/main/README.txt
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 12:56:59AM -0500, M. Zhou wrote:
> (2) are the options clear enough for vote? Considering lots of the readers may
> not be faimiliar with how AI is created. I tried to explain it, as well as
> the implication if some components are missing.
this explaination text is surely useful/well ment but also makes it somewhat
hard
to see where the GR text starts.
> (3) is there anything unclear or ambiguous in the text for backgrounds and
> options?
> (4) is there anything else that should be added to the text?
> (5) what is the actionable outcome of this generaal resolution?
> (6) is a neutral tone necessary for a proposal? I have a clear
> tendency throughout the texts.
as I understand your text and the GR process, you presented two (or three) GR
options in one, which is a bit unusual, so maybe it will help to clearly to
split
this in (3 files)
a.) GR background, explainations about AI
b.) GR option 1 (called "Proposal A" in your text currently.
c.) GR option 2 (called "Proposal B" in your text currently.
Your Proposal C is not needed because "further discussion" is always an option
in our GRs.
Also you don't need to be neutral, though of course you can and maybe you should
try. But my point is: anyone else can also propose GR options with a more or
less
neutral tone, so you can definitly be enthusiastic about your proposal!
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
I have a joke about trickle down economics. 99% of you won’t ever get it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
