(1) do you know any important but missing reference materials? You may want to include references to currents cases in court, like:
https://www.npr.org/2025/01/14/nx-s1-5258952/new-york-times-openai-microsoft Maybe not that particular one, but something to the effect. By supporting proposal B: "Toxic Candy" is free software, I believe one would be taking side on those disputes, against creators that believe that their work is being used as training data and has not been dutifully honored. Otherwise, the proposals look impeccable. Thank you On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 at 01:57, M. Zhou <lu...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I heard that people were looking for me during FOSDEM. > > I spent a couple of hours and finally get something draft-ish > for the previously mentioned general resolution on the software > freedom interpolation with respect to AI software. > > https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/gr-ai-dfsg > (I turned the issues on. Feel free to open issues there) > > This is an early draft. Before really posting to -vote, I need your > help on the following aspect: > > (1) do you know any important but missing reference materials? > > (2) are the options clear enough for vote? Considering lots of the readers > may > not be faimiliar with how AI is created. I tried to explain it, as well as > the implication if some components are missing. > > (3) is there anything unclear or ambiguous in the text for backgrounds and > options? > > (4) is there anything else that should be added to the text? > > (5) what is the actionable outcome of this generaal resolution? > > (6) is a neutral tone necessary for a proposal? I have a clear > tendency throughout the texts. > > (7) I have not yet asked ftp-master on their opinion. > > > According to https://www.debian.org/vote/howto_proposal , > there is a template https://www.debian.org/vote/sample_vote.template > but I don't understand this XML dialect. How to use this XML file? > > -- Jacinto A. Dávila Quintero http://webdelprofesor.ula.ve/ingenieria/jacinto
